Presiding Officer to step down at Holyrood 2026 election
Alison Johnstone has been in the role since 2021 and was the sixth person – and only the second woman – to hold the position.
She entered politics in 2007 when she was elected as a Scottish Greens councillor in Edinburgh.
READ MORE: Kate Forbes: Numbers prove that the world is ignoring those who talk Scotland down
She was then elected as an MSP in 2011, and 10 years later became the first Scottish Greens party member to take up the role of Presiding Officer.
Alison Johnstone (Image: PA) Announcing her decision to step down, Johnstone told The Times that "it was always my intention that this would be my last term in Holyrood".
'I came from a wholly non-political background and got involved in a campaign to save a school playing field," she said.
'I was not in a political party but campaigned for the creation of a Scottish parliament and I then worked as an assistant for Robin Harper, the first-ever Green parliamentarian in the UK elected to the first-ever Scottish parliament.'
Most recently, Johnstone made headlines after she expelled former Scottish Tory leader Douglas Ross from the debating chamber after he refused to follow rules.
Ross tried to bring the matter up a week later, and was slapped down again after he inferred Johnstone had not acted in a "neutral manner".
READ MORE: UK Government 'set to proscribe Palestine Action after RAF protest'
Holyrood's Presiding Officer is impartial – when MSPs take up the role, they give up their party affiliation.
They are responsible for chairing meetings in the debating chamber, selecting which questions will be asked at First Minister's Questions, as well as chairing Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body and Parliamentary Bureau meetings.
The Presiding Officer is supported by two deputies – currently Annabelle Ewing (SNP) and Liam McArthur (LibDem).
According to the Scottish Parliament website, the Presiding Officer receives a salary of £130,500.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Wall Street rocked by heavyweight slugfest as investment titan lays down massive bet against $100bn company
Two billionaire Wall Street titans have gone to war over the rise of Bitcoin in the financial markets. The ongoing clash between cryptocurrency investor Michael Saylor and renowned financial skeptic James Chanos has sent shockwaves through the stock market. Saylor, the executive chairman of MicroStrategy, has built what he refers to as a 'treasury' of the cryptocurrency by amassing a huge stockpile of more than 500,000 Bitcoins over the past five years, reports the Washington Post. The investor has made billions out of the move as his company bought the currency through issuing stock and bonds, and he has seen his fortune skyrocket since President Trump was elected. Trump was once a crypto skeptic, but he has since become a keen supporter of the financial tool, even launching his own cryptocurrency, $TRUMP coin, in January. In May, Trump Media & Technology Group echoed Saylor's tactics by announcing it would raise $2.5 billion to build its own 'Bitcoin treasury.' Stocks in Saylor's company have risen an astronomic 1,500 percent since 2020, and his 'treasury' of Bitcoin is currently valued at almost double that of Bitcoin itself. The massive surge in price could have an impact on wallets across the country, as MicroStrategy is expected to join the S&P 500 - and many 401ks - at some point this year. But Chanos, a legendary Wall Street player known for betting against other companies, has gambled against Saylor's investments in a feud that could crater the stock market. Chanos announced at the Sohn Investment Conference in May that he was 'selling MicroStrategy stock and buying Bitcoin,' alleging in a subsequent CNBC interview that Saylor's 'treasury' is 'ridiculously' overvalued so he was shorting his firm. Chanos described his play of buying Bitcoin and shorting Saylor's company as the equivalent of buying something for $1 and selling it for $2.50. Jim Osman, founder of financial analysis firm Edge, told the Washington Post that the battle between the two titans has gripped traders on Wall Street, and is seen by many as a litmus test for the strength of the cryptocurrency industry at large. 'It's a poker game with very high stakes,' he said. 'One man has put everything on Bitcoin, predicting that it's the future of money. And the other man is saying it's all smoke and mirrors and that he is blinding you with science.' Osman said the clash comes down to one fundamental question: 'Do you want to bet on a dream, or do you want to bet against it?' Saylor's stockpile of over 500,000 Bitcoin is valued at around $59 billion. Chanos has long been a skeptic of cryptocurrency, and in 2018 he described it as a 'libertarian fantasy' to Cointelegraph. He has doubted the stability of Bitcoin because it is not backed by any major currency, and has labelled it 'the dark side of finance' due to its links to illegal activities. Take Compound ₿ — Michael Saylor (@saylor) June 26, 2025 Jim Chanos lays out his MSTR short strategy. 'I'm doing what Saylor is advocating. I'm selling MSTR securities to buy Bitcoin.' — Bitcoin News (@BitcoinNewsCom) June 14, 2025 Chanos has built his reputation, and net worth of around $2 billion, on shorting companies, and most famously bet against Enron before the company's accounting scandal in 2001. When Chanos laid down his gamble against Saylor in May, he said MicroStrategy's approach to cryptocurrency could lead other, less stable firms to follow suit, and ultimately lose money if he is correct. He said his trade is 'a good barometer of not only just the arbitrage itself, but I think of retail speculation', per Cointelegraph. Earlier this month, the feud between the two billionaires escalated as Saylor criticized Chanos on Bloomberg TV, warning that 'if our stock rallies up, he's going to get liquidated and wiped out.' The next day, Bloomberg showed Saylor's warning to Chanos, to which he responded: 'I always love it when management says: 'He just doesn't understand our business.' 'Michael Saylor is a wonderful salesman, but that's what he is: He's a salesman. … I call it financial gibberish.'
