
Drone incursions on US bases come under intense scrutiny as devices prove lethality overseas
FIRST ON FOX: A group of House Republicans is demanding details on how government agencies are addressing the growing threat of unauthorized drone incursions on U.S. military installations.
In letters sent Thursday, the Subcommittee on Military and Foreign Affairs requested a trove of documents and communications from the Departments of Defense (DoD), Transportation (DOT), and Justice (DOJ).
The letters note that in 2024 alone, there were 350 drone incursions at over 100 U.S. military bases.
Lawmakers believe many of the responses to the illegal incursions, including an instance where a group of drones traipsed over Langley Air Force Base for over two weeks in December 2023, have been insufficient and fragmented.
Under current rules, base commanders must establish "hostile intent" before taking action — a threshold the lawmakers say is ill-suited to fast-moving and ambiguous drone threats.
Coordination between military installations, the DOJ, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), and local law enforcement is often "improvised and bureaucratically delayed," the letter states, leaving gaps that adversaries could exploit.
To assess the issue, Republicans are asking the agencies to turn over documents by July 10, including: all interagency policies and agreements on drone detection and mitigation; a list of all facilities protected under Title 10 Section 130(i); communications involving DoD, DOJ, FAA, and others about drone threats and authority gaps; all incident reports related to drone incursions since January 2022; any internal reviews assessing current legal frameworks and recommending reforms; plans for a joint federal-state-local task force on counter-drone coordination.
Fox News Digital has reached out to DoD, DOJ, and DOT for comment.
The lawmakers frame their demands as part of a broader push for legislative reform and operational clarity in the face of escalating drone threats to national security. "This is a rapidly evolving threat that requires a unified and proactive response," the letter states, emphasizing the need for better data sharing and resource allocation between agencies.
The threat comes at a time when the lethal capabilities of modern drone warfare have been proven on the ground in Ukraine and in the Middle East.
From the early days of Russia's 2022 invasion, unmanned aerial systems (UAS) have been deployed with devastating effect by both Russian and Ukrainian forces, transforming how battles are fought and how intelligence is gathered. What began as surveillance and artillery-spotting platforms has evolved into a full-scale integration of explosive-laden loitering munitions, or "kamikaze drones," capable of precision strikes deep behind enemy lines.
One of the most notorious platforms is the Iranian-made Shahed-136, a low-cost, GPS-guided drone that Russia has used in swarms to overwhelm Ukrainian air defenses and strike civilian infrastructure, including power stations and residential areas. These drones, launched in waves, have been used to sow terror and inflict strategic damage while costing a fraction of conventional missiles. Ukraine, for its part, has responded with creative adaptations, converting consumer camera drones into improvised bombers and launching strikes on Russian trenches, vehicles, and even naval assets in the Black Sea.
Israel used drones alongside warplanes to assault top generals and key military and nuclear facilities in Operation Rising Lion this month. Iran fired back its own onslaught of drones toward Israel.
Military analysts have said Ukraine represents the first major war where drones are central to strategy, not just supporting tools. Their widespread deployment has forced a tactical rethink, prompted innovations in electronic warfare and counter-UAS systems, and prompted debate about how quickly drones may outpace manned aircraft in aerial combat.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Antoine Massey captured after New Orleans jailbreak
NEW ORLEANS (WGNO) — 33-year-old Antoine Massey has been captured after 10 people escaped from the Orleans Justice Center over a month prior, on May 16. Confirmation of Massey's capture was provided by the U.S. Marshal's Office, with the inmate reportedly being found on Stroelitz Street in the Hollygrove neighborhood thanks to a tip that came from Crimestoppers. Officials with the Louisiana State Police say he will be taken to a correctional facility outside of the area. At the time of the escape he was facing charges of domestic abuse battery involving strangulation, theft of a motor vehicle and parole violation. More charges may follow his arrest. Convent man facing life sentence in 2021 fatal shooting case Homeland Security, the New Orleans Police Department, the Orleans Parish Sheriff's Office, Louisiana State Police, US Marshalls and the Jefferson Parish Sheriff's Office were all involved in the arrest. More details are expected to be provided by the NOPD in a 5:30 p.m. news conference, to be live streamed in this story. With Massey's capture, only one alleged escapee, Derrick Groves, remains on the run. Prior to the latest capture, it had been over a full month since another inmate, Lenton Vanburen, was taken into custody. This story will be updated as more information becomes trend already identified among 'Generation Beta' babies, BabyCenter claims Eight people shot within nine hours in New Orleans Two dead in Lower Ninth Ward homicide investigation Boil water advisory issued in New Orleans after 30″ main break How do the chemicals in sunscreen protect our skin from damage? Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Eight people shot within nine hours in New Orleans
