
Tribunal hears Judge President Selby Mbenenge could not take ‘no' for an answer
The mammoth Judicial Service Commission (JSC) Conduct Tribunal probing allegations of sexual harassment against Eastern Cape Judge President Selby Mbenenge heard expert evidence on Monday of his relentless persistence and harassment.
Mbenenge (64) communicated various demands, including for nude photographs, in 47 WhatsApp conversations with the complainant, court secretary Andiswa Mengo (41), it was revealed on Monday, 30 June.
The conversations have been entered as evidence and have not been contested.
On Monday, Dr Lisa Vetten, a renowned expert on gender-based violence and sexual harassment, interpreted the depth and extent of Mbenenge's workplace transgressions.
Advocates Musi Sikhakane and Griffiths Madonsela, for Mbenenge, have claimed the 'relationship' between the Judge President and the secretary had been 'consensual'.
Bible verses to ward off approaches
Mbenenge, who is also a pastor, was not even put off by a Bible verse, Psalm 1, Verse 1, sent to him by Mengo after he had suggested they physically meet.
Vetten set out how, before this, the Judge President had bombarded her with requests for photographs and had asked her 14 times to discuss her favourite sexual position, to which she did not respond.
Even a response by Mengo that her 'exhaustion was extreme' and that she was still at work did not deter her pursuer, testified Vetten. Mbenenge continued, after hours, to intrude upon her personal space, often late at night, sexually harassing her.
Defining future office life
While Sikhakane and Madonsela had objected to the late bringing of Vetten's expert testimony, the chairperson, retired Judge Bernard Ngoepe, allowed this.
Evidence leader advocate Salomé Scheepers and Mengo's counsel, advocate Nasreen Rajab-Budlender, have put up a gargantuan case which will define future workplace relations, depending on this ruling.
It will also highlight the responsibilities that come with status and control for men in positions of power.
Vetten clearly set out in no uncertain terms the definitions of sexual harassment in the workplace and the codes and norms that governed these.
She said that the 2022 Code of Good Practice on the Elimination and Prevention of Sexual Harassment in the workplace encompassed four types of contact and behaviour.
'This includes physical, unwanted, touching, rape, verbal (as in spoken) and non-verbal (in terms of sending pictures or creating a hostile work environment) and then quid-pro-quo, which amounts to coercion,' she said.
To qualify, she added, there needed to be a persistence about the behaviour.
'Jokes, whistling, persisting in asking someone out on a date. However, some egregious acts need only occur once, like the grabbing of a crotch, which is grossly offensive'.
In an 'ideal world', Vetten said, 'we should all be able to say no, stop, this makes me uncomfortable' and the code recognised that this was not always possible'.
Power matrix
One of the reasons sexual harassment was so difficult to tackle and deal with, said Vetten, was because of gender power imbalances, which needed to be carefully examined in each case.
'Was someone in a position to say 'no' to clearly communicate and tell someone to stop? In law, those kinds of situations do occur,' she told the tribunal.
She noted there was a difference between 'submission' and 'consent'. In the case of a rape when a victim begged her rapist to wear a condom, this could not be considered consent.
'One can say 'yes' because saying 'yes' might be less worse than two terrible choices – facing violence and a sexually transmitted disease'.
Also, consent to one type of behaviour did not necessarily imply consent to any other behaviours that followed, she said. Added to the mix were the swirling stereotypes of men and women in society, which exist and which have 'clouded thinking'.
'There is this idea that men and women have different sexual urges, men more urgent. The other idea that has developed is that men pursue, and it is up to women to say 'yes' or resist'.
We lived in a society which viewed men as more active sexually and women as 'far more passive, waiting for men to approach them'.
Active sexuality in men was recognised and admired, and the general idea was that men 'must persist because women are in need of a bit of persuasion is real'.
Gender inequality also manifested in a range of other ways, including who performed what work.
Workplaces were governed by codes of conduct, regulations and hierarchies which inform workplace structures.
'If you look at the CEOs, they will predominantly be men. Who is likely to hold what position, and what we associate with this, matters. A secretary might make tea or be on the service side, there to listen and carry out instructions.'
'This is why we have workplace law to determine who is overstepping their mandate. Workplaces in different industries have different norms, but they are highly structured.'
Saying 'no' to someone who is your senior 'is difficult', said Vetten. 'Then, if the person has a lot of status and credibility, who is more likely to be believed or seen as more credible? Whose word will carry more weight?'
Silence and evasion
Many of Mbenenge's suggestions and propositions were deferred or ignored by the complainant in an attempt to escape them. At times, there were even long silences.
Asked whether, in this instance, there had been a blurring of workplace boundaries, Vetten replied, 'Very much so. To begin with, contacting her after hours after their very first contact, which follows as a result of [him] seeing her earlier in the day with her child and asking about its father.'
This grooms her for further questions with regard to the number of children she had and whether 'I can trust you'.
'Why would that be relevant?' Vetten asked.
Why would the Judge President, after this, request nude photographs of her upper body as proof that he could trust her?
