New training programme launched for young lawyers to stay ahead of AI curve, strengthen basic advocacy and drafting skills
Source: Business Times
Article Date: 22 May 2025
Author: Tessa Oh
The Junior Lawyers Professional Certification Programme (JLP) will bring structure to what was previously left to chance, says Singapore Academy of Law CEO Yeong Zee Kin.
In response to technological disruptions in the legal sector, a new training programme will equip young lawyers with skills and knowledge in artificial intelligence (AI), as well as strengthen proficiency in basic advocacy and drafting skills.
Set up by the Singapore Academy of Law (SAL), the Junior Lawyers Professional Certification Programme (JLP) offers structured training for young lawyers in both disputes and corporate practice areas.
Participants, for instance, can take courses on the ethics of generative AI, prompt engineering for lawyers and cross-boarder contract drafting, among others.
The programme was launched on Wednesday (May 21), with an opening conference held at Parkroyal Collection Marina Bay.
It is open to lawyers with up to five years of post-qualification experience. In addition to the mandatory opening conference and masterclass, participants are required to complete 11 more modules within two years in order to obtain certification.
To earn certification in either the disputes or corporate track, lawyers are required to complete at least four modules that are specific to their chosen area of specialisation.
Most of the disputes modules will be led by current or former members of the judiciary as trainers or guest speakers.
In his opening address, SAL chief executive Yeong Zee Kin said the JLP will 'bring structure to what was previously left to chance', ensuring that lawyers learn fundamental legal skills in a holistic way.
Participating in this programme is voluntary but recommended. Lawyers can use SkillsFuture to offset fees, while some law firms have offered to sponsor their associates.
Disruptive shifts
The JLP chiefly seeks to address the disruptive impact of generative AI on the legal sector, Yeong told The Business Times in an interview before the launch.
The widespread accessibility of generative AI tools such as Microsoft Copilot and ChatGPT has made it possible for anyone to generate simple contracts, or even seek advice on litigation strategy – even without formal legal training, noted Yeong.
'Because all these tools are coming on stream and clients have access to them, it means that clients' expectations when they come to see a lawyer is going to be higher,' he added.
In this environment, lawyers need to move beyond basic information gathering to deliver greater value to their clients.
The JLP thus aims to plug this gap, by helping young lawyers keep abreast of AI advancements and strengthening their proficiency in basic legal skills.
Yeong views the programme as a bridge between the Bar exams and the specialist accreditation exams that senior lawyers take when seeking to specialise in a particular field.
Lawyers are required to take modules each year to fulfil continuing professional development (CPD) requirements, but these courses are usually ad hoc in nature, he said.
The JLP, on the other hand, provides a more 'structured way for some of these very fundamental skills and very crucial domain knowledge' for young lawyers.
And since the programme is voluntary, Yeong hopes it attracts serious participants.
'If you want to just take enough courses to fill your CPD requirements, there are a lot of free and cheap courses,' he said. 'This course is not for lawyers with that kind of mentality… it is meant for those who want to learn.'
Addressing attrition
While the JLP reduces attrition among young lawyers by focusing on career support, Yeong recognised that it does not resolve the perennial issue of the high work demands and long hours within the legal profession.
To this, he said SAL has other plans in the works, such as the legal profession symposium in July.
'That's intended to address workplace issues, (such as) the changing expectations between different generations of lawyers, the interactions between juniors and seniors,' he said.
Workplace pressures could also be an obstacle for young lawyers, who have to juggle their personal development with tight work deadlines, to take up training courses.
Acknowledging this, Yeong said it would not be feasible to require all law firms to allow their associates time off to attend the programme.
What SAL has done is to get law firms to sign a training pledge to demonstrate their commitment to supporting the JLP and other training initiatives. Fifty-two legal organisations have signed this pledge.
SAL will work with the firms to ensure that they develop good practices over time, said Yeong.
It will also monitor the programme's sign-up rates to see if its 'message is not getting through', he added. More than half of the 80 slots for the programme have been taken up thus far.
'Law is a knowledge-based profession, so the acquisition of knowledge will never end, because things change, business models change… new areas of law will come out,' said Yeong. 'We need to continue sharpening our skills and learning new things.'
