
After blacks in Cincinnati beat white adults, why was there no nationwide, racial outrage?
The original altercation apparently broke out between a black and white male in he-said/he-said fashion. But that dispute soon turned into a virtual free-for-all.
Numerous male and female black youths sucker-punched a middle-aged woman. Others continued to kick or body slam the victims.
There were many disturbing aspects to the beat-downs.
One, the violence broke out along racial and age fault lines. After the initial dispute, groups of black youths swarmed solitary older white bystanders to pound them.
Two, the surrounding assembled group of black youths not only failed to intervene to restrain the bullies. They also recorded the beatings for social media and were heard cheering on the one-sided violence.
Three, there was neither a police presence nor any timely Good Samaritan interventions.
Four, oddly few of the usual black spokespeople who habitually comment on interracial violence were to be seen.
During the fake Jussie Smollett attack, self-appointed leaders from Al Sharpton to Kamala Harris immediately issued warnings about so-called systemic white racism that had reared its ugly head to victimize Smollett.
Yet when it was revealed Smollett had concocted the entire charade — and even hired his own assaulters — there were few if any retractions from those once so eager to shout 'racist!'
Such demagoguery is a well-known pattern dating back to the days of the Tawana Brawley rape hoax, the Duke Lacrosse charade, the Covington kids ruse, the Michael Ford 'Hands-up-Don't Shoot' fabrication or the NASCAR noose fable.
Racialists too often concoct white racist attackers and go silent when the evidence proves fabricated — only to be primed to manipulate the next hoax.
Five, the media and authorities did their best to either hide or play down the violence.
City leaders, the chief of police and the media variously blamed the mass black-on-white violence on 1) social media, 2) the original dispute, 3) alcohol, 4) the lack of civilian intervention to stop the violence and 5) a festival atmosphere — anything except endemic racial hatred shown toward whites from the crowd of black youths.
Six, had a gang of white toughs beat middle-aged African-Americans senseless, recorded it and cheered on the violence, there would have been immediate national outrage.
Nor did anyone wish to raise the taboo topic of inordinate black crime rates, disproportionate to respective demographic realities.
In rare interracial violent crimes, the asymmetrical ratio of black-on-white versus white-on-black assaults ranges from three to five times greater.
Seven, the quiet of the left-wing media to the reprehensible violence stands in marked contrast with their usual rush-to-judgment racialism in two near-simultaneous incidents.
When a shooter entered a New York City corporate headquarters last week and executed four innocents, CNN falsely raised the speculation that a 'white male' was perhaps responsible — despite the photograph of the suspect, who was as clearly male as he was not white.
Media and municipal officials jumped to explain the violence as due to the killer's alleged past traumatic brain injury or because of his access to a semi-automatic weapon — or anything other than his hate-filled plan to murder an NFL executive.
Actress and model Sydney Sweeney just cut a jeans commercial in front of a poster that said, 'Sydney Sweeney has great genes' — with 'genes' crossed out and replaced with 'jeans.'
Every morning, the NY POSTcast offers a deep dive into the headlines with the Post's signature mix of politics, business, pop culture, true crime and everything in between. Subscribe here!
The left then exploded, alleging the ad was a supposed Hitlerian reference to white eugenics.
Yet the eugenics movement in America was mostly a product of left-wing progressives, from Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger to Democratic President Woodrow Wilson.
And the ad's sponsor, American Eagle, had previously used all sorts of models from all racial backgrounds.
All might agree that the ad simply shows both tight, sexy jeans and a naturally attractive wearer — period.
The country is descending into a tribal morass of double standards and racial fixations.
The diversity/equity/inclusion industry, the defund-the-police madness and the perpetual left-wing hunt for 'white racism/white privilege/white rage' — from the prior Pentagon hierarchy to the lunatic fringe of Jasmine Crockett, Joy Reid and Zohran Mamdani — have all legitimized double standards while lowering the bar of the once unacceptable.
When our careerist left-wing elites seek to divide us by race and make it essential, not incidental, to our identities, that tribalist message filters throughout communities.
The ensuing signal is that 'payback' violence is OK — on the expectation that there are no consequences for interracial violence — as long as the victim is white and the assaulter is not.
