logo
Sean ‘Diddy' Combs found guilty on two of five counts in sex-trafficking case

Sean ‘Diddy' Combs found guilty on two of five counts in sex-trafficking case

The Guardian02-07-2025
A New York Jury has found Sean 'Diddy' Combs guilty of two counts and not guilty on three counts, following a closely watched seven-week federal trial marked by emotional and graphic testimony.
The mixed verdict saw Combs being found not guilty of the biggest charge, racketeering conspiracy, not guilty of the sex trafficking of Casandra Ventura or the sex trafficking of 'Jane,' and guilty of both the transportation to engage in prostitution, related to Casandra Ventura, and the transportation to engage in prostitution related to 'Jane.'
The verdict was delivered on Wednesday morning, after 13 hours across three days of deliberation by a jury composed of eight men and four women.
On Tuesday evening, the jury announced that it had reached a verdict on four of the five counts – two counts of sex trafficking and two counts transportation to engage in prostitution – but said that they were unable to come to a decision on the racketeering conspiracy charge. On Wednesday, the jury returned with the verdict on that remaining count.
Combs, 55, had pleaded not guilty to one count of racketeering conspiracy, two counts of sex-trafficking and two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution. He has remained incarcerated without bail in a federal detention facility in Brooklyn since his September arrest.
Prosecutors accused Combs of operating his business empire as a criminal enterprise, dating back to at least 2004, to carry out and conceal various crimes including sex-trafficking, kidnapping, arson, bribery, forced labor, drug distribution, enticement to engage in prostitution and obstruction of justice, with help from employees and close associates.
The government alleged that Combs used his power and wealth, as well as violence and threats of blackmail, to coerce women into complying and participating in what were described as drug-induced sexual marathons often involving one of Combs's girlfriends and male escorts, referred to as 'freak-offs'.
Throughout the trial, which began on 12 May, the defense acknowledged past instances of domestic violence, but denied that any coercion or sex trafficking took place and maintained that all sexual activity was consensual and part of a 'swingers lifestyle'. They claimed Combs was being wrongly prosecuted for his private sex life and also denied that any criminal conspiracy existed.
Over seven weeks, the government called 34 witnesses, including two of Combs's former girlfriends, multiple former employees and assistants, male escorts, hotel staff, law enforcement agents and public figures such as rapper Kid Cudi and singer Dawn Richard and others. Combs did not testify.
Central to the prosecution's case were the accounts from the two former girlfriends and alleged victims: singer Casandra 'Cassie' Ventura and a woman identified as 'Jane'.
Both delivered raw and emotional testimony, alleging that Combs coerced them into participating in the frequent and sometimes days-long 'freak-offs'.
They both described the alleged 'freak-offs' in graphic detail, and testified that Combs directed, watched, masturbated during the encounters and sometimes filmed.
Ventura testified that over the course of their decade-long relationship, Combs subjected her to physical abuse and blackmail.
She also alleged that he raped her after their break up in 2018, and testified that Combs would at times threaten to release explicit footage of her, threaten to cut off financial support or stifle her career if she acted in ways he did not like.