'Why would you ask for a personal picture? She is a secretary, and you are asking for pictures without explaining why you want them. This is an expression of power – people who can demand things of others without explanation.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Maverick
3 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Mbenenge's legal team pulls the ‘culture' and every other card in Judicial Conduct Tribunal
The tribunal heard that Judge President Selby Mbenenge would not take 'no' for an answer in a barrage of after-hours WhatsApps attempting to solicit nude photographs and discuss sexual positions. The equivalent of an Intellectual Heavyweight title fight between the Old Patriarchs and the Gender-Based Violence Expert lit up Judge President Selby Mbenenge's Judicial Conduct Tribunal this week. On Tuesday, after marathon testimony on Monday, renowned gender-based violence and sexual harassment expert Dr Lisa Vetten faced a gruelling cross-examination by advocate Mmusi Sikhakhane, representing Mbenenge. Sikhakhane is ruthless as a cross-examiner, with a propensity to slide into sarcasm, false flattery and personal jabs, a tactic long recognised as an attempt to unsettle a witness. He pulls at his tie like a man getting ready to roll, feigns surprise at replies and questions Vetten's credentials as one of the most experienced GBV experts in SA. From the start, advocates Sikhakhane and Griffiths Madonsela have vehemently defended their client's conduct, saying it was 'consensual'. 'Not your culture' On Monday, the tribunal heard from Vetten that Mbenenge would not take 'no' for an answer in a barrage of after-hours WhatsApps attempting to solicit nude photographs and discuss sexual positions. Mbenenge communicated various demands, including for nude photographs, in 47 WhatsApp conversations with the complainant, court secretary Andiswa Mengo, it was revealed on Monday. On Tuesday, Sikhakhne, after much badgering and informing Vetten that while he 'respected her as an intellectual', she could not possibly read or understand the nuances of the isiXhosa used in WhatsApps sent between the 64-year-old Judge President and the subordinate secretary, Andiswa Mengo, 41. In isiXhosa culture, Sikhakahne ventured, men were expected to persist when in pursuit of a woman, no matter how often she said 'no'. That is how it was done. 'Are you saying traditional courting rituals are unconstitutional?' Sikhakhane tossed at Vetten. On Tuesday, Vetten, undeterred by Sikhakane's red herring, pointed out this was also the case in most other cultures, but that the entire issue at hand was whether this behaviour was appropriate in the workplace. In this milieu, governed by strict labour rules and regulations, the Judge President had status and power far greater than that of Mengo, she said. A similar argument about the misunderstanding of 'culture' was used by Jacob Zuma's legal team during his 2006 rape trial and before his acquittal. In that instance, Zuma had claimed that Fezekile Kuzwayo, or Kwezi, as she was known at the time, had worn a 'kanga', which he had interpreted as an invitation to sexual intercourse. Zuma also argued that a Zulu man could, culturally, not leave a woman unsatisfied. Agency and recourse On Tuesday, Sikhahane also suggested that Vetten had 'infantilised' Mengo, rendering her a person without agency. 'She is a divorced woman with a teenaged daughter, she is not a child,' Sikhakhane responded to Vetten's suggestion that the complainant had viewed the JP, who is also a pastor, as 'a father figure'. He criticised Vetten for constantly interpreting matters in favour of the complainant during the tribunal while she had not had sight of the entire record. This would show that Mengo knew exactly what she was doing when she finally responded to Mbenenge, said Sikhakane. Anyone watching the live broadcast on YouTube on Tuesday would have had many occasions to shout at Sikhakane's undisguised dastardliness in framing questions and receiving answers. There were an equal number of occasions to punch the air as Vetten served comeback after comeback, undeterred. Mengo's intentions, through silence or responses, were surgically examined, including how to interpret her response that should she say 'yes' to her boss, this might lead to further unwanted contact. Mbenenge, on the other hand, had interpreted this to mean that should Mengo say 'yes', this would be an indication that she wanted to go 'Full Long Tom' – or sexual intercourse. At the end of her testimony, Vetten said she would not change her opinion of the meaning and intention of the WhatsApps as an expert witness, even after she had had sight of the entire record. 'In the end, he [Mbenenge] asked her multiple times for nude photos, which she ended up not sending. She also felt aggrieved enough to report the matter,' said Vetten. The hearing continues on Wednesday with Sikhakane leading witnesses in favour of Mbenenge. DM


eNCA
7 hours ago
- eNCA
Judge president faces sexual harassment tribunal
JOHANNESBURG - Shocking details continue to emerge at the Judicial Conduct Tribunal of Eastern Cape High Court Judge President, Selby Mbenenge. WATCH: Inquiry into Judge Mbenenge resumes He's accused of sexually harassing court secretary, Andiswa Mengo. As WhatsApp messegas are detailed in public we look at the emotional cost for victims who speak out and then face intense scrutiny. Clinical psychologist, Bradley Daniels, discussed this with eNCA.


Eyewitness News
8 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Mbenenge's legal team accuses gender expert of omitting texts sent by Mengo
JOHANNESBURG - Advocate Muzi Sikhakhane has accused research associate at Wits University, Lisa Vetten, of deliberately omitting texts sent by high court secretary, Andiswa Mengo, in which she initiated conversations with Eastern Cape Judge President, Selby Mbenenge. Sikhakhane cross-examined Vetten before the Judicial Conduct Tribunal sitting in Johannesburg and is tasked with investigating the sexual harassment allegations that Mengo has made against the top judge. In some interactions between the pair, Mengo sent Mbenenge messages after work hours, including one where she called him "cute" at 10:20 pm. ALSO READ: Vetten previously testified that Mbenenge engaged with the junior staffer on WhatsApp in the evenings and often asked her for her photos. But Sikhakhane highlighted the instances in which Mengo acted in a similar manner and accused Vetten of failing to highlight it. "She says to him, 'cute' and I'm saying this because you made a song and dance about people initiating or saying something after hours. You omitted this. Is there any particular reason? When she does it, when she tells him 'you're cute' in the evening, are you prepared to call it inappropriate or blurring the lines between this little girl and the father figure?" However, Vetten hit back. "No, I have mentioned that there is, this is in the context of a conversation that's been going on throughout the day. And I did mention that she does describe him, I think there are two occasions where she makes a comment on his appearance, where she says, cute and then it's followed into, but weren't you younger then or whatever. So there are two, there are two occasions where she does comment on his appearance."