Georgia-Linked Activist Vahagn Chakhalyan Detained in Armenia
said
July 4.
Armenia's Investigative Committee said Chakhalyan, along with other leaders and members of the opposition Sacred Struggle movement, was arrested on terrorism and coup-plotting charges.
Georgia's jailed ex-president Mikheil Saakashvili said on Facebook that Chakhalyan was an agent of Russian military intelligence and slammed the Georgian Dream government for its 2013 decision to release him from prison under an amnesty.
'Chakhalyan was not doing Armenian work, neither in Georgia nor in Armenia. He was a GRU-recruited agent based in Akhalkalaki. Georgian Dream also served Russian interests by releasing him from prison,' Saakashvili
wrote
.
In Georgia, Chakhalyan was active in the early 2000s in the Samtskhe-Javakheti region, where ethnic Armenians form the majority. He was part of groups that organized protests in 2005 against the withdrawal of a Russian military base from the town of Akhalkalaki and called for autonomy for the Javakheti region.
In 2008, Chakhalyan was arrested on charges of illegal weapons possession. Additional charges followed, related to weapons possession, hooliganism, and acts against public order, connected to 2005 and 2006 incidents, when protesters
stormed
a court chamber and a local branch of Tbilisi State University in Akhalkalaki.
Chakhalyan and his supporters called the charges politically motivated. He was released in 2013 under a broad amnesty by the newly elected Georgian Dream government, a move that
drew criticism
from Saakashvili and his United National Movement party.
Saakashvili called Chakhalyan 'an enemy of the Georgian state' and accused then-Prime Minister Bidzina Ivanishvili of releasing him 'to please' Russia.
That same year, Chakhalyan and Saakashvili had a
heated public exchange
during Saakashvili's visit to Akhalkalaki. Saakashvili accused Chakhalyan of separatism and ties to Russian intelligence, while Chakhalyan criticized his imprisonment and raised concerns about the rights of the local Armenian community.
Also Read:
This post is also available in:
ქართული
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
OC Media
5 hours ago
- OC Media
Pashinyan remains most trusted politician in Armenia — at only 13% approval
Sign in or or Become a member to unlock the audio version of this article Join the voices Aliyev wants to silence. For over eight years, OC Media has worked with fearless journalists from Azerbaijan — some of whom now face decades behind bars — to bring you the stories the regime is afraid will get out. Help us fuel Aliyev's fears — become an OC Media member today Become a member Amidst the crisis between the Armenian government and the Armenian Apostolic Church, a new survey commissioned by the International Republican Institute (IRI) has found that Armenians are largely satisfied with the church. In addition, while Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan was the most trusted politician in Armenia, his popularity, as well as that of his Civil Contract party, has declined. The data was collected via telephone administered interviews with 1,505 Armenian residents and Nagorno-Karabakh refugees from 16–26 June. The results of the survey were published on Monday. According to the results, Pashinyan was the most trusted politician in Armenia, with 13% of respondents expressing confidence in him. He was followed by Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan, with 5%, and opposition leader and former President Robert Kocharyan with 4%. Notably, 61% of respondents said they did not trust any political figure. Support for Pashinyan and his Civil Contract party declined to 17%, down from 20% in both 2023 and 2024. In contrast, the rating of Kocharyan's Armenia Alliance faction doubled, rising from 2% to 4%. Amidst the crisis between the Armenian government and the Armenian Apostolic Church, which has escalated since late May, survey data showed that the church was the institution with the second-most level of approval in Armenia, with 58% of respondents expressing satisfaction with its work. Respondents were most satisfied with the Armenian Armed Forces, which received an approval of 72%. Meanwhile, only 38% of respondents expressed satisfaction with the Prime Minister's office, a continued decline from over 80% in the aftermath of the 2018 Velvet Revolution. Advertisement The courts were the only public institution where the public have consistently been dissatisfied since August 2018 — according to the latest data, 52% of respondents were dissatisfied, while only 31% were satisfied. Despite criticism and protests against the government's handling of social assistance, 55% of respondents said they were satisfied with the Armenian government's support programmes for displaced Armenians from Nagorno-Karabakh, while 36% expressed dissatisfaction. In addition, the IRI survey noted that they 'found signs of increasing political disengagement among young Armenians, with 37% of youth (age 18 to 35) responding that they would not vote if national parliamentary elections were held next Sunday'. The report quoted Stephen Nix, Senior Director for Europe and Eurasia at IRI, as saying that the Armenian government 'should undertake serious efforts to involve Armenian youth in the political and electoral processes'. Russia is still seen as a political threat Despite the apparent favourable turn in Armenia–Russia relations, following a freefall that started after lack of support in light of the Azerbaijani attack towards Armenia in 2021 and 2022, Armenians still view Russia as a political threat, behind just Azerbaijan, Turkey, and Israel. When asked about the signing of a peace treaty with Azerbaijan, 47% of respondents supported such a move while 40% opposed it. Those against the signing of a peace deal mentioned security issues, risks of war, the cession of territories to Azerbaijan, a lack of trust, and that the terms of the agreement are dictated only by Azerbaijan as the main disadvantages to such an agreement. Separately, Armenia's prospective membership in the EU enjoys broad support, with 49% of respondents saying they would vote in favour and only 15% opposed. Among those who expressed support for Armenia's accession to the EU, the main perceived benefits were strengthening the country's security, stability, and economy, and developing the country. In contrast, opponents of EU membership cited several concerns, including the deterioration of traditional Armenian family values, problems related to preserving national identity, the emergence of security problems, a negative impact on the economy, and risks of 'angering' Russia. Indeed, national security and border issues were considered to be the main problem that Armenia currently faces, with 44% expressing such a standpoint. Unemployment was the next biggest issue, receiving 14%, while political instability — 12% — was the third largest problem.
