Indian Producers' Associations Warn of Box Office Bloodbath After Donald Trump's 100% Tariff Bombshell
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience. Generate Key Takeaways
Indian producers associations are sounding the alarm over President Donald Trump's recent proposal to implement a 100% tariff on foreign-produced films entering the U.S. market, a move that threatens the $100 million theatrical business that Indian cinema currently enjoys in America.
Shibashish Sarkar, president of the Producers Guild of India, cautions that it's still early to fully assess the situation. 'It is a little early to comment as global film industries and stakeholders are still processing what is the objective of the statement by President Trump, and what exactly it will solve for Hollywood. Also as we see from his other announcements on tariffs, things change till it's implemented,' Sarkar tells Variety.
More from Variety
If implemented, Sarkar believes the immediate impact would be on theatrical distribution. 'Indian films do about $100 million dollar +/- at the gross box office level in the U.S. If this tariff gets implemented, either the exhibitors will increase the ticket prices and make it expensive for the consumers, because of which even the footfalls will come down dramatically,' he explains.
Indian films have been making significant strides at the North American box office. Among the top performers, 'Baahubali 2: The Conclusion' leads with a gross of $22 million, followed by 'Kalki 2898 AD' at $18.5 million, 'Pathaan' at $17.4 million, 'RRR' at $15.3 million, 'Jawan' at $15.2 million, 'Pushpa 2: The Rule' at $15.08 million, and 'Animal' at $15.01 million.
The alternative scenario could be equally problematic for Indian producers. 'If the exhibitors want to absorb the price, then they will pass on that loss to the producers, so the producers share will also come down dramatically. Either way, there will be an impact on the Indian producer's share from a theatrical point of view,' Sarkar says.
The ripple effects would extend beyond theatrical releases to digital platforms as well. 'Also, digital or pay TV deals that Indian producers do for global rights will be impacted. That may be post theatrical rights or direct to digital films,' Sarkar notes, adding that any revenue generated by Indian content in the U.S. would likely be subject to the tariff.
Sarkar also points out potential consequences for Hollywood productions shooting in India, suggesting they would face tariffs when bringing content back to the U.S. for release.
Abhay Sinha, president of the Indian Motion Pictures Producers' Association (IMPPA), which represents 25,000 Indian producers and distributors, also warns of mutual damage. 'The sanctions imposed on foreign films by the President Trump administration are going to have far reaching consequences on Indian films releasing in the U.S.,' Sinha tells Variety, noting that U.S. exhibition chains also rely on Indian content for survival.
Hollywood films have a significant presence in the Indian market, accounting for approximately 10% of the annual $2 billion box office. Top-performing Hollywood films in India include 'Avatar: The Way of Water' with $59.5 million, 'Avengers: Endgame' at $62.6 million, and 'Avengers: Infinity War' with $43.5 million.
The producers' bodies are planning coordinated action in response. 'All our producers and distributors bodies will have to meet in order to resolve the issue using government deliberations first. IMPPA and FFI (Film Federation of India) will approach the government to announce our joint stand on the issue,' Sinha says.
Best of Variety
Sign up for Variety's Newsletter. For the latest news, follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Senate to Vote on Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill': Here's What It Contains
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The U.S. Senate is working through the weekend to pass President Donald Trump's comprehensive domestic policy bill, a sprawling 940-page piece of legislation that Republicans are calling crucial for the nation's economic future. The U.S. House of Representatives has already passed their version, and senators are now working to finalize their draft before sending it back for a final House vote while Democrats remain united in opposition to the package. Why It Matters This legislation represents Trump's signature domestic policy initiative, combining massive tax cuts with significant spending on border security and defense while implementing substantial cuts to social safety net programs. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO), which is nonpartisan, estimates the House's version would add $2.4 trillion to the nation's deficit over the next decade, though Republicans dispute this calculation. The bill's passage would fundamentally reshape federal spending priorities and tax policy, affecting millions of Americans across income levels. What To Know The bill centers on approximately $3.8 trillion in tax cuts, making permanent the tax rates and brackets from Trump's first term while adding new exemptions for tips, overtime pay, and some automotive loans. The legislation would increase the child tax credit from $2,000 to $2,200 and provide a $6,000 deduction for older adults earning under $75,000 annually. The state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap would increase from $10,000 to $40,000 for five years. For border security and immigration enforcement, the package allocates $350 billion, including $46 billion for the U.S.