The new storyteller: How AI is reshaping literature
In recent years, AI systems like OpenAI's GPT models have demonstrated a remarkable ability to produce coherent, stylistically diverse writing. These programs have been trained on vast libraries of human-created text, absorbing patterns of language, tone, and structure. As a result, they can now craft short stories, poems, essays, and even full-length novels with surprising fluency. Some projects, like 1 the Road—an AI-written travel novel modeled after Jack Kerouac's On the Road—push the boundaries of what it means to 'write.' Elsewhere, AI tools are being used to co-author books with humans, assisting in world-building, dialogue generation, or sparking ideas when writers face creative blocks. Yet the question persists: if a machine composes a poem, is it truly poetry? Or is it merely an imitation—an echo of human sentiment without the consciousness that traditionally gives literature its soul?
AI's foray into literature forces a reevaluation of the concept of creativity. Historically, creativity has been understood as the unique, often ineffable ability of humans to produce something new and meaningful. But when an AI generates a narrative that evokes emotion or thought, it challenges the assumption that creativity requires consciousness or intention. Rather than replacing human writers, AI may be better understood as a collaborator or catalyst. Authors are already using AI to explore hybrid forms of storytelling, where human intuition and machine-generated text interact in unexpected ways. In these cases, the final work becomes a dialogue—a conversation between human and machine, intuition and algorithm.
Perhaps one of the most intriguing roles AI plays in literature is as a mirror. The stories AI produces, trained on the vast corpus of human writing, often reveal our cultural obsessions, clichés, and hidden biases. They can expose the undercurrents of language that human writers might miss or take for granted. Moreover, AI-generated literature invites reflection on deeper philosophical questions: What does it mean to tell a story? Is storytelling an act of connection between sentient beings, or can it exist independently of human experience? If literature has historically been a vessel for understanding the human condition, what does it mean when a non-human entity begins to produce it?
As AI continues to evolve, its role in literature will likely grow, not as a replacement for human writers, but as a new tool for creative exploration. Already, AI challenges traditional notions of authorship, originality, and the relationship between language and thought. It expands the landscape of possibility, offering writers new ways to think about form, voice, and narrative structure. In the end, the arrival of AI in literature does not necessarily signal the end of human storytelling. If used appropriately, it could mark the beginning of a richer, more complex dialogue—a new chapter where technology and humanity meet, not in competition, but in collaboration.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
What will learning look like in the age of superintelligence? Sam Altman says intelligence may soon cost no more than electricity
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman In his recent blog titled The Gentle Singularity , OpenAI CEO Sam Altman reflects on how the arrival of digital superintelligence may reshape every dimension of human learning. The post is not a speculative essay filled with distant hypotheticals. Instead, it reads like a quiet alert from someone at the very center of what he calls a "takeoff. " One of the most significant areas poised for transformation, according to Altman, is learning itself. As artificial intelligence systems surpass human capability in increasingly complex domains, the role of the learner is expected to evolve. In Altman's view, we are now past the hard part. The breakthroughs behind tools like ChatGPT have already laid the groundwork. What follows is a period where these tools begin to self-improve, causing knowledge creation, experimentation and implementation to accelerate at a pace the world has never seen before. "Already we live with incredible digital intelligence, and after some initial shock, most of us are pretty used to it," Altman writes. That shift in perception is critical, what was once astonishing has quickly become mundane. In education, this means that the bar will keep moving. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Secure Your Child's Future with Strong English Fluency Planet Spark Learn More Undo Learners may no longer be evaluated on their ability to recall information or apply frameworks but rather on their ability to collaborate with machines, interpret insights and define new problems worth solving. Here are six radical shifts Altman's vision suggests we may see in how learning functions in an age of superintelligence: Cognitive agents will become co-learners Altman notes that 2025 marks the arrival of AI agents capable of performing real cognitive work. Writing software, solving novel problems and simulating thought are no longer limited to humans. This doesn't mean the end of learning but a reorientation of it. Students, professionals and educators alike may find themselves working alongside these agents, not as passive users but as active collaborators. The process of learning may increasingly center around guiding, auditing and amplifying the work of intelligent systems. The pace of scientific understanding will compress One of the most profound claims in Altman's blog is that the timeline for scientific discovery could collapse dramatically. "We may be able to discover new computing substrates, better algorithms, and who knows what else," he writes. "If we can do a decade's worth of research in a year, or a month, then the rate of progress will obviously be quite different." This will directly affect how educational systems operate, curricula may have to update monthly instead of yearly. Students might prepare not for known fields but for capabilities that do not yet exist. Personalisation will become the baseline Altman envisions AI systems that feel more like a global brain — "extremely personalized and easy for everyone to use." Such systems could radically alter how learning journeys are shaped. Education may shift away from standardisation and towards deep customisation, where each learner follows a uniquely adaptive path based on their goals, context and feedback loops with intelligent systems. This could also challenge long-held norms around grading, pacing and credentialing. Creativity will remain human, but enhanced Despite machines taking over many cognitive tasks, Altman emphasises that the need for art, storytelling and creative vision will remain. However, the way we express creativity is likely to change. Learners in creative fields will no longer be judged solely by their manual skill or originality but by how well they can prompt, guide and harness generative tools. Those who embrace this shift may open entirely new modes of thought and output. Intelligence will become infrastructural In Altman's projection, 'As datacenter production gets automated, the cost of intelligence should eventually converge to near the cost of electricity.' Once data centers can build other data centers and robots assist in manufacturing robots, the cost of deploying intelligence could plummet. This repositions knowledge from something rare and scarce to something ambient. Learning may become less about access and more about intent, what one chooses to do with the world's near-limitless cognitive resources. The meaning of expertise may change As systems outpace human ability in certain domains, the role of the expert will evolve. According to Altman, many of today's jobs might appear trivial or performative to future generations, just as subsistence farming seems primitive to us now. Yet meaning will remain rooted in context. Learners will continue to pursue mastery, not because the machine cannot do it but because the act of learning remains socially and personally meaningful. The human impulse to know and contribute will not vanish, it will be redirected. Throughout the blog, Altman remains clear-eyed about the challenges. "There will be very hard parts like whole classes of jobs going away," he admits, but he is equally optimistic that the world will become so much richer, so quickly, that new ways of structuring society, policy and education will follow. Learning may become less of a race to gain credentials and more of a lifelong dialogue with intelligent systems that expand what it means to know, to build and to belong. "From a relativistic perspective, the singularity happens bit by bit, and the merge happens slowly," Altman writes. The shift may not feel disruptive day to day but its long arc will redefine how we learn, what we teach and how intelligence itself is understood in the decades to come. Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Meet Mark Zuckerberg's AI dream team powering Meta's next big leap
Brains over data. That's Meta's game plan as it races to dominate artificial intelligence. While other tech titans throw compute power and training data at the problem, Mark Zuckerberg is doing something far more personal. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now He's handpicking minds. And he's not subtle about it. According to The Wall Street Journal, Zuckerberg has been personally calling OpenAI researchers, offering eye-popping compensation packages—some reportedly as high as $100 million—to woo them away. Even Sam Altman, OpenAI's CEO, admitted in a recent podcast that Meta's offers were staggering. It's all part of Meta's newly revealed Superintelligence Lab, and Zuckerberg has already released the first 11 names on what insiders call 'The List.' These aren't just brilliant AI engineers. They are scientists, founders, problem solvers—and in many cases, immigrants or first-generation Americans whose work helped define the most powerful AI models in existence today. Before we dive in, one thing is clear: this isn't just a hiring spree. It's the making of a brain trust that could shape how AI reasons, speaks, listens, and even dreams. Let's meet the team. Alexandr Wang Source: X The wunderkind leading Meta's new lab has already made a name for himself in Silicon Valley. As the founder of Scale AI, Wang built a company that quietly powered the data-hungry ambitions of tech's biggest players. What fewer people know is that his story begins far from boardrooms—in New Mexico, where he was born to Chinese immigrant parents who worked as physicists for the U.S. military. Wang grew up surrounded by science and structure, but also by discipline. He competed in national math Olympiads as early as sixth grade, taught himself how to code, and played violin with the same intensity he brought to algorithms. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now After enrolling at MIT to study mathematics and computer science, he dropped out to pursue Scale. By 28, he wasn't just building tools for AI—he was redefining how AI learns. Meta reportedly invested $14 billion into Scale as part of the deal to bring Wang onboard. Nat Friedman Source: LinkedIn In contrast to Wang's youth, Nat Friedman brings gravitas. A seasoned technologist and venture investor. Friedman is known for scaling ideas into institutions. As the former CEO of GitHub, he steered the platform through its $7.5 billion acquisition by Microsoft and was known for his understated but razor-sharp leadership style. Born in Charlottesville, Virginia, Friedman fell in love with online communities at the age of 14 and later called them his 'actual hometown.' That early sense of connection shaped his future—first at MIT, then through his work co-founding Xamarin, a developer tools company that attracted Fortune 500 clients like Coca-Cola and JetBlue. Today, Friedman is deeply embedded in the AI startup ecosystem, backing companies like Perplexity and Stripe. Trapit Bansal Source: X Born and raised in India, Trapit Bansal is a quiet architect behind some of OpenAI's most sophisticated reasoning models. With dual degrees in mathematics and statistics from IIT Kanpur and a PhD from the University of Massachusetts Amherst, Bansal's academic journey has always straddled theory and application. At OpenAI, he played a crucial role in the development of the o-series, particularly the o1 model—widely regarded as a turning point in AI's ability to 'think' before responding. Bansal's specialty is meta-learning. Jiahui Yu Source: LinkedIn A rising star in the world of multimodal AI, Jiahui Yu has already left his mark on two of the most powerful labs in the world—Google and OpenAI. At OpenAI, he led the perception team, working on how machines interpret images, audio, and language as a seamless whole. At Google's DeepMind, he helped develop Gemini's multimodal capabilities. Yu's educational path began at the prestigious School of the Gifted Young in China, followed by a PhD in computer science from the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Shuchao Bi Source: X Shuchao Bi is one of the few people who can claim co-founder status on a cultural juggernaut—YouTube Shorts. During his 11 years at Google, he helped create and refine its short-form video platform and later led its algorithm team. But Bi's heart has always belonged to research. At OpenAI, he focused on multimodal AI and helped launch GPT-4o's voice mode—essentially giving chatbots the power to talk back. Educated at Zhejiang University and later at UC Berkeley, Bi blends statistical elegance with creative application. His role at Meta? To make machines not just responsive, but expressive. Huiwen Chang Source: LinkedIn Known for her expertise in image generation and style transfer, Huiwen Chang was instrumental in OpenAI's visual interface work for GPT-4o. But her roots are in rigorous academia. She graduated from the Yao Class at Tsinghua University—a training ground for China's best minds in computer science—and then earned her PhD from Princeton. Chang's work is where art meets architecture. She understands how to train machines to not just see an image, but to manipulate it, interpret it, and even mimic human aesthetic judgment. Before OpenAI, she cut her teeth at Adobe and Google. Ji Lin Source: LinkedIn Another Tsinghua-to-MIT story, Ji Lin blends engineering finesse with frontier thinking. He worked on several of OpenAI's most powerful models before joining Meta, with a focus on both reasoning and multimodal integration. What sets Lin apart is his mix of research and real-world application. He interned at NVIDIA, Adobe, and Google before landing at OpenAI. Hongyu Ren Source: X If you're improving an AI model after it's built—teaching it to be more ethical, more accurate, or more human—you're