Jurors were shown the 2016 hotel surveillance footage of Combs attacking Ventura in a hotel hallway. They also heard from several witnesses who testified that they saw Combs be violent toward Ventura.
Jane echoed many of Ventura's claims, and testified that she repeatedly told the music mogul that she no longer wanted to participate in the 'freak-offs'. She said that he was dismissive and would pressure her, and that she felt 'obligated' to participate as he paid her rent. She said Combs would threaten to stop paying when she voiced discomfort with the sexual encounters.
During cross-examination, Combs's attorneys sought to portray both Ventura and Jane as willing and consenting participants in the 'freak-offs', pointing to explicit and affectionate text exchanges with Combs in which the women appeared to speak positively about the encounters. The defense also frequently asked about the role that jealousy and drug use played in their relationships.
A third woman, a former assistant to Combs who testified under the pseudonym 'Mia', alleged that Combs physically and sexually assaulted her during her employment, and said that she felt 'trapped' and feared retaliation.
Defense attorneys suggested that she fabricated the allegations, and cited social media posts and messages in which she praised Combs after the alleged assaults.
A handful of witnesses testified under immunity deals, including several of Combs's personal assistants who claimed that they were tasked with obtaining drugs for Combs.
Some former employees also testified that they would stock hotel rooms with baby oil and condoms and other items ahead of the 'freak-offs' and then clean up afterward and said that protecting Combs's public image was 'very important'.
Throughout the trial, the defense sought to undermine the credibility of the prosecution's witnesses. They'd point to inconsistencies in witness testimony and suggested that financial motivation played a role among those who have filed civil suits against the music mogul.
The government rested its case on 24 June. The defense followed suit later that day, opting to call no witnesses, instead submitting more evidence to the court and relying on its extensive cross-examinations.
Closing arguments were delivered Thursday and Friday.
Prosecutors recapped their case against Combs, revisiting key testimony and breaking down each charge against the music mogul, painting him as a 'leader of a criminal enterprise' who refused to take 'no for an answer' and who used 'power, violence and fear to get what he wanted'.
They argued that Combs was powerful but that he 'became more powerful and more dangerous because of the support of his inner circle and his businesses'.
The defense countered, and urged the the jury to acquit Combs and reject what they called an 'exaggerated' and 'false' case by the government.
Combs's lawyer challenged witness testimony from the trial, pushed back on the government's allegations and charges, and disputed the prosecution's portrayal of Ventura and Jane as sex trafficking victims, describing them instead as women with agency who willingly participated in the 'freak offs'.
Though Combs didn't testify, he remained visibly engaged throughout the proceedings, frequently conferring with his legal team and reacting visibly to testimony.
Earlier this month, the judge reprimanded him for 'nodding vigorously' at the jury and warned that he could be removed from the courtroom if he continued.
Separately, Combs still faces dozens of civil lawsuits accusing him of sexual assault. He has denied sexually assaulting anyone.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Blake Lively fears Justin Baldoni will make her deposition a 'public spectacle' after BIZARRE venue request
Blake Lively fears Justin Baldoni will make her deposition a 'public spectacle' after BIZARRE venue request

