logo
'We need to find these people': L.A. immigration raids a sign of what's to come, officials say

'We need to find these people': L.A. immigration raids a sign of what's to come, officials say

Yahoo12-06-2025
When Donald Trump promised on the campaign trail to unleash the largest deportation campaign in U.S. history, he said his second administration would start by going after people with criminal records.
But now, disappointed with the pace of arrests, the Trump administration is casting a wider net by targeting anyone deportable.
Raids in California have taken place at courthouses, during scheduled check-ins with immigration authorities, at clothing factories, Home Depots, car washes, farms and outside churches. But officials say the state is hardly being singled out. Raids are coming for other sanctuary jurisdictions too, said Tom Homan, President Trump's chief advisor on border policy.
"This operation is not going to end," he told The Times.
Read more: All of L.A. is not a 'war zone.' We separate facts from spin and disinformation amid immigration raids
Across the country, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement is stepping up new strategies and tearing down precedent to meet the White House's demands. Homan acknowledged the pace of deportations had not met expectations and that while the administration still prioritizes removing those who threaten public safety and national security, anyone in the country illegally is fair game.
"I'm not happy with the numbers," he said. "We need to find these people."
Arrests are being made in places previously considered off limits, and the administration earlier this year rescinded a policy that prohibited enforcement actions in hospitals, schools or houses of worship. Agents who typically focus on drug and human trafficking are seeing their duties shifted to immigration enforcement.
The government is also now appealing to the public to help find and deport people in the country without authorization. The Department of Homeland Security, ICE's parent agency, released a poster on social media this week that depicts Uncle Sam urging people to call a hotline to 'report all foreign invaders.'
And in Los Angeles, the National Guard and U.S. Marines were mobilized without the consent of state and local leaders — a tactic that Trump administration officials said could be repeated elsewhere. Trump claimed the deployments have been effective — "Los Angeles would be a crime scene like we haven't seen in years,' Trump said Thursday — but local leaders have said the protests against ICE raids had not gotten out of control and that Trump's actions only inflamed tensions.
As protests reached their seventh day in Los Angeles, isolated incidents of violence lessened, though some tensions remained. Even so, White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller wrote Wednesday on X that 'America voted for mass deportations. Violent insurrectionists, and the politicians who enable them, are trying to overthrow the results of the election.'
California Democrats say the enforcement actions are about retribution against the state for its policies that protect immigrant residents, as well as an attempt to distract the public from congressional Republicans' attempts to pass the president's tax-and-spending bill, which would add more than $150 billion for immigration and border enforcement. They say the president is testing the bounds of his authority and wants protests to spiral so that he can crack down further by invoking the Insurrection Act to establish martial law.
Invoking the Insurrection Act would allow military troops to arrest civilians. Further unrest, Trump critics say, would be welcomed by the president.
'This is about if it bleeds, it leads,' said Rep. Sydney Kamlager-Dove (D-Los Angeles). 'So he has created and manufactured violence so that he can have a show on the television. But other people — older people, folks who are disabled, young people — are going to be bleeding when Medicaid gets cut, when people are evicted from their homes.'
While public attention has focused on the arrests of employees, the administration says it's also looking at employers who hire workers in the country illegally.
"It's not just about arresting illegal aliens, it's about holding employers responsible too — but there's a burden of proof," Homan said. "If we can prove it, then we'll take action."
Read more: Death threats, vandalism, investigations: L.A. immigrant rights groups in the fight of their lives
One former Homeland Security official in the Biden administration said immigration laws could be enforced without escalating public tension. 'Why aren't they doing I-9 audits instead of just going after people?' said the former official, Deborah Fleischaker, of forms used to verify an employee's identity and eligibility to work in the U.S. 'There are ways to do this in ways that are less disruptive and calmer. They are choosing the more aggressive way.'
In many ways, the current immigration crackdown reflects exactly what Trump said during the presidential campaign, when he declared that millions of people would be deported.
The new expansive approach appears to be a response to a late May meeting, first reported by the Washington Examiner, in which Miller lambasted dozens of senior ICE officials, asking them: 'Why aren't you at Home Depot? Why aren't you at 7-Eleven?'
'Well, now they're all of a sudden at Home Depots,' Fleischaker said.
Homan said the agency has recently arrested around 2,000 people a day, up from a daily average of 657 arrests reported by the agency during Trump's first 100 days back in office. The increase is reflected in rising detention numbers, which have topped 50,000 for the first time since Trump's first presidency, according to TRAC, a nonpartisan data research organization.
Asked about complaints of overcrowding and substandard conditions in detention facilities, Homan acknowledged some facilities are overcrowded during intake. Some of the immigrants detained in California since Friday have been transferred to other states, he said.
'California has been pretty stringent and they want to shut down immigration detention,' he said. 'It doesn't mean we're releasing these people. The less detention space we have in California, the more action they take in not helping us with detention beds, then we'll just simply move them out of state.'
The work of immigration agents — sometimes hours of surveillance for a single target — can be slow. Jason Houser, who was ICE's chief of staff under the Biden administration, said law enforcement agents, when given quotas, will always find the easiest way to fulfill them.
Miller, he said, knows ICE 'doesn't have enough resources or staff to get them to a million removals" by the end of the year.
Houser said that's where the military troops come in. Homeland Security officials said military personnel already have the authority to temporarily detain anyone who attacks an immigration agent until law enforcement can arrest them. Houser predicted that soldiers could soon begin handling arrests.
Critics of the administration's tactics, including former Homeland Security officials, said the White House's strategy boils down to frightening immigrants into leaving on their own. It costs a few hundred dollars a day to detain an immigrant; deportation can cost thousands, and some countries are reticent to accept the return of their citizens.
'They arrest one, they scare 10,' said one former senior ICE official. 'That's a win.'
Read more: Tensions over L.A. immigration sweeps boil over as Padilla is tackled, ICE arrests pick up
The former official, who asked not to be named in order to speak freely, said that's an about-face from the Biden administration, during which agents answered to lawyers and precedent.
'Everything was vetted and vetted … to the detriment in some ways of the agency,' the former official said. 'But to see them just doing whatever they want when they want, it's a little stunning and it's like, look at all the things we could've done if we had that attitude. But they seem to have so little regard for consequences, lawsuits, media, public opinion — they have no constraints.'
Homan said protests in Los Angeles have made enforcement actions more dangerous but have not prevented agents from making as many arrests as planned.
'If the protesters think they're going to stop us from doing our job, it's not true,' he said. 'We're going to probably increase operations in sanctuary cities, because we have to.'
Get the L.A. Times Politics newsletter. Deeply reported insights into legislation, politics and policy from Sacramento, Washington and beyond, in your inbox twice per week.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Elon Musk forms new US political party, calls it 'America Party'
Elon Musk forms new US political party, calls it 'America Party'

