India conveys concerns to US Senator on Russian oil 'tariff'
senator Lindsey Graham
on a proposed bill seeking to impose a 500 per cent tariff on countries importing crude oil from Russia.
"Regarding Senator Lindsey Graham's bill, any development which is happening in the US Congress is of interest to us if it impacts our interest or could impact our interest. So we have been in touch with Senator Lindsey Graham. The embassy, ambassador have been in touch," Jaishankar told reporters in Washington on Wednesday.
He said Graham has been made aware of India's concerns and interests in the energy and security space. "We'll then have to cross that bridge when we come to it, if we come to it," he added.
Experts on Russian-US affairs indicated that India could be seeking a waiver under the bill.
The bill proposes to levy a 500 per cent tariff on any nation that buys Russian oil, natural gas, uranium, and other products. The bill has over 80 co-sponsors in the Senate, potentially making it veto-proof.
Speaking to ABC news on Sunday, Graham claimed US President Trump told him that the sanctions bill should be brought forward for a vote.
Earlier in May, Graham said he is in touch with Trump about the bill. Republican lawmakers have indicated they are worried about moving the bill but are waiting for Trump's approval before bringing it to the floor of the Senate.
The proposed bill comes amid efforts by the White House to stabilise ties with the Kremlin.
Meanwhile, Jaishankar also acknowledged the challenge of finding consensus among international partners. He said countries are not supporting each other "sufficiently enough" when countering terrorism.
"Part of diplomacy is to exhort them, encourage them, persuade them, motivate them to do that, and which is why it's important to speak up, and which is why it's important to carry them with us to the best possibility," he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
16 minutes ago
- News18
Indian-Origin Leader Vivek Ramaswamy Faces Hate For Celebrating July 4
Vivek Ramaswamy shared a family picture on social media, extending his wishes on the US Independence Day. Indian-origin Republican leader Vivek Ramaswamy has time and again faced racist and anti-immigrant comments on social media. His social media posts with family pictures have mostly faced attacks, with users frequently mocking his ethnicity and asking him to go back to India. A similar instance recently took place after the politician shared a family picture on X, extending his wishes on July 4, aka the US Independence Day. 'The little guys get bigger every year. Happy Fourth!" Ramaswami wrote in his caption. The post drew strong reactions from online users, who asked him to go back to India and celebrate in Mumbai and Gujarat. A few others questioned what he had to do with the American Independence Day. The little guys get bigger every year. Happy Fourth! — Vivek Ramaswamy (@VivekGRamaswamy) July 4, 2025 A user wrote, 'I wonder if any of your family or friends will get deported under Trump's regime? Maybe your wife will leave you if her family members get deported," while another added, 'The only Americans we can see are the kids sitting behind." A user aimed a sharp response and wrote, 'You're NOT an Ethnic American. Go back to India," while one suggested, 'You should celebrate with your family in Gujarat or Mumbai." The attacks didn't just end here, as similar comments flooded the post, with one of them reading, 'You are not American. Just perpetuating the replacement of Americans. It's also called Independence Day. Something you or your ancestors had absolutely nothing to do with." The renewed heat towards the Indian-origin politician comes at a time when President Donald Trump has ended birthright citizenship in the country. While the US has given automatic citizenship to anyone born in the country, Trump intends to change the rule. Earlier in June, Ramaswamy was bombarded with racist and anti-immigrant comments after posting a picture with his kids. A politician was closely aligned with the MAGA movement until Christmas 2024, when he criticised American culture, further reaffirming his support for the H-1B visa program. At that time, he was also serving as a co-chief of Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
29 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump says US-China talk on possible TikTok sale to begin next week
Trump last month also extended a deadline to 17 September for China-based ByteDance to divest the US assets of TikTok, a social media app with 170 million users in the US read more Tik Tok logo is displayed on the smartphone while standing on the US flag in this illustration picture taken on November 8, 2019. Reuters File Donald Trump has said he will start talking to China on Monday or Tuesday about a possible TikTok deal. The United States president said the US 'pretty much' had a deal on the sale of the TikTok short-video app. 'I think we're gonna start Monday or Tuesday … talking to China – perhaps President Xi or one of his representatives – but we would, we pretty much have a deal,' Trump told reporters on Air Force One on Friday. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump also said he might visit Xi Jinping in China or the Chinese leader may visit the US. The two leaders last month invited each other to visit their respective countries. Trump last month also extended a deadline to 17 September for China-based ByteDance to divest the US assets of TikTok, a social media app with 170 million users in the US. A deal had been in the works this spring to spin off TikTok's US operations into a new US-based firm, majority-owned and operated by US investors, but it was put on hold after China indicated it would not approve it following Trump's announcements of steep tariffs on Chinese goods. Trump said on Friday the US would probably have to get a deal approved by China. Asked how confident he was that Beijing would agree to a deal, he said: 'I'm not confident, but I think so. President Xi and I have a great relationship, and I think it's good for them. I think the deal is good for China and it's good for us.' Trump's June extension was his third executive order to delay the ban or sale of TikTok and gave ByteDance another 90 days to find a buyer or be banned in the US. Trump's first executive order giving TikTok a reprieve came on his first day in office – just three days after the supreme court ruled to uphold the ban. Trump issued the second executive order in April. The deadline for the sale or ban was then set for 19 June. Now, TikTok has until September. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In a statement issued the same day, TikTok thanked Trump and JD Vance. 'We are grateful for President Trump's leadership', the statement said, and TikTok would 'continue to work with Vice President Vance's Office' to come to an agreement. Democratic senator Mark Warner, vice-chair of the Senate intelligence committee, accused Trump of sidestepping the law with an executive order.
