
Loneliness Not Tied to Mortality in Older Adult Home Care
Bonaventure A. Egbujie, MD, PhD
In fact, after adjustment for multiple possible confounders, the survival analysis showed that loneliness was associated with reductions in the 1-year risk for mortality of 18% in Canada, 15% in Finland, and 23% in New Zealand.
Nevertheless, 'Loneliness doesn't have to kill you to be a major public health issue,' study author Bonaventure A. Egbujie, MD, PhD, adjunct professor of public health sciences at the University of Waterloo in Waterloo, Ontario, told Medscape Medical News. 'We would like to see policymakers begin to take the issue of loneliness seriously, consider it a quality-of-life issue, and not treat it as a mortality issue, because when you make it a mortality issue, it becomes less likely to be something that you can intervene on.'
The findings were published in the Journal of the American Medical Directors Association .
Pervasive but Not Deadly
The investigators used population-based home care data on 178,611 home care recipients from Canada, 35,073 home care recipients from Finland, and 85,065 home care recipients from New Zealand. Participants were between 65 and over 85 years old, and about 38% were men.
Of the Canadian cohort, 15.9% reported being lonely; 20.5% of the Finnish cohort reported being lonely, and 24.2% of the New Zealand cohort reported being lonely. The prevalence of loneliness generally increased with age across the three countries.
Loneliness was higher among recipients who had better baseline physical function and worse pain and cognitive performance across the three countries.
After adjusting for confounding factors, including age, sex, Alzheimer's disease or dementia, marital status, and living alone or not living alone, the researchers calculated the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of loneliness and mortality risk as 0.82 in the Canadian cohort, 0.85 in the Finnish cohort, and 0.77 in New Zealand.
The findings contrast with existing evidence in the literature suggesting a link between loneliness and death, Egbujie acknowledged. He suggested that the difference may result from the fact that this study was done in a specific group of individuals, whereas other meta-analyses examined the general population.
'One of the reasons we studied the effect of loneliness on older home care recipients is because this group has not been specifically studied,' he said. 'There has been a focus on people in other places, including those in the community, those in hospital, and in nursing homes, but not on this group.'
The team also found that the two strongest independent predictors of mortality across the three countries were cancer (Canada, HR, 2.88; Finland, HR, 2.57; and New Zealand, HR, 2.07) and Changes in Health and End-Stage Disease and Symptoms and Signs scores of 3 or more (Canada, HR, 2.66; Finland, HR, 2.61; and New Zealand, HR, 2.65).
A limitation of the study was the 1-year follow-up, as health consequences of loneliness may take more time to manifest themselves, the authors noted. In addition, they relied on a single-item measure of loneliness rather than a multi-item summary scale.
Egbujie would like to see longer-term studies to better understand whether there is a causal relationship between loneliness and adverse health outcomes and mortality.
A shortcoming of the current study, he said, 'is that we don't know the sequence of events. Which appeared first? Was it loneliness that appeared first and led to the health condition, or was it the health condition that appeared first and led to individuals being lonely?'
Regardless, 'for clinicians and policymakers, this finding highlights the need to examine home care more carefully,' the authors wrote. 'Loneliness should be addressed as a quality-of-life concern for home care clients in its own right without the need to justify intervention based on mortality risks.'
'Important Public Health Issue'
Rachel Savage, PhD, a scientist at Women's College Hospital, an assistant professor at the University of Toronto, Toronto, and a public health researcher who investigates the impact of loneliness on health system use and mortality, commented on the study for Medscape Medical News . She noted that the study is 'methodologically sound, led by a highly respected researcher who is an expert in home care,' and has the key strength of having been replicated across three countries. Savage did not participate in the study.
Rachel Savage, PhD
She agreed with the authors that the absence of evidence of an increased risk for death from loneliness does not make loneliness unimportant.
'It's not an either/or quality-of-life issue or a mortality risk; it's potentially both,' said Savage. 'We know that loneliness is an important predictor of quality of life and mental health, so even if we do find that it does not increase mortality risk among certain populations, it's still a very important public health issue.'
'There is something unique about the home care population,' she added. 'It's wonderful that these authors have started to build some of the evidence in this group, because, as they state, most of the large meta-analyses that have shown a link between loneliness and an increased risk for premature death are set in the general population.'
She noted that females consistently report higher rates of loneliness than males. There could be a few different reasons for this, she said.
