logo
Journalists at satirical magazine in Turkey arrested over Prophet Muhammad cartoon

Journalists at satirical magazine in Turkey arrested over Prophet Muhammad cartoon

Independent2 days ago
Turkish satirical magazine have been arrested after allegedly publishing a cartoon that authorities claim depicts the Prophet Muhammad, a figure whose portrayal is forbidden in Islam.
The cartoon, published in the LeMan weekly magazine, depicts a Muslim and a Jewish figure – both illustrated with wings and halos – shaking hands as bombs rain down below them.
Four days after its release, the image went viral on social media, sparking outrage. Hundreds of protesters marched down Istanbul's main tourist avenue, chanting 'Allahu Akbar'. Turkish officials swiftly denounced the magazine after Istanbul's chief prosecutor announced the arrest of the magazine editors and the cartoonist on the grounds that it had published a cartoon that 'publicly insulted religious values'.
Turkey 's interior minister Ali Yerlikaya called the cartoon a provocation and said those 'who dare to do this will be held accountable before the law'. Mr Yerlikaya asserted that the cartoon did not fall under the protections of freedom of expression or speech.
According to Mr Yerlikaya, Turkish police arrested the cartoonist as well as LeMan's graphic designer. Media reports also stated that arrest warrants had been issued for LeMan's editor-in-chief and its managing editor, both of whom were named in the investigation.
Fahrettin Altun, the Turkish presidency's communications chief, condemned it as a 'vile attack on our beliefs and values'.
Meanwhile, the justice ministry announced a formal investigation under Article 216 of the Turkish Penal Code, which covers the offence of 'publicly insulting religious values'.
Yilmaz Tunc, the justice minister, said: 'No freedom grants the right to make the sacred values of a belief a subject of humour in an ugly way.'
LeMan, the weekly Turkish political satire magazine, released a statement after the backlash. 'This cartoon is not a caricature of the Prophet Mohammed (pbuh). In the work, the name Mohammed is fictionalised as belonging to a Muslim person killed in Israel's bombardments. There are more than 200 million people named Mohammed in the Islamic world. The work does not refer to the Prophet Mohammed in any way,' the magazine's editor-in-chief, Tuncay Akgun, said.
'By highlighting a murdered Muslim, the aim was to highlight the righteousness of the oppressed Muslim people, with no intention whatsoever of belittling religious values. We reject the stigma imposed on us, as there is no depiction of our Prophet,' LeMan said.
'To interpret the cartoon in such a way requires extreme malice,' the magazine added, but also offered an apology to any readers who may have been offended.
Istanbul governor Davut Gul confirmed that all four individuals sought in connection with the cartoon are now in police custody. While he did not specify whether any protesters had been detained, Mr Gul noted in a statement that 'it has been determined that some individuals mingling among the protesters have engaged in provocative actions'.
He urged protestors to disperse peacefully to protect public safety and prevent further unrest. However, several groups have since called for further demonstrations against the magazine on Tuesday.
Mr Gul earlier also lashed out at 'this mentality that seeks to provoke society by attacking our sacred values'.
'We will not remain silent in the face of any vile act targeting our nation's faith,' he said.
As protests intensified, Turkey's interior ministry shared footage of the cartoonist being detained at home, barefoot and in handcuffs, with captions warning they couldn't evade justice.
Outside LeMan 's offices in central Istanbul, demonstrators kicked down doors and chanted threats, with one declaring, 'For our Prophet, we would give our lives and take lives; no one can insult our Prophet'.
On social media, the incident drew comparisons to the 2015 Charlie Hebdo attack in Paris, when two gunmen stormed the offices of the French satirical magazine and killed 12 people. The attackers sought to avenge the Prophet Mohammad nearly a decade after the atheist and frequently provocative weekly published cartoons mocking the Prophet.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Iran's 'axis of resistance' was meant to be the Shias' NATO
Iran's 'axis of resistance' was meant to be the Shias' NATO

Economist

time3 hours ago

  • Economist

Iran's 'axis of resistance' was meant to be the Shias' NATO

The ten days of Shia lamentation for Hussein, the Prophet Muhammad's grandson, end this year on July 6th, with Ashura. They are always filled with anguish but this year that is even more true. In shrines across the Middle East, eulogists lauded the recently dead. Worshippers beat their chests and lashed themselves with chains as the coffins of the hundreds killed in Israeli strikes were paraded past. In the rubble of their southern villages and the suburbs of Beirut, Lebanon's Shias cried for their fallen leaders and footsoldiers. From Lucknow to London, Shias asked whether their brief revival was over, and whether they faced a future, once again, as Islam's oppressed.

Who really built this country?
Who really built this country?

Spectator

time16 hours ago

  • Spectator

Who really built this country?

