logo
China shows signs of tackling the price wars that are taking a toll on its EV industry

China shows signs of tackling the price wars that are taking a toll on its EV industry

BEIJING (AP) — The Chinese government is signaling enough is enough when it comes to the fierce competition in the country's electric car market.
China's industrial policy has engineered a remarkable transformation to electric vehicles in what is the world's largest auto market. In so doing, it has spawned far more makers than can possibly survive. Now, long-simmering concerns about oversupply and debilitating price wars are coming to the fore, even as the headline sales numbers soar to new heights.
Market-leader BYD announced this week that its sales grew 31% in the first six months of the year to 2.1 million cars. Nearly half of those were pure electric vehicles and the rest were plug-in hybrids, it said in a Hong Kong Stock Exchange filing. The company phased out internal combustion engine cars in 2022.
BYD came under thinly veiled criticism in late May when it launched a new round of price cuts, and several competitors followed suit. The chairman of Great Wall Motors warned the industry could come under threat if it continues on the same trajectory.
'When volumes get bigger, it's just much harder to manage and you become the bullseye,' said Lei Xing, an independent analyst who follows the industry.
The government is trying to rein in what is called 'involution' — a term initially applied to the rat race for young people in China and now to companies and industries engaged in meaningless competition that leads nowhere.
BYD has come under criticism for using its dominant position in ways that some consider unfair, sparking price wars that have caused losses across the industry, said Murthy Grandhi, an India-based financial risk analyst at GlobalData.
With the price war in its fourth year, Chinese automakers are looking abroad for profits. BYD's overseas sales more than doubled to 464,000 units in the first half of this year. Worried governments in the U.S. and EU have imposed tariffs on made-in-China electric vehicles, saying that subsidies have given them an unfair advantage.
Market leader BYD comes under attack
The latest bout of handwringing started when BYD cut the price of more than 20 models on May 23.
The same day, the chairman of Great Wall Motors, Wei Jianjun, said he was pessimistic about what he called the "healthy development' of the EV market. He drew a comparison to Evergrande, the Chinese real estate giant whose collapse sent the entire industry into a downturn from which it has yet to recover.
"The Evergrande in the automobile industry already exists, but it is just yet to explode,' he said in a video message posted on social media.
Two days later, a BYD executive rejected any comparison to Evergrande and posted data-filled charts to buttress his case.
'To be honest, I am confused and angry and it's ridiculous!' Li Yunfei, BYD's general manager of brand and public relations, wrote on social media. 'All these come from the shocking remarks made by Chairman Wei of Great Wall Motors.'
Next, the government and an industry association weighed in. The China Association of Automobile Manufacturers called for fair competition and healthy development of the industry, noting that major price cuts by one automaker had triggered a new price war panic.
On the same day, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology vowed to tackle involution-style competition in the auto industry, saying that recent disorderly price wars posed a treat to the healthy and sustainable development of the sector.
'That price cut might have been the final straw that irked both competitors and regulators for the ruthlessness that BYD continues to show,' Lei said.
A promise to pay suppliers within 60 days signals possible shift
The following month, 17 automakers including BYD made a pledge: They would pay their suppliers within 60 days.
One way China's automakers have been surviving the bruising price wars is by delaying the payments for months. The agreement, if adhered to, would reduce financial pressure on suppliers and could rein in some of the fierce competition.
'The introduction of the 60-day payment pledge is the call of the government to oppose involution-style competition," said Cui Dongshu, the secretary-general of the China Passenger Car Association.
It also reduces the risk of an Evergrande-like scenario.
Many automakers had stretched out payments by paying suppliers with short-term debt — promises to repay them in a certain period of time — instead of cash. Real estate developers used the same system. It worked until it didn't. When Evergrande defaulted on its debts, suppliers were left holding worthless promises to pay.
'This practice is seen as a potential cause of a larger crisis, similar to what happened with Evergrande,' Grandhi said.
The vows to speed up payments and the government calls to rein in the price wars, along with a rollback of some financing offers, point to an effort to reverse downward price expectations, said Jing Yang, a director at Fitch Ratings who focuses on the auto industry.
'We may watch how effectively these measures are in reversing the price trend and how would that affect EV demand in the coming quarters,' she said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

DBS Sticks to Its Buy Rating for BYD Co (BYDDF)
DBS Sticks to Its Buy Rating for BYD Co (BYDDF)

Globe and Mail

time3 hours ago

  • Globe and Mail

DBS Sticks to Its Buy Rating for BYD Co (BYDDF)

DBS analyst maintained a Buy rating on BYD Co today and set a price target of HK$164.00. The company's shares closed yesterday at $15.63. Don't Miss TipRanks' Half-Year Sale Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Make smarter investment decisions with TipRanks' Smart Investor Picks, delivered to your inbox every week. BYD Co has an analyst consensus of Strong Buy, with a price target consensus of $22.89. Based on BYD Co's latest earnings release for the quarter ending March 31, the company reported a quarterly revenue of $170.36 billion and a net profit of $9.15 billion. In comparison, last year the company earned a revenue of $124.94 billion and had a net profit of $4.57 billion

What could a scrapped EV mandate mean for Windsor's NextStar battery plant?
What could a scrapped EV mandate mean for Windsor's NextStar battery plant?