'The most obvious one, especially for older adults, is that females on average have a longer life expectancy and so are more likely to experience widowhood and living alone, which are big risk factors for loneliness. Women are also more likely to be caregivers and to have lower incomes, both of which are associated with loneliness. And the last thing is women are more likely to admit their feelings than are men because of social norms.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
RFK Jr wants Canada to pardon 400 ostriches
The Canadian government ordered 400 ostriches to be culled after they were exposed to bird flu, but U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. wants to save the flock. Universal Ostrich Farms in British Columbia was ordered to cull the flightless birds after avian flu was detected last December, CBC reported. A month later, 69 birds died. A court battle has ensued, with the farm owners arguing the ostriches should be kept alive to be studied for potential treatments. Although the court rejected the initial argument, the federal appeals court last month paused the order as it reviewed the matter; the court heard arguments in the case this week. Amid the legal challenges the birds have found an unlikely ally to the south: RFK Jr. 'The Secretary has urged Canada not to kill the ostriches but to do further testing to try to better understand the virus,' a spokesperson for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services told Politico. HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. wants to save 400 Canadian ostriches from being culled (REUTERS) The health secretary wrote a letter to the president of the Canadian Food Inspection Agency in May, urging the agency not to go through with plans to eradicate the flock and instead test the birds' antibodies: 'We believe significant scientific knowledge may be garnered from following the ostriches in a controlled environment at the Universal Ostrich Farm.' The cull was ordered as part of a so-called 'stamping-out' policy, used to mitigate the risk of the virus spreading to humans or animals, according to the agency. A screengrab from a video capturing two ostriches resting at the Universal Ostrich Farm, where the Canadian government has ordered for 400 birds to be culled due to avian flu exposure (Katie Pasitney / Facebook) 'Allowing a domestic poultry flock known to be exposed to [bird flu] to remain alive means a potential source of the virus persists. It increases the risk of reassortment or mutation of the virus, particularly with birds raised in open pasture where there is ongoing exposure to wildlife,' the agency explained in a May release after the federal court dismissed the farm owners' applications for judicial review. This week, Kennedy — along with Trump's Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Administrator Mehmet Oz and billionaire John Catsimatidis — sent letters to Prime Minister Mark Carney pressing his government to alter its policy, Politico reported. Hundreds of birds remain symptom-free months after 69 birds died after being exposed to bird flu, according to the farm owners' lawyer (Katie Pasitney) According to CBC, Katie Pasitney, whose parents own the farm, thanked the trio for their efforts, saying on Tuesday: "I guess we'll just see where that goes from here because we do know that Dr. Oz and RFK are very passionate about this, just as well as John Catsimatidis." In court on Tuesday, Umar Sheikh, a lawyer for the farm owners, similarly argued that the government's policy was too strict, noting that hundreds of ostriches still exhibit no symptoms of avian flu. Only two birds tested positive for the virus before the cull was ordered, he said. "We would ask questions such as why 100 percent destruction needs to occur based on 0.5 percent confirmed infection?" Sheikh asked the court, according to CBC. Aileen Jones, a lawyer for the agency, argued that the court has already determined the 'stamping-out policy is a reasonable policy,' the outlet reported. Solve the daily Crossword

Associated Press
32 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Kratom Consumer Advisory Council (KCAC) Releases White Paper Debunking Claims on Safety of '7' Products
