Palestine Action ban clears U.K. parliament ahead of legal challenge
Peers in parliament's House of Lords upper chamber backed the move to proscribe the group under the Terrorism Act of 2000 without a vote, a day after MPs approved the legislation.
The government announced it would ban Palestine Action after activists from the group broke into an air force base in southern England last week.
Two aircraft at the base were sprayed with red paint causing an estimated £7 million ($9.55 million) in damage.
The group has condemned the proposed proscription as an "unhinged reaction". An urgent hearing to challenge the ban is set to be held at the High Court in London on Friday.
The legal challenge is backed by Amnesty International and other rights groups.
The proposed ban on Palestine Action would make it a criminal offence to belong to or support the group, punishable by up to 14 years in prison.
Announcing the clamp-down, Interior Minister Yvette Cooper listed other attacks by Palestine Action at the Thales defence factory in Glasgow in 2022, and two last year against Instro Precision in Kent, southeast England, and Israel-based Elbit Systems in Bristol, in the country's southwest.
Thursday's approval by the Lords came as four Palestine Action activists were remanded in custody over the break in.
Counter-terror police on Wednesday charged the four suspects with "conspiracy to enter a prohibited place knowingly for a purpose prejudicial to the safety or interests of the United Kingdom, and conspiracy to commit criminal damage."
Prosecutors will argue the offences were terror-linked.
Amy Gardiner-Gibson, 29, Daniel Jeronymides-Norie, 35, Jony Cink, 24, and Lewie Chiaramello, 22, appeared at London's Westminster Magistrates' Court.
They were remanded in custody until their next appearance at London's Old Bailey criminal court on July 18.
A 41-year-old woman who was arrested "on suspicion of assisting an offender" has been released on bail.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
18 minutes ago
- India Today
I know where you live: Delhi man claims Blinkit delivery agent abused, threatened him
A Delhi-based man claimed a Blinkit delivery left him rattled after the delivery agent allegedly abused his access to personal information and threatened him over the man, who detailed his ordeal in a now-viral post on LinkedIn that has since gone viral, requested anonymity while speaking to He alleged that the delivery agent warned him, saying, 'Maloom hai mujhe kaha rehte ho (I know where you live).'advertisementIt all began on Sunday morning when the man ordered cat food through the Blinkit app. What should have been a routine delivery quickly turned stressful. 'The delivery partner called me at least three times, asking for step-by-step directions despite my complete address being mentioned on my profile. But the nightmare started once he handed over the order,' the man wrote in his alleged that the same agent then harassed him with over 15 phone calls in a matter of minutes, using abusive language and threats. 'It's not just about me. Millions trust Blinkit with their personal details - this could be life-threatening. Imagine what could happen if this access is misused,' he man further wrote, 'I'm not sure what hiring criteria Blinkit follows. But giving such access to people who might threaten customers' safety is dangerous. We pay for convenience, not daily harassment.'A screenshot from his phone logs - also shared in the post - showed a long list of back-to-back calls from the same number shortly after the a look at his post here: While speaking to the man explained that his cat had given birth to a new litter a week ago, prompting the cat food order that morning.'The delivery boy called me a few times for my address, which was fine. I thought he was new on the job. But soon after delivering the order, he started calling me repeatedly, hurling abuse and singing vulgar songs over the phone,' he added, 'I initially picked up as I was expecting another delivery. That's when he said, 'Maloom hai mujhe kaha rehte ho!''When asked if he had contacted Blinkit, the man confirmed that he had raised a complaint with the company's support team. 'They assured me strict action would be taken against the delivery agent,' he the time of writing this story, Blinkit had not issued any public response to the viral LinkedIn post. For now, the man's ordeal has raised fresh concerns over consumer safety in the gig economy.- EndsTrending Reel
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
33 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Xi Jinping delegates power, fuelling speculation over his political future
Xi's move sparked speculation that he may be laying the groundwork for an orderly power transition or scaling back his role in preparation for possible retirement Press Trust of India Beijing Chinese President Xi Jinping, widely regarded as a leader for life, is beginning to delegate authority to key organs of the ruling Communist Party, a first in his over 12-year rule. Xi's move sparked speculation that he may be laying the groundwork for an orderly power transition or scaling back his role in preparation for possible retirement. Speculation about Xi's power transition was rife after state-run Xinhua news agency recently reported that the powerful 24-member Political Bureau of the ruling Communist Party of China (CPC) in its meeting on Jun 30 reviewed a set of new regulations on the work of the party's institutions. The meeting presided over by Xi himself stressed that the regulations will further standardise the establishment, responsibilities, and operations of the CPC Central Committee's decision-making, deliberative, and coordinating institutions. Such institutions should exercise more effective leadership and coordination over major tasks and focus on planning, discussing, and overseeing major tasks, the Xinhua report said. While the overseas Chinese dissident community in recent months was abuzz with speculation of a power struggle within the secretive