Sebi tweaks framework for ESG Rating Providers using subscriber-pays model
Markets regulator Sebi has tweaked the framework for ESG Rating Providers (ERPs), especially for those using a subscriber-pays model , requiring them to share ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) rating reports with both subscribers and the rated issuer simultaneously. This policy needs to be publicly disclosed.To give this effect, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) has amended rules governing credit rating agencies in a bid to enhance clarity and transparency."An ESG rating provider following a subscriber-pays business model shall share the ESG rating report with its subscribers and the rated entity or the issuer whose securities have been rated at the same time and provide two working days to such rated entity or the issuer to provide its comments," Sebi said in its notification issued on Tuesday.Further, all comments or clarifications received from the rated entity within the specified timeline will be included in the addendum to the ESG rating report by the ERP.If the rated entity or the issuer has a different viewpoint on the data stated in the report, ERPs, after taking into account such viewpoint, can either revise the report or issue an addendum to the report with its remarks, for circulation to all its subscribers.Moreover, ERPs are required to disclose the policy regarding the sharing of ESG rating reports with the rated entity or the issuer whose securities have been rated and the subscribers on its website.Also ERP will provide a facility to the rated entity or the issuer whose securities have been rated to seek any clarification, including the ESG rating methodology or assumptions.Sebi has defined subscriber-pays business model as a business model where the ESG rating provider derives its revenues from ESG ratings from subscribers including banks, insurance companies, pension funds, or the rated entity itself.An ESG rating provider following a subscriber-pays business model will have to ensure that assigned rating is based only on publicly available information and that the fee paid by the subscriber is the lowest fee paid amongst all the subscribers if the rated entity or issuer is a subscriber itself."Only group companies or associates of an entity, whose core business requires ESG ratings of such an entity or the securities issued by such entity, and are regulated by the financial sector regulator(s) can subscribe to the ESG rating," Sebi said.However, there should not be any conflict of interest or any potential or actual abuse or misuse, it added.ERPs will have to state on its website the financial sector regulator or authority under whose purview it undertakes ESG ratings for each product and will have to comply with the applicable laws administered by such financial sector regulator or authority.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
20 minutes ago
- Mint
Sebi moots major relief for big firms on related party transaction norms
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) on Monday proposed sweeping changes to its related party transaction (RPT) regime, sharpening its focus on ease of doing business for large companies. The capital markets regulator's consultation paper recommends a significant overhaul of materiality thresholds, potentially cutting compliance hurdles by nearly 60% for the nation's top listed firms. The consultation paper, released for public comment, sets out a 'scale-based threshold mechanism' to determine when RPTs are considered material and must be placed before shareholders for approval. Currently, listed companies must seek shareholder approval for any RPT exceeding ₹ 1,000 crore, or 10% of their annual consolidated turnover, whichever is lower. However, Sebi noted that this was onerous for listed entities with high turnover, as large companies were forced to classify many substantial—but not necessarily significant—transactions as material, leading to excessive paperwork. To address this, Sebi has proposed replacing the 'one-size fits all' approach with a scale-based system: For companies with up to ₹ 20,000 crore turnover: Threshold remains 10% of annual consolidated turnover. 20,000 crore turnover: Threshold remains 10% of annual consolidated turnover. ₹ 20,001–40,000 crore turnover: Threshold of ₹ 2,000 crore plus 5% of turnover above ₹ 20,000 crore. 20,001–40,000 crore turnover: Threshold of 2,000 crore plus 5% of turnover above 20,000 crore. Above ₹ 40,000 crore turnover: Threshold of ₹ 3,000 crore plus 2.5% of turnover above ₹ 40,000 crore, subject to a maximum of ₹ 5,000 crore. 'The approach of scale-based threshold would ensure that materiality threshold increases with the increase in the turnover of the company leading to an appropriate number of related party transactions being categorized as material thereby reducing the compliance burden of listed entities.' Sebi said. Testing the new thresholds with recent data, Sebi found the number of material RPTs requiring shareholders' approval has reduced by around 60%. Sebi also addressed transactions by subsidiaries, proposing that deals above ₹ 1 crore require audit committee approval if they exceed either 10% of the subsidiary's turnover or the new scale-based threshold for the parent, 'whichever is lower.' For subsidiaries without full-year financials, the comparison would be to 10% of net worth or the parent's threshold. Noting that the ₹ 1 crore exemption from full disclosure requirements is a "minuscule amount for listed entities having high turnover," Sebi proposed that smaller RPTs (up to 1% of turnover or ₹ 10 crore, whichever is lower) need only provide minimal information to the Audit Committee or shareholders. The consultation paper seeks to formalize that omnibus RPTs approved in an AGM shall be valid up to the date of the next AGM for a period not exceeding 15 months. For other shareholder meetings, the approval remains valid