Victor Davis Hanson is a distinguished fellow of the Center for American Greatness.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
18 minutes ago
- New York Post
CNN data guru dubs Trump the ‘most influential president this century'
CNN data guru Harry Enten has dubbed President Trump the 'most influential president this century' while rattling off the major transformations he has ushered in on tariffs, immigration and other issues. Enten argued that the president 'has been tremendously influential to a historic degree' just over half a year into his second term. 'Love it, like it, lump it — Trump's remaking the United States of America,' Enten said as he began a weekend segment on the cable news network. 'I can't think of a more influential president during this century.' Enten noted that the highest average US tariff rate in effect on another country has jumped from 2% last year up to about 18%, which is the largest rate in America since the 1930s. 3 CNN data guru Harry Enten cited President Trump's work on tariffs, immigration and executive orders to back up his assessment of 'historic' influence of the commander in chief. CNN 3 Trump has made overhauling US trade a key objective of his second term. AFP via Getty Images On immigration, the data buff noted that net migration into the US appears to be trending down sharply, by at least 60%, from 2.8 million last year. 'We may be dealing with — get this — negative net migration to the United States in 2025,' Enten said. 'That would be the first time there is negative net migration in this country in at least 50 years.' 'Trump has always run on tariffs, and he's running a hawkish line on immigration,' Enten said. 'And on both of those issues — we are seeing record-high tariff rates for this century, and when it comes to immigration, net migration, we are seeing record low levels.' 3 The president has also mounted a significant clampdown at the US-Mexico border and stepped up enforcement of immigration laws. REUTERS Based on those two factors, Enten contended that Trump is the most influential president 'probably dating a good [chunk back] into the 20th century.' Another example Enten cited was Trump's use of executive orders, having signed 180 of them halfway through his first year of his second term, surpassing all of his predecessors dating back to Franklin D. Roosevelt. Trump is one of two presidents to serve two nonconsecutive terms as president, alongside Grover Cleveland.


Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
OPEC+ Countries Agree to Boost Oil Production: What to Know
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC+) on Sunday announced plans to increase oil production by over half a million barrels per day for September as concerns over supply disruptions persist. The eight members of OPEC+ held a virtual meeting in response to U.S. pressure on some nations—such as India—to halt all Russian oil purchases in an additional move aimed at pressuring Moscow to end its ongoing conflict in Ukraine. However, OPEC+ said it would increase output due to a healthy economy and low oil inventory, with oil prices remaining at a higher level even as output has increased from members. Newsweek reached out to the White House and Department of Energy (DOE) by email on Sunday outside of normal business hours for comment. Why It Matters President Donald Trump in last year's presidential campaign promised to tackle a number of major targets, including an end to the Russia-Ukraine war and lowering prices for Americans amid high inflation. Russian President Vladimir Putin's resistance to diplomatic efforts has frustrated Trump and forced the U.S. to seek more creative means to try and achieve an end to the war that began in February 2022. What To Know The U.S. has looked at imposing tariffs on Russia and convincing countries that still purchase Russian oil to switch to other sources. Some feared that these actions could drive up gas prices for Americans, as well. However, those fears appear to have been averted as OPEC+ agreed to increase production, providing a healthy alternative to Russian oil. OPEC+ includes Saudi Arabia, Russia, Iraq, United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Kazakhstan, Algeria and Oman. It remains unclear how this could impact Russia's other sales and negotiations. OPEC+ has made voluntary production cuts since November 2023, with plans to phase those cuts out by September 2026, but the announcement means that the countries will increase output for the second time this year—following July's announcement of a similar increase in August—and effectively ending the program early. Prices have remained at the higher rate of around $70 a barrel for Brent crude despite the increased output, however, raising some doubts as to what impact the increased output might have on gas prices. An Austrian soldier stands outside of the building headquarters of OPEC (Organization of The Petroleum Exporting Countries) in Vienna, Austria on May 28. An Austrian soldier stands outside of the building headquarters of OPEC (Organization of The Petroleum Exporting Countries) in Vienna, Austria on May 28. Joe Klamar/AFP via Getty Images What People Are Saying President Donald Trump last week wrote on Truth Social, in part: "We have just concluded a Deal with the Country of Pakistan, whereby Pakistan and the United States will work together on developing their massive Oil Reserves. We are in the process of choosing the Oil Company that will lead this Partnership. Who knows, maybe they'll be selling Oil to India some day!" Mark Temnycky, a nonresident fellow at the Atlantic Council think tank's Eurasia Center, previously told Newsweek: "If the U.S. follows with new restrictions or tariffs, Americans could see higher energy prices, especially at the gas pump and in sectors tied closely to fuel, like transportation and manufacturing." He added: "These cost increases may filter down to everyday goods as companies adjust for rising input expenses. In addition, inflation will be a concern for many American consumers and policymakers." What Happens Next? The members will meet again in September for further discussions and adjustments to production. This article includes reporting by the Associated Press.


