
Federal judge to consider revival of Virginia Beach election lawsuit
VIRGINIA BEACH — A federal lawsuit that led the city to change to its election system is once again in play as Virginia Beach prepares to hold a referendum vote on how it elects its City Council and School Board members.
On Monday, Judge Raymond Jackson, of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, rescinded his previous dismissal of the Holloway v. City of Virginia Beach case and plans to issue a memorandum and opinion on the matter later this week.
Two Virginia Beach residents – Latasha Holloway and Georgia Allen — sued the city in 2017, challenging the all at-large election system used to elect members of the City Council. Jackson ruled in 2021 that the system 'denies Hispanics, African Americans and Asians equal access to the electoral and political process,' violating the federal 1965 Voting Rights Act. After that, the city began using a district-based electoral system that did away with all at-large seats except the mayor.
Jackson's ruling on the lawsuit comes as several well-connected business and community associations have pushed the idea of restoring some at-large seats on the council, and city lawmakers voted last month to include the question on a November ballot referendum.
Deputy City Attorney Christopher Boynton confirmed in an email Monday afternoon that Jackson's ruling has set the stage for the case to be reopened.
'The court vacated the prior dismissal order in the former Holloway case upon plaintiffs' motion and is allowing the plaintiffs to file an Amended Complaint asserting whatever claims they believe are currently meritorious,' Boynton said.
Virginia Beach will vote on filling borrow pit with dredged material on Tuesday
Portsmouth sheriff declines to expand existing partnership with ICE
Here's the team responsible for keeping Virginia Beach resort area in tip-top shape
Virginia Beach police threaten legal action against 'pop-up' events next week
Violent crime up but overall crime down as Portsmouth police earn national accreditation
Virginia Beach appealed Jackson's initial ruling in 2021. While awaiting the court's opinion, the city implemented 10 single-member districts, including three districts where minority voters formed a majority of the voting population.
In July 2022, the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled the case was moot because Virginia's General Assembly had already passed a law, HB2198, eliminating at-large voting for most of the seats on the City Council. Jackson later dismissed Holloway's case but allowed for it to be brought back.
'The former dismissal was a voluntary, non-prejudicial dismissal so they didn't waive any rights at the time by agreeing to the dismissal,' Boynton said.
Jackson's decision on Monday to rescind the voluntary dismissal allows Holloway to challenge a potential hybrid election system, Holloway's attorney Simone Leeper wrote in an email.
'Plaintiffs now will have the opportunity to amend their complaint to challenge the 7-3-1 system currently reflected in the City Charter as amended by HB2198,' Leeper said, referencing a system that includes seven district seats, three at-large seats, and the mayor.
Under the current '10-1' system, the mayor is elected by residents across the city, but the 10 council members are elected only by residents in their district.
Virginia Beach has used the district-based election system since 2022, and the City Council formally adopted a redistricting plan in 2023 that authorized the use of the system. However, the city charter doesn't yet align with it, and previous efforts to enshrine the 10-1 system into law have been held up because of legal challenges.
In May, seven of 11 council members voted in favor of a charter change referendum on the election system to be placed on the November ballot to gauge the public's interest in keeping the 10-1 system. The referendum question will ask voters whether they want to keep the current single-member district system or if they support a system with some at-large seats on council.
In a motion filed in April seeking to reopen the lawsuit, Holloway's attorneys cited the referendum. They argued action was necessary 'because the City is no longer fulfilling its representation to this Court to take all steps necessary to maintain a 10-1 system and is actively seeking to evade this Court's jurisdiction over any claim by the Holloway Plaintiffs that implementing the 7-3-1 system would violate Section 2 of the federal Voting Rights Act ('VRA').'
The referendum could open the door to a modified 7-3-1 system, in which three council members would serve in at-large seats and all residents could vote for them. Under that system, the remaining seven members would be elected by residents only in their district.
In 2023, the city's legal team warned Virginia Beach could face renewed litigation in federal court if it chooses not to stick with the current ward-based election system.
Stacy Parker, 757-222-5125, stacy.parker@pilotonline.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
19 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Powell and Lagarde Count Cost of Trump's Turbulence
The global economy's concussion from five months of Donald Trump's presidency is likely to feature when five of the world's leading central bank chiefs discuss monetary policy in public on Tuesday. From tariff-related trade ructions to oil-price gyrations caused by Middle East hostilities, the question of how to handle the fallout from White House decisions may loom large as Federal Reserve chief Jerome Powell speaks on a panel with peers from the euro zone, Japan, South Korea and the UK.