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Elon Musk forms new US political party, calls it 'America Party'

Elon Musk said that the "American Party is formed", a day after asking his followers on X whether a new US political party should be created. A day after asking his followers on X whether a new US political party should be created, Elon Musk said on Saturday that the "America Party is formed." "By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it!" he said in a post on X. "Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom." The announcement from Musk comes after President Donald Trump signed a tax-cut and spending bill into law on Friday, which the billionaire chief executive officer of Tesla fiercely opposed. Musk spent hundreds of millions on Trump's re-election and led the Department of Government Efficiency under the Trump administration aimed at slashing government spending, but the two have since fallen out over disagreements about the bill. Trump earlier this week threatened to cut off the billions of dollars in subsidies that Musk's companies receive from the federal government. Musk said previously that he would start a new political party and spend money to unseat lawmakers who supported the bill. Republicans have expressed concern that Musk's on-again, off-again feud with Trump could hurt their chances to protect their majority in the 2026 midterm congressional elections.

Trade deadlines and oil drama set the stage for a crunch week in global markets
Trade deadlines and oil drama set the stage for a crunch week in global markets

CNBC

time32 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Trade deadlines and oil drama set the stage for a crunch week in global markets

CNBC's assignment desk has a conundrum this week: how to approach July, 9. Why does this specific date matter? It's the deadline for trade negotiations between the U.S. and European Union before the tariffs axe (maybe) falls once again. But President Donald Trump's tendency to move deadlines makes it tricky to commit to a big coverage plan when the date could become redundant. However — as we saw with the surprise framework agreed between the U.S. and China in Geneva back in April — you also can't afford to underplay the deadlines' significance. What we do know is that a full trade deal is "impossible" before the deadline, in the words of European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, and that the best Brussels can hope for is an "agreement in principle." As CNBC anchor Silvia Amaro reported last week, the EU is banking on at least a bare-bones deal to show progress and avoid the 50% levy on products exported from the bloc. We should get some clues from Brussels on Tuesday and Wednesday, as European finance ministers gather for their regular meeting in Brussels. Another assignment that is much more definitive: the OPEC Seminar. The circus rolls back into Vienna as the oil producers' International Seminar takes place at the city's grand Hofburg Palace on Wednesday and Thursday. The meeting offers delegates two days of discussion and analysis on energy security and investment. It's a far cry from the days of the OPEC media scrum at the concrete headquarters on the other side of the Austrian capital. As a junior producer, I was lucky enough to cover OPEC with CNBC Anchor Steve Sedgwick. Before Covid, these manic biannual meetings saw journalists fight for soundbites from the world's most influential OPEC ministers. In those days, the scrum was affectionately known by a much less polite term… OPEC+ members — a wider group that includes non-OPEC oil producers, including Russia — meet this weekend to decide on another (highly anticipated) output hike amid a volatile month for crude prices. At the Seminar, ministers will also be joined by the CEOs of some of the world's largest energy companies, including BP and Shell. CEOs Murray Auchincloss and Wael Sawan will be the center of attention as market watchers and journalists alike look for any clues that a much-denied takeover could still be in the cards.

