logo
Reputation hit from 2021 state election caused WA Electoral Commission to outsource polling day staff recruitment, documents suggest

Reputation hit from 2021 state election caused WA Electoral Commission to outsource polling day staff recruitment, documents suggest

The WA Electoral Commission took the unprecedented step of outsourcing almost all of its election workforce recruitment, in part because it was concerned the previous state election had damaged its reputation.
In reality, the 2025 poll experienced far more reported issues, including reports of long wait times at polling booths and some locations running out of ballot papers.
Those problems were so great the government ordered a special inquiry to probe what went wrong and why the commission contracted labour hire company PERSOLKELLY.
Documents released to the ABC under Freedom of Information laws show, for the first time, why that decision was made.
The documents also highlight how the WAEC and PERSOLKELLY downplayed the scale of the outsourcing in the days following the election.
It comes after the ABC revealed the chaos inside the commission in the lead-up to the state election, with one senior official saying they had warned of issues with the labour hire company as much as four months before the poll.
In a procurement plan compiled in the first half of 2023, the WAEC set out its reasons for wanting to outsource its temporary election workforce.
It noted an audit after the 2021 election, which found there were "some issues", including with a different labour hire company used in a limited capacity under a government-wide contract.
"Service delivery expectations were not met, [temporary election workforce] staff expressed deep dissatisfaction and the WAEC's reputation and performance suffered," it reads.
The plan noted the commission did "not have the internal resources available (human resources and systems) to best manage projects of this size".
"The aim of this [tender] is to address the recommendations made to the WAEC … to ensure that elections are run cost effectively and to a high standard into the future," it reads.
But a senior WAEC source who worked both the 2021 and 2025 elections said the earlier poll was "positively functional".
"Delivery of materials was underdone, the logistical side of things," they said.
WA's Shadow Electoral Affairs Minister Shane Love agreed while there were a few issues in 2021 it was "nothing like the collapse that we saw in 2025".
"What I can see here is a commission just outsourcing, washing their hands and saying, not our problem. Well, it is your problem," Mr Love said.
In the days after the election, as the full scale of problems came to light, both the WAEC and its contractor sought to play down the role outsourcing could have played.
"There have been a number of election events where the WAEC has engaged contractors for the provision of recruitment services," a spokesperson told the ABC about a week after the election.
Do you know more about this story? Contact Keane Bourke.
"This is not a new or uncommon practice. Previous state and federal electoral commissions have appointed recruitment companies to provide support staff in a similar way," a PERSOLKELLY spokesperson said the following day.
But the procurement plan shows that was not the full picture.
While it noted other states have had similar issues trying to staff elections themselves, none had outsourced the entire job.
"The approach of the WAEC to outsource a significant part of the requirement is new and is not currently being undertaken in any other jurisdiction," the plan reads.
In a statement to the ABC, PERSOLKELLY maintained its position that the scale of outsourcing was not new or uncommon.
The WA Electoral Commission said it would be inappropriate to comment until the special inquiry report was released publicly.
The tender document rated the overall risk of outsourcing as "low/moderate".
But it noted one of the most significant risks was "contractor unable to provide sufficient staff at relevant locations" and that potential impacts included "public unable to vote" — with some voters complaining that long delays and a shortage of ballot papers discouraged voting.
The plan identified one of the controls for that risk was "the contractor has experience in an electoral process, preferably in WA", which it said would help reduce the risk from "significant" to "moderate".
PERSOLKELLY said it had supported the Australian Electoral Commission to run federal elections in WA in 2013, 2017 and 2025, as well as the New South Wales state election in 2015, on top of decades of experience providing staff to all levels of government.
"This includes support to government agencies, including elections, locally and nationally along with similar experience in multiple countries outside of Australia," the company said.
In a statement following the election, the WAEC said PERSOLKELLY had "deployed the personnel requested … in line with the project's requirements" and that all 682 polling locations were staffed and operational.
It said its role was limited to recruiting and onboarding staff.
The document also indicated "appropriate funding has been confirmed by Robert Kennedy — Electoral Commissioner" to cover the estimated total value of $30 million.
But government records show the value of the contract awarded was more than double that at $86.9 million.
The WAEC said the initial figure "reflected all relevant information available to the Western Australian Electoral Commission at that time".
"The final contract award estimate … reflects the maximum value of the contract if all extension options are exercise based on the agreed pricing structure with PERSOLKELLY Australia."
An earlier version of the procurement plan, also released to the ABC, shows the commission had initially planned to offer a six-year contract for the outsourcing, which would run until after the 2029 state election.
However, a Department of Finance staffer managing the tender noted that would require an "internal exemption" to go over a five-year limit.
Future versions of the document refer to a four-year contract with the option of a two-year extension.
The future of the contract is uncertain though, with the Acting Electoral Commissioner telling budget estimates earlier this month the contract would be reviewed after local government elections in October.
"Part of that process will involve looking at what the future looks like with PERSOLKELLY," Dennis O'Reilly said.
On Monday, Premier Roger Cook confirmed the contract was "addressed in the context of the report" without providing specific details.
"We certainly need to make changes to ensure that the WA Electoral Commission can conduct the local government elections which will take place in October this year, but we'll table the report first and then our response," he told reporters.
Questions have been raised about the commission's ability to conduct those elections after its Director of Election Operations resigned.
Commissioner Robert Kennedy and Deputy Commissioner Courtney Barron are on leave.
Both commissioners have been temporarily replaced by senior public servants, with staff brought in from the Australian Electoral Commission to help run local government elections.
"We look forward to the outcome of the special inquiry into the planning and delivery of the 2025 WA state election, and welcome learnings that will come as a result," a PERSOLKELLY spokesperson said.
That report is expected to be released when parliament next sits in mid-August.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Prosecutor asks Brazil's Supreme Court to find Bolsonaro guilty of coup
Prosecutor asks Brazil's Supreme Court to find Bolsonaro guilty of coup