-Mexico border wall and $45 billion for 100,000 migrant detention facility beds. The plan aims to deport approximately 1 million people annually through hiring 10,000 new U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers and expanding Border Patrol forces. To offset costs, Republicans propose significant cuts to Medicaid, food stamps, and green energy programs, potentially saving $1.5 trillion. The legislation would impose new 80-hour monthly work requirements for Medicaid and food stamp recipients up to age 65, while rolling back former President Joe Biden-era's renewable energy tax incentives. The CBO estimates these changes would leave 10.9 million more people without health coverage and 3 million without food stamp eligibility. Additional provisions include $25 billion for the "Golden Dome" missile defense system, establishment of "Trump Accounts" children's savings program, and $40 million for a "National Garden of American Heroes." The bill also restricts artificial intelligence (AI) development, blocks transgender surgeries, and directs the sale of up to 1.2 million acres of public land for housing development. The U.S. Capitol is seen on June 28 in Washington, D.C. The U.S. Capitol is seen on June 28 in Washington, People Are Saying President Donald Trump on Truth Social on Friday: "The Great Republicans in the U.S. Senate are working all weekend to finish our 'ONE, BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL.' We are on the precipice of delivering Massive General Tax Cuts, NO TAX ON TIPS, NO TAX ON OVERTIME, NO TAX ON SOCIAL SECURITY FOR OUR SENIORS, Permanently Securing our Borders, an even Bigger and More Powerful Military." House Republicans' X, formerly Twitter, account wrote on Friday: "House Republicans are united and ready to DELIVER the largest tax cut for working and middle-class Americans in history. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act will unleash our economy and restore the American Dream." Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer of New York wrote on X on Saturday: "BREAKING: I will object to Republicans moving forward on their Big, Ugly Bill without reading it on the Senate floor. Republicans won't tell America what's in the bill. So Democrats are forcing it to be read start to finish on the floor. We will be here all night if that's what it takes to read it." Trump on Truth Social on Saturday: "WHY ARE THE DEMOCRATS ALWAYS ROOTING AGAINST AMERICA???" Tech billionaire and MAGA ally Elon Musk wrote on X on Saturday: "Polls show that this bill is political suicide for the Republican Party." In his post, he shared polling data from The Tarrance Group that showed majority opposition across different voter groups. What Happens Next The Senate must complete its work and pass the bill before sending it back to the House for a final vote. Trump has demanded the legislation reach his desk by July 4th. With Democrats united in opposition and some Republican concerns emerging over provisions affecting rural hospitals and AI restrictions, the timeline remains uncertain. Reporting from the Associated Press contributed to this article.
Politico
2 hours ago
- Politico
‘Kill shot:' GOP megabill targets solar, wind projects with new tax
Senate Republicans stepped up their attacks on U.S. solar and wind energy projects by quietly adding a provision to their megabill that would penalize future developments with a new tax. That new tax measure was tucked into the more than 900-page document released late Friday that also would sharply cut the tax credits in the Inflation Reduction Act for solar and wind projects. Those cuts to the IRA credits were added after a late-stage push by President Donald Trump to crack down further on the incentives by requiring generation projects be placed in service by the end of 2027 to qualify. The new excise tax is another blow to the fastest-growing sources of power production in the United States, and would be a massive setback to the wind and solar energy industries since it would apply even to projects not receiving any credits. 'It's a kill shot. This new excise tax on wind and solar is designed to fully kill the industry,' said Adrian Deveny, founder and president of policy advisory firm Climate Vision, who helped craft the climate law as a former policy director for Democratic Senate Leader Chuck Schumer. Analysts at the Rhodium Group said in an email the new tax would push up the costs of wind and solar projects by 10 to 20 percent — on top of the cost increases from losing the credits. 'Combined with the likely onerous administrative reporting burden this provision puts in place, these cost increases will lead to even lower wind and solar installations. The impacts of this tax would also flow through to consumers in the form of higher electricity rates,' Rhodium said. The provision as written appears to add an additional tax for any wind and solar project placed into service after 2027 — when its eligibility for the investment and production tax credits ends — if a certain percentage of the value of the project's components are sourced from prohibited foreign entities, like China. It would apply to all projects that began construction after June 16 of this year. The language would require wind and solar projects, even those not receiving credits, to navigate complex and potentially unworkable requirements that prohibit sourcing from foreign entities of concern — a move designed to promote domestic production and crack down on Chinese materials. In keeping with GOP support for the fossil fuel industry, the updated bill creates a new production tax credit for metallurgical coal, which is used in steelmaking.