for one year. It proposed that exemptions on retail purchases will apply only to directors or key managerial personnel of a listed entity or its subsidiary (or their relatives). It also clarified that exemptions for transactions between holding companies and subsidiaries are intended for listed holding companies only. Sebi has sought public comments on these proposals by August 25, 2025. Legal experts said the challenge will be to balance efficiency with sufficient rigour, ensuring that the compliance reset does not dilute minority rights or open new avenues for opacity in related party dealings. Ashima Obhan, senior partner at Obhan & Associates, welcomed the nuanced shift, noting that Sebi's move towards scale-based thresholds for material RPTs reflected a nuanced recognition of the varied compliance capacities of listed entities. "While easing procedural burdens for larger corporations may enhance operational agility, it is crucial that such relaxation does not dilute the protection framework for minority shareholders.' Obhan said scaled thresholds require careful calibration to ensure truly significant deals face scrutiny, and that reduced disclosures for small-value transactions should be coupled with safeguards like periodic aggregative disclosures or triggers, to maintain transparency without overburdening companies. Echoing the sentiment, Hardeep Sachdeva, senior partner at AZB & Partners, said that for large listed entities, the higher thresholds could reduce procedural friction. "But it is imperative that shareholder protection, particularly for minority investors, remains uncompromised." Sachdeva underscored the need to avoid fragmentation of RPTs into small tranches that slip through oversight. "While fewer transactions may cross materiality thresholds, the responsibility to ensure fairness and arm's length dealing will only grow, demanding greater diligence and internal coordination.' With potentially fewer transactions being escalated by default, audit committees will need robust internal mechanisms to proactively assess the commercial rationale and fairness of intra-group dealings, she said, adding that enhanced reliance on internal controls, independent evaluations, and data analytics may become essential to fulfill their fiduciary mandate. The reforms, if adopted, could mark a significant shift in the compliance of related party transaction norms, promising greater flexibility for India's most prominent corporates. But the onus will remain on the companies' boards and committees to maintain rigorous oversight.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 hours ago
- Business Standard
Sebi plans to ease RPT rules for large firms, cutting shareholder approvals
Sebi proposes easing related party transaction (RPT) norms for large companies, raising materiality thresholds and reducing the number of approvals needed from shareholders and audit committees premium Listen to This Article In a major overhaul of the related party transaction (RPT) norms, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) has proposed linking thresholds for the materiality of such transactions to the turnover of the listed company — a move expected to benefit larger firms more. The proposed changes could reduce the number of RPTs requiring shareholders' approval by approximately 60% for the top 100 listed companies, according to a back-test conducted by the securities regulator. Under the current regulations, an RPT is considered material if the transaction exceeds Rs 1,000 crore or 10% of the annual consolidated turnover of the
New Indian Express
2 hours ago
- New Indian Express
SBI, two other investors to make a killing from Rs 3,600-crore JSW Cement IPO
MUMBAI: JSW Cement, the slag-focused cement maker that had scaled down its primary share sale size by Rs 400 crore, has fixed the price-band for the Rs 3,600-crore issue that opens on August 7 at Rs 139-147, valuing it at the upper end at Rs 20,040 crore. The issue consists of Rs 1,600 crore in fresh issue, making this the largest fresh issue in the cement sector in the past 10 years, and Rs 2,000 crore in offer for sale by Apollo Global, Synergy and SBI, which had collectively invested Rs 1,600 crore in the company in the third quarter of FY22. The company was planning the IPO in January 2025 but last September the regulator Sebi had withheld permission for alleged regulatory lapses involving the inter-se transfer of investments held by Hexa Securities and Finance in which several Jindal family members, including group chairman Sajjan Jindal, were holding director positions. The Rs 2,000-crore OFS involves SBI and two other investors AP Asia Opportunistic Holding (Apollo Global) and Synergy Metals Investments Holdings offloading their stakes. While AP Asia Opportunistic Holdings, and Synergy Metals will be selling shares worth Rs 937.5 crore each in the OFS, SBI will be selling shares worth Rs 125 crore, making a clean profit over its weighted average investment cost of Rs 65.45 per share or 124.6% gains on its investment. The other two investors will be making 115% and 117%, respectively off their investment in four years. The company intends to utilise Rs 800 crore of the fresh issue proceeds for part financing the capex on a new integrated cement unit at Nagaur in Rajasthan, and a further Rs 720 crore to repay debt which stood at Rs 6,166.6 crore as of March 2025, up from Rs 5,836 crore a year before. The company has already deployed Rs 287.8 crore in its Nagaur unit till June 2024, out of a total estimated cost of Rs 2,697.3 crore. The remaining Rs 2,409.4 crore will be funded from IPO proceeds (and project loan of Rs 1,609.4 crore). The company with 20.6 million tonnes of annual capacity, which it is planning to take to 41.8 million over the next four to five years, had filed the IPO papers with Sebi in August 2024, but Sebi kept the approval on hold in September and the final approval was accorded only this January.
