India actively discussing trade pact with US, say minister
bilateral trade agreement
(BTA) with an aim to expand trade and investment, Parliament was informed on Tuesday.
In a written reply to the Lok Sabha, Minister of State for Commerce and Industry
Jitin Prasada
said India-US bilateral trade agreement negotiations were launched in March 2025.
Productivity Tool
Zero to Hero in Microsoft Excel: Complete Excel guide
By Metla Sudha Sekhar
View Program
Finance
Introduction to Technical Analysis & Candlestick Theory
By Dinesh Nagpal
View Program
Finance
Financial Literacy i e Lets Crack the Billionaire Code
By CA Rahul Gupta
View Program
Digital Marketing
Digital Marketing Masterclass by Neil Patel
By Neil Patel
View Program
Finance
Technical Analysis Demystified- A Complete Guide to Trading
By Kunal Patel
View Program
Productivity Tool
Excel Essentials to Expert: Your Complete Guide
By Study at home
View Program
Artificial Intelligence
AI For Business Professionals Batch 2
By Ansh Mehra
View Program
Five rounds of negotiations have been held, the last being from July 14-18th, 2025, at Washington, he said.
The US team is visiting India from August 25 to hold the next round of trade talks.
"To safeguard the interests of farmers and the domestic industry, international trade negotiations allow for the inclusion of sensitive, negative, or exclusion lists -- categories of goods on which limited or no tariff concessions are granted," he said.
Live Events
In addition, in case of surge in imports and injury to the domestic industry, a country is allowed to take recourse to trade remedial measures such as anti-dumping and safeguards on imports.
During 2021-25, the US was India's largest trading partner. The US accounts for about 18 per cent of India's total goods exports, 6.22 per cent in imports, and 10.73 per cent in bilateral trade.
With America, India had a trade surplus (the difference between imports and exports) of USD 35.32 billion in goods in 2023-24. It was USD 41 billion in 2024-25 and USD 27.7 billion in 2022-23.
In 2024-25, bilateral trade between India and the US reached USD 186 billion. India exported USD 86.5 billion in goods while importing USD 45.3 billion.
In a separate reply, he said the US did not accept India's request for consultations under an agreement of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) concerning American tariffs on steel, aluminium, and related derivative products, Parliament was informed on Tuesday.
The US has maintained that these measures were introduced on the grounds of national security, Prasada said in a written reply to the Lok Sabha.
India, however, considers these measures to be safeguard actions that should have been notified and subjected to consultations under the WTO's Agreement on Safeguards (AoS).
"India has accordingly reserved its right to suspend substantially equivalent concessions (right to impose equal trade measures in response) due to the US's non-compliance with its obligations under the AoS," he said.
In another reply, the minister said India has not taken any decision to suspend or restrict trade or tourism activities with Turkey and Azerbaijan.
However, the import from Turkey has declined from USD 3.78 billion in 2023-24 to USD 2.99 billion in 2024-25.
The major items imported from Turkey during 2024-25 include Petroleum Crude, Gold, Inorganic Chemicals, Granite, Natural Stones and Aircraft & Spacecraft parts.
The major items of import from Azerbaijan during 2024-25 include Finished Leather, Medical and Scientific Instruments, Raw Hides and Skins, Fruits/Vegetables Seeds and Hand Tools, Cutting Tools of Metals.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
10 minutes ago
- Mint
NSA Ajit Doval in Moscow amid Trump tariff threats over India's Russian oil buys. What's on the agenda?
