Is Target coming to Frankfort, Ky.? Where Target is opening new stores near me across US
Target's corporate website doesn't list opening dates for the new stores, but does reveal the approximate size of each new location.
Here's what know:
Yes, Target is opening one new store in Kentucky in Frankfort, according to corporate.target.com.
The new store will be located at the northeast quadrant of Interstate Highway 64 and Route 127, according to corporate.target.com. The size will be approximately 128,000 square feet.
Target has not yet revealed the opening date for the Frankfort store.
A Target spokesperson stated via email that the store's opening date would be revealed closer to when the location is ready for customers.
"We're excited to bring an easy, affordable and convenient shopping experience to new guests in the Frankfort community with this new Target store," the Target spokesperson said. "As we get closer to opening the store, we'll have more specific details to share − including how the shopping experience will be tailored to serve local guests and the grand opening date."
Here is a list of additional new Target locations, according to corporate.target.com. Target did not disclose opening dates for upcoming stores:
Buckeye: Located at the northeast corner of Interstate Highway 10 and Verrado Way; approximately 148,000 sq. ft.
Mesa Far E: Located at the northeast corner of Highway 60 and Signal Butte Road; approximately 148,000 sq. ft.
Queen Creek: Located at 37854 N. Gantzel Road; approximately 145,000 sq. ft.
Bakersfield: Located at Panama Lane and Gosford Road; approximately 148,000 sq. ft.
Fresno Fancher Creek: Located at 205 S. Clovis Ave.; approximately 148,000 sq. ft.
Jurupa Valley: Located at 8063 Mission Boulevard.; approximately 148,000 sq. ft.
Perris: Located at 1688 N. Perris Boulevard; approximately 150,000 sq. ft.
Denver Green Valley Ranch: Located at the northwest corner of East 56th Avenue and Tower Road; approximately 150,000 sq ft.
Firestone: Located at 4358 City Centre Road; approximately 128,000 sq. ft.
Guilford: Located at 900 Boston Post Road; approximately 78,130 sq. ft.
Norwalk: Located at 680 Connecticut Ave.; approximately 117,215 sq. ft.
Bradenton Heritage Harbor: Located at 725 Lighthouse Drive; approximately 148,000 sq. ft.
Cypress Creek Station: Located at 6415 N. Andrews Ave., Fort Lauderdale, Fla.; approximately 121,000 sq. ft.
Lake Nona: Located on Lake Nona Boulevard, half mile east of Boggy Creek Road; approximately 149,000 sq. ft.
Trailwinds Village: Located at County Road 466A and Seven Mile Drive; approximately 136,900 sq. ft.
Wesley Chapel Grove: Located at the corner of Oakley Boulevard and Pink Flamingo Lane; approximately 148,500 sq. ft.
Winter Haven: Located at U.S. Highway 17- 3rd Street SW and Avenue R SW; approximately 149,000 sq. ft.
Pocatello Chubbuck: Located at Pine Ridge Mall, southwest corner of Interstate Highway 86 and Yellowstone Avenue; approximately 128,000 sq. ft
Frankfort: Located at the northeast quadrant of Interstate Highway 64 and Route 127; approximately 128,000 sq. ft.
Springfield: Located at Boston Road and ½ mile east of Parker Street and Highway 21; approximately 128,000 sq. ft.
Tupelo: Located at northwest corner of North Gloster Street & Commonwealth Boulevard; approximately 148,700 sq. ft.
Springfield: Located at the southeast intersection of West Sunshine Street (Missouri Route 413) and West Bypass (U.S. Highway 160); approximately 148,000 sq. ft.
University City: Located at Olive Boulevard between Interstate Highway 170 and Woodson Road; approximately 149,900 sq. ft.
Grand Island: Located at West 13th Street (between Highway 281 and North Webb Road); approximately 148,200 sq. ft.
Flemington: Located at 325 Route 202; approximately 75,525 sq. ft.
West Orange: Located at 235 Prospect Ave.; approximately 150,000 sq. ft.
Bridgehampton: Located at 2044 Montauk Highway; approximately 90,000 sq. ft.
Queens Astoria: Located on 31st Street between Ditmars Boulevard and 23rd Avenue; approximately 47,000 sq. ft.
Fuquay-Verina: Located at 2901 Wallace Adcock Boulevard; approximately 148,000 sq. ft.
Mebane: Located at Interstate Highway 40 and Trollingwood Road; approximately 128,000 sq. ft.
Myrtle Grove: Located at southeast corner of Carolina Beach Road and Piner Road; approximately 128,000 sq. ft.
Selma: Located at 551 Saint Mark Ave.; approximately 130,000 sq. ft.
