Infosys techie now Newcastle technical director
'... Sudarshan will lead the club's football data operations, working closely with Eddie Howe (head coach of the men's first team) and his coaching staff and the club's performance, medical, analysis, methodology and recruitment teams,' a club press release read. 'His role will be dedicated to implementing data-informed practices across all sporting departments throughout men's, women's and Academy teams.'
Gopaladesikan started off as a techie before joining Portuguese giants Benfica where he oversaw the data science programme. At Atalanta in 2024, he saw the Italian Serie A oufit lift the UEFA Europa League.
The Indian men's national team may not have many takers but several Indians as well as Indian origin people involved in football either work or have worked across top-tier clubs in Europe. Former Arsenal managing director Vinai Venkatesham holds a top management role at Tottenham. Krishnan A Seshadrinathan, currently a member at Rajasthan Royals, previously used to number crunch at Arsenal.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
13 minutes ago
- Mint
Gill has been thrown into deep end as captain: Manjrekar decodes Indias shambolic outing in Manchester
New Delhi [India], July 26 (ANI): Former cricketer-turned-commentator Sanjay Manjrekar feels Shubman Gill, who is carrying "immense responsibility" on his shoulders, has been thrown into the deep end during his first captaincy assignment in England. India arrived in England without its batting bigwigs Rohit Sharma and Virat Kohli, to orchestrate an unprecedented series win. The challenge was immense, considering India has returned winless in every single tour since 2007. From Leeds to London, India fought their hearts out but surrendered to a 2-1 trail in the five-match series. In the fourth Test, the story has been a complete contrast to the past three contests. India has appeared out of its depth as England pulls the strings to control the flow of the game. Manjrekar decoded the various reasons behind India's fall from grace at Old Trafford in Manchester. With injuries to Akash Deep and Nitish Kumar Reddy, India was robbed of its balanced final XI. India had to fly in Anshul Kamboj and straightaway threw him into the XI, and since then, he has struggled to meet the demands of Test cricket. "Shubman Gill is on his first trip to England as a batter and has also been thrown into the deep end as captain, carrying immense responsibility. He fought well across the first three Tests, but this game feels slightly beyond India, considering the challenges and resources. India's bowling was hampered by Akash Deep's unavailability -- he picked up 10 wickets in the last Test but missed out due to injury. Anshul Kamboj came in, but struggled to rise to the demands of Test cricket," Manjrekar said on JioHotstar. Manjrejkar reiterated his stance that spinners are often an afterthought for the Indian team. The pace bowling quartet Jasprit Bumrah, Mohammed Siraj, Kamboj and Shardul Thakur have combined to bowl 83 overs and returned with three wickets. On the other hand, the ball-tweaking duo of Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar scalped four wickets in 52 overs. "One area India could've improved is their bowling combination, seamers bowled nearly 82 overs for just three wickets, while spin got four wickets in just 52 overs. That's something they'll need to reassess. The standout, though, was Mohammed Siraj -- it was great to see him bowl with such heart right till the end," he added. England ended the third day on a high with 544/7 on the board in reply to India's 387, enjoying a healthy lead of 186 runs. With skipper Ben Stokes unbeaten on the crease, he will look to pile up as many as he can to take an unassailable 3-1 lead in the series. (ANI)
Economic Times
13 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Whisky Business: Indian alcohol industry flags non-tariff barriers in UK market
Scotch and British gin producers may have secured lower import duties in India, but Indian alcoholic beverage makers allege an uneven playing field when exporting to the UK, The Times of India has reported. ADVERTISEMENT Domestic liquor firms claim that non-tariff barriers in the UK and EU restrict access for Indian-Made Foreign Liquor (IMFL) products. These barriers, they say, revolve around technical norms like maturation period and ingredients, which are not aligned with Indian production conditions. 'The UK and even the European Union do not allow fair imports of most Indian-Made Foreign Liquor (IMFL) products due to non-tariff barriers related to maturation and ingredients. We only wish that the Indian govt had stood firm on the issue of non-tariff barriers,' said Anant S Iyer, director general of the Confederation of Indian Alcoholic Beverage Companies (CIABC), told TOI. UK regulations define whisky as a spirit matured for a minimum of three years—criteria applied to both domestic and imported products. But Iyer argues the rule disadvantages Indian producers due to climate differences. 'In India, the maturation is much faster. A longer maturity period, say, three years, means that around one-third of our spirit will evaporate due to the hotter climate which will not only result in losses but also impact the quality of the product,' he said. He further added that Indian companies are unable to market their products as whisky in the UK, forcing them to label it as 'Indian spirits' instead. 'We would like to label our products as Indian Whisky or Indian Rum/Brandy and sell the same in the UK/EU and allow the market and consumer to decide.' ADVERTISEMENT CIABC has urged the Indian government to raise this 'discrimination' with UK authorities and push for a level playing field. The lobby group has also proposed a minimum import price (MIP) for Bottled-in-Origin (BIO) liquor from Scotland to prevent Scotch imports from undercutting domestic brands. (With inputs from TOI) ADVERTISEMENT (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel)
India.com
13 minutes ago
- India.com
Bengalurus FAANG Lure: After 18 Years, This Green Card Holder Asks, Should I Go Home?
Working in the US while my parents live in India is commonly seen in this generation, especially in tech profiles. An Indian-origin tech professional working at a top-tier FAANG company in the United States has to erupt an online debate after the dilemma of moving back to India after nearly two decades. After living in the US for over 18 years, he's now a green card holder facing a life-changing decision. With two young US-born children, aged 8 and 3, and a clear path to American citizenship in four years, a lucrative FAANG job offer in Bengaluru has sparked deep internal conflict. He expressed concern that moving back would mean giving up his green card, which is a significant decision. According to Financial Express, the Indian-origin techie said, 'Our kids will have a different citizenship than us, which might make it harder if they want to return to the US for college or to settle down.' Regarding the question of moving back to India, he expressed concern about his ageing parents living there and the sense of alienation he feels as a 'permanent outsider' despite spending years in the US. 'Once the kids are older, moving back might become impossible,' he said. He also expressed concern about India's urban quality of life, especially issues like air pollution and long commute times in cities such as Bengaluru.