Politico
2 hours ago
- Politico
Millions of students could lose federal aid under a proposal to slash Pell Grants
College presidents are rallying behind Senate Republicans in a bid to stave off megabill cuts to a program that helps more than 6 million low- and middle-income students pay for school. To help avert a $2.7 billion shortfall in the Pell Grant program later this year, the House's version of President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' advanced tighter eligibility rules that alarmed educators. The changes, according to the Congressional Budget Office, could kick nearly 10 percent of Pell recipients off the award and shrink the amount of money most participants receive. Those numbers are driving college leaders — many already facing threats of Trump-driven funding cuts, new endowment taxes and limits on international students — to support the Senate's less-restrictive take on the popular bipartisan program. Mark Brown, a former Trump Education Department official who is now president of Alabama's Tuskegee University, told senators last month that Pell reductions proposed by the House would push students to take out more loans. And some of the nation's largest university systems, like California State University and California Community Colleges, have called the restrictions an 'existential threat.' 'This is a difference between some of those students either coming to our universities or tech colleges or not,' said Jay Rothman, president of the Universities of Wisconsin, whose 13 campuses have roughly 31,600 Pell Grant recipients. Republicans in both chambers are under tremendous pressure from party bosses to find savings that help offset Trump's $4 trillion in broader tax cuts. But higher education leaders across the nation say the House GOP's plans would imperil college access for working students and contend that their institutions can't make up for the loss of federal financial aid. 'There are going to be some students who have the ability and have the passion and have the desire, but will not have the financial means to attend our universities. And there will be students that will not get the benefit of that higher education because of these reductions,' Rothman said. During the 2024-25 award year, the maximum Pell Grant was $7,395, which is determined based on income, family size, federal poverty guidelines and other factors. The House-passed 'big, beautiful bill' would require students to increase their course load from 24 credit hours a year to 30 each year to be eligible for the maximum amount of the grant. Most students would likely have to take 15 credits per semester instead of 12 to get the full award, though students could take summer courses to meet the full-time requirements. The bill also includes language that would bar students enrolled less than half-time from the grant. But the Senate has proposed scaling back the lower chamber's dramatic changes to the grant, and appears to be sticking with its Pell plans in the chamber's latest legislative text. The upper chamber's plan would deem students ineligible for the grant if they receive federal, state, institutional or private aid that covers the full cost of attendance, something campus leaders and advocates deem more favorable. Education Chair Bill Cassidy's proposal strips the full-time definition and half-time language from the panel's portion of the reconciliation bill, to the disgruntlement of some House leaders. 'I'm not OK with it,' said House Education and Workforce Chair Tim Walberg, whose panel is responsible for the lower chamber's Pell proposal. 'But we learned that we have to deal with reality. We know that we have to pass the One Big Beautiful Bill.' Walberg said he hasn't seen anything in the Senate's proposal that would be a deal breaker but worries about the long-term sustainability of the grant. Pell's estimated shortfall could balloon up to $10 billion by the end of fiscal 2026. Both the House and Senate proposals include funding to address the shortfall, but Walberg has said his proposed changes to eligibility would help rein in annual spending on Pell and help stave off another deficit. 'We thought it was very realistic,' the Michigan Republican said. 'The issue is, if we're going to pay for the shortfall that's going to be in Pell, we have to make sure that we have students that are finishing up, completing an education and moving on.' But some institutions are discouraging students from taking heavy course loads, saying student performance goes down the more classes they take, especially if they have obligations outside of school. 'We actually advise them to take 12, not 15, so that they will do well. Fifteen credits is far too many,' Trinity Washington University President Patricia McGuire said. 'That is such a heavy, heavy academic load for students who are normally working. Also, many of them are raising their own children, many of them have family circumstances that are very stressful. Congress, in addition to not understanding how education works, have no concept of the lives of low-income students.' McGuire, who has headed the D.C. university for over 30 years, said 60 to 70 percent of her nearly 2,000 students are Pell recipients. 'If this goes through, we will go out, and we will make the case directly to donors: Can you help us to close this new gap that the government has created?' she said. 'But that also seems like we shouldn't have to do that.' Alabama Republican Sen. Tommy Tuberville, a HELP Committee member, said he just wants the reconciliation bill's education proposals to be 'right in the end' when asked about the House Pell plans. 'Education is hugely important,' he said. Pell eligibility changes, if they become law, could be much more acute for community colleges, where students are often part-time. 'At community colleges, we're about careers, we're about jobs, we're about getting people into the workforce and if they can't afford to access the education, then we certainly can't get them into the workforce,' Forsyth Technical Community College President Janet Spriggs said.