New analysis calls out misinformation, urges public health protections from dangerous 7-hydroxymitragynine (7-OH) formulations Kratom Consumer Advisory Council (KCAC) today released a comprehensive white paper challenging recent claims that products containing isolated 7-hydroxymitragynine (also known as '7') are safe for widespread, uncontrolled consumer use. The white paper, " Have '7' Products with 7-Hydroxymitragynine (7-OH) Been Proven to Be Safe? " directly refutes assertions made in a July 7 press release by the Holistic Alternative Recovery Trust (HART), which KCAC says misrepresented findings from a report HART itself commissioned from healthcare consulting firm Marwood Group. KCAC Chair Dr. C. Michael White, Pharm.D., FCP, FCCP, FASHP, and Distinguished Professor of Pharmacy Practice at the University of Connecticut, issued a stark warning: 'It is dangerously misleading to suggest that 7 products are safe for public sale without medical oversight. Marwood Group's own report, despite being commissioned by HART, clearly concludes that synthetic 7-hydroxymitragynine is a potent opioid agonist with high abuse potential, rapid tolerance development, and physical dependence in animal models. HART's attempt to erase key parts of the report after publication, including these risk statements, is an alarming act of public deception that endangers consumers.' The KCAC white paper cites the following key concerns from the Marwood Group report that HART initially published and then quietly removed: The KCAC paper refutes Marwood Group's assertion that 7-hydroxymitragynine has a lower risk of respiratory depression. They used a surrogate marker called beta-arrestin recruitment to say the risk was lower without looking at actual animal studies where breathing was assessed and shown to be depressed, just like with morphine. It also provides a balanced perspective on anecdotal experiences with 7 products where consumers report widespread recreational use for euphoria and suffering from severe addiction. 'We've seen this playbook before, downplaying the risks of potent opioids while encouraging unregulated use. The opioid crisis of the 2000s began with similar false assurances,' said Dr. White. 'We must not repeat history with synthetic 7-hydroxymitragynine. These products must be evaluated through rigorous clinical trials and carefully controlled, not sold like candy at gas stations.' The white paper also highlights KCAC's support for the FDA's July 15 warning letters against firms illegally marketing synthetic 7-hydroxymitragynine products and making unsubstantiated medical claims. KCAC calls on regulators, lawmakers, and the media to take a clear-eyed view of the risks posed by synthetic 7-hydroxymitragynine products and urges a halt to the sale of these potent synthetic derivatives outside of clinical or research settings. The full white paper, 'Have '7' Products with 7-Hydroxymitragynine (7-OH) Been Proven to Be Safe?' is available here. About Kratom Consumer Advisory Council (KCAC) Kratom Consumer Advisory Council (KCAC) is an independent board made up of a clinician-scientist and consumers that uses the strongest available evidence to produce position statements that promote evidence-based policy. The KCAC is supported by the Global Kratom Coalition which advocates for regulations that protect consumers and curbs the sale of adulterated or synthetic products falsely marketed as kratom. For more information, visit Media Contact Dr. C. Michael White [email protected] ### SOURCE: Kratom Consumer Advisory Council (KCAC) Copyright 2025 EZ Newswire
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Are hot dogs really that unhealthy? These are the worst ones you can eat — and the best to grill on your summer BBQ
From dinner on the deck to campfire feasts, hot dogs are a staple food of summer. And while there are some great debates we'll abstain from (mustard versus ketchup, toasted buns versus untoasted), one unequivocal fact about this warm-weather winner — which is celebrated on Wednesday, July 16 this year for National Hot Dog Day — is that it can be a hidden source of sodium. A small amount of sodium is a necessary part of a balanced diet, as the mineral regulates blood pressure, keeps fluids in balance and helps both muscle and nerve functioning. However, too much is a serious health concern: In a 2017 report, Health Canada states the "average daily sodium intake of Canadians is currently estimated at 2,760 mg, which is higher than the established goal of 2,300 mg per day," going a long way to explaining the prevalence of high blood pressure in the country. This article is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Contact a qualified medical professional before engaging in any physical activity, or making any changes to your diet, medication or lifestyle. "Most Canadians, particularly children, adolescents and males continue to consume too much sodium," the study warns, explaining high blood pressure is a risk factor for heart disease and stroke. The same study also shares 72 per cent of children aged four to 13, and an eye-popping 90 per cent of men over age 14, consume sodium to potentially health-affecting excess. The study states approximately 25 per cent of Canadians over age 20 