National Security Adviser Ajit Doval has landed in Moscow, where he is scheduled to meet with Russian officials. This comes amid US President Donald Trump's threats to impose tariffs on Indian exports over the country's continued purchases of Russian oil. An anonymous source told Russia's state-run news agency TASS that Doval is expected to have 'several meetings' with Russian officials on Thursday, 7 August. Doval reached Moscow on Tuesday, according to Russian media. "A series of meetings is planned for August 7," the source said in TASS report. Doval was in Moscow last year in September. External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar is also scheduled to visit Moscow later this month. While Doval and Jaishankar's are part of routine annual consultations and were scheduled well in advance, they come against the backdrop of growing tensions in India-US relations over New Delhi's ties with Moscow. After imposing a steep 25 per cent tariff on India, Trump on Tuesday threatened to raise it 'substantially' over New Delhi's refusal to stop buying Russian oil. On Monday, too, Trump had warned that he would raise the tariff on India 'substantially', saying that India was not only buying 'massive amounts of Russian oil' but also selling it 'on the open market for big profits'. Washington argues that India — along with China — is helping President Vladimir Putin fund his war in Ukraine through those purchases. New Delhi has defended its position, saying criticism from the US and European Union about India's trade with Russia was 'unjustified and unreasonable.' It highlighted that the EU and US continue to buy energy and other materials from Russia when 'such trade is not even a national compulsion.' Over the years, Modi has maintained close ties with Putin, having visited Russia in October. The Russian president is expected to visit India later this year — a trip that will likely be on the agenda during Doval and Jaishankar's discussions in Moscow, Bloomberg reported Amid rising tensions with Trump, India last week reaffirmed its 'steady and time-tested partnership' with Moscow and has not, so far, instructed its oil refiners to stop buying Russian oil.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
10 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Lebanese govt pushes for army plan to disarm Hezbollah by year-end
The govt's move came as Beirut is under US pressure to disarm the group that recently fought a 14-month war with Israel & was left gravely weakened, with many political & military leaders dead AP Beirut The Lebanese government asked the national army on Tuesday to prepare a plan in which only state institutions will have weapons in the small nation by the end of the year, a move that aims to disarm the militant Hezbollah group. The announcement by Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, after a nearly six-hour Cabinet meeting, came shortly after Hezbollah's leader said his group would not disarm and warned that the Iran-backed faction would resume missile attacks on Israel if military operations against them intensify. Salam said the government asked the army to have the plan ready by the end of the month for discussion and approval. The government's move came as Beirut is under US pressure to disarm the group that recently fought a 14-month war with Israel and was left gravely weakened, with many of its political and military leaders dead. The decision followed a July visit by US envoy Tom Barrack, who called for a more decisive policy to disarm the Iran-backed group. On Tuesday afternoon, Hezbollah leader Naim Kassem rejected calls for his group to lay down its weapons, speaking as the government was meeting to discuss the group's disarmament. Since the Israel-Hezbollah war ended in November with a US-brokered ceasefire, Hezbollah officials have said the group will not discuss its disarmament until Israel withdraws from five hills it controls inside Lebanon and stops almost daily airstrikes that have killed or wounded hundreds of people, most of them Hezbollah members. Israel has accused Hezbollah of trying to rebuild its military capabilities. Israel's military has said the five locations in Lebanon provide vantage points or are located across from communities in northern Israel, where about 60,000 Israelis were displaced during the war. Since the ceasefire, Hezbollah has claimed responsibility for one attack on a disputed area along the border. In a televised speech on Tuesday, Kassem said Hezbollah rejects any timetable to hand over its weapons. "Israel's interest is not to widen the aggression because if they expand, the resistance will defend, the army will defend and the people will defend," Kassem said. "This defence will lead to the fall of missiles inside Israel." Since the war ended, Hezbollah has withdrawn most of its fighters and weapons from the area along the border with Israel south of the Litani river. Last week, Lebanese President Joseph Aoun reiterated calls for Hezbollah to give up its weapons, angering the group's leadership. The ceasefire agreement left vague how Hezbollah's weapons and military facilities north of the Litani river should be treated, saying Lebanese authorities should dismantle unauthorised facilities starting with the area south of the river. Hezbollah maintains the deal only covers the area south of the Litani, while Israel and the US say it mandates disarmament of the group throughout Lebanon. Kassem said Hezbollah rejects a government vote over its weapons, saying such a decision should be unanimously backed by all Lebanese. "No one can deprive Lebanon of its force to protect its sovereignty, Kassem said. Hezbollah's weapons are a divisive issue among Lebanese, with some groups calling for its disarmament. Before the Cabinet meeting ended, two ministers allied with Hezbollah walked out of the session in what appeared to be a show of opposition to the decision. The Israel-Hezbollah war started a day after the October 7, 2023, Hamas-led attack against Israel from Gaza. It left more than 4,000 people dead and caused damage worth USD 11 billion. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Hindustan Times
