INDIA bloc allies meet online for Monsoon Session strategy, set to raise Op Sindoor, Bihar SIR in House
The meeting, which included representatives from 24 opposition parties, was attended by top Congress leaders, including party president Mallikarjun Kharge, Lok Sabha Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi, and parliamentary party chairperson Sonia Gandhi.
New Delhi: Leaders of the INDIA bloc held a virtual meeting Saturday to plan their strategy for the upcoming Monsoon Session of Parliament, vowing to corner the Modi government over the Pahalgam terror attack and the sudden halt of Operation Sindoor.
Apart from the Aam Aadmi Party, which has pulled out of the alliance, leaders of all other members of the coalition including Trinamool Congress national general secretary Abhishek Banerjee attended and spoke in the meeting which lasted nearly two hours.
Sources who attended the meeting said that, in his remarks, Rahul said that the Pahalgam terror attack and the 'sudden halt' of the military operations against Pakistan were major issues that the Opposition must raise unitedly in Parliament.
Leaders, including Rahul, also referred to US President Donald Trump's latest claim that five fighter jets were shot down during Operation Sindoor and underlined the need to question Prime Minister Narendra Modi's silence on the matter.
Sources close to Banerjee told ThePrint that the Trinamool leader questioned the one-year extension given to Intelligence Bureau chief Tapan Deka despite Jammu and Kashmir Lt Governor Manoj Sinha admitting that intel failure led to the 22 April attack in Pahalgam resulting in the deaths of 26 people.
The TMC national general secretary, who was part of a multi-party delegation dispatched by the Centre to various countries to present India's case against Pakistan-sponsored terrorism, is also learnt to have questioned the objectives achieved by the initiative.
'How many countries came in our support? Instead of briefing our own people, MPs were sent to brief people and relevant stakeholders of other countries,' Banerjee is learnt to have said.
Sources said CPI general secretary D.Raja emphasised on the need for the INDIA bloc parties to act in a more coordinated fashion and avoid bickering in public. His suggestion came against the backdrop of the controversy sparked by Rahul Gandhi's remarks that he fights both the Communist Party of India (Marxist) and the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh ideologically.
CPI(M) general secretary M.A.Baby, who had termed Rahul's statement as deeply insulting, also attended the meeting but did not raise the matter, multiple leaders, who were in attendance, said.
CPI(ML) general secretary Dipankar Bhattacharya said there was a near consensus on the need to put the Modi government in the dock on the subject of foreign policy and India's 'complete isolation'.
'Many leaders expressed the need for holding a physical meeting of the alliance soon. It is likely that the meeting will be held during the Monsoon Session itself as it will last one entire month,' Dipankar said after the end of the meeting.
Congress general secretary (organisation) K.C. Venugopal said that the meeting would be held in August.
Later, Congress Rajya Sabha Deputy Leader Pramod Tiwari told reporters that the Opposition also agreed to question the government's position on the continuing Israeli assault against Gaza.
Among other issues that the Opposition resolved to raise in the Parliament include the demand for restoration of statehood to Jammu and Kashmir and the Special Intensive Revision in Bihar.
Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah also attended the meeting. The other CM present there was Jharkhand's Hemant Soren. The Samajwadi Party was represented by Ramgopal Yadav, while Tiruchi Siva of the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam also spoke at the meeting.
(Edited by Tony Rai)
Also Read: Narasimha Rao reason why coalition govts perform better than majority govts, says Naidu
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
8 minutes ago
- Mint
The new Income Tax Bill: Will linguistic makeover lead to taxation simplicity?