Daily Mail​

time40 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Blake Lively fears Justin Baldoni will make her deposition a 'public spectacle' after BIZARRE venue request

Blake Lively is preparing to for tough questions from Justin Baldoni 's legal team as she tries to nail down a venue for her upcoming deposition in her ongoing sexual harassment lawsuit against the actor. But the 37-year-old actress' legal team fears that Baldoni's attorneys will try to make her sworn testimony into a 'public spectacle,' according to court filings obtained by on Friday. The actress' legal team sought to schedule the deposition at a location that would minimize publicity amid the whirlwind trial, which was redacted in the documents following a request by her attorneys, though the venue is located in New York City. Her proposed venue would make for a stark contrast with what Baldoni's attorney Bryan Freedman is requesting, as he previously told TMZ that Lively's deposition should be live-streamed to an audience in Manhattan's iconic indoor arena Madison Square Garden. Freedman's suggestion, which Lively's attorney shot down at the time as a publicity-seeking distraction, would be to sell tickets to the event and donate the proceeds to domestic violence victims. has contacted representatives for Lively and Baldoni to request comment but hasn't received a response yet. The 37-year-old actress' legal team has requested a venue in New York for the deposition, according to redacted documents. Her attorneys are concerned that Baldoni's team may try to force her to walk in front of paparazzi and gawkers; Baldoni seen in December 2024 in LA The parties have currently agreed to conduct the deposition on July 17, though recent legal filings indicate that the two sides have been in conflict over discovery requirements. In emails between Lively and Baldoni's attorneys that were entered into the record, Lively's lawyers accused Baldoni's team of failing to mail hard drives of evidence to them in a timely manner, which would make it difficult for the Gossip Girl star and her team to examine any documents or videos the defendants may refer to when questioning her. Her legal team also expressed concern in the new filings that Baldoni may hope to have her paraded in front of paparazzi and gawkers if the deposition is held in a less-private location. In a statement to TMZ, Lively's representative said: 'Ms. Lively is looking forward to her deposition next week, and it should follow the same rules as every other witness in this case. 'Justin Baldoni's lawyer has tried to make this matter a public spectacle at every turn, even proposing to sell tickets to a televised deposition at Madison Square Garden,' they continued. 'This is a serious matter of sexual harassment and retaliation and it deserves to be treated as such.' Earlier this week, courting filings indicated that from an email sent July 2 that the deposition for Lively, who shares four children with husband Ryan Reynolds, 48, would take place on July 17. The details were uncovered as part of a request for a one-week extension after attorneys for Lively subpoenaed a pair of publicists employed by Baldoni, 41. An attorney for the publicists then subsequently filed the motion, according to documents obtained by Earlier this week, it was revealed in court documents that the deposition has been scheduled for July 17; Lively is pictured June 9 in NYC The Gossip Girl alumna, who with Reynolds was dismissed from Baldoni's $400 million defamation and extortion lawsuit nearly a month ago, is tentatively slated to take the stand when the trial begins in New York City in March 2026. The deposition is slated to take place in New York City, insiders confirmed to TMZ, but the intended location wasn't initially revealed. Insiders close to Lively told the outlet that she was prepared to face a series of difficult inquiries, and that Reynolds isn't expected to attend. reached out to reps for Lively and Baldoni for further comment at the time. Baldoni's attorney Bryan Freedman spoke with TMZ Live June 10, a day after a New York City judge scuttled Baldoni's $400 million suit. The lawyer admitted that while he and the Baldoni camp 'weren't pleased that that the judge dismissed the defamation claim, ' it wasn't 'what the case is about.' He then recapped the series of events that led to the massive litigation surrounding the surprise summer hit. 'We got started because Blake Lively filed a CRD complaint and then walked over and filed a lawsuit,' he said, 'which accused some very good people of a smear campaign and accused a terrific young man of sexual harassment - both of the which were completely untrue.' 'And that's where the case got started' and 'where the case stands today.' 'What we wanted our win is to show there was no smear campaign, and there's no sexual harassment,' Freedman explained. 'And she hasn't proved a thing - as a matter of fact, it's just the opposite.' Freedman told TMZ Live that evidence presented in the early stages of litigation has been damning for Lively and Reynolds. 'Look at the facts, look at what's been shown, look at the receipts, look at the video,' said the lawyer. Freedman told the outlet that proving the claims Lively made to be false has always been the chief focus for Baldoni's team, 'in addition to getting damages.' He said he was hoping Lively didn't 'drop her lawsuit ... because she's on a false victory tour, and she's afraid of the truth. 'The truth is, you know, going to be shown through depositions, which is what's going to be next, I've noticed her deposition - it's set in June - we're going to see if she's going to appear at that deposition or not,' Freedman said. 