Scientists Launch Independent Climate Assessment After White House Dismisses Federal Report Contributors
In response, two major U.S. scientific societies—the American Meteorological Society and the American Geophysical Union —have announced a joint initiative to continue critical climate research. They plan to publish peer-reviewed studies addressing various aspects of climate change, including observations, projections, impacts, risks, and solutions. While this initiative will not replace the NCA, it aims to maintain momentum and provide a platform for ongoing climate assessments following the administration's cuts to federal climate research efforts.
The dismissal of the NCA contributors has raised concerns among climate scientists and environmental groups about the administration's commitment to addressing climate change. The last NCA report, released in 2023, highlighted $150 billion in annual damages from extreme weather and emphasized the disproportionate impact on disadvantaged communities. Experts warn that discontinuing this assessment risks leaving the U.S. unprepared for climate-related challenges.
The Trump administration's actions have been met with sharp criticism. Experts warn the move undermines scientific integrity, impairs national preparedness against climate-related disasters, and prioritizes the fossil fuel industry over scientific and public welfare. Advocates stress that suppressing facts does not mitigate climate risks and urge Congress to uphold its legal obligation to ensure the NCA proceeds with transparency and scientific rigor.
The administration's proposed 2026 budget further reflects its stance on climate issues, prioritizing increased national security spending while slashing $163 billion in non-defense domestic programs, including cuts to climate initiatives. Concerns have also been raised over funding reductions to public broadcasters and efforts to eliminate school desegregation orders.
Amid rising fears of an economic downturn influenced by Trump's aggressive trade policies, the job market showed unexpected strength with 177,000 new jobs in April, though consumer confidence remains low. Wall Street marked its longest streak of gains since 2004, buoyed by positive employment data.
The Trump administration's dismissal of the NCA contributors and the disbanding of the Global Change Research Program have raised concerns among climate scientists and environmental groups about the administration's commitment to addressing climate change. The last NCA report, released in 2023, highlighted $150 billion in annual damages from extreme weather and emphasized the disproportionate impact on disadvantaged communities. Experts warn that discontinuing this assessment risks leaving the U.S. unprepared for climate-related challenges.
The American Meteorological Society and the American Geophysical Union's joint initiative to continue critical climate research aims to maintain momentum and provide a platform for ongoing climate assessments following the administration's cuts to federal climate research efforts. They plan to publish peer-reviewed studies addressing various aspects of climate change, including observations, projections, impacts, risks, and solutions. While this initiative will not replace the NCA, it aims to maintain momentum and provide a platform for ongoing climate assessments following the administration's cuts to federal climate research efforts.
The dismissal of the NCA contributors has raised concerns among climate scientists and environmental groups about the administration's commitment to addressing climate change. The last NCA report, released in 2023, highlighted $150 billion in annual damages from extreme weather and emphasized the disproportionate impact on disadvantaged communities. Experts warn that discontinuing this assessment risks leaving the U.S. unprepared for climate-related challenges.
The Trump administration's actions have been met with sharp criticism. Experts warn the move undermines scientific integrity, impairs national preparedness against climate-related disasters, and prioritizes the fossil fuel industry over scientific and public welfare. Advocates stress that suppressing facts does not mitigate climate risks and urge Congress to uphold its legal obligation to ensure the NCA proceeds with transparency and scientific rigor.
The administration's proposed 2026 budget further reflects its stance on climate issues, prioritizing increased national security spending while slashing $163 billion in non-defense domestic programs, including cuts to climate initiatives. Concerns have also been raised over funding reductions to public broadcasters and efforts to eliminate school desegregation orders.
Amid rising fears of an economic downturn influenced by Trump's aggressive trade policies, the job market showed unexpected strength with 177,000 new jobs in April, though consumer confidence remains low. Wall Street marked its longest streak of gains since 2004, buoyed by positive employment data.
The Trump administration's dismissal of the NCA contributors and the disbanding of the Global Change Research Program have raised concerns among climate scientists and environmental groups about the administration's commitment to addressing climate change. The last NCA report, released in 2023, highlighted $150 billion in annual damages from extreme weather and emphasized the disproportionate impact on disadvantaged communities. Experts warn that discontinuing this assessment risks leaving the U.S. unprepared for climate-related challenges.
The American Meteorological Society and the American Geophysical Union's joint initiative to continue critical climate research aims to maintain momentum and provide a platform for ongoing climate assessments following the administration's cuts to federal climate research efforts. They plan to publish peer-reviewed studies addressing various aspects of climate change, including observations, projections, impacts, risks, and solutions. While this initiative will not replace the NCA, it aims to maintain momentum and provide a platform for ongoing climate assessments following the administration's cuts to federal climate research efforts.
The dismissal of the NCA contributors has raised concerns among climate scientists and environmental groups about the administration's commitment to addressing climate change. The last NCA report, released in 2023, highlighted $150 billion in annual damages from extreme weather and emphasized the disproportionate impact on disadvantaged communities. Experts warn that discontinuing this assessment risks leaving the U.S. unprepared for climate-related challenges.
See also Dubai to Convene Global Leaders for Green Economy Talks
The Trump administration's actions have been met with sharp criticism. Experts warn the move undermines scientific integrity, impairs national preparedness against climate-related disasters, and prioritizes the fossil fuel industry over scientific and public welfare. Advocates stress that suppressing facts does not mitigate climate risks and urge Congress to uphold its legal obligation to ensure the NCA proceeds with transparency and scientific rigor.
The administration's proposed 2026 budget further reflects its stance on climate issues, prioritizing increased national security spending while slashing $163 billion in non-defense domestic programs, including cuts to climate initiatives. Concerns have also been raised over funding reductions to public broadcasters and efforts to eliminate school desegregation orders.
