Weight loss jabs alone will not be enough to turn the tide on obesity
It should also make sure people have wraparound support to help ensure they do not pile back the pounds on after they have lost weight, the RCP said.
It also called for action to tackle the nation's 'broken food system' to help people make healthier choices, including reducing 'aggressive' marketing and advertising of unhealthy food.
In a new position statement, the College said: 'Medication alone will not be enough to make meaningful and lasting progress on tackling obesity.'
It said that the Government must also tackle the 'social and environmental drivers of obesity'.
The position statement adds: 'Policies should reduce aggressive marketing and advertising of foods high in fat, salt, and sugar, while increasing the availability and affordability of healthy foods from an early age.
'We must tackle our broken food system and ensure it is easier for all to choose to eat healthily.'
#BetterHealth offers a range of free NHS apps to help people eat better and get active, including the NHS Weight Loss Plan app.
Data shows it can help people lose 5.8kg on average over just 12 weeks. Find out more: https://t.co/Bv6bumO9ZU pic.twitter.com/XQuL0z6unA
— NHS London (@NHSEnglandLDN) July 25, 2023
Last week the Government pledged to 'launch a moonshot to end the obesity epidemic' in its 10 Year Plan for Health.
Now the College has urged ministers to set out details and timelines of how it will deliver this commitment.
It comes as the College released a poll of members and fellows, showing that four in five (80%) of almost 19,000 doctors in the UK, surveyed by the RCP, said that the number of patients they see with obesity has increased over the last five years.
The RCP warned that treatment for other illnesses is less effective as a result of obesity.
Dr Kath McCullough, special adviser on obesity for the RCP, said: 'The narrative that obesity is about personal responsibility or that new medications will solve the problem is misleading.
'Obesity is a chronic illness shaped by a range of factors and influences – and it's on the rise.
'We are seeing daily how obesity causes and makes it harder to treat conditions, from diabetes and arthritis to heart disease and cancer.
'The NHS 10 Year Plan rightly sets out a suite of measures that can be used in the fight against obesity, but the armoury is far from complete.
'Weight loss drugs can be part of the solution for some patients, but our efforts must focus on preventing people developing obesity and overweight in the first place.
'We welcome the measures Government announced last week – they have great potential. We look forward to seeing the detail on how we will translate that ambition into reality.'
RCP president Dr Mumtaz Patel said: 'Doctors are telling us loud and clear about the scale and impacts of obesity. It is undermining treatment, driving up complications and placing additional pressure on an already overwhelmed NHS.
'In less affluent communities, we're watching obesity fuel a vicious cycle – people are getting sicker, their care becomes harder to deliver and the system just can't catch up.
'We welcome steps the Government is taking. No few individual measures will be enough. It is a complex problem that requires multifaceted solutions.
'We need bold, joined-up preventative action that tackles the genetic, social, economic and commercial factors that drive obesity.'
An estimated 1.5 million are taking weight loss jabs in the UK.
Around 29% of adults in the UK are obese.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
STV News
4 hours ago
- STV News
Infected blood scandal victims 'stripped of their dignity'
The Government's 'failure' to listen to victims of the infected blood scandal has been 'exposed' in a new report, campaigners have said. The Haemophilia Society said that victims of the scandal, dubbed the worst treatment disaster in the history of the NHS, have been 'stripped of their dignity'. Campaigners said that around 100 infected people have died since the main report into the scandal was published last May, with people in the 'affected community' – including bereaved parents and partners – dying in even greater numbers. It comes as a report into the compensation for those infected and affected was published on Wednesday, following additional hearings of the Infected Blood Inquiry. Kate Burt, chief executive of the Haemophilia Society, said: 'Government's failure to listen to those at the heart of the contaminated blood scandal has shamefully been exposed by the Infected Blood Inquiry yet again. 'This failure is exhausting, damaging and is stripping this community of its dignity. 'Now Government must take urgent action to put this right by valuing those impacted by this scandal through a fair and fast compensation settlement. 'Only then can the infected blood community move on from the past and finally focus on what remains of their future.' Andy Evans from the campaign group Tainted Blood, said: 'Since the inquiry published its final report on May 20 2024, we have been losing people at a rate of up to two a week, and that's been continuing since that time. 'And since we're now more than a year on, we are now talking about more than 100 people having died from the infected community alone, and more from the affected community who are ageing parents and partners.' He added: 'The concerns we had (about compensation) are valid and things need to be done about them. So I'm really pleased the inquiry has listened to us and made these recommendations. 'We hope the Government realises that we are not the enemy here, we can help them with this compensation scheme.' The latest report into the scandal states that 'the impacts of infection with hepatitis are not being fully recognised (or applied) in the scheme as it stands'. Glenn Wilkinson, from the Contaminated Blood Campaign, told the PA news agency: 'It's not about the speed of compensation, it's about the adequacy of compensation. 'What's the point in delivering a compensation scheme quickly if it's going to fail the majority of people? 'As it stands, those in the hepatitis C community are going to be compensated at the very least 50% less compared to those with HIV when the death toll within the hepatitis C community is far greater than that of the HIV community. There's no justice to this.' He said that people with hepatitis C feel forced to stay on support schemes as a result of the current compensation scheme which mean they are 'effectively tied to our abuser for the rest of our lives'. Gary Webster, a pupil who went to Lord Mayor Treloar College, a boarding school in Hampshire, from 1975 to 1983, welcomed the recommendation for an increase to the money paid for 'unethical research practices'. Mr Webster was one of several pupils who attended the school and was given treatment for haemophilia at an on-site NHS centre while receiving their education. It was later found that many pupils with the condition, which has no cure and impairs the body's ability to make blood clots, had been given blood products which were infected with hepatitis and HIV. 