CTV News

time4 hours ago

  • CTV News

What could a scrapped EV mandate mean for Windsor's NextStar battery plant?

A truck seen leaving NextStar Battery Plant in Windsor, Ont. on July 4, 2025. (Robert Lothian/CTV News Windsor) The potential scrapping of Canada's electric vehicle mandate could create more uncertainty in the short term for Windsor's NextStar Energy electric vehicle battery plant. Earlier this week, automotive leaders asked the federal government to scrap its electric vehicle sales mandate. 'Now, what's changed since it was designed and came into force is that we've had this collapse in EV sales,' Brian Kingston, the CEO of the Canadian Vehicle Manufacturers' Association, said after a meeting with Prime Minister Mark Carney on Wednesday. The meeting included the CEOs of Ford Canada, Stellantis Canada, and GM Canada. Greg Layson, the Digital and Mobile Editor for Automotive News Canada, told CTV News the targets were always 'ambitious.' 'With no zero emissions vehicle purchase incentives, it becomes more difficult to meet those targets from the government standpoint,' Layson said. Potentially lowered EV production creates another hurdle to overcome for the NextStar battery plant. Production of battery cells has been expected to begin at the plant later this year. NextStar Battery Plant NextStar Battery Plant seen in Windsor, Ont. on July 4, 2025. (Robert Lothian/CTV News Windsor) 'We were never going to see three shifts of production at the battery plant on day one,' Layson said. 'We weren't even going to see two shifts of production on day one. It was going to be a long, slow process. It might just be a longer, slower process.' Previous estimates expected the battery plant to create about 2,500 jobs when fully operational. NextStar Energy declined to comment on potential changes to the vehicle mandate. In a previous unrelated inquiry last week, the battery manufacturer noted about 850 employees have been hired so far. 'We're not going to hire 2,500 workers overnight to fill this place. They're going to hire shift at a time, fill what they need, work when they need to,' Layson added. Under the EV sales mandate, 20 per cent of all new light-duty vehicles sold in Canada must be zero-emission as of next year. The target rises annually to 100 per cent by 2035. Layson believes Canada could loosen the mandates and 'spread' out the targets. He's optimistic the plant will play a key role in the EV sector when consumers transition, but it could take longer than expected. The automotive journalist added the industry will need better infrastructure and more competitive pricing to see demand take off. 'When sales fall, production falls, and when production falls, batteries aren't needed,' he noted. -With files from the Canadian Press.

Global economy on edge ahead of Trump's trade deal deadline
Global economy on edge ahead of Trump's trade deal deadline