Anyone who has visited Canada or Australia in recent years might have noticed an interesting new tradition. This is the trend for issuing a 'land acknowledgement' at the start of any public event. Before discussion gets under way, some bureaucrat or other will get up and note that we are all fortunate enough to be on the land of X, and then garble the name of some not-especially-ancient tribe. The moment gives everyone a feeling of deep meaning and naturally achieves nothing. Even our King indulged in some of this in May when he opened the latest session of the Canadian parliament. Before getting down to the meat of his speech, Charles said: 'I would like to acknowledge that we are gathered on the unceded territory of the Algonquin Anishinaabeg people.' You would have thought that by dint of his being King and addressing a parliament the land had been very much ceded. In any case this is the modern routine. Every-body pays tribute to an extinct or almost extinct tribe, giving the sense that anyone other than the members of the said tribe is an interloper and that indigenous peoples are everywhere and always to be revered. Their ways are forever understood to be the ways of peace. Their customs, habits, crafts and learnings are to be discussed as having a connection to some ancient wisdom, long lost to our own wretched materialistic societies. One interesting thing is that concern for indigenous rights has exceptionally firm borders. The delineation of those borders are clear. All indigenous peoples must be allowed to have rights, just so long as the people in question are not white and do not originate from our own continent. The brouhaha over last weekend's Glastonbury festival nicely clarified some of this. Pascal Robinson-Foster, singer of the rap group Bob Vylan, has been much commented upon because of his 'death to the IDF' chant. But another of his charming ditties got far less attention. This one consisted of him jumping around screaming: 'Heard you want your country back. Ha. Shut the fuck up.' As he repeated this, things like 'This country was built on the backs of immigrants' flashed up on a screen at the back of the stage. I'm not sure that anyone could come up with a more irksome and divisive message if they tried. The taunt is clear: 'If you are English and think this is your country then I have news for you. Nope. It's ours now.' Others have been ratcheting up a similar message. At last year's general election, a man called Shakeel Afsar ran as an Independent in Birmingham Hall Green and Moseley, and was only a few thousand votes away from becoming the area's MP. He is the sort of person who is usually described by local media as a 'firebrand'. I'm not sure that does him justice. His public life has mainly consisted of insisting that Birmingham will not allow the inventor of Islam – Mohammed – to be in any way criticised or ridiculed. Afsar is also not a fan of Prime Minister Modi of India, for obvious sectarian reasons. In a recent interview, he was asked about the line that a few brave souls have had the temerity to utter in recent years: that if you want to bring your Third World beliefs to our country and replay the same failed playbook here, then perhaps there are other countries – including your family's country of origin – in which it might be better for you to live. This was how Afsar responded: 'Our forefathers were instrumental in rebuilding this country after the second world war. It was our grandfathers who worked in the factories 20 hours. It was our grandfathers who came here and ran the infrastructure. It was our grandfathers who brought you the lovely curry which is your national dish. So how can you tell us to go? We're not going nowhere. We're here to stay. We're not here to take part. We're here to take over.' That would seem to me to be almost the definition of a threatening statement, and one almost perfectly designed to stir up the worst sentiments of the human heart. Personally I feel these sentiments throbbing through me when I hear statements like this, or those Mr Robinson-Foster decided to project from the stage at Glastonbury. Keir Starmer, Danny Boyle (who directed the 2012 Olympics opening ceremony) and others have long insisted that this country was effectively built by the Windrush generation. If they had pitched this ball a little shorter they might have been on to something. If they had said that our country had a rich and distinct history and that we owe 'something' to those who came after the last war then they might have brought more people along with them. But the suggestion that the British were an essentially uninteresting and bad people until the noble migrants came to rescue us is a story that is not only false but insulting. So back to the retort that this new type of anti-British demagogue inevitably wishes to provoke. They want a backlash along the lines of: 'Actually this is not your country. It's mine. Your grandfathers may have done something, but mine did far more for a lot longer and to much greater effect. The benefits of the recipe for curry we might litigate another time. But I prefer everything that was already ours.' And so the language of indigenous rights that has been pushed on our friends in Australia and North America finally comes back around to the people it was never meant to assist. Yes – many feel they would like their country back. Many do not wish their country to be taken over. We were here first, they'll think. That's how it works, right?

Pope Leo tells Turkish first lady he might visit Turkey in November, presidency says
Pope Leo tells Turkish first lady he might visit Turkey in November, presidency says

Reuters

timea day ago

  • Reuters

Pope Leo tells Turkish first lady he might visit Turkey in November, presidency says

ISTANBUL and VATICAN CITY, July 2 (Reuters) - Pope Leo told Turkish First Lady Emine Erdogan that he aims to visit Turkey at the end of November, according to a readout of their meeting at the Vatican on Wednesday by the Turkish presidency. The pope, who held an official meeting with the wife of President Tayyip Erdogan at the Vatican's apostolic palace, told her that officials from Ankara and Vatican were working on the details of the visit, the presidency said in a statement. The Vatican did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the first lady's statement. Leo, elected on May 8 to replace the late Pope Francis, has not yet announced any foreign trips. Francis had been planning a trip to Turkey before his death to celebrate the 1,700th anniversary of an early Church council with Patriarch Bartholomew, the spiritual leader of the Eastern Orthodox Church. Leo has been widely expected to take the trip in Francis' stead. Bartholomew previously told an Italian television station that he and Leo discussed the possibility of the new pope travelling to Turkey in late November.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store