'I was very pleased with Sir Brian's additional report today,' he told the PA news agency. 'We are pleased with the recommendations made, especially the proposed uplift in unethical medical research; also that the whole process needs to be sped up as (we) don't have time to wait.' Rachel Halford, chief executive of the Hepatitis C trust, said: 'The people impacted by the infected blood scandal have been failed for 50 years; the Government's refusal to act swiftly and collaboratively in designing the infected blood compensation system failed them yet again. 'They have delayed every action and routinely ignored the voice of the community; as a result, we have a poorly designed compensation scheme that does not reflect the harm done to thousands of people affected.' She added: 'This report should never have been needed. 'But we hope today can mark a turning point in this terrible scandal.' Richard Angell, chief executive of Terrence Higgins Trust, added: 'Those impacted by HIV as a result of this tragedy have endured unimaginable suffering – physically, mentally, and emotionally. 'Having borne the heaviest burden for the longest time, it is essential that their claims be prioritised. 'We work with one family whose young son died three decades ago because of Aids-related illnesses caused by infected blood. 'His father now has dementia. It shouldn't be too much for him to receive compensation whilst he can still remember his son. 'Justice delayed is justice denied. We need faster and fairer progress and those who have been waiting the longest, experiencing Aids, early treatments and loss after loss, deserve to be prioritised.' Leigh Day partner Gene Matthews said: 'We hope the Cabinet Office and the Government accept those recommendations and take immediate steps to ensure the infected and affected communities are properly compensated for what happened to them. Des Collins, senior partner at Collins Solicitors and adviser to some 1,500 victims of the infected blood scandal, said: 'The Government has earmarked £11.8bn in funds for the infected blood community. 'We need the Government to work constructively now with the Inquiry and the victims to implement Sir Brian's recommendations without delay.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Leader Live
5 hours ago
- Leader Live
NHS resident doctors will strike for five days later this month, union says
Announcing strike dates across England, the BMA said it was giving the Government two weeks to come to the table to negotiate 'a path to pay restoration'. Health Secretary Wes Streeting called the move 'completely unreasonable' and urged the union to 'abandon their rush to strike', while health chiefs warned strikes are 'unfair to patients'. Resident doctors are scheduled to strike from 7am on July 25 to 7am on July 30. BMA resident doctors committee co-chairs, Dr Melissa Ryan and Dr Ross Nieuwoudt, said in a statement they had met with Mr Streeting but the Government would not move on pay. It said: 'We met Wes Streeting yesterday and made every attempt to avoid strike action by opening negotiations for pay restoration. 'Unfortunately, the Government has stated that it will not negotiate on pay, wanting to focus on non-pay elements without suggesting what these might be. 'Without a credible offer to keep us on the path to restore our pay, we have no choice but to call strikes. 'No doctor wants to strike, and these strikes don't have to go ahead. 'If Mr Streeting can seriously come to the table in the next two weeks we can ensure that no disruption is caused. 'The Government knows what is needed to avert strikes. The choice is theirs.' Reacting to the BMA announcement, Mr Streeting said: 'I wrote to the BMA this morning to offer to meet their committee and work with them to improve the working lives of resident doctors. 'Instead of talking, they've announced strikes. 'No trade union in British history has seen its members receive a 28.9% pay rise only to immediately respond with strikes, and the majority of BMA resident doctors didn't vote to strike. 'This is completely unreasonable. 'The NHS recovery is hanging by a thread, and the BMA are threatening to pull it. 'The BMA should abandon their rush to strike and work with us to improve resident doctors' working lives instead.' It comes after Mr Streeting warned that the public 'will not forgive' strike action by resident doctors. He wrote in The Times that walkouts would be a 'disaster' for BMA members and patients, saying the Government 'can't afford' more pay rises. Some 90% of voting resident doctors backed strike action, with the BMA reporting a turnout of 55%. The union has said that resident doctors need a pay uplift of 29.2% to reverse 'pay erosion' since 2008/09. A Number 10 spokesman said: 'We aren't going to reopen negotiations on pay. 'Resident doctors have received the highest pay award across the public sector for two years in a row, and we've been clear that we can't be more generous than we already have this year.' Daniel Elkeles, chief executive of NHS Providers, warned five days of strike action with two weeks' notice 'can only be harmful'. 'It's totally unfair to patients whose care will be cancelled at such short notice just as the NHS was beginning to turn the tide on reducing waiting lists,' he said. 'It shows a lack of respect for colleagues from many other disciplines who received lower pay rises and will now have to cover resident doctors' work. 'And it is going to divert attention away from improving services to focus on planning to keep services as safe as possible. 'We need cool heads to de-escalate this and remove the threat of further damaging industrial action.' Danny Mortimer, chief executive of NHS Employers, part of the NHS Confederation, also warned industrial action 'will have a huge impact on the NHS and its patients' and could lead to thousands of cancelled appointments and operations. 'While NHS leaders and their teams will have to fill rota gaps and rearrange appointments, ultimately it is patients who will bear the brunt of this decision and will be left waiting longer for treatments,' he said. 'It is disappointing that talks to avert industrial action seem to have broken down so quickly. But it is hard to see how the Government could commit to increasing resident doctor pay further, particularly after they have received some of the biggest public sector pay rises over the last two years.' In September, BMA members voted to accept a Government pay deal worth 22.3% on average over two years. The 2025/26 pay deal saw resident doctors given a 4% uplift plus £750 'on a consolidated basis' – working out as an average pay rise of 5.4%. The BMA call for a 29.2% uplift is based on Retail Prices Index (RPI) inflation, the measure of average changes in the price of goods and services used by most households.