Globe and Mail

time6 hours ago

  • Globe and Mail

Global economy on edge ahead of Trump's trade deal deadline

After U.S. President Donald Trump imposed hefty tariffs on dozens of countries in April, then announced a three-month pause, one of his top advisers made a bold prediction. 'We're going to run 90 deals in 90 days,' Peter Navarro, the president's trade adviser, told Fox Business Network. Trade partners would trip over one another to offer concessions to the U.S. in order to avoid the threatened 'reciprocal' tariffs. With the July 9 deadline only days away, the Trump administration has come up short. It has signed only three deals – two barebone trade pacts with Britain and Vietnam and a partial and temporary tariff truce with China. On Thursday, a frustrated Mr. Trump said he would start sending letters to countries that had failed to reach an agreement with the White House, dictating tariffs as high as 70 per cent that would come into force in August. The situation is combustible. If Mr. Trump proceeds with the unilateral imposition of punishing tariffs, major trading partners that have held off retaliation will likely hit back with their own counter-tariffs. That could escalate quickly, convulsing supply chains and disrupting the calm that has prevailed in financial markets since April. Mr. Trump has threatened to send tariff letters before without following through. And more deals could emerge before the July 9 deadline. Trade officials from the European Union, Japan, South Korea and other countries, including Canada, have all been in Washington looking for a breakthrough. Analysis: As some Asian countries strike deals with Trump, others brace for tariffs Still, the fact that Mr. Trump – who fancies himself the ultimate deal-maker – has had such trouble closing, highlights the limits of America's ability to force its protectionist vision on the rest of the world. Access to the world's largest consumer market is potent leverage in any trade discussion. But other countries have diverse interests and complex domestic politics that make large trade concessions difficult. And they have an incentive to rag the puck, hoping Mr. Trump backs down in the face of renewed market turmoil, domestic opposition or court challenges. 'Countries don't view these talks entirely as a math equation,' said Brian Clow, who was deputy chief of staff to former prime minister Justin Trudeau and who helped oversee Canada-U.S. relations. 'It's also about pride and sovereignty, and so countries are only willing to bend so much to this president.' Mr. Trump's wholesale attempt to re-engineer the global trading system kicked into high gear on April 2, which he dubbed 'Liberation Day.' Using executive powers outlined in the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, Mr. Trump imposed a baseline tariff of 10 per cent on all trading partners – excluding Canada, Mexico and China, which had already been hit with IEEPA tariffs, ostensibly to punish them for shortcomings on border security. He also unveiled 'reciprocal' tariffs on some 50 trading partners, ranging from 10 per cent on the United Kingdom to 49 per cent on Cambodia. (These tariffs are separate from the sectoral tariffs Mr. Trump has placed on steel, aluminum and automobiles using Sec. 232 of the Trade Expansion Act). The verdict on 'Liberation Day' was swift and damning. Stock markets plunged and the U.S. dollar tumbled. There was a sharp sell-off in U.S. Treasuries alongside worrying signs of dysfunction in the world's most important bond market. After a week, Mr. Trump relented and announced the three-month pause, citing the 'yippy' bond market as a reason he reversed course. That set in motion the three-month sprint to get deals done. Britain reached an agreement first, which lowered levies on British car exports under a 100,000-vehicle quota and established duty-free quotas for beef, but left a 10 per cent baseline tariff in place. That was followed by an agreement with China that walked back the triple-digit tariffs both countries had placed one another in a mutually destructive show of brinksmanship. The truce is only six-months long and leaves the U.S. effective tariff rate on Chinese goods above 30 per cent. Then this week, the White House announced an agreement with Vietnam, that puts a 20 per cent tariff on Vietnamese goods (which is lower than the 40 per cent Mr. Trump had threatened), as well as a 40 per cent tariff on products that are deemed to have originated in China and been shipped to the U.S. via Vietnam. The booming Southeast is Trump's secret trade-war weapon Other deals are in the works. Negotiators from Japan, South Korea and the European Union have been meeting with Mr. Trump's trade team, led by Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer. But leaders in Tokyo, Seoul and Brussels have all indicated in recent days that the negotiating teams remain far apart and deals by July 9 are unlikely. 'The bottom line is that the Trump administration wants a fundamentally unbalanced deal,' said Jacob Funk Kirkegaard, a senior fellow at the Brussels-based think tank Bruegel. 'They want something like what they got with the U.K., what they appear to have gotten with Vietnam. But that doesn't work with, an economy that is roughly the size of the U.S. itself,' he said, referring to the EU. Ottawa is also trying to secure a deal with Washington but is working toward a self-imposed July 21 deadline. Canada wasn't hit with 'reciprocal' tariffs, but is facing sectoral tariffs on steel, aluminum and automobiles as well as levies on goods that don't comply with continental free trade agreement's rules of origin. While many countries appear to be earnestly engaging with the U.S., there are reasons to slow-walk negotiations. In May, the United States Court of International Trade ruled that Mr. Trump's use of IEEPA to impose tariffs was illegal, calling into question the basis of Mr. Trump's 'reciprocal' tariff plan. That ruling has been stayed until an appeal can be heard by a higher court, but it may be giving trade negotiators from other countries pause. There are also already more U.S. sectoral tariffs in the pipeline, with investigations currently under way into pharmaceuticals, lumber, semiconductors and copper that could result in Sec. 232 tariffs like those on steel, aluminum and automobiles. That means foreign negotiators don't have a clear picture of what other tariffs they may ultimately face when they're offering concessions. 'This type of exercise or negotiation is facilitated when both sides are putting chips on the table,' said Jeffrey Schott, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics and a former U.S. trade negotiator. 'But in many respects the United States is just making demands and saying we will limit the protection we impose against you if meet our demands. That's a tough negotiating position.' So far, financial markets have taken this trade uncertainty in stride. Equity markets have rebounded from the post-'Liberation Day' slump and hit record highs in recent days. Volatility remains low in bond and currency markets. Robin Brooks, senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and a former chief FX strategist at Goldman Sachs, said that markets are responding positively to the trade détente between the U.S. and China, as well as the better-than-expected U.S. economic data that suggests earlier recession calls were overly pessimistic. As long as China and the U.S. don't resume their hot trade war, markets may shrug off a breakdown in trade discussions between the U.S. and the EU or Japan, Mr. Brooks said. But they likely won't be so sanguine if the failure to hit the July 9 deadline causes another round of erratic flip-flops from Mr. Trump. 'The dollar didn't fall because of tariffs. It fell because of this back-and-forth which in markets created a perception of chaos,' Mr. Brooks said of the market meltdown in April. 'If you're trying to put a finger on what could cause markets to fall out of bed, then it's more stuff like that, more back and forth.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store