Lima Mall: Located at Elida Road and North Cable Road; approximately 128,000 sq. ft.
West Goshen: Located at 985 Paoli Pike; approximately 120,000 sq. ft.
Indian Land: Located at 5345 Crossridge Boulevard; approximately 148,000 sq. ft.
Lexington Augusta Highway: Located between Oak Pointe Drive and Jamestowne Court on Augusta Highway; approximately 129,000 sq. ft.
Seneca: Located at 1810 Sandifer Boulevard; approximately 128,855 sq. ft.
Brookings: Located north of Sixth Street/Highway 14 and east of Interstate Highway 29; approximately 127,000 sq. ft.
Dallas − Wynnewood Village: Located at 655 W. Illinois Ave., Dallas, TX 75224; approximately 111,000 sq. ft.
Forney: Located at 11520 East U.S. 80; approximately 148,900 sq. ft.
Fort Worth: Located at McPherson Boulevard and Chisholm Trail Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76123; approximately 149,000 sq. ft.
Katy Heritage: Located at 29355 Katy Freeway, Katy, TX 77494; approximately 148,000 sq. ft.
Little Elm: Located at southwest quadrant of U.S. Highway 30 and Ryan Spiritas Parkway; approximately 148,000 sq. ft.
Stafford: Located at Arc Lane; approximately 124,500 sq. ft.
Herriman: Located at 13251 S. Towne Commons Drive; Approx. 128,800 sq. ft.
Logan: Located at 1300 Main St., Suite #100, Logan, UT 84341; Approx. 148,771 sq. ft.
South Riding: Located at Loudoun County Parkway and Dulles West Boulevard; approximately 148,000 sq. ft.
Brown Deer: Located at the NE quadrant of W. Brown Deer Road and N. Green Bay Road. Approximately 128,000 sq. ft.
Chris Sims is a digital content producer for Midwest Connect Gannett. Follow him on Twitter: @ChrisFSims.
This article originally appeared on Louisville Courier Journal: Target near me 2025: Future Target locations coming soon to Kentucky, US
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)'s CEO Has A Great Relationship With Trump, Says Jim Cramer
We recently published . NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA) is one of the stocks Jim Cramer recently discussed. After bleeding close to $600 billion in market value in January amidst the DeepSeek selloff, Wall Street's AI chip darling, NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA) is once again the most valuable company in the world. The firm has benefited from growing investor bullishness about the long-term prospects of AI. NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA)'s shares closed the week 1% higher after big tech's continued persistence to spend billions of dollars to buy AI chips. Cramer discussed the impact and the CEO's relationship with President Trump: 'All CapEx go up, it's all NVIDIA. . .it's really good for NVIDIA. But of course, NVIDIA, the President talking about breaking them up, we'll get to that later. It was an out of body comment. Previously, the CNBC TV host commented on NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA)'s shares and parabolic moves: 'What is the solution to this? Look, in my forthcoming book, How to Make Money in Any Market, I have banished my antiparabola bias. I have a method I reveal of picking five stocks to go alongside an index fund with some money added each month. I state point blank that if you are in your 30s or older, you should own one speculative situation like an Oklo, okay, or a Joby. Just one. It could fail you after going parabolic. Moreover, if you're under 30, you can pick two speculative names out of five because you've got enough time to make back any potential losses. Photo by Javier Esteban on Unsplash Now, you may think I'm reckless for endorsing any of these even with caveats, but it's time to admit that for many years now, speculative stocks with great growth, they've worked. Oh, and let's not forget, they don't have to stay speculative. NVIDIA stock has had many parabolic moves, including the one that started in April. To keep yourself out of these runs because of a principle that stopped working ages ago, that's to be blind to change, and I don't like it. I don't want to be that way.' While we acknowledge the potential of NVDA as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the . READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
I Asked ChatGPT What Would Happen If Billionaires Paid Taxes at the Same Rate as the Upper Middle Class
There are many questions that don't have simple answers, either because they're too complex or they're hypothetical. One such question is what it might mean for billionaires to pay taxes at the same rate as the upper middle class, whose income starts, on average, at around $168,000, depending on where you live. Find Out: Read Next: ChatGPT may not be an oracle, but it can analyze information and offer trends and patterns, so I asked it what would happen if billionaires were required to pay anywhere near as much as the upper middle class. Here's what it said. A Fatter Government Larder For starters, ChatGPT said that if billionaires paid taxes like the upper middle class, the government would bring in a lot more money — potentially hundreds of billions of dollars more every year. 