Sun, skin, savings! Viral Amazon brush on SPF rare 15% OFF for Prime Day
Raise your hand if you hate that sticky, oily feeling sunscreen leaves on your skin!
Well, the feeling is mutual. No one wants the dreaded and often inevitable residue that comes with getting sufficient SPF coverage, but it is your lucky day because we're here to tell you we found a product that changes EVERYTHING.
Mineral Fusion Brush-On Powder Sunscreen
Reapplying sunscreen just got a lot easier!
This innovative (and CLEAN!) brush-on SPF is making waves in the beauty world for its incredible coverage.
The formula is one of a kind with dermatologist approval, UV protection, and a fantastic shine control quality.
During Amazon Prime Day you can snag it for 15 percent off!
$25.52 (was $30) Shop
Mineral Fusion's Brush-On Powder Sunscreen is seriously as good as it gets. The innovative product is where beauty and protection collide with a unique powder form formula that puts UV guard first.
The Brush-On Powder Sunscreen works both as an SPF refresh and a makeup setting powder, meaning you can keep your summer looks in place without sacrificing protecting your skin.
Shoppers can't believe how well it works, with one saying: 'I absolutely love this product! I live in Florida, so I wear sunscreen every day and sometimes you don't wanna drop the lotions on.'
'This was a light weight brush on formula that works for me. I couldn't even believe that it was on my face and I did not get burnt. This product is great quality and it is absolutely worth your money for the value that you are getting from this bottle.'
What makes Mineral Fusion even more exceptional is its commitment to keeping its formulas clean. The Brush-On Powder Sunscreen is non-toxic, paraben-free, chemical-free, fragrance-free, and more. This means you can apply guilt-free, knowing you are giving your skin the best of the best.
By far shoppers favorite aspect of this heard turning brush-on SPF is its blurring powers! One said: 'This airy sunscreen powder brings you the protection of SPF 30 in a lightweight powder that dupes as the most perfect makeup setting.'
'With UV-resistant minerals and sea kelp, this translucent powder gives the perfect matte finish, provides shine control, and blurs pores without clogging. I am so in love with how easy it is to use and take with you on the go.'
Take on the beach this summer the right way with this best-selling Mineral Fusion Brush-On Powder Sunscreen at your side! Make sure to shop before it sells out while it is 15 percent off for Prime Day.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
39 minutes ago
- The Independent
How Iga Swiatek explained away her doping case and escaped a serious ban
Iga Swiatek was the second high-profile tennis player to test positive for a banned substance last year, with the five-time grand slam champion receiving a one-month ban from the International Tennis Integrity Agency (ITIA). The ITIA announced that Swiatek had accepted a one-month suspension after testing positive for the prohibited substance trimetazidine (TMZ) – a medication used to treat heart conditions that, in a sporting context, can increase blood flow and improve endurance. It came only months after men's World No 1 Jannik Sinner twice tested positive for clostebol, a banned anabolic steroid. Sinner was cleared as the ITIA accepted there was 'no fault or negligence', and later agreed to a three-month suspension. Meanwhile, Swiatek was found to have been 'at the lowest end of the range for no significant fault or negligence' after the 23-year-old Polish player explained that her doping violation was caused by a contaminated supply of the non-prescription medication melatonin, which she uses to help with jet lag and sleep issues. Following interviews with Swiatek and analysis of the medicine from independent laboratories, the ITIA accepted the explanation that the melatonin provided to her by her physio was contaminated during manufacturing, resulting in an extremely low trace of TMZ. Swiatek tested positive in an out-of-competition sample on 12 August 2024, before the Cincinnati Open. How did the TMZ get into Swiatek's system? Swiatek explained that she has used melatonin to help regulate her sleep patterns and deal with jet lag, which came as a result of her frequent travel. In Poland, melatonin is classified as a medication and is available to buy off the shelf in pharmacies and Swiatek said her physio would usually buy the product for her. Swiatek competed at the Olympics in Paris, winning the bronze medal on August 2 after defeat to Qinwen Zheng in the semi-finals the previous day. She arrived at the Cincinnati Open shortly before August 12, where she was called to provide a sample for doping control at around 6-7am. A urine sample was collected and taken to a WADA-accredited laboratory in Montreal for analysis. Swiatek was asked to list on a doping control form any 'medications or supplements' she had taken over the past seven days. She provided a list of 14 supplements and medications on the form but did not include melatonin, even though Swiatek later explained that she had ingested two to three tables of the product at around 2-3am that morning when she was unable to sleep. In providing evidence to the ITIA, Swiatek explained that she forgot to include melatonin because it was not on her list of medications and supplements that she would copy across from form to form. She also said she was tired, having had her sleep interrupted by being summoned by doping control. The ITIA later said the reasons for this omission were 'unsatisfactory'. Swiatek's urine sample was split into an A-sample and a B-sample, and the A-sample was found to contain the banned substance TMZ. Swiatek was informed of her positive test on September 12 and she replied two days later requesting further analysis of her B-sample, which returned the same result as the A-sample: a trace concentration of 50 pg/ml. How Swiatek proved contamination Swiatek was issued with a provisional suspension on September 12, which she appealed