Source: The Business Times © SPH Media Limited. Permission required for reproduction.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
2 hours ago
- Business Times
I'm human. Are you? The quest for our online identity
It's every manager's worst nightmare: Hiring a remote employee who turns out to be a North Korean hacker intent on loading malware on to your network. But that's what happened to the US cyber security company KnowBe4 last year, as the company's founder, Stu Sjouwerman, described in a candid blog post. KnowBe4 had posted a job ad for an AI software engineer, interviewed candidates by video, conducted background checks, verified references and made an offer. But soon after the company sent a Mac workstation to the remote employee's notional address, he went rogue. The company quickly discovered he was a fake North Korean IT worker, who had used a valid, but stolen, US-based identity to land the job. He then accessed the workstation remotely from Asia via an 'IT mule laptop farm'. Thankfully, no data was compromised but the company said it was a 'learning moment'. 'If it can happen to us, it can happen to almost anyone. Don't let it happen to you,' Sjouwerman wrote. This scary incident highlights the difficulties of authenticating someone's identity online – even by specialist security experts. But that challenge is about to become immeasurably harder as we outsource more responsibilities to AI chatbots and agents, getting them to perform many administrative functions online, and we generate lifelike video avatars. Up to now, the internet has mostly involved machines communicating with machines and humans interacting with humans. But increasingly those lines are blurring. We're close to the point where chatbots and avatars are all but indistinguishable from humans online. How can you be sure that you're not interacting with a synthetic human? As is the way with Silicon Valley, some tech executives have come up with a proposed solution to the problem they have created, profiting from both sides of the transaction. Prominent among them is Sam Altman, who triggered the generative AI investment frenzy after his company OpenAI released ChatGPT in 2022. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Altman has also co-founded Tools for Humanity, which has developed an iris-verification device, a white globe about the size of a football, called the Orb. 'We needed some way for identifying, authenticating humans in the age of AGI,' he told an event in San Francisco this year. 'We wanted a way to make sure that humans stayed special and central.' Once a user's eye is scanned, the company sends them a World ID, a global digital passport, and US$42 in Worldcoin cryptocurrency as a reward for joining the network. As of April, some 13.5 million people in 23 countries had used the Orb to generate a World ID. The service was launched in the UK last month. The Orb is undoubtedly trying to address a real user need. But, quite apart from the scary Black Mirror vibes, it is questionable how effective the iris-scanning service will be. The need for a special machine to identify and authenticate any user (there are currently more than 1,500 Orbs in operation) makes the system clunky and expensive. The insistence on one centralised digital identity deprives a user of the freedom to have multiple, disconnected identities, raising privacy concerns. The World ID passport also risks becoming a walled garden that may not interoperate with other ID networks, such as the EU Digital Identity Wallet, which will become operational across the bloc by 2026. Nevertheless, some security experts suggest that we are rapidly entering a world where our default assumption must be that all online counterparties are synthetic unless they can prove otherwise. That creates a need to demonstrate genuine presence online, or 'liveness', as Andrew Bud, founder of the biometric authentication company iProov, calls it. iProov's premium service has been used more than 100million times by customers, including governments and financial services companies, through a smartphone-based facial recognition system. This shoots multicoloured lights at a user's face and analyses the reflections, verifying their identity in about 2.5 seconds. 'Digital identity is a set of facts. But trust does not reside in facts. It resides in people,' Bud tells me. That means linking those facts to a human being who controls those facts. 'And for that you're going to have to use biometrics.' The identification and authentication of users is one of the hardest challenges we face on the internet because technology is evolving so fast, but it is critical that we meet it. The likely next threat? Masses of synthetic hackers. FINANCIAL TIMES
Straits Times
17 hours ago
- Straits Times
ChatGPT's mental health costs are adding up
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox From brain rot to induced psychosis, the psychological cost of generative AI is growing and flying under the radar. The private and personalized nature of AI use makes its mental health impact difficult to track, but the evidence of potential harms is mounting Something troubling is happening to our brains as artificial intelligence platforms become more popular. Studies are showing that professional workers who use ChatGPT to carry out tasks might lose critical thinking skills and motivation. People are forming strong emotional bonds with chatbots, sometimes exacerbating feelings of loneliness. And others are having psychotic episodes after talking to chatbots for hours each day.
Business Times
a day ago
- Business Times
Why I'm afraid to commit to a full-time job as a Gen Z Singaporean in the age of AI
AS A 20-something in Singapore, I often hear older generations talk about job security, retirement savings or climbing the corporate ladder. But for many in my generation, those ideas feel increasingly outdated – if not completely out of reach. I'll admit it: I'm afraid to commit to a traditional full-time job. Not because I lack ambition. Not because I'm lazy. But because I genuinely don't know if the job I train for today will even exist five years from now. A recent article in The Business Times, 'Rethinking AI skilling: From awareness to practical adoption', rightly points out that companies are rapidly investing in artificial intelligence (AI). Tools like ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot and other enterprise-grade platforms are now embedded in workflows. McKinsey's report that 92 per cent of companies will increase their AI investment over the next three years says everything: the AI wave is no longer on the horizon – it's here. While businesses talk about upskilling employees to 'work with AI', the reality for many of us entering the workforce is this: we're not just learning to work with AI. We're quietly trying to figure out how not to be replaced by it. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 3 pm Thrive Money, career and life hacks to help young adults stay ahead of the curve. Sign Up Sign Up Take marketing, my field of study. I've used generative AI tools like ChatGPT for copywriting, Invideo AI for automated video creation, and even niche GPTs like Excel AI to process and sort information. These tools are fast, scalable and increasingly accessible. But they also raise uncomfortable questions: If AI can write, design and even strategise at scale, where does my human value lie? Is it worth specialising in something today if AI could automate it tomorrow? Should I take a full-time job when the skills I'm hired for may be obsolete before I get promoted? These are not theoretical concerns – they're daily mental roadblocks. Instead, many of my peers are exploring alternative routes: building portfolio careers, freelancing across domains and constantly picking up short-term micro-skills to stay adaptable. But this agility comes with its own cost: instability, burnout and the fear of never becoming truly 'expert' at anything. AI has undeniably unlocked opportunities. But for young professionals, it has also introduced an undercurrent of quiet anxiety. We need not just skilling pathways, but also realistic conversations about what long-term employability looks like, in an age where technology evolves faster than training programmes can keep up. Until we bridge that gap, don't be surprised if more Gen Zs like myself hesitate to sign on to the traditional 9-to-6 contract – not out of disinterest, but out of deep uncertainty. Amos Lau