New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Beyond Trump's trade deals, consolation for the little guy and other commentary
Business desk: Beyond Trump's Trade Deals 'Dealmaker-In-Chief' Donald Trump has been 'positively monomaniacal' about trade lately, marvels Freddy Gray at The Spectator. His 'real coup' is the 'new framework arrangement with the European Union,' which is 'not simply a major breakthrough in and of itself,' but also 'a useful piece of leverage in the even bigger tariff struggle with China' — because it pulls 'Europe more towards a western trading orbit and less towards the east.' Trump then slammed India for 'buying up Russian oil and gas,' and pivoted sharply by praising a new deal with Pakistan, 'including an arrangement to invest in Pakistani oil.' Advertisement Meanwhile, his enthusiasm for Pakistan — 'an extension of China's empire' — may be part of a plan to 'ring loud alarm bells' in Beijing. From the right: Consolation for the Little Guy 'For all the political criticism they take, the federal courts keep delivering good outcomes more often than not,' cheers The Wall Street Journal's Editorial Board. In 2016, the Labor Department 'imposed hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines' on a fourth-generation farm, Sun Valley Orchards — first requesting penalties and then approving them itself, thus 'serving as prosecutor, judge and jury.' Advertisement But an appeals court just ruled the proceedings 'should properly be enforced in federal court' — the proper venues for federal agencies to impose fines. Sun Valley has since gone out of business,' but at least its owners 'have the consolation of a ruling that will vindicate the rights of other farmers and small businesses under the boot heel of the bureaucracy.' Libertarian: Get Honest About Gov't Spending 'What kind of government do Americans want seriously enough to pay for?' asks Veronique de Rugy at Reason. 'I suspect that most people aren't willing to pay the taxes required to fund everything our current government does.' Advertisement Yet 'all the benefits and subsidies that we're unwilling to pay for' but keep going 'will eventually have to be paid for in the future with higher taxes, inflation, or both' by our children and grandchildren. 'Growing the economy' can be 'part of the solution,' but it won't be enough, and 'raising taxes on the rich will fall short too,' since higher tax rates 'do not automatically translate to more tax revenue.' 'It's long past time' we 'ask what level of spending we truly want with the money we truly have.' Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Liberal: Hey, Dems — End the #Resistance Advertisement 'Nonstop Democratic fulminations in Trump's second term have been notably unsuccessful in resuscitating the party's toxic brand,' sighs the Liberal Patriot's Ruy Teixeira. Tellingly, 'voters, despite their negative views of Trump's performance on key issues, still prefer Republicans to Democrats.' Also, 'voters neither like nor trust' Dems, and thus don't see them as 'an obvious choice over their opponents.' Yet 'many Democratic politicians persist in reading — loudly — from the #Resistance script.' Why? The '#Resistance trope is what advantages individual Democratic politicians within the party because it generates adulation from activists, media coverage, and gushers of donations.' And taking back the House in 2026 will only 'convince #Resistance aficionados that nothing really needs to change.' Hello, President JD Vance. Health beat: Big Pharma Wins, Patients Lose 'In May, Dr. Vinay Prasad joined the Food & Drug Administration as the top regulator for vaccines,' yet he 'apparently knew the games too well,' gripes Alex Berensen at his Substack: After last week's attacks from Trump's allies, Prasad resigned: 'He was targeted because he posed a direct threat to Big Pharma profits.' Advertisement Just last month, he told Sarepta Therapeutics 'it needed to halt shipments of its gene therapy for Duchenne muscular dystrophy, or DMD.' 'Sarepta has never shown its drugs actually benefit patients.' The company won the right to a drug trial in 2016; 'nine years later, Sarepta still hasn't completed those trials.' Yet 'that hasn't stopped it from selling the drug — for up to $1.5 million per year.' Advertisement 'Big Pharma scalped Prasad for his honesty.' — Compiled by The Post Editorial Board