News.com.au

timean hour ago

  • News.com.au

Prosecutor asks Brazil's Supreme Court to find Bolsonaro guilty of coup

A prosecutor asked Brazil's Supreme Court on Tuesday to find ex-president Jair Bolsonaro guilty of plotting a coup, in closing arguments after a trial that saw US President Donald Trump try to intervene on behalf of his right-wing ally. Bolsonaro is accused of seeking to overturn the 2022 election won by his left-wing opponent, current President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. The prosecution told the court that former army officer Bolsonaro and seven others were guilty of participating in "armed criminal association" and had sought to "violently overthrow the democratic order." The case now goes to Justice Alexandre de Moraes. If found guilty, Bolsonaro and his co-defendants could face up to 40 years in prison. Bolsonaro, who served as president from 2019-2023 before Lula replaced him, says he is the victim of a political persecution. Prosecutors say Bolsonaro tried to overturn his 2022 loss in a plot that only failed because the military did not side with him. Violent supporters then rioted, rampaging through government buildings in the capital Brasilia in scenes that echoed the assault on the US Capitol by Trump's supporters after the Republican lost to Democrat Joe Biden in 2020. The trial has attracted attention from Trump, who returned to power in the 2024 election and continues to claim -- despite this being rejected repeatedly by the courts -- that he won in 2020. Trump has repeatedly called on social media for Bolsonaro's trial to be stopped, accusing the authorities in Brazil of mounting a "witch hunt" and a "disgrace." On July 9, he took his campaign to extraordinary new levels by announcing plans to tariff Brazilian imports to the United States at 50 percent. Unlike the tariffs Trump is slapping on countries around much of the world, including top US allies, the measures against Brazil -- which are set to take effect August 1 -- were announced in openly political terms. Trump cited "Brazil's insidious attacks on Free Elections" among other issues, warning of further escalation if the country retaliated -- something Lula indicated would happen. On Friday, Trump reiterated his claim that Bolsonaro was being unfairly treated. "They're treating President Bolsonaro very unfairly," Trump told reporters, calling him "a good man." "I know the honest ones, and I know the crooked ones," he added. Lula has hit back at Trump's "interference," insisting that "no one is above the law."

Environmental reform could slash government spending, lift productivity: expert
Environmental reform could slash government spending, lift productivity: expert

News.com.au

time2 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Environmental reform could slash government spending, lift productivity: expert