India's Income Tax Act is getting its biggest rewrite in over six decades. The Select Committee of Parliament has unanimously adopted the draft Income Tax Bill, 2025, which proposes 285 amendments to the original draft tabled in the Lok Sabha on 13 February. The government has accepted most of the committee's recommendations, paving the way for its likely passage in the ongoing monsoon session. At first glance, the new Bill appears to simplify India's notoriously dense tax code. It's shorter, cleaner, and more intuitively laid out. But scratch the surface, and questions emerge: does a change in language truly make for a simpler law? A clean slate While the new Income Tax Bill boasts a significantly reduced word count—almost half of the existing Income Tax Act—this brevity is largely a result of smart formatting and presentation rather than a fundamental simplification of the law. Much of the detailed content that previously existed as dense prose in long-winded sections, sub-sections, provisos and explanations has now been streamlined into clearer tables, schedules, and structured sections. For instance, the existing bulky sub-clauses containing saving and investment avenues in section 80C have now been moved into a separate Schedule XV. This reorganization enhances readability and accessibility, but the underlying legal complexity and scope of the law largely remain intact. Words that matter The Bill replaces traditional legal expressions like 'notwithstanding anything" with 'irrespective of anything." While the latter may sound simpler, it lacks the legal clarity that decades of judicial interpretation have attached to the former. 'Notwithstanding" indicates overriding power—'irrespective" does not carry that settled meaning, potentially reigniting legal disputes courts had already resolved. Moreover, for a common taxpayer, both phrases remain equally opaque. Replacing legalese with plain language doesn't necessarily make the law easier to follow—certainty in interpretation matters more than tone. There's no change in the fundamental classification of income. The new Bill retains all five heads of income—salaries, house property, business or profession, capital gains, and other sources. These are simply presented in a neater layout. Key provisions, such as tax slabs, standard deductions, and the ₹12 lakh threshold under the new regime, remain as defined in the Finance Act, 2025. This ensures continuity and avoids compliance shocks—but also means that long-standing complexities such as capital gains computation, valuation rules, and transfer pricing remain intact. Provisos reimagined A major shift lies in how the Bill handles provisos. The 1961 Act used them to carve out exceptions to main provisions, often viewed as subordinate. The new Bill, however, replaces many of these with separate sub-sections. While this improves visual clarity, it can change legal interpretation—turning what was once an exception into a standalone obligation or right. This could reopen settled positions and generate fresh litigation, particularly when courts try to interpret these new standalone sub-sections. In an unexpected move, the new Bill dials back the codified certainty around faceless assessments and appeals. Instead of clear statutory mandates, it leaves much of the process to be prescribed via future government notifications or schemes. This opens the door to discretionary interpretations and potential confusion around procedure. The Bill explicitly grants tax authorities powers to access digital devices, cloud storage, and social media during search and seizure operations. Though these were often exercised informally, they now gain legal footing. This raises privacy concerns and the urgent need for clear procedural safeguards to prevent misuse. The real test ahead To its credit, the Bill streamlines definitions, introduces logical sequencing, and replaces dense legal blocks with structured tables and sub-sections. It also adopts more intuitive terminology—such as replacing 'previous year" and 'assessment year" with 'tax year." These changes will certainly help professionals and users navigate the law more easily. But true simplification requires more than a cosmetic facelift—it must reduce ambiguity and litigation, not merely restructure it. The Income Tax Bill, 2025 brings welcome clarity in format and a future-ready design. But tax law isn't just about how it reads—it's about how it works. The law's strength lies in the continuity of judicial interpretation, and rewriting it without preserving this context risks making it unpredictable in practice. The real test won't be readability. It will be how well the new law holds up—in assessment proceedings, in courts, and in reducing taxpayer disputes. Mayank Mohanka is founder, TaxAaram India, and a partner at S.M. Mohanka & Associates.
Time of India
25 minutes ago
- Time of India
Rahul Gandhi speaks like "Leader of Pakistan," says BJP national spokesperson CR Kesavan