Fox News
33 minutes ago
- Fox News
Key GOP senator defects on crucial vote, imperiling Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' in narrow majority
Print Close By Alex Miller Published June 28, 2025 A vulnerable Senate Republican put his foot down against President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill" over concerns of deep Medicaid cuts inside the megabill. Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., told Fox News Digital that he would not support the measure through a procedural hurdle necessary to kick off a marathon of debate and amendment voting that would eventually culminate in the measure's final passage. TRUMP'S 'BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL' FACES REPUBLICAN FAMILY FEUD AS SENATE REVEALS ITS FINAL TEXT Tillis, who is up for reelection in 2026, said after exiting the Senate GOP's closed-door lunch that he has a "great relationship" with his colleagues, but that he couldn't support the colossal bill. "We just have a disagreement," he said. "And, you know, my colleagues have done the analysis, and they're comfortable with the impact on their states. I respect their choice. It's not a good impact in my state, so I'm not going to vote on the motion to proceed." ANXIOUS REPUBLICANS TURN TO TRUMP AMID DIVISIONS OVER 'BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL' He also won't support the bill during the final stretch. Tillis is part of a cohort of Senate Republicans who have expressed reservations over the Senate GOP's changes to the Medicaid provider tax rate. Tillis' resistance to the bill is a bad sign for Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., who can only afford to lose three votes. So far, Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., has vowed to vote against the procedural test, and Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., is expected to follow suit. Trump was meeting with Johnson and Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fl., another possible holdout, during the lunch. Lawmakers are expected to vote to advance the bill at 4 p.m. on Saturday. The mounting resistance could force Thune to go back to the drawing board. Further complicating matters is Collins, who is also up for reelection in 2026, who said that while she would support the bill through the first step, she was leaning against voting to pass the bill in the final stretch unless the legislation was "further changed." SENATE GOP EYES MEDICAID SWEETENER TO SAVE TRUMP'S 'BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL' The latest version of the bill, which dropped near the stroke of midnight, included tweaks to the Senate's offering that would push back the provider rate crackdown by one year, and also added another $25 billion for a rural hospital stabilization fund. While others in the group, like Sens. Susan Collins, R-Maine, and Josh Hawley, R-Mo., are on board to at least see the legislation move through the first key procedural hurdle, Tillis has argued that his state would be harshly affected by the crackdown. Indeed, during a closed-door lunch earlier this week, the lawmaker reportedly warned that North Carolina could lose as much as $40 billion in Medicaid funding if the changes were codified. CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP For now, Tillis is unlikely to budge, even after conversations with Trump. He is also planning to unveil further analysis on the impact of Medicaid cuts on his state that he said no one in the "administration or in this building" has been able to refute. "The president I have talked, and I just told him that, 'Look, if this works for the country, that's great. And if my other colleagues have done extensive research and concluded it's different in their states, I respect that,'" he said. "We just have a disagreement based on the implementation in our respective states." Print Close URL
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Democrats split on presidential primary candidate, poll says
LANSING, Mich. (WLNS) — A new Emerson College Polling of U.S. voters shows that Democrats are split on who they will support in the 2028 presidential primary. According to the poll, 16% support former Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg, 13% former Vice President Kamala Harris, 12% California Gov. Gavin Newsom, 7% Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro, and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, respectively, 5% Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, and 3% New Jersey Senator Cory Booker. 23% percent of voters are undecided. Emerson College reports that in the last poll, held in , Harris received 37% support, Gov. Newsom 7%, and Sec. Buttigieg 4%, Gov. Shapiro 3%, and Gov. Whitmer 3%. In the November poll, voters were allowed to write in their preferred candidate. On a generic 2028 presidential ballot test, 42% would support the generic Democratic candidate, 42% the Republican, and 16% are undecided. 'Similarly to the generic congressional ballot, independents break for the generic Democrat on the presidential ballot, 37% to 29%, with a significant 34% undecided,' said Spencer Kimball, executive director of Emerson College Polling, in a news release sent to 6 News. According to the poll, the economy remains the top issue for voters at 32%, down from 41% in March. Threats to democracy are the top concern for 22% of voters, a four-point increase. Immigration follows at 14%, healthcare at 9%, housing affordability at 7%, and crime at 5%. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.