The Herald Scotland
5 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Scottish Government invests £85m to cut delayed discharges
While that is a 5% drop from May 2024, there were still 720,119 days spent in hospital by people who were well enough to go home during 2024–25. That is the highest annual figure reported since 2016. READ MORE Often, patients remain in hospital because the social care needed to support them at home is unavailable. The knock-on effect can leave others stranded in A&E, waiting hours—or even days—for a ward bed to become available. First Minister John Swinney was in Falkirk on Wednesday to announce plans to increase the capacity of the Hospital at Home service—which provides care at home rather than in a healthcare setting—to 2,000 beds. Mr Swinney said that as well as the £85m to be spent on the initiative, the Government was stepping up plans to introduce 'frailty teams' in every A&E department in Scotland, aimed at diverting older people to other services where appropriate. The teams, the Government said, will be in place by the end of the summer—slightly later than originally planned. The First Minister had previously pledged in January that they would be operational 'by this summer', with a similar commitment appearing in a Government document from March. Speaking ahead of the visit, Mr Swinney said: 'I am resolutely focused on taking the necessary action to reduce wait times and clear the blockages leading to delayed discharges across our NHS. 'This investment will ensure many patients can receive first-class NHS care in the comfort of their own homes and not have to travel to a hospital where it isn't required. 'Expanding Hospital at Home to 2,000 beds by December 2026 will create the largest 'hospital' in the country, thereby improving the flow of patients throughout the NHS and generating greater capacity for staff. 'The staff delivering this service at Falkirk Community Hospital are testament to the success of Hospital at Home and it has been eye-opening to see the effort that goes into providing this first-class care. 'The NHS is Scotland's greatest treasure but we know we must do better to ensure patients get the care they need, when and where they need it. 'The 2025–26 Budget provides record funding of £21 billion for Health and Social Care services—with NHS boards across Scotland receiving an additional £2 billion to deliver key front-line services.' Delayed discharge can often see patients stuck in A&E waiting for a bed (Image: Sourced) Marion Denholm, whose husband Bill was cared for by the Falkirk Hospital at Home team after contracting a chest infection, praised the clinicians. 'There are no words to adequately describe the care and attention my husband received while under the care of Hospital at Home,' she said. 'We've had doctors, advanced nurse practitioners, physiotherapists, occupational therapists, a dietitian and a speech and language therapist all visit our home to provide the care and treatment he required so he didn't have to go into hospital. 'This meant he was able to stay in familiar surroundings with his family around him at all times and still receive the same type of care he would have received in hospital.' She added: 'I can't praise the Hospital at Home service enough and I am sure many other local families feel the same. 'It also makes so much more sense to treat people in their own homes if you can, rather than occupy a bed in a busy hospital—it's definitely a win-win for everyone involved.' However, Scottish Conservative shadow public health minister Brian Whittle was sceptical. He said: 'It is over a decade since Shona Robison promised to eradicate delayed discharge from our hospitals, only for bed-blocking to hit record highs last year on the SNP's watch. 'Expanding this service will only help patients if the SNP properly resource local care services to deliver it, rather than squandering money on backroom bureaucracy. 'SNP ministers appear to have been blind to the delayed discharge crisis that has spiralled on their watch and leaves far too many Scots suffering in hospital every single day. 'They should finally accept their approach isn't working and back our common-sense plans to guarantee resources will get to where they are needed most.' READ MORE LibDem leader Alex Cole-Hamilton said the announcement was 'too little, too late'. 'The SNP have completely failed to get people the care they need at home or in the community,' he said. 'The SNP wasted time, energy and millions of pounds of taxpayers' money on a top-down takeover of social care which did not address the actual problems the system faces. 'Fixing the care crisis is at the very heart of the Liberal Democrat offer to the country. 'We want to see a new UK-wide minimum wage for care workers, £2 higher than the national minimum wage, to tackle the chronic staff shortages in care and make social care a profession of choice.'