Bharatiya Janata Party ( BJP ) national spokesperson CR Kesavan on Sunday launched a sharp attack on Leader of Opposition (LoP) in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi , accusing him of echoing a "pro-Pakistan narrative" after the Congress leader questioned Prime Minister Narendra Modi over US President Donald Trump 's recent "five jets shot down" claim. He further stated that the Congress leader spoke like the "Leader of Pakistan." Explore courses from Top Institutes in Select a Course Category PGDM Technology Others Data Science Leadership Public Policy Digital Marketing CXO Degree Finance others healthcare Healthcare Cybersecurity Data Analytics Management Artificial Intelligence MBA MCA Product Management Project Management Design Thinking Data Science Skills you'll gain: Financial Analysis & Decision Making Quantitative & Analytical Skills Organizational Management & Leadership Innovation & Entrepreneurship Duration: 24 Months IMI Delhi Post Graduate Diploma in Management (Online) Starts on Sep 1, 2024 Get Details "Rahul Gandhi is speaking like LoP. Not the Leader of Opposition but the Leader of Pakistan, peddling a very toxic pro-Pakistan narrative and tarnishing the image of India and our army," Kesavan told ANI. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Join new Free to Play WWII MMO War Thunder War Thunder Play Now Undo Labelling Rahul Gandhi's social media post as "pernicious and toxic", Kesavan said that the tweet demonstrated the Congress leader's lack of trust in the Indian Armed Forces . "Rahul Gandhi's pernicious, toxic tweet clearly demonstrates that Rahul Gandhi has no trust in our Indian Armed Forces. The tweet clearly shows that Rahul Gandhi's loyalty does not lie with India, and also Rahul Gandhi seems to be deriving a very sadistic pleasure in demeaning our brave defence personnel and defaming our nation... Rahul Gandhi currently got bail in a defamation case, allegedly for insulting the dignity of the Indian Army, and now he continues to ungratefully malign our armed forces..." Live Events Kesavan further claimed that while Trump's statement on jets nowhere mentioned India, Rahul Gandhi twisted and tried to humiliate the selfless valour of the Indian Army. "The tweet made by US President Trump had nowhere mentioned India's name. Rahul Gandhi has twisted and tried to humiliate the selfless valour of the Indian Army... he does not have belief in our own armed forces. His behaviour is condemnable. His dangerous anti-India campaign has caused outrage everywhere..." he added. Kesavan said such "anti-India campaigns" by Rahul Gandhi had triggered widespread outrage and added, "People of India will teach Rahul Gandhi a lesson..." The remarks came a day after Rahul Gandhi, in a post on X on July 19, questioned Prime Minister Narendra Modi regarding Trump's claims of having defused an escalation between India and Pakistan, during which "five ships were shot down." The post read, "Modi ji, what is the truth about the 5 ships? The country has the right to know!" This comes after Donald Trump once again claimed to have halted the escalation of the India-Pakistan conflict on Saturday.
Hans India
38 minutes ago
- Hans India
BJP leader Ashoka terms tunnel road project as ‘environmental disaster'
Bengaluru: BJP leader R Ashoka on Saturday lashed out at Deputy Chief Minister D K Shivakumar for pursuing a tunnel road project in the city, claiming this is not just an 'environmental disaster', it's a monument to 'political arrogance, ego and corruption.' With this project, he alleged that the Congress-led government in the state plans to plough through Bengaluru's most iconic heritage zones and lung spaces - Lalbagh, Palace Grounds, St John's Hospital, Race Course, and Hebbal - by digging 100-ft deep shafts to launch giant tunnel boring machines. 'This isn't urban mobility. It's urban mutilation,' he said. Criticising the project, Ashoka, who is also the Leader of Opposition in the state Legislative Assembly, said the people of Bengaluru deserve better, not 'ego tunnels' for a few, but clean air, green spaces, and real, equitable public transport. 'This is not development. This is environmental vandalism masquerading as infrastructure, and Congress-backed betrayal of a city already on the brink. There is loot at the end of this tunnel!,' he said in a post on 'X'. According to a Cabinet decision, the tunnel road will cost Rs 17,780 crore, and it will be implemented under modified Build-Own-Operate-Transfer (BOOT) model. The twin tunnel will run from Hebbal's Esteem Mall Junction to Silk Board Junction, covering 16.745 km. 'DCM @DKShivakumar's tunnel road project is not just an environmental disaster, it's a monument to political arrogance, ego, and corruption,' he stated. Questioning the 'deafening silence' of Congress leader Rahul Gandhi and that of AICC president Mallikarjun Kharge over the project, the BJP leader further said, 'This is the same Rahul Gandhi who raised a hue and cry over environmental concerns in Aarey (Maharashtra) and Hasdeo Aranya (Chhattisgarh). But when his ownparty's Deputy CM is ploughing through Bengaluru's ecology, he suddenly looks away. Why the hypocrisy?.' Targeting the Congress leaders, Ashoka asked, 'If Rahul's environmental concern were reserved only for BJP-ruled states? Or is that the Congress High Command is getting a cut in this crore worth tunnel road project deal? 'Has their silence been purchased through contracts, commissions, and legacy politics? There is loot at the end of this tunnel!' Recently, BJP MP Tejasvi Surya slammed Shivakumar for pursuing an unscientific 'vanity' tunnel road project in the city, claiming that it would only serve the elite while burdening the common man. He urged the state government to abandon the plan and instead invest in expanding public transport infrastructure, warning that the tunnel project could worsen the city's traffic situation.