and tightly controlled CPC, a China-based political analyst who spoke on condition of anonymity said the regulations on these party bodies could hint at preparations for Xi's retirement. The rules may be set up to regulate the bodies because it's a key time for power transition, the Hong Kong-based South China Morning Post on Sunday quoted the analyst as saying. Other experts, however, averred that Xi, regarded as the most powerful leader after CPC founder Mao Zedong, may be delegating some powers to focus on larger issues. It does seem that Xi might pay less attention to day-to-day details, which necessitates a policing mechanism to ensure that his policy priorities are still being carried out by lower-level officials, Victor Shih, a specialist in Chinese elite politics and finance at the University of California San Diego, told the Post. Xi also skipped the BRICS summit being held in Rio de Janeiro from Sunday. This is the first time since he became president that he will be missing the summit of the emerging economies. Chinese Premier Li Qiang is heading China's delegation at the summit. Xi's move of delegating power comes amid US President Donald Trump's tariff war disrupting China's USD 440 billion exports to America, besides major headwinds faced by the Chinese economy, with growth falling due to continued slowdown, and the collapse of the housing market, the mainstay of the economic growth. The crisis was exacerbated by the government's attempts to rein in the corporate sector and the unsuccessful zero COVID policy of shutting down Chinese cities during the height of the pandemic, resulting in the industry and business coming to a grinding halt. Since he took over power, becoming the General Secretary of the CPC in 2012, Xi, who was previously the Vice President, rapidly consolidated his power hold in the key power centres -- the party, the presidency, and the powerful military as the Chairman of the Central Military Commission (CMC) -- the overall high command of Chinese armed forces. As he firmed up his grip over power structures, carrying out China's biggest anti-corruption campaign in which over a million officials were punished and dozens of top generals purged, Xi was declared as core leader of the party, a designation that was conferred only on party founder Zedong. Later, the key rule of the president's term of two five-year terms was amended by the legislature, paving the way for him to get elected for an unprecedented third five-year term as the General Secretary of the Party in 2022 and as President of the country in the following year. All of Xi's predecessors retired after two five-year terms, while he continued in power with no term limits, earning him the label of president for life. Analysts say his plan to remain in power or share power was expected to unravel before or during the next five-year congress of the CPC to be held in 2027, by which time his third term will end.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
After Crocs, Birkenstock cracks down on fake footwear in India
Indian court-appointed legal representatives inspected small-scale factories in recent weeks to seize suspected counterfeit Birkenstock footwear, after the German brand launched an infringement lawsuit, people familiar with the matter said. Birkenstock's case is occurring around the same time other shoemakers are in the news in India. (REUTERS) Birkenstock's case is occurring around the same time other shoemakers are in the news in India. Crocs this month secured a court nod to pursue a nine-year-old infringement case, while Prada is facing heat over showcasing sandals similar to ethnic Indian footwear without initially giving credit to India. Reuters is first to report the Indian case details related to Birkenstock sandals, which have evolved from a counterculture symbol to a trendy fashion item, and are also popular in India. In May, Birkenstock filed an infringement lawsuit in the Delhi High Court against four footwear traders, four factories and two unnamed individuals. Its complaint stated an internal investigation found counterfeits were being made in rural areas in and around the tourist hub of Agra, and sold locally and exported to other countries. On May 26, Delhi judge Saurabh Banerjee issued a confidential order that was only made public on the court's website last week. It said 10 local lawyers were appointed as commissioners to visit the suspected factories. The judge said commissioners can "seize, pack and seal the infringing products", and his order included photographs that Birkenstock submitted showing the alleged counterfeit footwear and shoe boxes with the company's branding. The visits have been completed and reports were submitted confidentially to the judge, the three people familiar with the matter said on Saturday, asking to remain unidentified. The next hearing in the case is set for October 6. The visits were conducted in Agra, home to the Taj Mahal, and in India's capital New Delhi, the people said, declining to give further details from their inspection. Birkenstock did not respond to queries from Reuters and its lawyers from Delhi-based law firm Lall and Sethi declined to comment, citing the pending legal case. In his May order, Banerjee said he reviewed photographs and samples of the alleged counterfeit products in court, and they "seem like a cheap knock off" of Birkenstock products. "There is all likelihood of the public getting deceived ... The differences, hardly if any, are not something which can be discernable to the naked eyes," he wrote. Once popular with hippies, tech enthusiasts and medical professionals, Birkenstock gained widespread attention after Australian actress Margot Robbie wore a pair of pink Birkenstocks in the final scene of the 2023 hit movie "Barbie". In February, a German court said Birkenstock sandals do not qualify as art and are therefore not protected by copyright, dismissing a lawsuit brought by the German company. In India, Birkenstock footwear for women is priced between $46 and $233.