'That's because most billionaires don't make their money from salaries like upper-middle-class workers do. Instead, they grow their wealth through investments–stocks, real estate, and businesses–which are often taxed at much lower rates or not taxed at all until the assets are sold,' ChatGPT told me. Billionaire income is largely derived from capital appreciation, not wages. In other words, they make money on their money through interest. And as of yet, the U.S. tax code doesn't tax 'unrealized capital gains' so until you sell your assets, you could amass millions in appreciation and not pay a dime on it, ChatGPT shared. Learn More: What Do Billionaires Pay in Taxes? Right now, many billionaires pay an effective tax rate of around 8% or less, thanks to loopholes and tax strategies. Meanwhile, upper-middle-class households earning, say, $250,000 might pay around 20% to 24% of their income in taxes. (Keep in mind that the government doesn't apply one tax bracket to all income. You pay tax in layers, according to the IRS. As your income goes up, the tax rate on the next layer of income is higher. So you pay 12% on the first $47,150, then 22% on $47,151 to $100,525 and so on). So, if billionaires were taxed at the same rate as those upper-middle-class wage earners, 'it would level the playing field–and raise a ton of revenue that could be used for things like infrastructure, education or healthcare,' ChatGPT said. The Impact on Wealth Equality I wondered if taxing billionaires could have any kind of impact on wealth equality, as well. While it wouldn't put more money in other people's pockets, 'it could increase trust in the tax system, showing that the wealthiest aren't playing by a different set of rules,' ChatGPT said. It would also help curb 'the accumulation of dynastic wealth,' where the richest families essentially hoard wealth for generations without contributing proportionally to the system. But it's not a magic bullet. 'Wealth inequality is rooted in more than just taxes–wages, education access, housing costs, and corporate ownership all play a role,' ChatGPT said. Billionaires paying taxes doesn't stop them from being billionaires, either, it pointed out. Taxing Billionaires Is Not That Simple While in theory billionaires paying higher taxes 'would shift a much bigger share of the tax burden onto the very wealthy,' ChatGPT wrote, billionaires are not as liquid as they may seem. 'A lot of billionaire wealth is tied up in things like stocks they don't sell, so taxing that would require big changes to how the tax code works.' Also, billionaires are good at finding loopholes and account strategies — it might be hard to enforce. What's a Good Middle Ground? We don't live in a black and white world, however. There's got to be a middle ground, so I asked ChatGPT if there is a way to tax billionaires more, even if it's not quite how the upper middle class are taxed. A likely compromise would come from a policy decision, which isn't likely to be forthcoming anytime soon. President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill only offered more tax breaks to the wealthiest. However, policy proposals that have been floated, include: A minimum tax on billionaires where they might pay around 20% of their overall income Limiting deductions and closing tax loopholes that allow them to significantly reduce taxable income Tax unrealized gains (those assets that have only earned but not yet been sold), gradually. ChatGPT agreed that billionaires could pay more than they currently do, even if they don't pay exactly what upper-middle-class workers pay in percentage terms. 'The key is to design policies that are fair, enforceable, and politically feasible.' I asked how realistic such policy proposals are, and ChatGPT told me what I already knew: They're 'moderately realistic' but only with the 'right political alignment.' More From GOBankingRates 9 Downsizing Tips for the Middle Class To Save on Monthly Expenses This article originally appeared on I Asked ChatGPT What Would Happen If Billionaires Paid Taxes at the Same Rate as the Upper Middle Class Se produjo un error al recuperar la información Inicia sesión para acceder a tu portafolio Se produjo un error al recuperar la información Se produjo un error al recuperar la información Se produjo un error al recuperar la información Se produjo un error al recuperar la información
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Not Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) But RTX, Say A Lot Of People According To Jim Cramer
We recently published . Lockheed Martin Corporation (NYSE:LMT) is one of the stocks Jim Cramer recently discussed. Lockheed Martin Corporation (NYSE:LMT) is a key American defense contractor when it comes to the aerospace industry. Its fighter aircraft form the backbone of US air superiority. The shares have lost 11.9% year-to-date on the back of a major 10.8% dip in July after its Q2 profit dipped by a whopping 80% on the back of a classified $1.6 billion loss on a classified aeronautics project. Lockheed Martin Corporation (NYSE:LMT)'s Q2 revenue of $18.16 billion also missed analyst estimates of $18.57 billion. No wonder Cramer made the following remarks about the firm: 'RTX, by the way, pushed by a number of people, saying that's the defense stock you want to be in, not Lockheed Martin.' Source: Pexels Previously, Cramer had advised viewers to stay long on Lockheed Martin Corporation (NYSE:LMT): 'I like Lockheed Martin too much to tell you to do that. Every time I see Jim Taiclet, I say to myself, why does anyone want to sell that stock with a 3% yield and a great book of business and a terrific CEO? No, you stay long, Lockheed Martin.' While we acknowledge the potential of LMT as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the . READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