Indian Express
30 minutes ago
- Indian Express
The ‘beauty' of Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill may lie only in the eye of the beholder
President Donald Trump's initiation at the White House was a promise contrary to the new world vision of stable diplomatic ties, greener economies, free trade and reversing decades of tax cuts. Embarking on a journey to 'make America great again', Trump unveiled the One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBB). The Bill quickly turned friends into foes, not least among policy experts, who dread the large fiscal costs. The OBBB, now passed by both houses of Congress and soon to be a reality, proposes to raise the debt ceiling as well as extend tax cuts and deductions introduced by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, 2017, which are set to expire this year. The proposed tax cuts come at the cost of Medicaid, the food stamps programme and energy tax credits, all of which are expected to shrink. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a Washington-based non-profit, estimates that the tax changes, if temporary, will cost $3.4 trillion in primary deficits over the next decade and add $4.1 trillion to current debt. In sharp contrast, the Joint Committee on Taxation, at the request of the Senate GOP, has pegged the costs at a far lower $442 billion. This is mainly arrived at through innovative accounting. Under all estimates, the Bill seems set to deliver a positive macroeconomic impact, although the optimism gets pared down when considering the implications of these measures for low-income households and for the future of the green economy. The Joint Committee on Taxation estimates that the resources available to households in the lowest decile will decrease, whereas that for the top decile will increase. The reduction of taxes on overtime work and tips through 2028 is meant to ensure inclusivity. Yet this is quite insignificant in comparison to the fiscal impact of other tax measures. With Trump's assurance that America was going to drill away, the removal of tax benefits to the clean energy sector is hardly a surprise. The OBBB is set to close the existing commercial and consumer tax credits under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). The obsolescence of the measure could be ill thought-out as the American shale industry is at the mercy of OPEC. To 'make America great again', Trump advocated recklessly for inward-looking policies such as tariff hikes, taxes on remittances and immigration control, all of which are attempts to negotiate trade deals bilaterally. This includes the retreat from the global tax deal while getting countries like India and Canada to stall their efforts to apply a digital services tax. The proposals to apply additional income taxes on payments made to persons of a jurisdiction applying 'unfair foreign taxes' — such as a digital services tax or top-up taxes on payments taxed less than the global minimum rate — are clever negotiation tactics that seem to pay off making it a propitious time for large US corporations. Caught in the fire is the Federal Reserve, which has adopted a wait-and-watch approach. The tariff, if carried through, can set off inflationary effects that may transmit slowly and may be exacerbated where international oil prices spike again if tempers soar in West Asia. As the world watches the US manoeuvre through international political and domestic economic headwinds, there is no doubt that US debt is expected to rise, more so if defence budgets are to grow. But is the world willing to hold this debt? The US-Iran conflict has further convoluted diplomatic ties in the region and has economists guessing about what this may mean for the future. If political stress flares, central banks will have to resume an attentive position. If that be the case, the US will also have to rethink its borrowing plans and tax cuts. The yield of the 10-year US treasury is among the highest in its S&P rating class, and with the recent Moody's rating cut, the question is if it can borrow additionally at prevailing costs. A pause on interest rate reductions would raise the costs of borrowing. In spite of the elevated interest rates that pose a domestic fiscal problem, a third of US treasuries are held abroad and are largely with Japan, China and the UK. The willingness of these countries to buy the T-bills will also determine the US's prospects of delivering tax cuts. Given that the US is no longer playing a reliable arbiter, with policy driven by temperament, the currency of its government securities may not be unaffected. The promised return of economic glory may be delayed for the US and for now the beauty of the bill may only lie in the eye of the beholder. The writer is associate professor, NIPFP