NEW ORLEANS (WGNO) — Eight people have been shot in New Orleans across four incidents that occurred within nine hours on Saturday, June 28. According to the New Orleans Police Department, the first of the incidents became a homicide investigation in the Lower Ninth Ward neighborhood of New Orleans, and was reported around 12:38 a.m. Details of that incident have been covered by WGNO in a dedicated article. The next shooting incident reportedly happened at a house party at the intersection of Bill Street and Gus Street in New Orleans East around 1:18 a.m. Antoine Massey captured after New Orleans jailbreak Police say as the victims were present, multiple gunshots were fired, leaving a female and three males injured. The four of them arrived at two separate hospitals via private conveyance. The third shooting reportedly happened around 1:22 a.m. in the 2600 block of General De Gaulle Drive, where a man was shot in the body at least one time. He arrived at a local hospital by private conveyance. In the fourth incident, a 16-year-old male was reported to have been shot in the hand around 9:28 a.m., with confirmation at 9:49 a.m. Police say the shooting happened in the 10000 block of Dwyer Road in New Orleans East. He was also taken to a local hospital by private conveyance. No further information was trend already identified among 'Generation Beta' babies, BabyCenter claims Eight people shot within nine hours in New Orleans Two dead in Lower Ninth Ward homicide investigation Boil water advisory issued in New Orleans after 30″ main break How do the chemicals in sunscreen protect our skin from damage? Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


CNN
13 minutes ago
- CNN
After Supreme Court term, Chief Justice Roberts shrugs off ‘venting' by those who lost
Speaking a day after the Supreme Court ended its term with a burst of high-profile decisions, Chief Justice John Roberts on Saturday warned 'political people' against criticizing judges and shrugged off critics if they are 'venting' just because they lost. Without addressing the court's blockbuster decisions, including the high-profile ruling limiting the power of courts to act as a check on President Donald Trump, Roberts stressed the importance of an independent judiciary and warned against politicians expressing hostility toward jurists. 'I've been compelled over the past few years to make statements about people on one side of the aisle – their views on judges – and on the other side,' Roberts told a conference of judges meeting in Charlotte, North Carolina. 'It becomes wrapped up in the political dispute that a judge who's doing his or her job is part of the problem.' A few months ago, an audience listening to Roberts' remarks might have read a subtle message about Trump between those lines. In March, the chief justice issued a striking statement pushing back on White House talking points that increasingly targeted judges – including with threats to impeach those who ruled against Trump. But more recently, Roberts and his conservative colleagues on the court have given the president far more reasons to celebrate than complain. The most significant example of that landed Friday, when a 6-3 majority backed Trump in his months-long fight over nationwide court orders that have paused many of his controversial executive orders. Democrats and left-leaning groups decried that ruling on Friday, arguing it kneecapped the ability of courts to stop a president's policy even if it violates the law. 'The danger, of course, is somebody might pick up on that, and we have had, of course, serious threats of violence and murder of judges just simply for doing their work,' said Roberts, who was speaking to a conference organized by the 4th US Circuit Court of Appeals. 'I think the political people on both sides of the aisle need to keep that in mind.' Speaking with Judge Albert Diaz, the chief judge of the 4th Circuit, Roberts recognized that the court had dealt with with six major cases on its final day – more than usual. In addition to the ruling on nationwide injunctions, the court also sided with religious parents who want to opt their children out of reading LGBTQ books in schools and upheld a Texas law that requires age verification for pornographic websites. 'Things were a little crunched toward the end this year,' Roberts said, suggesting the court might 'try to space it out a little better next year, I suppose.' Taking criticism over the court's opinions, Roberts said, is par for the course. But the chief justice also said that 'usually' such criticism has more to do with the fact that a party lost rather than any sense they didn't get a fair hearing. 'It's not the judge's fault that a correct interpretation of the law meant that, no, you don't get to do this,' Roberts said. 'If it's just venting because you lost, then that's not terribly helpful.'