Pressure on Labour to respond to landmark Palestine occupation ruling
The UK Government was sent a letter by 15 civil society organisations and one trade union, the Public and Commercial Services union, demanding it respond to the International Court of Justice's (ICJ) advisory opinion on the Israeli occupation of Palestine.
The occupation of territory outwith the borders of Israel agreed in 1948 is illegal and widely recognised as such, including by the UK Government.
However, the ICJ ruling from July 19, 2024 demanded that governments take action against Israel in a bid to force an end to its annexation of Palestinian land.
The letter, which has been signed by groups such as Christian Aid, Islamic Aid and Quakers in Britain, demanded that the UK Government stops selling arms to Israel and ends trade with the occupied territories.
It said: 'The UK Government has continued transferring arms to Israel, including F-35 parts which it admits are used in military activities in the [occupied Palestinian territories].
'The UK continues to allow the import of goods from the illegal settlements, and has taken no steps to prevent investment or involvement by UK companies in the illegal settlement project and occupation.
READ MORE: Armed police threaten woman with terror charge for holding Palestinian flag
'The UK has failed to suspend its trade deal with Israel, or even announce a review of it, despite the text of that agreement requiring respect for human rights as an 'essential element'.
'Our organisations demand that the UK Government acts with the utmost urgency to identify and prevent financial, commercial, trade, diplomatic, military, logistical or other support that aid or assist the maintaining of Israel's unlawful occupation of Palestinian territory, in violation of international law.'
It warned that Britain's abstention on a UN motion endorsing the ICJ opinion had served to embolden Israel as it continued its genocide in Gaza and expanded its illegal settlements in [[Palestine]] – with accompanying violence.
The letter said: 'The failure of the UK and other influential states to respond to the AO [advisory opinion] with the urgency it demands has encouraged Israel to defy the ruling.
'With impunity, Israel is in fact deepening its illegal occupation and accelerating the accompanying displacement of Palestinians. State and state-backed settler attacks on Palestinian West Bank communities continue to soar – with more than 1000 Palestinians including over 200 children so killed since October 2023 and 30 Palestinian West Bank communities forcibly transferred in the same period.'
A letter, signed by more than 100 MPs and peers has also been sent to the UK Government – with signatories crossing party boundaries – urging it to respond to the ICJ opinion.
It said: 'The failure of the government to publish its response on the advisory opinion and address the unlawful situation occurring in the [occupied Palestinian territories], as well its own obligations under international law to avoid complicity, needs to be rectified.
'Over the last year, since the opinion was issued, Israel has accelerated its violations of international law including the Fourth Geneva Convention in the [occupied Palestinian territories].'
Signatories include mother of the House Diane Abbott, Scottish Labour's Richard Baker, Patricia Ferguson and Brian Leishman (currently suspended), the entirety of the SNP group, former Scottish secretary Alistair Carmichael and Tory former Cabinet minister Kit Malthouse.
And 80 MPs and peers on Thursday wrote to the Foreign Secretary with a list of specific sanctions including suspending the Israel-UK trade agreement, cutting trade with illegal settlements and imposing travel bans and asset freezes on people and companies "complicit" in the occupation.
The UK Government was approached for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
2 minutes ago
- Reuters
Hamas says no interim truce possible without work toward permanent ceasefire deal
CAIRO, July 18 (Reuters) - Hamas' armed wing spokesperson said on Friday that while the group favours reaching an interim truce in the Gaza war, if such an agreement is not reached in current negotiations it could revert to insisting on a full package deal to end the conflict. Hamas has repeatedly offered to release all the hostages held in Gaza and conclude a permanent ceasefire agreement, and Israel has refused, Abu Ubaida added in a televised speech. Arab mediators Qatar and Egypt, backed by the United States, have hosted more than 10 days of talks on a U.S.-backed proposal for a 60-day truce in the war that has laid waste to the Palestinian enclave. As part of the potential deal, 10 hostages held in Gaza would be returned along with the bodies of 18 others, spread out over 60 days. In exchange, Israel would release a number of detained Palestinians. "If the enemy remains obstinate and evades this round as it has done every time before, we cannot guarantee a return to partial deals or the proposal of the 10 captives," said Abu Ubaida. Disputes remain over maps of Israeli army withdrawals, aid delivery mechanisms into Gaza, and guarantees that any eventual truce would lead to ending the war, said two Hamas officials who spoke to Reuters on Friday. The officials said the talks have not reached a breakthrough on the issues under discussion. Hamas says any agreement must lead to ending the war, while Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says the war will only end once Hamas is disarmed and its leaders expelled from Gaza.