'And we're gonna proceed forward with the case, and we're gonna show that there was no sexual harassment, and we're gonna show that there was no smear campaign.' Freedman in May told People he hoped the deposition would have a large audience amid massive public interest in both the film and what happened behind the scenes during production. 'Since Ms. Lively is open to testifying, let's make it count Hold the deposition at MSG, sell tickets or stream it, and donate every dollar to organizations helping victims of domestic abuse,' he said. The actress on Monday released a powerful statement on June 9, hours after a judge dismissed Baldoni's case. 'Last week, I stood proudly alongside 19 organizations united in defending women's rights to speak up for their safety,' Lively said on Instagram. 'Like so many others, I've felt the pain of a retaliatory lawsuit, including the manufactured shame that tries to break us.' The Los Angeles-born star continued: 'While the suit against me was defeated, so many don't have the resources to fight back.' Lively vowed that she was 'more resolved than ever to continue to stand for every woman's right to have a voice in protecting themselves, including their safety, their integrity, their dignity and their story.' Lively wrapped up in thanking those in the public who have supported her amid the turbulent past year. 'With love and gratitude for the many who stood by me, many of you I know,' Lively said. 'Many of you I don't. But I will never stop appreciating or advocating for you.' The It Ends With Us actress, whose legal battle has had a significant impact on her friendship with Taylor Swift, added a list of groups that had publicly supported her amid the highly-publicized Tinseltown tussle. Among them, in alphabetical order, were the California Employment Lawyers Association, California Women's Law Center, CHILD USA, Coalition Against Trafficking in Women, Equal Rights Advocates, Esperanza United, Her Justice, and Herunivercity Inc. In a move that might have been a harbinger of changing momentum in the case, Lively took aim at Baldoni Thursday, saying that women's groups had abandoned him in droves. A total of '19 leading survivors and organizations devoted to women's rights, children's rights and domestic violence have now signed onto four separate amicus briefs,' a spokesperson for the Another Simple Favor actress told Daily Mail in a statement. The statement continued: 'All are united in opposing Justin Baldoni's attempt to dismantle a law designed to protect women who speak up — simply to protect himself.' Lively's team said that Baldoni was going against his own playbook as the complicated legal case progresses, leaving himself open to increased scrutiny in the wake of his past public statements. 'Rather than defend his case on the facts, Baldoni is now contradicting years of his own public persona - abandoning the message of his #MeToo YouTube 's, podcasts, TED Talks, and interviews, where he once upon a time urged men 'to listen to the women in your life … to hold their anguish and actually believe them, even if what they're saying is against you,' Lively's rep said. The statement wrapped up: 'These women and organizations are sounding the alarm about his DARVO tactics, and the chilling effect they could have well beyond this case.' One party that can breathe a sigh of relief after Baldoni's lawsuit was thrown out is Marvel Entertainment, LLC. Baldoni had subpoenaed the studio to get it to preserve any documents related to the Deadpool & Wolverine character Nicepool, which his legal team claimed was designed 'to mock, harass, ridicule, intimidate or bully' Baldoni. The star of films such as The Town and The Shallows posted a statement to her Instagram Stories amid the momentous legal proceedings June 9 But after throwing out Baldoni's lawsuit, Liman agreed to Marvel's request to 'quash the subpoena issued to Marvel from [Baldoni's] Wayfarer Parties and for a protective order prohibiting the disclosure of Marvel's confidential documents.' Baldoni's team had send a letter requesting documents be retained to Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige and Bob Iger, CEO of its parent company Walt Disney, on January 7. Lively has accused Baldoni of sexual harassment in a lawsuit; while Baldoni accused Lively, her husband Ryan Reynolds and publicist Leslie Sloane of defamation and extortion in a $400 million suit - the latter of which was dismissed Monday. Baldoni has denied the allegations brought about by Lively, while Lively, Reynolds and Sloane have denied the accusations made in litigation by Baldoni. Lively in December sued Baldoni amid claims of sexual harassment during production of the motion picture. In her lawsuit, the Gossip Girl alum accused Baldoni of sexually harassing her in multiple ways — including body shaming her — and orchestrating a smear campaign against her to damage her reputation. Baldoni and his reps have said in response to the lawsuit that Lively twisted the meaning of text messages and mislead the public about their interactions while making the motion picture. In her lawsuit, Lively named a number of Baldoni's collaborators, including his company Wayfarer Studios, the studio's CEO and financial backer, and PR personnel Melissa Nathan and Jennifer Abel. Baldoni subsequently sued the newspaper for $250 million in a defamation claim over a December 21 story titled '"We Can Bury Anyone": Inside a Hollywood Smear Machine ;' the newspaper has denied the allegations. Baldoni on January 16 filed a $400 million lawsuit against Lively, Reynolds and her publicist Leslie Sloane, alleging defamation and extortion. Baldoni told the court the trio had concocted 'false accusations of sexual harassment' against him. In the film based off Colleen Hoover's 2016 novel, Lively portrayed florist Lily Bloom opposite Baldoni who played the role of Ryle Kincaid.