Urgent reform of Australia's 'broken' environmental laws would dramatically cut government costs and lift productivity growth, a leading environment expert claims. The Albanese government has faced continued pressure over Australia's sluggish productivity growth, which is among the worst in the developed world. Australian Climate and Biodiversity Foundation chair Ken Henry said sweeping environmental reform could be the solution. The former Treasury secretary will tell the National Press Club in Canberra on Wednesday there is 'no chance' the Labor government will meet its net-zero target while also delivering upon housing and infrastructure commitments without reform to state and federal environmental protection laws. 'The Australian government has an ambition to massively increase critical minerals exports and downstream processing here in Australia,' Dr Henry is expected to state. 'This means more mines, new industrial facilities, and more pressure being loaded onto broken EPBC project assessment and approval processes.' The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act, or EPBC, is Australia's main national environmental legislation. Dr Henry said the government's pledge to erect 1.2 million homes by 2030 would require more land and transport, meaning more interaction with EPBC assessments. 'These projects, be they wind farms, solar farms, transmission lines, new housing developments, land-based carbon sequestration projects, new and enhanced transport corridors or critical minerals extraction and processing plants, must be delivered quickly and efficiently,' Dr Henry will tell the NPC. 'All these projects will be critical to enhancing economic resilience and lifting flagging productivity growth. 'Boosting productivity and resilience relies upon environmental law reform. 'But the biggest threat to future productivity growth comes from nature itself; more particularly, from its destruction.' Dr Henry will urge for a breaking of the 'deadlock' to deliver sweeping reforms in a single package. They would include protecting Matters of National Environmental Significance guidelines by shifting the focus to regional planning, urgent finalisation of the effective national environmental standards, and formation of a national environmental protection agency. He will also urge for 'genuine co-operation and a shared purpose' between business and environmental groups as well as between the states and federal government. 'Environmental law reform provides an opportunity to reconstruct the co-operative federal reform capability we developed in the 1990s but have since lost,' Dr Henry will state. 'A strong federal reform capability will be required to deliver other, even more challenging economic reforms. Environmental law reform can provide the template.' Dr Henry said there was 'no point in building a faster highway to hell', and while approvals needed to be granted faster, the environment needed to be protected. 'In reforming the EPBC Act, we can get this right. We have had all the reviews we need,' he will say. 'All of us have had our say. It is now up to parliament. Let's just get this done.' The Labor government is contending with a raft of proposals to fix productivity, from superannuation reform to artificial intelligence and disability inclusion. At the same time, Environment Minister Murray Watt said in May that legislating a federal environment protection agency was a 'very high and immediate' priority.

Nine homes in three years: Australia's rental crisis laid bare
Nine homes in three years: Australia's rental crisis laid bare

News.com.au

time2 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Nine homes in three years: Australia's rental crisis laid bare

Jess Preston was just 17 when she moved into her first rental – an arrangement so dodgy her landlord insisted on cash-only payments, banned cooking indoors and ultimately faced the tribunal after Ms Preston took legal action. 'I was young so I didn't know these weren't things that were not OK to have as a condition,' Ms Preston said. After escaping an unsafe home as a teenager, Ms Preston, now 22 and studying at university in Canberra, has moved nine times in just three years, spending part of that time in shelters and on the streets. Despite finally landing in a stable home, the cost of rent has left her making impossible choices just to stay afloat. 'I usually skip lunch or breakfast, I went to the chemist for cold and flu tablets this week and I could afford it this time but I never know about next time,' she said. 'I always have in the back of my mind, will I have to drop out of uni again and go back to full-time work? 'The worst thing is, my story isn't uncommon.' Ms Preston is far from alone. A new report by national housing campaign Everybody's Home lays bare the worsening rental crisis in Australia. The Out of Reach report, released on Wednesday, reveals average weekly rents in capital cities have surged 57 per cent from $473 in 2015 to $742 in 2025. The sharpest increases came just in the past three years with a rise of 34 per cent. Meanwhile, the proportion of social housing has plummeted to a record low of 4.1 per cent, down from 4.7 per cent in 2013. In cities once considered affordable, the situation is even more dire. Rents in Adelaide have jumped 81 per cent over the last 10 years, with Hobart not far behind at 76 per cent. 'This is a national crisis that is now pricing out everyday people right across the country. This report paints a clear picture of the damage that has been done, and without change it will only get worse,' Everybody's Home spokeswoman Maiy Azize said. 'As the federal government has walked away from providing housing, more and more people are being forced into an already strained private rental market which then pushes up rents right across the board. 'With more Australians renting than ever before and being priced out of the private housing market, the need for more low-cost rentals is essential.' Ms Preston has fought for years to remain housed while juggling studies and scraping by on Centrelink payments of just under $900 a fortnight, less than her $1000 rent. 'The worst thing is it's also not just rents increasing, it's the cost of moving multiple times,' she said. Ms Preston has fought back, starting petitions to change the dispute handling process, and facing landlords at the ACT Civil and Administrative Tribunal. But the system, she says, is stacked against renters. 'Sometimes tenants need to know their rights better than agents,' she said. 'If you have a concession card you get your fees covered but just because someone doesn't have a concession card doesn't mean they can afford to go to the tribunal. 'And even if the landlord pays the fine, they can just kick you out at the end of the lease so no one wants to face that.' She believes many Australians underestimate how widespread housing insecurity has become. 'People look down on those on Centrelink, but most of us don't want to be on it.' Everybody's Home is calling on the federal government to act decisively to set ambitious social housing targets and make proper investments to fix the crisis. 'If we want one in ten homes to be social housing, we need to build an extra 54,000 social homes every year for 20 years,' Ms Azize said. 'We need government action that matches the scale of the housing crisis. Australian governments have stepped up and mobilised during other emergencies, from Covid-19 to natural disasters, 'Housing should be no different.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store