doing post-training. That's Hongyu Ren's specialty. Educated at Peking University and Stanford, Ren led a post-training team at OpenAI and is one of the more philosophically-minded researchers in the group. Shengjia Zhao Source: X As a co-creator of ChatGPT, Shengjia Zhao is no stranger to AI that captures public imagination. But behind the scenes, he was also working on one of the field's most quietly important trends: synthetic data. By helping machines generate their own training material, Zhao advanced a method to keep AI learning, even as real-world data dries up. After graduating from Tsinghua University and Stanford, Zhao joined OpenAI in 2022 and quickly rose through the ranks. Johan Schalkwyk Source: X Hailing from South Africa, Johan Schalkwyk has always worked on the frontier of communication. At Google, he led the company's ambitious effort to support 1,000 spoken languages, a moonshot project that blended linguistics, machine learning, and cultural preservation. Most recently, he served as machine learning lead at Sesame, a startup trying to make conversational AI feel like real dialogue. Pei Sun Pei Sun helped power the brains behind Waymo, Google's self-driving car unit. His work involved building next-generation models for perception and reasoning—skills that translate neatly into the world of chatbots, robots, and beyond. Educated at Tsinghua University and Carnegie Mellon, Sun began a PhD before dropping out to join the industry faster. Joel Pobar Source: LinkedIn An AI infrastructure veteran, Joel Pobar most recently worked at Anthropic, where he helped scale inference systems for some of the most advanced models in the world. Before that, he spent nearly a decade at Facebook, leading engineering teams. Educated in Australia at Queensland University of Technology, Pobar brings a rare mix of insider knowledge and outsider grit. His job at Meta will likely focus on making sure the lab's most powerful creations can actually run reliably, at scale, and in real time.
India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
Aravind Srinivas announces Perplexity Max with unlimited Labs and early Comet, Veo 3 access
Perplexity, the AI-powered search startup, has launched a new subscription tier aimed at its most dedicated users. Announced via a company blog post on Tuesday, the new plan, dubbed Perplexity Max, comes with a hefty $200 (around Rs 17,063) monthly price tag and is designed to offer power users advanced tools, faster access to new features, and priority use of the most advanced AI models available Perplexity Max tier includes unlimited access to Labs, Perplexity's proprietary tool for generating spreadsheets and reports, as well as early entry to experimental features, including Comet—an AI-enhanced browser currently in development. Subscribers will also be prioritised when accessing services built on top-tier AI models, such as OpenAI's o3-pro and Anthropic's Claude Opus 4. With this move, Perplexity joins a growing list of AI companies offering ultra-premium services to monetise their most engaged user base. OpenAI was the first to introduce a $200-per-month ChatGPT Pro plan, and other major players like Google, Anthropic, and developer platform Cursor have since rolled out similar premium new Max plan sits at the top of Perplexity's subscription ladder. The company continues to offer a $20/month Pro plan for individual users, as well as an Enterprise Pro plan at $40 per user per month. A Max plan tailored for enterprise customers is also in the pipeline, though a launch date has yet to be Perplexity has been scaling up but is still in growth mode. In 2024, the company generated an estimated $34 million in revenue—primarily from its $20 Pro subscriptions—but also recorded a cash burn of around $65 million. This high burn rate has largely been attributed to the costs of leasing cloud infrastructure and licensing powerful AI models from the likes of OpenAI and these losses, the startup appears to be gaining momentum. By January 2025, its annual recurring revenue had reportedly climbed to $80 million. In May, Perplexity was said to be in advanced discussions to raise $500 million at a staggering $14 billion valuation, though it remains unclear whether the funding round has been the road ahead may be far from smooth. The AI search space is becoming increasingly competitive, with Google aggressively promoting its own AI-powered search experience, dubbed AI Mode, which closely mirrors Perplexity's own offering. OpenAI has also been deepening its integration of search into ChatGPT and is rumoured to be developing a standalone Perplexity, success may hinge on maintaining strong partnerships with the very AI model providers it competes against—while continuing to innovate and deliver superior user experiences. If the Max plan can generate significant new revenue, it could give the startup the firepower it needs to stay ahead in a crowded and rapidly evolving field.- Ends