10 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Soon, SOPs to curb non-consensual content
BENGALURU The Union government has set up an expert committee to create a standard operating procedure for combating the spread of non-consensual intimate images (NCII), following directions from the Madras high court in a case involving a woman lawyer whose private images were leaked and repeatedly resurfaced online. Centre told the court that the committee, composed of six experts and representatives from the Union government, will come up with a framework to deal with all cases involving NCII content. (Getty Images/iStockphoto) Senior counsel Abudu Kumar Rajarathinam, who appeared for the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY), told the court that the committee, composed of six experts and representatives from the Union government, will come up with a framework to deal with all cases involving NCII content. The government made the submission before a bench of justice Anand Venkatesh of the Madras high court that was hearing the woman advocate's petition against the continued circulation of her private photos and videos, which her former partner had recorded without her consent and shared online. Despite multiple takedowns, the images kept reappearing, prompting Venkatesh to intervene and demand urgent systemic solutions. The government informed the court that MeitY had constituted a committee with representatives from the ministries of home affairs, women and child development, communications (department of telecommunications), and MeitY itself. The joint secretary of MeitY will head the panel, which also includes cyber law experts and nodal officers from the participating ministries, it said. The committee will draft an SOP (standard operating procedure) that combines 'legal and technical strategies to immediately and effectively' tackle NCII content. It will also propose long-term solutions and outline clear steps that victims themselves can take when their private content is leaked online. The Centre told the court that sensitising government agencies to the issue will form another key part of the committee's mandate. The high court recorded the submissions and said the committee should treat the present case as a 'test case' to find a robust mechanism to block such content and prevent it from resurfacing. 'This is like Ravana's head. Each time you cut it, it grows back. Even when we block the video, it reappears. The real problem is relapse,' justice Venkatesh said, referring to the woman lawyer's videos and photos resurfacing online despite the government and police authorities repeatedly blocking them. The court then suggested that MeitY can take the same steps it took to block over 1,400 URLs, including international links, spreading anti-India propaganda during 'Operation Sindoor'. Justice Venkatesh said the same intensity and technological tools must apply when a 'citizen's dignity' is at stake. 'The nation is nothing but a conglomerate of its citizens. If we can take swift action to protect the country's image, we must do the same when one individual's fundamental right under Article 21, right to dignity, is under attack,' the judge said. The court noted that NCII content remains a pervasive and recurring issue, especially affecting women who face stigma, threats, and long-lasting trauma. 'This isn't just one woman's fight. It reveals systemic gaps that harm thousands of women across the country,' the judge said. The petitioner's counsel pointed out that while MeitY had previously blocked six URLs, the video had now resurfaced across 13 new links. Senior counsel Rajarathinam confirmed that the URLs were inaccessible in Delhi and Mumbai but still active in Tamil Nadu. He said this was probably because of coordination issues with local service providers and said the authorities will fix it. The court reiterated that the committee must take the present case as a blueprint and evolve a method that works, so it can be replicated in future cases. 'This court will not allow this to become just another committee with a report that gathers dust,' justice Venkatesh said. During a previous hearing last month, the court had directed MeitY to detect and remove all private content of the petitioner within 48 hours. The woman had filed a police complaint after discovering that her ex-partner had secretly filmed their private moments and shared the content online. Despite repeated takedown efforts, the videos continued to resurface on pornographic websites, messaging apps, and social media platforms.