There's a sinister reason for Democrats' collapsing pride in America
There's a sinister reason for Democrats' collapsing pride in America

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

There's a sinister reason for Democrats' collapsing pride in America

One of America's two great political parties no longer thinks of itself as proudly American. As recently as 20 years ago, Democrats were almost as keen on their country as Republicans were, according to Gallup polling. In 2005, fully 81 per cent of Democrats said they were 'very' or 'extremely' proud of being American. Today that number is just 36 per cent. Republicans have hardly changed in that time: 93 per cent were 'very' or 'extremely' proud 20 years ago, and 92 per cent feel that way now. Their national pride didn't decline much even during the Democratic administrations of Barack Obama and Joe Biden. Democrats have grown more disenchanted with America whenever Donald Trump has been president, but their alienation isn't only about him. There was a time when even the Communist Party USA went out of its way to present itself as patriotic, insisting that 'Communism is 20th-century Americanism'. The 21st-century Democratic Party is rather less eager to present itself as characteristically American. If the Gallup surveys provide one indication of a post-American mentality taking root among Democrats, recent events supply further evidence. When illegal immigrants clash with law-enforcement in cities like Los Angeles, many Democrats, including office holders, side with the foreign lawbreakers. There are some 212 Democrats currently serving in Congress, but only seven voted for a House of Representatives resolution condemning the recent violent protests in LA. The Democrats have come to see themselves as a party that represents populations other than just American citizens. The charismatic 33-year-old who is the Democratic party's nominee for mayor of New York City, Zohran Mamdani, is himself an American citizen. But in 2013 his mother, the filmmaker Mira Nair, was quite emphatic in telling the Hindustan Times that Zohran 'is not an [American] at all. He was born in Uganda, raised between India and America. … He thinks of himself as a Ugandan and as an Indian.' That may have changed since he acquired US citizenship in 2018. Then again, his mother was already a US citizen when she made her boast to the Indian newspaper. Mamdani's father, for his part, is a professor at Columbia University renowned, the New York Times notes, as 'a major figure in the field of post-colonialism'. Mamdani might very well tell Gallup he's very or extremely proud to be an American, if he gets called during the next poll. But it's still fair to suggest that a Democratic Party already drifting in an ideologically 'post-colonial' and post-American direction is apt to accelerate down that path if the son of a top post-colonial academic becomes one of its future leaders. At the elite level with the Mamdanis and at the street level with the riots against Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the Left side of America's political spectrum is consistently committed to breaking down the connections between citizenship and the nation-state. Instead of the American federal government serving as an instrument of its citizens, the Left envisions a government administered by an elite without strong national loyalties, which rules in the name of humanity. To their minds, citizenship and national pride are anachronisms, indeed barbarities, that prevent the realisation of a more just, redistributive, 'post-colonial' society – the kind of thing that Mamdani's mayoral campaign might well have in mind with its call to 'shift the tax burden … to more expensive homes in richer and whiter neighbourhoods.' Republicans have a steady sense of pride in being American because their view of politics prioritises country over party: America doesn't stop being a source of pride simply because Barack Obama or Joe Biden is president. Democrats, however, clearly have a weaker attachment to the country in general, and that attachment is more party-dependent than it is for Republicans, according to the data. This suggests that what is a source of pride for Democrats is how well America's government approximates the Left's post-national ideal. Trump moved steadily away from that ideal during his first term in office, causing Democrats' degree of pride in America to slump, dropping every year to a low of 42 per cent of Democrats who said they were very or extremely proud of their country in 2020. (The number then shot up to 62 per cent – still 25 points below the Republican mark – in Biden's first year.) In his second term, Trump has asserted national distinctions against transnational ideals still more aggressively, triggering a corresponding collapse in Democrats' sense of pride in America, to today's record lows. For Democrats, 'national pride' means being proud of transcending the old nation. This wasn't always the case. For all the bad publicity Democrats rightly received for the antics of their anti-American, radical Left-wing during the Vietnam War, the party had a patriotic mainstream. The high levels of pride in America recorded by Gallup's polls of Democrats 20 years ago attest to how long that mainstream survived. But since then the party has adopted a new outlook, fostered by a highly educated elite. This first cost the party much of its working-class white support and is now eroding its working-class Hispanic and black support, while Democrats have picked up new donors and publicists from the ranks of old guard Republicans with an internationalist outlook. Yet this influx of a few libertarians and neoconservatives isn't nearly enough to offset the loss of working-class voters, and what's worse, it contributes nothing to restoring the party's feel for the nation – quite the opposite, in fact. One of America's two parties is now a world party instead. Yet voters, especially Americans, prefer the nation to the world. Daniel McCarthy is the editor in chief of Modern Age Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store