
U.S.-Russia nuclear war: Is World War 3 happening? What we know so far
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
FAQs
Donald Trump-led United States of America and Vladimir Putin-headed Russia are two of the most high profile nuclear armed countries. Any possibility of clashes will be nothing short of catastrophic and a possible World War III . In a warning to Russia, President Donald Trump said Friday he's ordering the repositioning of two U.S. nuclear submarines 'based on the highly provocative statements' of the country's former president, Dmitry Medvedev, who has raised the prospect of war online. A member of the Russian Parliament Duma has said that there are enough Russian nuclear submarines in the high seas to tackle two American subs dispatched by US President Donald Trump to counter Russia.The number of Russian nuclear submarines in the world's oceans is significantly higher than the American ones, and the subs that US President Donald Trump ordered to be redirected to the appropriate regions have long been under their control. So no response from the Russian Federation to the American leader's statement about the submarines is required, a senior Russian lawmaker, Viktor Vodolatsky, was quoted as saying by TASS.Earlier on Friday, Trump wrote on his Truth Social post that he had ordered the redeployment of US submarines "to appropriate regions" allegedly over "extremely provocative statements" by former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, who is also the deputy chairman of the Russian Security Council.The United States has a total of 14 Ohio Class nuclear-powered submarines, each capable of carrying up to 24 Trident II D5 ballistic missiles that can deliver multiple thermonuclear warheads up to 4,600 miles. Between 8 and 10 Ohio Class submarines are deployed at any one time, according to the Nuclear Threat Initiative arms control group.Russia currently operates 54 nuclear-powered submarines, including both strategic and attack types, out of an overall submarine force of about 79 vessels. 14 nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs)—Russia's sea‑based nuclear deterrent—comprise eight modern Borei‑class (Project 955/955A) and six older Delta III/IV boats. 13 nuclear-powered guided‑missile submarines (SSGNs), including six Oscar II‑class and seven Yasen‑class (Project 885/885M), serve as precision strike platforms with cruise- and hypersonic‑capable munitions. 16 nuclear-powered attack submarines (SSNs)—primarily upgraded Akula‑class and a few Sierra‑class boats used for anti‑submarine warfare and sea denial missions."Let the two US subs sail, they have been in the crosshairs for a long time now," the Russian lawmaker said. "A fundamental agreement that must be concluded between Russia and America so that the whole world calms down and stops talking about the beginning of World War III," he added.Trump posted on his social media site that, based on the 'highly provocative statements' from Medvedev, he had 'ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that.' The president added, 'Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances.'Meanwhile, editor-in-chief of Russia in Global Affairs magazine, Fyodor Lukyanov, said that Trump's nuclear submarine statement should not be taken seriously for now."Trump, as we know, runs his own channel and reacts, so to speak, emotionally, humanly and spontaneously. I think that the armed forces, the naval forces of the United States read this with great surprise. If this exchange of opinions continues, and Trump continues to be drawn into it, then, one way or another, he will probably have to take some action. In my opinion, so far this is only at the level of words," Lukyanov told local private news channel RBC TV.Earlier, responding to a media question over US State Department Secretary Marco Rubio's recent interview with Fox News, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said that Russia agrees with the US administration that a direct military confrontation between Moscow and Washington must not happen."While Europeans are hysterically pushing for Ukraine's integration into NATO and preparing for potential conflict with Russia, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio recently reaffirmed a responsible stance, explicitly stating that a direct military confrontation between the United States and Russia must be avoided. We wholeheartedly concur with this position. Such shared understanding has been facilitated through constructive Russian-American dialogue," Lavrov said.It wasn't clear what impact Trump's order would have on U.S. nuclear subs, which are routinely on patrol in the world's hotspots, but it comes at a delicate moment in the Trump administration's relations with Moscow.Trump has said that special envoy Steve Witkoff is heading to Russia to push Moscow to agree to a ceasefire in its war with Ukraine and has threatened new economic sanctions if progress is not made. He cut his 50-day deadline for action to 10 days, with that window set to expire next week.Any talk by a U.S. president about potential nuclear military capabilities raises concerns, the security experts said, noting that the United States has historically refrained from matching Russia's nuclear-saber rattling given the risks surrounding the world's most devastating weaponry."This is irresponsible and inadvisable," said Daryl Kimball, executive director of the Arms Control Association advocacy group. "No leader or deputy leader should be threatening nuclear war, let alone in a juvenile manner on social media."Hans Kristensen of the Federation of American Scientists noted that U.S. nuclear submarines – part of the so-called nuclear triad with bombers and land-based missiles – were always positioned to launch nuclear-armed missiles at targets in Russia."The subs are always there all the time and don't need to be moved into position," he said. "He grants Medvedev a response to these crazy statements."A1. President of USA is Donald Trump.A2. President of Russia is Vladimir Putin.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
8 minutes ago
- India Today
Chandrababu Naidu flags US tariff impact on Andhra aqua farmers, assures support
Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister N Chandrababu Naidu on Saturday said his government will take necessary steps in response to the 25% tariff imposed by the United States on Indian products, highlighting its potential impact on the state's aqua Naidu, whose Telugu Desam Party is an NDA partner at both the state and national levels, is the first Chief Minister to raise concerns about the impact of the made this statement while addressing farmers in Darsi during the launch of the PM KISAN - Annadata Sukhibhava scheme. Naidu said the 25% tariff imposed by US President Donald Trump will increase the burden on aqua farmers in the state. He said the government is aware of the issue and will discuss it with farmers to prepare an action plan. He further said the state provides electricity to aqua farmers at a subsidised rate of 1.50 paise per unit."We are supporting aqua farmers by giving them electricity at 1.50 paise per unit of current. The increase in tariff in America will burden the aqua farmers in the state. We have taken it into cognisance and we will discuss with the farmers in a day or two and formulate an action plan. Fishermen were given Rs. 10,000 earlier, but now Rs. 20,000 each. We have given money to 1,29,178 people under the matsyakarula sevalo,' he said while addressing the July 31, US President Donald Trump announced tariffs on Indian products and warned of further in April, Naidu had written to the central government seeking protection for Andhra Pradesh's aquaculture sector from the US his letter to Union Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal, he urged the Centre to take steps to secure an exemption for aqua products from the additional duties imposed by the Trump administration.- EndsTune InMust Watch IN THIS STORY#Andhra Pradesh

Hindustan Times
8 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Despite Trump statements, Russia oil buys seen still on
New York/Washington : US President Donald Trump claimed on Saturday he had heard India would no longer purchase Russian oil, calling it a 'good step', days after opening an unexpected salvo at New Delhi for its close trade and military ties with Moscow. US President Donald Trump(REUTERS) 'Well, I understand India no longer is going to be buying oil from Russia. That's what I heard. I don't know if that's right or not, but that's a good step. We'll see what happens,' Trump told reporters on Friday. His remarks bear significance due to his threats of punitive measures against nations that purchase oil from Russia, which is seen as being crucial to Moscow's war on Ukraine. However, new reports on Saturday cited senior Indian officials as saying there had been no change in policy, with one stating the government had 'not given any direction to oil companies' to cut back imports from Russia. India has become one of Russia's largest oil customers since Western sanctions drove down prices, helping Moscow maintain crucial export revenues whilst providing New Delhi with cheaper energy to fuel its growing economy. Earlier in the week, Trump formalised 25% tariffs on Indian exports through an executive order covering around 70 nations, though the document notably omitted the additional 'penalty' he had previously threatened over India's Russian energy purchases – a measure that America could still take. Ministry of external affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal, when asked at Friday's weekly briefing about reports claiming Indian oil companies had stopped buying Russian oil, said: 'As far as sourcing India's energy requirements is concerned, we take decisions based on the price at which oil is available in the international market and depending on the global situation at that time.' The US president has repeatedly criticised India's energy ties with Russia whilst announcing punitive trade measures. Declaring a 'massive trade deficit with India,' Trump argued that while 'India is our friend, we have, over the years, done relatively little business with them because their tariffs are far too high, among the highest in the world.' He described India as having 'the most strenuous and obnoxious non-monetary Trade Barriers of any country,' while noting that 'they have always bought a vast majority of their military equipment from Russia, and are Russia's largest buyer of energy, along with China, at a time when everyone wants Russia to stop the killing in Ukraine.' New reports on Saturday stated India will keep purchasing oil from Russia despite Trump's threats of penalties. Two Indian government sources told Reuters on Saturday, not wishing to be identified, that: 'These are long-term oil contracts. It is not so simple to just stop buying overnight.' Russia is the leading supplier to India, the world's third-largest oil importer and consumer, accounting for about 35% of its overall supplies. India imported about 1.75 million barrels per day of Russian oil from January to June this year, up 1% from a year ago, according to data provided to Reuters by sources. Justifying India's oil purchases, a second government source said India's imports of Russian grades had helped avoid a global surge in oil prices, which have remained subdued despite Western curbs on the Russian oil sector. Unlike Iranian and Venezuelan oil, Russian crude is not subject to direct sanctions, and India is buying it below the current price cap fixed by the European Union, the source said. However, sources told Reuters this week that Indian state refiners stopped buying Russian oil after July discounts narrowed to their lowest since 2022—when sanctions were first imposed on Moscow—due to lower Russian exports and steady demand. Indian Oil Corp, Hindustan Petroleum Corp, Bharat Petroleum Corp and Mangalore Refinery Petrochemical Ltd have not sought Russian crude in the past week or so, four sources told Reuters.


Deccan Herald
38 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
Read of the Week (Aug 3 to Aug 9)
At the turn of the century, the Central Intelligence Agency was in crisis. The end of the Cold War had robbed the agency of its mission. Then came September 11, 2001. After the attacks, the CIA transformed itself into a lethal paramilitary force, running secret prisons and brutal interrogations, mounting deadly drone attacks, and all but abandoning its core missions of espionage and counterespionage. The consequences were grave: the deaths of scores of its recruited foreign agents, the theft of its personnel files by Chinese spies, the penetration of its computer networks by Russian intelligence and American hackers, and the tragedies of Afghanistan and Iraq..A new generation of spies now must fight the hardest targets while confronting a president who has attacked the CIA as a subversive force. From Pulitzer Prize winner Tim Weiner comes The Mission, which tells the gripping, high-stakes story of the CIA through the first quarter of the 21st century, revealing how the agency fought to rebuild the espionage powers it lost during the War on Terror and finally succeeded in penetrating the Kremlin. .Tim Weiner has won the Pulitzer Prize for his reporting on American national security and the National Book Award for Legacy of Ashes: The History of the CIA.