have been diagnosed with high blood pressure, but adds the actual number is likely much higher given the condition presents no symptoms and develops slowly. If that's not enough to have you put down the salt shaker, how about this: Heart disease and stroke are, respectively, the second and third leading causes of death in Canada after cancer. Much of the excess sodium in Canadian diets comes from bakery goods and prepared meats, making that hot dog you were thinking about having for dinner a potentially high source of the mineral. So, when it comes to sodium levels, who's the top dog? We checked the nutritional values found on several common grocery store varieties to find out. What are the best and worst hot dogs when it comes to your health? Classic hot dogs A mix of pork with chicken or beef, these are the originals that your mind's eye summons when you think "hot dog." Maple Leaf Natural Top Dogs Calories: 100 Sodium: 330 mg, 14% DV Fat: 8 g (includes 3 g saturated), 11% DV No Name Original Hot Dogs Calories: 90 Sodium: 390 mg, 17% DV Fat: 6 g (includes 2 g saturated), 8% DV Schneiders Red Hots Original Weiners Calories: 100 Sodium: 360 mg, 16% DV Fat: 8 g (includes 3 g saturated, 0.1 g trans), 11% DV Larsen Classic Wieners Calories: 110 Sodium: 340 mg, 14% Fat: 9 g (includes 3 g saturated), 14% DV Beef hot dogs All-beef dogs are a winner at many a barbecue. When it comes to sodium, they clock in slightly better than one might expect. Schneiders All-Beef Wieners Calories: 90 Sodium: 340 mg, 15% DV Fat: 7 g (includes 3.5 g saturated and 0.3 g trans), 9% DV No Name All-Beef Wieners Calories: 110 Sodium: 410 mg, 18% DV Fat: 8 g (includes 3.5 g saturated and 0.4 g trans), 11% DV Great Value All-Beef Wieners Calories: 100 Sodium: 300 mg, 13% DV Fat: 8 g (includes 3.5 g saturated and 0.3 g trans), 11% DV Turkey and chicken dogs A change of pace that'll keep al fresco fun feeling fresh all season long, poultry-based dogs are some other barbecue favourites. Butterball Turkey Franks Calories: 110 Sodium: 260 mg, 20% DV Fat: 7 g (includes 2 g saturated, 0.1 g trans), 9% DV Zabiha Halal Original Chicken Wieners Calories: 80 Sodium 270 mg, 12% DV Fat: 6 g (includes 1.5 g saturated), 8% DV Maple Lodge Farms Original Chicken Wieners Calories: 80 Sodium: 300 mg, 13% DV Fat: 6 g (includes 2 g saturated), 9% DV Mina Halal Chicken Wieners Calories: 60 Sodium: 350 mg, 15% DV Fat: 4 g (includes 1 g saturated), 6% DV No Name Chicken Hot Dogs Calories: 70 Sodium: 310 mg, 13% Fat: 5 g (includes 1.5 g saturated), 7% DV Great Value Chicken Wieners Calories: 80 Sodium: 310 mg, 13% Fat: 6 g (includes 1.5 g saturated), 8% DV Veggie dogs No longer the afterthought at the cookout, vegetarians have more options than ever when hitting the grill. Lightlife Plant-Based Hot Dogs Calories: 60 Sodium: 350 mg, 15% DV Fat: 2 g, 3% DV Yves Tofu Dogs Calories: 60 Sodium: 250 mg, 10% DV Fat: 1.5 g (includes 0.2 g saturated), 2% DV Yves Veggie Dogs Calories: 60 Sodium: 290 mg, 12% Fat: 1 g, 2% DV Are hot dog buns also full of sodium? As stated in the Health Canada study, bakery goods are a surprising minefield when it comes to watching sodium intake. A single hot dog bun from Wonder Bread delivers between seven and nine per cent of your daily sodium allowance, depending on if you reach for the taller "topslice" style or a more classic option. President's Choice has all-butter brioche buns that deliver 230 mg, or 10 per cent, of your daily sodium needs, while D'Italiano brand's brioche-style offering hits 13 per cent of your daily sodium allowance. Classic hot dog buns from Dempster's and Compliments both clock in at seven per cent, while sausage buns from Villaggio have 13 per cent of your recommended daily sodium intake each. Don't forget the extra condiments Even though it tastes sweet, ketchup can pack a sodium punch with roughly 50 g (or about four tablespoons' worth), delivering 18.5 per cent of your daily sodium needs. Mustard and relish aren't off the hook, either: According to the USDA, the average yellow mustard has 23.5 per cent of your daily sodium in a comparable amount, while your average sweet relish hovers around 16.5 per cent of your sodium needs for about four tablespoons. It seems hot dogs can be a lower-sodium option than burgers. Still, it's worth keeping an eye out while building your dream 'dog if sodium is a concern for you, as a hot dog on a bun with toppings could easily clear a quarter of your daily sodium allowance (and that's without chips on the side). Tofu dogs will be the lowest-sodium option, but an all-butter brioche bun won't make it feel too austere. Skimping on condiments can keep things in check as well. Now, if only deciding if a hot dog is a sandwich were as straightforward an endeavour!