The Herald Scotland
4 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
PM ‘incapable of sticking to a decision' after welfare U-turn
In a speech to the Local Government Association Annual Conference in Liverpool on Wednesday, Ms Badenoch will criticise Sir Keir for creating a 'punishing welfare trap that shuts people out of going back to work'. The Labour party is 'making everything worse', she will say (Stefan Rousseau/PA) 'This week, the Prime Minister backed down on limited reforms that would have made modest reductions to the ballooning welfare bill,' she will say. 'He was too weak to hold the line. 'The result? A punishing welfare trap that shuts people out of going back to work. 'Right now, Labour are making everything worse. And Keir Starmer sums up exactly what's wrong with politics today. 'Now that his backbenchers smell blood, there's almost certainly another climb down on the two-child benefit cap in the offing. 'Labour told us 'the adults were back in charge', but this is actually amateur hour. The Prime Minister is incapable of sticking to a decision. 'If he can't make relatively small savings to a benefits bill that is set to exceed £100 billion by 2030, how can we expect him to meet his promised 5% defence spending, or ever take the tough decisions necessary to bring down the national debt?' On Saturday, the Prime Minister told the Welsh Labour conference the 'broken' welfare system must be fixed 'in a Labour way'. In a speech to the Welsh Labour conference, he said: 'We cannot take away the safety net that vulnerable people rely on, and we won't, but we also can't let it become a snare for those who can and want to work,' the Prime Minister said. 'Everyone agrees that our welfare system is broken: failing people every day, a generation of young people written off for good and the cost spiralling out of control. 'Fixing it is a moral imperative, but we need to do it in a Labour way.'
Scotsman
5 hours ago
- Scotsman
18 fire stations across Scotland have no running water as firefighters treated with 'contempt'
The Scottish Conservatives described the situation for firefighters as 'intolerable'. Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... SNP ministers have been accused of treating firefighters with 'contempt' after new figures revealed 18 stations across Scotland have no running water. The statistics, obtained by the Scottish Conservatives, come in the wake of proposals unveiled this week by the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service (SFRS) to close up to 13 stations due to funding cuts. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The 18 stations without running water are primarily located across the Highlands and rural areas, and include Cromarty, Foyers and Spean Bridge. The Scottish Fire and Rescue Service (SFRS) has launched a public consultation on proposals that could see up to 13 fire stations closed | PA The SFRS, which has seen its budget cut by £57 million in real terms over ten years, was criticised by the Health and Safety Executive earlier this year for the facilities at some stations. Colin Brown, of the Fire Brigades Union, said the service has seen year-on-year cuts to jobs and services. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'Decades of underfunding have left the Scottish fire service with a crumbling estate and an eye-watering £800 million hole in their capital finances,' he said. 'What we need is sustained investment in staff, stations and equipment to keep our communities safe.' Conservative MSP Sharon Dowey MSP said: 'These shocking figures are proof of the SNP's contempt for Scotland's brave firefighters. 'It's shameful and negligent that they are risking the health and wellbeing of dedicated emergency workers by denying them access to the most basic yet essential facilities at work. 'SNP ministers have been short-changing the service for years, leaving firefighters to do their job with one hand behind their back, jeopardising public safety. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'On their watch, the number of firefighters is plummeting, stations are being earmarked for closure and now we learn a growing number of bases lack running water. This situation is intolerable, unsustainable and could have devastating consequences.' Capital backlog of over £800m Assistant Chief Officer Craig McGoldrick, director of training, safety and assurance for the SFRS, said: 'It is well documented that SFRS has an insurmountable capital backlog of more than £800 million and that many of our ageing buildings require action. 'We can only address this by changing how we work. We're currently running a public consultation that outlines 23 options for change to help address urgent property issues and ensure our resources – staff, stations and appliances are matched to operational risk and demand across Scotland.' He added: 'The safety of our firefighters will always be a priority and it's important that our crews can shower and clean kit following attendance at an incident with potential contaminants. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad '£3.2m is being invested by the service into the management of fire contaminants and this includes boosting our reserves of personal protective equipment, enhanced storage for contaminated kit and new laundry procedures. 'For the small number of stations without running water, specialist decontamination wipes have been provided.' A Scottish Government spokeswoman said: 'Scotland's firefighters do an amazing job and the Scottish Government continues to support the SFRS to deliver the high standard of services required to keep Scotland safe with an overall budget of £412.2m, an increase of £18.8m for 2025/26. Scotland continues to have more firefighters per capita than other parts of the UK. 'The SFRS has been clear that the changes proposed are not about cuts, but so it can adapt to the changing risks and demands of communities and ensure firefighters are in the right place at the right time. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad
