Housing crisis fix should involve wood – the ‘ultimate renewable'
So, when we're building these desperately needed new homes, renovating existing ones or even furnishing our current ones, we want to do so in an environmentally responsible and sustainable way so that we can all play our part in meeting the global goal of net zero by 2050.
United Nations-backed climate science data shows that to avert the worst impacts of climate change we must ensure the global temperature does not increase by more than 1.5 degrees. The UN admits that 'transitioning to a net-zero world is one of the greatest challenges humankind has faced'.
Achieving this target means slashing the current rate of carbon emissions, while finding new ways to absorb and store remaining greenhouse gases. The maths is daunting: we need to reduce emissions by 45 per cent by 2030 to give ourselves any chance of meeting net zero by 2050.
'It calls for nothing less than a complete transformation of how we produce, consume and move about,' the UN states plainly on its website.
Australia's Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water has identified several steps for decarbonising, including embracing circular economy principles, finding ways to expand zero-emission technology options and scaling up nature-based carbon sequestration.
Turns out, trees have been doing this since the beginning of time. Forest and Wood Products Australia (FWPA) head of marketing Sarah Downey notes — with a nod to the group's campaign The Ultimate Renewable — that when done sustainably, forestry is circular.
'Responsibly sourced, certified timber comes from well-managed forests,' she says. 'This means trees are regrown, biodiversity is protected and carbon stays locked away.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
Outback astronomers lodge appeal against Hydrostor's $1b energy storage project
A nearly $1 billion energy storage venture has hit a roadblock after an astronomy tourism business lodged a court appeal against the New South Wales government's decision to approve the outback project. In February, the NSW government approved Canadian company Hydrostor's 200-megawatt Advanced Compressed Air Energy Storage (A-CAES) project on the outskirts of Broken Hill as a State Significant Development (SSD) application. Linda and Travis Nadge own the tourism business Outback Astronomy, approximately 1.1 kilometres from the project, and lodged an appeal in the Land and Environment Court stating the project adversely impacts its business operations. In court documents obtained by the ABC, the Nadges said there is no agreement between them and Hydrostor addressing the noise levels at its address. The pair also said the project did not sufficiently identify lighting impacts, and that the environment impact statement and lighting impact assessment do not provide "any assessment of the light disturbance conducted at night". They say the Outback Astronomy business requires, over the course of a 30-day lunar cycle, three weeks of a dark, moon-free black sky to run its sky shows. Their other events require a moonlit sky to work. The pair also claim the environmental impact statement did not have a construction environmental management plan (CEMP) and therefore the project does not comply with EPA Act or key EPA regulations. In total, the Nadges made nine contentions in their 18-page statement, which was lodged in the NSW Land and Environment Court on May 16. They also contended the project did not meet zone objectives or have adequate essential services, in addition to lacking landowners' consent and detail on the development layout. Overall, the statement said, there was insufficient material to assess the application. Hydrostor lodged a response on June 16 and the NSW government on July 3, respectively. In response to noise concerns, a lawyer acting for the minister for planning and public spaces stated that the noise impacts on the Nadges were "assessed to comply with the NSW Noise Policy for Industry". Both the minister and Hydrostor denied the Nadges' contention regarding lighting impact. Both respondents' lawyers rejected the need for a CEMP, stating the project complied with the Planning Secretary's Environmental Assessment Requirements (SEARs). "It amounts to a contention that the minister's delegate did not have the jurisdiction to determine the SSD application, which is not a matter that is appropriate to be dealt with in this court's class 1 jurisdiction and is in an event denied," the minister wrote. As part of their statements of facts, the Nadges contend a residence adjacent to the project and across the highway from the Outback Astronomy business would also have adverse noise impacts from the project. In its reply, a lawyer for the state government alleged the residence was "unlawfully occupied" on land legally owned by the NSW government, and the residence had been constructed without "development approval". A day-long conciliation conference for the parties is scheduled for August 21.
ABC News
19 hours ago
- ABC News
Why we're using more electricity than ever before
Our hunger for electricity has never been so great. That's hardly surprising given the growing desire to electrify our homes and transport. But it's the massive computer data centres that could become a big problem. There are questions about whether the official forecasts underestimate how much power they'll need over the next ten years. Today, ABC energy reporter Dan Mercer on whether we have enough electricity to keep up with the huge demand. Featured: Dan Mercer, ABC energy reporter Subscribe to ABC News Daily on the ABC listen app.
ABC News
2 days ago
- ABC News
Ai Group boss says the industrial relations conversation is far from over as the government tries to lift productivity
Ai Group chief executive Innes Willox says the government's IR policies are inhibiting productivity. He also wants energy to cost less, and broad agreement on how to achieve de-regulation.
