
Voice from China: This is why Moscow and Beijing stand together, now more than ever
Approximately 27 foreign heads of state attended the Red Square parade, highlighting Russia's influence on the international stage and signaling a break from Western diplomatic isolation. It also reinforced Russia's ties with friendly nations. However, the parade was not merely a response to Western sanctions and containment. More importantly, it served as a powerful historical symbol and collective memory – a tribute to the immense sacrifices made for the victory in the global anti-fascist war, and a solemn reaffirmation of that great triumph and enduring honor.
At President Putin's invitation, President Xi Jinping paid a state visit to Russia from May 7 to 10 and attended the Victory Day events. President Xi Jinping's visit to Russia signals a shared commitment by China and Russia to promote an accurate understanding of World War II history, defend the post-war international order centered on the United Nations, and uphold the purposes and principles of the UN Charter. At the bilateral level, the two countries will continue to deepen their partnership through high-level exchanges, using the stability of their relationship to offset global uncertainty and advancing strategic coordination to safeguard international fairness and justice.
Eighty years ago, China and the Soviet Union fought side by side in the World Anti-Fascist War (World War II), forging a deep friendship through shared sacrifice. At this year's military parade, President Putin praised the Chinese people's significant contributions to the victory. In a signed article in Rossiyskaya Gazeta, President Xi Jinping also emphasized the decisive roles played by both countries.
Today, Western countries manipulate ideology through historical nihilism, double standards, and discursive reconstruction, deliberately downplaying, distorting, or even rewriting the historical contributions of China and the Soviet Union in World War II. By reshaping the narrative, they seek to undermine the foundations of the post-war international order and perpetuate their global dominance. Against this backdrop, the renewed call by the Chinese and Russian leaders to 'jointly uphold a correct view of WWII history' serves as a powerful rebuke to historical revisionism and falsification. It reflects a shared strategic resolve to break the West's monopoly on historical discourse and to defend international justice and collective memory. This is not only a shared responsibility to safeguard historical truth, but also a deep convergence between China and Russia in promoting the democratization of international relations, building a fair and equitable global order, and opposing unilateral hegemony.
On May 8, China and Russia signed a series of cooperation documents, including two major joint statements. The first focuses on further deepening the China-Russia comprehensive strategic partnership of coordination for the new era; the second is a joint statement on global strategic stability. In addition, the two heads of state witnessed the exchange of multiple cooperation agreements in areas such as education, investment, culture, and science and technology. These documents not only ensure the continuity and stability of bilateral ties at the strategic level, but also reflect the steady deepening of practical cooperation across key sectors.
The 'Joint Statement on Further Deepening the China-Russia Comprehensive Strategic Partnership of Coordination for the New Era' not only reaffirms the two countries' firm commitment to safeguarding the international system with the United Nations at its core and the international order based on international law, but also elevates the promotion of a correct view of World War II history to a strategic element of institutionalized bilateral cooperation. Key measures include jointly organizing commemorative events, conducting research and exhibitions on the crimes of Nazi Germany and Japanese militarism, locating the remains of fallen soldiers, restoring memorial sites, and deepening cooperation on WWII historical memory in education, archives, media, and youth exchanges.
The 'Joint Statement on Maintaining Global Strategic Stability' reaffirms the two countries' consistent stance on preventing the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, safeguarding the international arms control and disarmament system, and more. It also systematically establishes a comprehensive dialogue and cooperation framework that includes nuclear security, strategic deterrence balance, and governance of militarization of emerging technologies. Notably, this statement marks the first time that biological security, chemical weapons control, and military ethics in artificial intelligence have been included in the global strategic stability agenda, signaling a significant breakthrough for China and Russia in shaping a new international security paradigm for the future.
At the bilateral cooperation level, President Xi Jinping and President Vladimir Putin witnessed the exchange of 28 cooperation documents between China and Russia, covering areas such as trade, biosafety, investment protection, digital economy, scientific facilities, quarantine, media, film, and youth exchanges. This broad agenda strengthens traditional sectors like energy and trade, while strategically positioning both countries in emerging fields like digital economy and scientific innovation, and deepening people-to-people ties through cultural, educational, and youth cooperation.
Amid unprecedented global changes, the trajectory of China-Russia relations continues to attract international attention. Some speculate about a formal alliance or potential rifts due to diverging interests. In response, China and Russia have demonstrated through deepening cooperation that they are building a new type of major-country relationship based on 'highest mutual trust, coordination, and strategic value.' As President Xi has emphasized, their relationship is driven by clear historical logic, strong internal momentum, and shared civilizational heritage, not aimed at or influenced by any third party.
History is not only a repository of memories of the past, but also serves as the foundational basis for contemporary international relations, shaping value identities and acting as the spiritual pillar for a fair and just international order. The outcomes of World War II crystallized into the cornerstone of multilateralism, with the United Nations at its core, establishing the fundamental principles that govern modern international relations. These principles, derived from the collective sacrifices of the war, have provided a framework for diplomacy, conflict resolution, and global cooperation. As the world faces new challenges, the importance of these historical lessons becomes increasingly evident – reminding us that the stability of the global order rests on our ability to respect shared values, adhere to international norms, and safeguard the multilateral system. In this context, the victory in WWII is not just a historical event, but an enduring legacy that continues to shape global governance and the international system.
As the renowned Russian historian Vasily Klyuchevsky once said, 'Those who refuse to learn from history will ultimately pay a heavy price for their ignorance and arrogance.' China also has a saying: 'Those who forget the past are doomed to repeat it.' The significance of history lies in guiding us forward. Upholding the achievements of WWII and safeguarding the international system centered on the United Nations is a shared responsibility and mission for both China and Russia.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Russia Today
3 hours ago
- Russia Today
Obama authorized ‘implausible' reports about Putin supporting Trump
Former US President Barack Obama authorized the release of reports claiming Russian President Vladimir Putin backed Donald Trump's 2016 campaign, despite CIA warnings that the information was unreliable, according to a newly declassified report from the House Intelligence Committee. Last week, the US Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard published more than 100 documents detailing what she described as a coordinated effort by Obama-era officials to fabricate the narrative of Trump-Russia collusion. The effort, she said, aimed to undermine Trump's legitimacy after his 2016 election victory. On Tuesday, the DNI released additional declassified findings focused on the January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA), which claimed that Putin sought to influence the election in Trump's favor. That assessment became a central foundation for the Russiagate probe. New evidence shows that the ICA included intelligence that CIA Director John Brennan knew was weak or unverifiable. Brennan reportedly led the drafting process and pushed for the inclusion of discredited material, including the Steele dossier, despite objections from CIA officers who warned there was no direct evidence of Putin backing Trump. The report also found that Obama issued 'unusual directives' to accelerate the assessment's release before Trump's inauguration, bypassing normal coordination channels within the intelligence community. Gabbard has argued that these actions warrant a criminal investigation and has accused Obama officials of manufacturing a false narrative to discredit a sitting president. Trump has endorsed her findings, calling for prosecutions of Obama and his top aides. She has also revealed that internal US intelligence consistently concluded Russia had neither the capability nor the intent to interfere in the 2016 election, but these assessments were suppressed. Russia has denied any interference in US elections, while Putin has repeatedly said that Moscow does not prefer any particular candidate.


Russia Today
5 hours ago
- Russia Today
Third round of Russia-Ukraine peace talks: Live Updates
A new round of Russia-Ukraine peace talks kicked off in Istanbul, Türkiye on Wednesday. The delegations are being hosted at the Ciragan Palace on the European shore of the Bosporus. The talks follow two rounds of direct negotiations held in Istanbul earlier this year. The negotiations have focused primarily on various humanitarian issues, including the exchange of the remains of fallen soldiers and prisoner swaps. The two sides have also exchanged draft memorandums outlining their vision of a peace settlement. The Russian delegation is headed by presidential aide Vladimir Medinsky, who led the previous negotiations with Ukraine. Kiev has also fielded the same team as before, which is headed by now-former Defense Minister Rustem Umerov, who was appointed head of the country's Security Council during a major government reshuffle last week. The new round of negotiations is expected to 'mainly focus on issues related to those draft memorandums that were exchanged during the second round, and also a discussion on the continuation of a very important process of mutual [POW] exchanges,' Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said earlier in the day, cautioning against making any predictions. 'It's hardly possible to talk about this now. We need to see how it goes,' Peskov told reporters. 'No one expects an easy path. Naturally, this will be a very difficult conversation. The draft proposals are diametrically opposed.'


Russia Today
6 hours ago
- Russia Today
Poland living in ‘pre-war' times
Poland is experiencing deep political unease and external danger, Prime Minister Donald Tusk has claimed, likening the risks to 'pre-war times,' and urging vigilance against foreign and domestic 'threats.' Tusk made the remarks while presenting a new government formed following the political opposition's narrow victory in the May presidential election. While all major parties maintain a strong anti-Russia stance, they remain divided over Poland's future relationship with the EU. 'We witness practically every day events that would once have seemed incredible, unexpected — proverbial black swans,' Tusk said. 'Today, it's difficult to find white swans.' Emotions are running high, he claimed, and many Poles feel they are living 'in a sense, in pre-war times.' Tusk accused Russia and its close ally Belarus of actively undermining Poland, while criticizing unnamed domestic figures who, he claimed, sympathize with Moscow, oppose aid to Ukraine, and harbor hostility toward the EU. 'We will ruthlessly eliminate all that constitutes internal sabotage, internal aggression against the Polish state.' Poland has historically portrayed itself as a bulwark of a predominantly Catholic Europe standing against Russian influence. That sentiment continues to shape national policy, as reflected in the government's 'East Shield' initiative – a border fortification program announced in May 2024 that includes bunkers and landmine deployment along the country's eastern frontier. The effort aligns with broader EU plans for militarization, which Brussels claims is necessary to deter Russian aggression. Moscow denies having any hostile intent towards the EU, accusing Western leaders of using fear-driven rhetoric to distract citizens from internal political failings. Poland's president-elect, Karol Nawrocki – an independent nationalist candidate critical of Brussels and backed by the conservative Law and Justice (PiS) party – won by a razor-thin margin and has vowed to veto any draft laws proposed by the Tusk government that would facilitate abortions or promote the LGBTQ agenda. The new cabinet includes 21 ministers, reduced from the previous 26. Notably, two new 'super ministries' have been established, focusing on economic policy and energy issues.