Civil.ge
6 hours ago
- Civil.ge
GD-Established Grants Agency Opens First Call for Applications
Georgia's State Grants Management Agency , established by a Georgian Dream government decree in April, issued its first call for grant applications on July 21, saying it 'aims to support civic initiatives through state funding.' Critics, however, have argued the ruling Georgian Dream party is seeking to fund loyal organizations – so-called government-organized non-governmental organizations (GONGOs), while continuing to cut western funding to independent civil society groups, including through legislative moves. The agency is headed by Tamar Zodelava, a former regional project manager with the German Society for International Cooperation (GIZ), who has also worked with the Council of Europe and the Eastern Partnership Regional Fund. 'Eligible applicants are non-commercial legal entities registered in Georgia whose founding documents reflect work in areas of state or public significance,' the agency said on July 21, adding that entities established by government bodies, municipalities, or other public institutions are not eligible. All grant proposals must align with one or more of 12 priority areas: (1) Democratic institutions, good governance, and human rights and fundamental freedoms; (2) Foreign policy and Georgia's integration into the EU; (3) Economic development; (4) Education, science, and youth; (5) Sports development; (6) Labor, health, and social welfare; (7) Defense and security; (8) Regional development and local self-government; (9) Environmental and natural resource protection; (10) Agriculture; (11) Legal and professional education; and (12) Reconciliation and civil equality. Applicants may request up to GEL 100,000 (approximately USD 37,000) per project, with a minimum project duration of three months from the signing of the grant agreement. A separate category of 'institutional development grants,' offering up to GEL 700,000 (USD 260,000), is also available for organizations seeking to 'strengthen organizational capacity and ensure long-term sustainability.' The application period runs from July 21 to August 11. The detailed guidelines are shared through a shared Google Drive folder as the agency currently lacks an official website and operates through a publicly listed email and phone number. Proposals will be evaluated by the Agency's council, with a quorum of at least 10 members required for any session. Decisions will be made by majority vote, with abstentions prohibited. In the case of a tie, the chairperson will cast the deciding vote. The state grant call comes as GD targets western funding for non-governmental organizations with repressive laws, including adopting Georgian interpretation of Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA), and introducing amendments to grant laws requiring foreign donors to obtain government approval before disbursing funds. The legislative crackdown was followed by further moves against media outlets and watchdogs through public agencies, including the Anti-Corruption Bureau targeting several civil society organizations with inspection requests, and the Revenue Service seizing accounts of media organizations citing outstanding debts. Also Read:
Civil.ge
7 hours ago
- Civil.ge
126th Ergneti IPRM Meeting
The 126th meeting of the Incident Prevention and Response Mechanism (IPRM) was held on July 21 in the village Ergneti, near the occupation line with Georgia's Russian-backed Tskhinvali region. The meeting was co-facilitated by Bettina Patricia Boughani, head of the EU Monitoring Mission (EUMM) in Georgia, and Christoph Späti, special representative of the OSCE Chairperson-in-Office for the South Caucasus. Georgia's State Security Service (SSSG) said it discussed 'all important incidents' along the occupation line since the previous IPRM meeting. The agency said its representatives reiterated their 'strong demand' for accountability in the November 2023 killing of Georgian citizen Tamaz Ginturi, who was fatally shot by Russian forces during an attempted illegal arrest near the village of Kirbali in the Gori municipality. The agency also said it raised the issue of releasing all individuals held in illegal detention and condemned the continued 'illegal so-called borderization' near the occupation line. It said humanitarian concerns affecting the local population were discussed, with 'special attention paid to the issue of free movement.' The co-facilitators welcomed the 'continued commitment' of all participants to the IPRM format, emphasizing its 'crucial role' in 'addressing security-related developments and finding practical solutions for conflict-affected communities on both sides of the administrative boundary line.' 'The EUMM and OSCE co-facilitators reiterated their concern over the continuous practice of detentions,' a joint statement said. 'They also advocated for enhanced freedom of movement, which would facilitate family visits during the summer.' The discussion also addressed irrigation and wastewater management, with co-facilitators urging 'practical cooperation to ensure sufficient access of the local population on both sides of the ABL to water resources during the dry season.' Both organizations reiterated their readiness to support efforts in this area. The official press release noted that participants acknowledged the EUMM-managed hotline as 'a highly effective tool for establishing a shared understanding of security and humanitarian developments.' Igor Kochiev, the de facto representative of the Russian-backed Tskhinvali region, told journalists following the meeting that the situation along the boundary remains 'stable, calm and predictable.' 'Since the previous meeting, a minimal number of violations of the state border and violations of the republic's airspace by unmanned aerial vehicles have been recorded,' he said. Representatives of the de facto authorities in the occupied Tskhinvali region once again raised the issue of a Georgian police post in the village of Tsnelisi/Uista. Kochiev said, 'The problem is constantly voiced, and the South Ossetian side has proposed withdrawing this post from the territory of the republic.' He added that the removal of the post is the 'only possible solution, including to make life easier for residents living on the right bank of the Lopan River.' The next meeting within the framework of the IPRM will be held on 29 September 2025 . Also Read:
