
GB News interrupts live broadcast with 'bleak' Air India crash update
GB News delivered a shattering "breaking news" update following the events of the Air India plane crash.
During an intense segment, GB News anchors Bev Turner and Andrew Pierce reported that an Air India flight en route to London Gatwick from Ahmedabad, India, with 242 people on board, met with disaster just moments after take-off.
In the midst of a live discussion, Andrew Pierce had to cut across an aviation specialist to share the update: "I'm sorry to interrupt, but we've got some breaking news.
"We have now confirmed 217 adults and 11 children were on board that flight which crashed almost on take-off, so that is even bleaker than we thought."
Air India has recognised that among the passengers on the ill-fated flight were 53 British nationals, while those injured are now being transported to hospitals.
(Image: AP)
The airline declared in their announcement: "The flight, which departed from Ahmedabad at 1338 hrs, was carrying 242 passengers and crew members on board the Boeing 787-8 aircraft.
"Of these, 169 are Indian nationals, 53 are British nationals, 1 Canadian national and 7 Portuguese nationals."
Security analyst Mark White later joined the broadcast providing further insights, revealing that the plane crashed atop a hostel housing doctors, with it remaining uncertain as to the extent of casualties on the ground.
(Image: GB News)
The programme cut to a brief ad break before returning, with presenter Andrew declaring: "Welcome back, we've got some big breaking news today," before cautioning the audience about the "graphic content" they were about to witness.
Subsequently, viewers were shown the distressing footage of an aircraft plunging just moments after take-off, with the massive jet appearing dangerously low before turning into a fireball just beyond the camera's view.
Air India has acknowledged that a distress signal was broadcasted to air traffic control from the doomed flight, but there was no further communication from the plane following air traffic's response.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
5 hours ago
- BBC News
Veterans help restore war memorial in Catterick Garrison
A group of military veterans and volunteers have helped a renowned artist to restore a "forgotten" war Dowlatshahi was one of three artists commissioned by North Yorkshire Council to create a range of artworks as part of the regeneration of Catterick Garrison's town vegetation she discovered an old brick labyrinth surrounding a Royal British Legion plaque in Coronation Park, and enlisted the help of veterans to help clear and rebuild volunteers said "Operation Labyrinth" had been a "fantastic" project to be a part of and that they were proud to have "breathed new life" into the memorial. Mrs Dowlatshahi was on a site visit when she noticed undulations and small lines surrounding the plaque, and when she walked around it she realised it was a labyrinth began to research its history and eventually found out that it was laid out as part of a Millennium project but then been said: "I made it my mission to reach out to the community to restore it. We've walked away with a sense of wellbeing and achievement that we've managed to completely transform this space." New seating was installed at the memorial as part of the those who volunteered were Nicole Blair, director of Veterans Community Working Party, and her father Nick Terry, a Royal Signals veteran who trained at the garrison in said the element of teamwork had appealed to the former soldiers who took part."Just working together and being able to use it in the future and say 'yes, I was part of that' is nice."Mr Terry added that the centre of the memorial had been vandalised and so needed to be said: "The community has been fantastic and we got lots of help and support." Listen to highlights from North Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.


North Wales Live
7 hours ago
- North Wales Live
DNA site announces 35 regal surnames that could be related to the Royal Family
Many of us are fascinated by our ancestry, keen to delve into our family history and discover potential connections to notable figures. Gone are the days of laboriously trawling through heritage records and census data, as there are now numerous online platforms that make this process straightforward and accessible, just like MyHeritage. Currently, MyHeritage is offering a 14-day free trial, providing individuals with the chance to map out their family tree, uncover new relatives, and sift through billions of historical records. They've even compiled a list of 35 surnames that could potentially reveal a connection to royalty, reports the Express According to MyHeritage, certain surnames have traditionally been linked to nobility and could strongly suggest a Royal lineage. If users possess one of these 35 surnames, they might be in for an unexpected revelation about their relatives. Curiosity about Royal lineage can be explored through surnames, and while they don't guarantee a connection to the monarchy, they serve as an intriguing starting point. To delve into their ancestry, individuals can utilise MyHeritage's platform to construct their family tree, incorporating names, dates, photos, and stories, and then sift through historical records including census data, birth, death certificates, and marriage records. Additionally, MyHeritage offers DNA testing services, as well. This provides insights into one's ethnic background and identify potential relatives. Using these tools, users can figure out if their surname is part of a royal lineage. Here's the aforementioned 35 surnames connected to the Royals, and how they made their mark on history: Windsor: The current British royal family's surname since 1917. Tudor: The Welsh dynasty that produced monarchs like Henry VIII and Elizabeth I. Stuart: A Scottish house that ruled England and Scotland in the 16th and 17th centuries. Plantagenet: A royal house that provided England with monarchs from Henry II to Richard III. Capet: The dynasty that ruled France from 987 to 1328. Bourbon: A European royal house that ruled France, Spain, and other territories. Habsburg: A prominent royal house of Europe, known for ruling the Holy Roman Empire. Hanover: The British royal house from George I to Queen Victoria. Valois: A cadet branch of the Capetian dynasty that ruled France. Lancaster: A branch of the Plantagenet dynasty, known for its role in the Wars of the Roses. York: Another Plantagenet branch, also central to the Wars of the Roses. Bruce: A Scottish royal house, with Robert the Bruce being a notable king. de Valois: A French royal house that produced several kings. de Medici: An influential Italian family that produced royalty and popes. Savoy: A royal family that once ruled parts of Italy and France. Orange-Nassau: The Dutch royal family. Oldenburg: A European royal house that includes the current Danish royal family. Glucksburg: A branch of the House of Oldenburg, associated with Danish and Norwegian royalty. Romanov: The last imperial dynasty to rule Russia. Baskerville: A noble family name with historical ties to English aristocracy. Darcy: A surname associated with medieval nobility and landowners in England and Ireland. Neville: A powerful English noble family with significant influence during the medieval period. Percy: An aristocratic English family known for their role in British history. Astley: A noble surname linked to the English peerage. Capell: A distinguished English family with historical ties to the aristocracy. Howard: A prominent aristocratic family in the UK, holding the title of Dukes of Norfolk. Seymour: The family of Jane Seymour, third wife of Henry VIII, with ties to the Dukedom of Somerset. Grey: Associated with Lady Jane Grey, England's nine-day queen. FitzAlan: A powerful medieval family, former Earls of Arundel. Courtenay: A noble family with connections to English and French royalty. Manners: The surname of the Dukes of Rutland, a high-ranking noble family. Russell: Connected to the Dukes of Bedford, an influential aristocratic lineage. Cavendish: The surname of the Dukes of Devonshire, a powerful British noble family. Talbot: A noble family holding the Earldom of Shrewsbury. Spencer: The family name of Princess Diana, tying it to the modern British royal family. For those seeking alternative resources, Ancestry is another option, providing DNA tests starting at £79, which not only connect users with relatives but also offer insights into familial origins. 23andMe is yet another choice, offering DNA tests with ancestry breakdowns and personalised health insights, with prices commencing at £89. MyHeritage boasts a commendable 4 out of 5-star rating on Trustpilot. One user praised the site, commenting: "Immediate accurate statistics of my immediate family members." Another user appreciated the ongoing updates and positive outcomes, stating: "Regular updates of discoveries, positive results. This site is not just about the money, it is about genuine results for the family history researcher." A satisfied customer shared their experience: "My family history has expanded and the format is easily understood. Changes are quick and easy. Thank you." Not all users are singing the same tune, with one commenting: "I don't fully understand it. I can't find a user guide, difficult to navigate, Help Center does not always understand my problems. My previous version was much easier for me." Yet, another budding genealogist recounted their use of the site as an 'enjoyable experience,' enthusing: "Finding related families and information relating to individuals has been a wonderful experience. MyHeritage has made it even easier to trace ancestors and verify relations."


Spectator
12 hours ago
- Spectator
Romantic fantasies of the French in India
'The English cannot assimilate any nation,' declared the narrator of a French travelogue set in India and published in the aftermath of the uprising of 1857. 'They can only dominate with brutality, squeezing every last drop of blood from the veins of the oppressed.' Reduced to 'slaves' who 'tremble before the Englishman's whip', the Indians in this tale yearn for the 'heroic Dupleix and his deputy de Bussy'. Had Louis XV's jealous court not betrayed those two men, 'India would have been French, not British'. The book was a work of fiction. It had to be. In reality, scarcely anybody in India, barring a reactionary nawab here and an obscurantist sultan there, longed for French rule. The French were history's losers. They were latecomers to India, backed the wrong locals, were betrayed by their masters at home and, despite their ambition and resourcefulness, were outsmarted by their British rivals on the battlefield. But defeat produced a powerfully nostalgic reaction in them for what might have been, in the way that an unrequited romantic constructs fantasies about a failed relationship. Like the Dutch, Portuguese, Danes and British, the French had gone to India to plunder it. But that opportunity lost, they imagined themselves as tragically thwarted missionaries of liberty. A cottage industry of counterfactual history materialised in France to cater to a market mourning India's 'loss'. The actual history, as Robert Ivermee shows in his luminous Glorious Failure, was wretched. The French preached Christianity to Indians, pillaged their wealth and enslaved their bodies. The Mughals attempted to halt the last of these horrors, but the trafficking of abducted Indians on French vessels did not end until the 1830s. The French rose and expanded rapidly in India. By the time the Compagnie des Indes launched in 1664, the Portuguese had been present in India for 166 years and the British for more than six decades. But it took the French less than a century to emerge as Britain's chief adversary on the subcontinent. The credit for this belongs to Joseph-François Dupleix, the governor of French India, whose labours to build an Indian empire for France occupy a large chunk of this book. With some luck Dupleix might have ended up as the French Robert Clive. He was a more competent diplomat and a less avaricious administrator than his British counterpart. What he lacked was reliable support from Paris. In 1754, he was abruptly recalled home for having exhausted the Company's coffers in pursuit of his political vision. French decline in India thereafter was swift. The Seven Years' War, ending in 1763, confirmed France's diminished status: losing spectacularly to the British in southern (or peninsular) India, it was left with five trading posts, which eventually became colonies of the French crown. France never recovered its nerve. Indians who set their clocks by the French would find themselves ruinously disappointed. Tipu Sultan, despite being the most formidable challenger to British dominance in southern India, failed to extract support from the French even after sending embassies to Paris. Napoleon, who saw his invasion of Egypt in 1798 as a mere prelude to the conquest of India, retreated home once Tipu's kingdom fell to the British the following year. But France clung to its possessions in India until well after the British departed the subcontinent. In 1949, no longer able to control an increasingly restive population, it staged a referendum in one of its territories. The result was a decisive repudiation of the romantic fables of French rule fabricated by Parisian writers. Virtually the entire population chose unification with India. Under intensifying pressure from Delhi, which threatened to choke French India by imposing economic cordons around it, Paris ceded control to India of all its holdings by 1954 – though this transfer of power was only ratified by the National Assembly in 1962, following the end of French rule in Algeria. Ivermee begins his book with a counterfactual scenario in which Jawaharlal Nehru, India's inaugural prime minister, recites his 'freedom at midnight' address in French. Although the ideas that emanated from revolutionary France – of liberty, equality and fraternity – animated the spirit of the liberal constitution India gave itself, an India ruled directly by France would have lacked the ingredients that gave rise to its unique quest for national independence. There would have been no Gandhi in French India. British rule, with all its cruelties, is what quickened India's unification and rebirth in a republican democratic avatar. The experience of those exposed to other imperialisms can be instructive and clarifying. Consider the words of the late Tibetan writer Tsewang Yishey Pemba in 1974: 'If only Tibet had been annexed as a British colony she might today enjoy the same status as India.' To recall Pemba's words is not to exonerate imperial rule. It is to remind ourselves that there were infinitely worse forms of it than what India ultimately got.