Federal judge issues stunning rebuke to Trump by blocking 'unlawful' ICE detentions in southern California amid wide scale crackdown
Federal judge issues stunning rebuke to Trump by blocking 'unlawful' ICE detentions in southern California amid wide scale crackdown

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Federal judge issues stunning rebuke to Trump by blocking 'unlawful' ICE detentions in southern California amid wide scale crackdown

A federal judge delivered a stunning rebuke to the Trump administration on Friday, halting what she described as racially-driven, unconstitutional immigration raids that have upended lives, shuttered businesses, and thrown entire communities into chaos across Southern California. The blistering ruling stunned government attorneys and sent shockwaves through the Department of Homeland Security. US District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong granted a temporary restraining order barring federal agents from using race, language, or vocation as justification for immigration stops. She also ordered immediate access to legal counsel for detainees held at the notorious downtown Los Angeles facility known as 'B-18.' The ruling marks a major legal victory for immigrant rights groups and a sharp blow to the Trump administration's hardline immigration tactics in liberal California - tactics critics have called draconian, dangerous, and politically motivated. Mayor Karen Bass praised the decision in a scathing statement Friday afternoon, saying Angelenos were living in fear as 'masked men grab people off the street, chase working people through parking lots and march through children's summer camps.' The court order stops ICE and CBP agents from detaining individuals based on race, Spanish-language use, or presence at sites like car washes, tow yards, bus stops, and Home Depot parking lots - all locations where hundreds of people were swept up in recent weeks. The lawsuit, Vasquez Perdomo et al. v. Noem et al., was filed last week on behalf of several advocacy organizations, three undocumented immigrants, and two US citizens, one of whom, Latino tow truck worker Brian Gavidia, was allegedly detained despite showing valid identification. The case was sparked by a wave of arrests across seven California counties including Los Angeles, Santa Monica, and Pasadena, that immigrant rights groups described as indiscriminate and terrorizing. Since June 6, more than 2,800 people have been detained in a massive escalation of ICE operations. A Los Angeles Times analysis found that nearly 70 percent of those arrested had no criminal record, and more than half had never been charged with a crime. Inside B-18, detainees were allegedly held in squalid conditions, denied food and water, and stripped of their constitutional right to an attorney. Judge Frimpong not only ordered 24-hour legal access and confidential phone lines for those in custody, she blasted the administration's apparent lack of evidence to justify the raids. California Governor Gavin Newsom weighed in, delivering one of the strongest rebukes yet of the Trump administration's tactics. 'Justice prevailed today - the court's decision puts a temporary stop to federal immigration officials violating people's rights and racial profiling,' Newsom said in a statement. 'Stephen Miller's immigration agenda is one of chaos, cruelty and fear. Instead of targeting the most dangerous people, federal officials have been arbitrarily detaining Americans and hardworking people, ripping families apart, and disappearing people into cruel detention to meet outrageous arrest quotas without regard to due process and constitutional rights that protect all of us from cruelty and injustice. 'That should stop now. California stands with the law, and the foundation upon which our founding fathers built this country. I call on the Trump administration to do the same.' California Attorney General Rob Bonta called the ruling a 'critical victory' and condemned what he called the Trump administration's campaign of 'fear and division.' Bonta led a multi-state coalition backing the plaintiffs and previously sued the Trump administration over an executive order to federalize California's National Guard. In court, he argued that the raids were not about immigration enforcement but about punishing Los Angeles for its political opposition to Trump - citing the president's own social media post vowing to conduct 'the single largest Mass Deportation Program in history.' Government lawyers struggled to defend the crackdown, saying agents acted lawfully and had only a few days to respond to the allegations. DOJ attorney Sean Skedzielewski insisted that ICE agents were trained on the 4th Amendment and acted 'aboveboard', but Judge Frimpong was openly skeptical, repeatedly pressing him on the lack of specific documentation. Declarations from DHS officials Kyle Harvick and Andre Quinones were dismissed as 'very general' and 'failing to engage with the high volume of evidence' presented by the plaintiffs. Plaintiffs argued the raids had less to do with public safety and more to do with politics - a point echoed by several city governments that joined the lawsuit this week. The cities of Los Angeles, West Hollywood, Montebello, and five others argued in their filing that the crackdown is a retaliation campaign, designed to make an example of Democratic strongholds. A curbside vender sells food to day laborers waiting near a Home Depot home improvement store in hope of finding work in Los Angeles Tajsar pointed to Gavidia's case as emblematic of the abuses. He was detained 'for no other reason than the fact that he's Latino and working at a tow yard in a Latino neighborhood,' he said. The Trump administration is expected to appeal the ruling, but for now the restraining order remains in effect in what is a rare, stinging legal defeat for an administration that has largely succeeded in hardening the nation's immigration enforcement policies. Community leaders are celebrating the decision but warning that the fight isn't over. The temporary order could eventually become permanent if the plaintiffs prevail at trial - a possibility Judge Frimpong suggested is highly likely.

Colorado dentist accused of poisoning his wife's protein shakes going on trial for murder
Colorado dentist accused of poisoning his wife's protein shakes going on trial for murder

The Independent

time2 hours ago

  • The Independent

Colorado dentist accused of poisoning his wife's protein shakes going on trial for murder

Just days before she died after suffering symptoms that mystified her doctors, Angela Craig confronted her husband, James, in their suburban Denver kitchen over his lack of support. In that 2023 argument captured on home surveillance video, she accused him of suggesting to hospital staff that she was suicidal, court documents show. Prosecutors say James Craig caused the ailments that ultimately killed his wife by poisoning her protein shakes and trying to make it look as if she killed herself. His trial on murder and other charges is set to begin Monday with the questioning of potential jurors. Angela Craig, 43, died in March 2023 during her third trip to the hospital that month. Toxicology tests later determined she died of poisoning from cyanide and tetrahydrozoline, an ingredient that is found in over-the-counter eye drops. The couple were married 23 years and had six children. Craig has pleaded not guilty to charges including first-degree murder, solicitation to commit murder and solicitation to commit perjury. Police say Craig tried to fabricate evidence to make it appear his wife killed herself The 47-year-old dentist allegedly bought arsenic online around the time his wife began to experience symptoms like dizziness and headaches for which doctors could find no cause, prosecutors say. At the time of his arrest, police said Craig was trying to start a new life amid financial troubles and appeared to be having an affair with a fellow dentist. Prosecutors said he had affairs with two other women, but they have not detailed a motive in his wife's death. Craig's attorneys have argued police were biased against him and claimed testing of his wife's shake containers did not turn up signs of poison. They've questioned the reliability of a jail inmate who said Craig offered him $20,000 to kill the case's lead investigator, an alleged plot for which Craig is also on trial. To avoid being held accountable, prosecutors said, Craig tried to fabricate evidence to make it appear his wife killed herself. He tried to get another fellow inmate to plant fraudulent letters at Craig's home to make it look like his wife was suicidal, prosecutors said. Then, in the weeks before Craig had been set to stand trial in November, prosecutors said he also sent letters to the ex-wife of the inmate he allegedly tried to get to kill the investigator, offering her $20,000 for each person she could find to falsely testify that his wife planned to die by suicide, they said. Previous Craig attorneys withdraw from case As jury selection was about to begin, his lawyer at the time, Harvey Steinberg, asked to withdraw, citing a rule allowing lawyers to step down if a client persists in actions considered criminal or that they disagree with. Another attorney for Craig, Robert Werking, later argued that investigators did not look into whether Craig wrote the letters or check them against his handwriting. Werking also said that the inmate and his ex-wife were prosecuted for forgery for their roles in an alleged fraud ring in 2005, suggesting they could not be trusted. Werking withdrew from the case himself this month after being charged with arson of his own home, leaving his wife and law partner, Lisa Fine Moses, to defend Craig. Werking's attorney, David Beller, said he was getting mental health treatment and asked the public to show him grace. Moses did not immediately return telephone and email messages seeking comment. Prosecutors plan to show video of couple's argument Over the objections of the defense, prosecutors plan to show the video of the argument in the kitchen to jurors. 'It's your fault they treated me like I was a suicide risk, like I did it to myself, and like nothing I said could be believed,' Angela Craig told her husband after her first trip to the hospital. Prosecutors convinced the judge jurors should see the video because they said it disproves potential claims that Angela Craig poisoned herself — possibly while trying to dissuade him from divorcing her — or to frame him and gain an advantage over him if they did divorce. 'Her mental state is anger and frustration, not suicidality or desperation to keep the defendant in the marriage,' Senior Chief Deputy District Attorney Michael Mauro wrote in a recent court filing. One of Angela Craig's siblings, Mark Pray, said last year that James Craig not only orchestrated the 'torment and demise' of his sister but had shown disregard for others, including their children. An online search Prosecutors say James Craig searched online for answers to questions such as 'how to make murder look like a heart attack" and 'is arsenic detectable in an autopsy?' After Craig's initial attempts to kill his wife failed, prosecutors allege, he ordered a rush shipment of potassium cyanide, supposedly for surgery. The shipment was accidentally discovered by an employee at his dental practice in the Denver suburb of Aurora on March 13, 2023. The employee reported it to the office manager two days later when Angela Craig returned to the hospital for a third and final time. Craig's business partner, Ryan Redfearn, told a nurse treating Angela Craig that he was concerned she could have been poisoned with the cyanide. The nurse reported that to police, who began their investigation the same day. Angela Craig died days later.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store