Reuters
3 minutes ago
- Reuters
UK police drop Kneecap investigation over Glastonbury set
LONDON, July 18 (Reuters) - British police will not take any action against Irish rap group Kneecap following an investigation into comments made by its members during a performance at Glastonbury music festival last month. The force had launched a criminal investigation into gigs by Kneecap as well as punk-rap duo Bob Vylan, which took place one after another at Glastonbury's West Holts stage on day four of the June 25-29 festival. In May, a member of Kneecap was charged with a terrorism offence for allegedly displaying at previous gig a flag of Hezbollah, the Iranian-backed militant group that is proscribed as a terrorist organisation in Britain. He denies the offence. At Glastonbury the Belfast-based group led chanting against Prime Minister Keir Starmer while Bob Vylan's set included chants of "death to the IDF," a reference to the Israeli military. Avon and Somerset Police said in a statement on Friday that they decided to drop the investigation after consulting the Crown Prosecution Service. "After that advice, we have made the decision to take no further action on the grounds there is insufficient evidence to provide a realistic prospect of conviction for any offence," their statement said. Police said enquiries were still ongoing over the Bob Vylan set. Kneecap said the investigation was politically motivated. "Every single person who saw our set knew no law was broken, not even the police saw fit to publicly announce they were opening an investigation," the group said on Instagram.
Spectator
30 minutes ago
- Spectator
I fear for the Druze
Over 500 people are estimated to have been killed in the ongoing sectarian clashes between the Druze and Bedouin populations in Syria's southern Suweida province this week. Vowing to protect the local Druze, and backing the community's militia, Israel has bombed Syrian government forces around Suweida and launched missiles on Damascus. While Syria's interim president Ahmed al-Sharaa has promised to safeguard the minority community, and has announced the withdrawal of troops from the area, his government forces have been directly involved in attacks against the Druze. Druze civilians have been indiscriminately killed in 'field executions' by Syrian government forces and their allies. A militia affiliated with the government have also been looting and burning homes, and have been recorded forcibly shaving the moustaches of Druze men in line with Salafi Islamist dictates. Radical Islamists have vowed a 'jihad against Druze' in recent weeks. An Arab esoteric religious community that evolved from the Ismaili branch of Shia Islam, the Druze self-identify as a distinct religious group. There are significant numbers of Druze in Syria, Lebanon and Israel. Roughly half of the around one million global Druze population live in Syria, the vast majority of them in Suweida's Jabal al-Druze region. The Druze have been dubbed heretics by radical members of both Shia and Sunni sects of Islam, who deem many of the community's beliefs, such as theophany and reincarnation, as sacrilege against Islam. From the Shia Fatimid Caliphate, to the Sunni Ottoman Empire, multiple regimes have sought to cleanse the Druze. Al-Sharaa's al-Qaeda affiliated Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) follows the jihadist ideology rooted in the teachings of 13th century Salafi theologian Ibn Taymiyya, who called the Druze the 'most deviant infidels', urging that their property be seized, women enslaved and the men 'killed whenever they are found.' Killings of Druze civilians, and clashes between sectarian militia in the region, have increasedsince the HTS toppled the Bashar al-Assad regime in December. The Israeli Druze community, up to 80 per cent of whom enlist in the Israeli Defence Forces, have urged their country's leadership to safeguard their besieged brethren in southern Syria. Even the Druze population of the occupied Golan Heights, many of whom have refused Israeli citizenship, has welcomed Israeli action in Syria. Sheikh Hikmat al-Hajari, the spiritual leader of the Druze community in Syria, has been requesting international intervention for weeks, insisting 'Israel is not the enemy'. But where Benjamin Netanyahu has justified Israeli airstrikes in Syria has being designed to 'protect our Druze brothers', the Israeli prime minister has much to gain from a demilitarised Suweida and southern Syria. The region can serve as a buffer between Israel and countries hostile to its existence, which might best be guaranteed by propping up an independent Druze state. An autonomous Jabal al-Druze, which means the mountain of the Druze, had briefly existed under the French mandate between 1921 and 1936 encompassing what is now the Suweida province of Syria. The name Jabal al-Druze had originally been used for parts of Mount Lebanon where independent Druze rule had existed under the Ma'n dynasty. These regions not only have significant Druze, but also Christians, another community in the region facing calls for elimination at the hands of Islamists. A grotesque reminder of the same was given last month when over 60 people were killed in the Mar Elias Church bombing in Damascus. This has prompted aspirations to rekindle the Maronite-Druze dualism that founded modern day Lebanon. The persecution of Christian community in the region, and the rise of Islamist forces recently exemplified by jihadist outfits such as Hezbollah, has reduced the Christians in Lebanon from constituting over 53 per cent of the population in 1932 to today being estimated to be under one third. Even though movements for the creation of a separate homeland haven't yet been taken up by the vulnerable Christian and Druze minorities in the region, it might have become an existential question for them today. While consolidating a Druze state with significant Christian population might serve Israel's geopolitical interests, the Jewish state needs to reflect on its own relationship with these communities as well. The Israeli Druze have protested against the 2018 law that established their country as a nation state of Jewish people, relegating religious minorities to the secondary tier with regards to the state's recognition of them, in turn tarnishing Israel's claims of being the sole secular democracy in the region. Far-right Jews, including some in Netanyahu's government, have also frequently attacked these communities. Safeguarding Druze autonomy in their historical homelands, while pushing for an ethnic cleansing of Gaza, is a leaf out of gory Islamist duplicity. It is hardly surprising that the Muslim world hasn't expressed any concern for the long victimised Druze community, and has not championed their right to self-determination.