within the 10-day deadline. She denied deliberately or knowingly using TMZ, maintained she did not know what the source of the TMZ in her sample was, and told the ITIA that it must have been ingested by mistake through a contamination. After being informed of her positive B-sample, Swiatek and her team sent packages of all the products she had been using prior to the August 12 test - including the melatonin - to two laboratories, one in Paris and one in Strasbourg. The analysis of the products used by Swiatek showed the sample of melatonin tablets - a Poland-made product called LEK-AM Melatonina - she had taken on the morning of August 12 was contaminated with TMZ, and those results were sent to the ITIA. In response, the ITIA said it would examine the melatonin tablets at another WADA-accredited laboratory in Salt Lake City, Utah. But the ITIA said it was unable to contact the Polish manufacturer of the melatonin, despite attempting to do so by telephone and email, in order to obtain from themselves a container of the product from the same batch. The ITIA said that was not possible due to the product's expiry date and the non-response of the manufacturer. Instead, Swiatek's team provided both the opened container of the melatonin product used on August 12 and a sealed container from the same batch. The ITIA said it 'verified that the sealed container obtained was from the same batch as that used by Swiatek (the batch numbers matched) and the sealed container had a tamper-evident seal'. On 4 October, the laboratory in Salt Lake City said it had found TMZ in tablets from both the opened and previously sealed containers of the melatonin, and ruled that contamination had occurred during manufacturing. The ITIA ruled the whole batch of melatonin had been contaminated and, despite its non-response, the ITIA also said manufacturer of the melatonin also makes a TMZ product in the same factory. Additional testing and the ITIA's ruling Swiatek was also called for drug tests on August 1 and August 2, after her semi-final and bronze-medal match at the Paris Olympics, as well as during the US Open. She was informed of her positive test eight days after her quarter-final defeat to Jessica Pegula. All of the other doping tests around the August 12 date were negative, with Swiatek only using the melatonin product that morning because she was struggling to sleep. The ITIA ruled in Swiatek's favour and found the the negative tests, as well as samples of Swiatek's hair that did not contain traces of TMZ, showed that she could not have used the substance as a therapeutic dose before the August 12. The ITIA said Swiatek's violation was at the lowest end of the range of 'no significant fault or negligence'. Swiatek accepted the one-month suspension offered by the ITIA. 'Once the source of the TMZ had been established, it became clear that this was a highly unusual instance of a contaminated product, which in Poland is a regulated medicine,' ITIA chief executive Karen Moorhouse said. 'However, the product does not have the same designation globally, and the fact that a product is a regulated medication in one country cannot of itself be sufficient to avoid any level of fault. Taking into account the nature of the medication, and all the circumstances, it does place that fault at the lowest end of the scale.'
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Children are far better off playing in the sun than sitting in a stuffy classroom
The American social psychologist Dr Jonathan Haidt's bestselling book, The Anxious Generation, argues that the rise of smartphones and so-called helicopter parenting has led to a 'rewiring' of childhood and increased mental illness. Since the emergence of smart phones and social media, traditional play-based childhood activities like free play, outdoor exploration, and spontaneous social interactions have been reduced and replaced by structured activities and screen time. 'Overprotection in the real world and underprotection in the virtual world are the major reasons why children born after 1995 became the anxious generation,' he writes. Modern parents are largely to blame for this, not least if they restrict their children's freedom and independence in the real world while failing to adequately monitor and guide their online activities. But schools must also bear their shame of the blame. Nanny-state schooling – and an over-emphasis on emotional validation – has undermined individual responsibility and self-reliance in a generation of young people. This week, we learnt that some headteachers are banning children from playing outside during heatwaves. Pupils are being kept inside for 'hot play' breaks when their playgrounds are deemed to be 'too hot to use safely '. The move is apparently designed to keep children away from outdoor surfaces that can become very hot to touch in the sun. If it wasn't bad enough that schools keep children inside when it's raining, despite the Peppa Pig-esque delight they take in jumping in puddles, we now have 'hot play' on top of 'wet play'. Surely keeping children indoors during hot weather is actually worse for their health than allowing them to play outside? There should be shaded areas in any playground, and children should wear sunscreen and hats, but one of the great things about hot weather is the fun you can have playing in it. If the alternative is sitting inside a stuffy classroom on a screen then it is completely self-defeating. Is it really any wonder so many young people are suffering from anxiety and depression when schools are wrapping them up in this much cotton wool?
Scottish Sun
2 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Mum shares agonising photos of her baby's blistered face after making chilling SPF discovery all parents should know
Exclusive RED ALERT Mum shares agonising photos of her baby's blistered face after making chilling SPF discovery all parents should know Mum Lauren, 22, feels 'so guilty' over the sun cream mistake and wants no other family to experience the same excruciating ordeal