Amid rising fears of an economic downturn influenced by Trump's aggressive trade policies, the job market showed unexpected strength with 177,000 new jobs in April, though consumer confidence remains low. Wall Street marked its longest streak of gains since 2004, buoyed by positive employment data.
The Trump administration's dismissal of the NCA contributors and the disbanding of the Global Change Research Program have raised concerns among climate scientists and environmental groups about the administration's commitment to addressing climate change. The last NCA report, released in 2023, highlighted $150 billion in annual damages from extreme weather and emphasized the disproportionate impact on disadvantaged communities. Experts warn that discontinuing this assessment risks leaving the U.S. unprepared for climate-related challenges.
The American Meteorological Society and the American Geophysical Union's joint initiative to continue critical climate research aims to maintain momentum and provide a platform for ongoing climate assessments following the administration's cuts to federal climate research efforts. They plan to publish peer-reviewed studies addressing various aspects of climate change, including observations, projections, impacts, risks, and solutions. While this initiative will not replace the NCA, it aims to maintain momentum and provide a platform for ongoing climate assessments following the administration's cuts to federal climate research efforts.
The dismissal of the NCA contributors has raised concerns among climate scientists and environmental groups about the administration's commitment to addressing climate change. The last NCA report, released in 2023, highlighted $150 billion in annual damages from extreme weather and emphasized the disproportionate impact on disadvantaged communities. Experts warn that discontinuing this assessment risks leaving the U.S. unprepared for climate-related challenges.
The Trump administration's actions have been met with sharp criticism. Experts warn the move undermines scientific integrity, impairs national preparedness against climate-related disasters, and prioritizes the fossil fuel industry over scientific and public welfare. Advocates stress that suppressing facts does not mitigate climate risks and urge Congress to uphold its legal obligation to ensure the NCA proceeds with transparency and scientific rigor.
____________________________________
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Zawya
34 minutes ago
- Zawya
Out-gunned Europe accepts least-worst US trade deal
LONDON - In the end, Europe found it lacked the leverage to pull Donald Trump's America into a trade pact on its terms and so has signed up to a deal it can just about stomach - albeit one that is clearly skewed in the U.S.'s favour. As such, Sunday's agreement on a blanket 15% tariff after a months-long stand-off is a reality check on the aspirations of the 27-country European Union to become an economic power able to stand up to the likes of the United States or China. The cold shower is all the more bracing given that the EU has long portrayed itself as an export superpower and champion of rules-based commerce for the benefit both of its own soft power and the global economy as a whole. For sure, the new tariff that will now be applied is a lot more digestible than the 30% "reciprocal" tariff which Trump threatened to invoke in a few days. While it should ensure Europe avoids recession, it will likely keep its economy in the doldrums: it sits somewhere between two tariff scenarios the European Central Bank last month forecast would mean 0.5-0.9% economic growth this year compared to just over 1% in a trade tension-free environment. But this is nonetheless a landing point that would have been scarcely imaginable only months ago in the pre-Trump 2.0 era, when the EU along with much of the world could count on U.S. tariffs averaging out at around 1.5%. Even when Britain agreed a baseline tariff of 10% with the United States back in May, EU officials were adamant they could do better and - convinced the bloc had the economic heft to square up to Trump - pushed for a "zero-for-zero" tariff pact. It took a few weeks of fruitless talks with their U.S. counterparts for the Europeans to accept that 10% was the best they could get and a few weeks more to take the same 15% baseline which the United States agreed with Japan last week. "The EU does not have more leverage than the U.S., and the Trump administration is not rushing things," said one senior official in a European capital who was being briefed on last week's negotiations as they closed in around the 15% level. That official and others pointed to the pressure from Europe's export-oriented businesses to clinch a deal and so ease the levels of uncertainty starting to hit businesses from Finland's Nokia to Swedish steelmaker SSAB . "We were dealt a bad hand. This deal is the best possible play under the circumstances," said one EU diplomat. "Recent months have clearly shown how damaging uncertainty in global trade is for European businesses." NOW WHAT? That imbalance - or what the trade negotiators have been calling "asymmetry" - is manifest in the final deal. Not only is it expected that the EU will now call off any retaliation and remain open to U.S. goods on existing terms, but it has also pledged $600 billion of investment in the United States. The time-frame for that remains undefined, as do other details of the accord for now. As talks unfolded, it became clear that the EU came to the conclusion it had more to lose from all-out confrontation. The retaliatory measures it threatened totalled some 93 billion euros - less than half its U.S. goods trade surplus of nearly 200 billion euros. True, a growing number of EU capitals were also ready to envisage wide-ranging anti-coercion measures that would have allowed the bloc to target the services trade in which the United States had a surplus of some $75 billion last year. But even then, there was no clear majority for targeting the U.S. digital services which European citizens enjoy and for which there are scant homegrown alternatives - from Netflix to Uber to Microsoft cloud services. It remains to be seen whether this will encourage European leaders to accelerate the economic reforms and diversification of trading allies to which they have long paid lip service but which have been held back by national divisions. Describing the deal as a painful compromise that was an "existential threat" for many of its members, Germany's BGA wholesale and export association said it was time for Europe to reduce its reliance on its biggest trading partner. "Let's look on the past months as a wake-up call," said BGA President Dirk Jandura. "Europe must now prepare itself strategically for the future - we need new trade deals with the biggest industrial powers of the world." (Additional reporting by Jan Strupczewski in Brussels; Christian Kraemer and Maria Martinez in Berlin; Writing by Mark John; Editing by Nick Zieminski)
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
'Israel has to make a decision on Gaza', says Trump
Trump says Israel will have to decide on next steps in Gaza UAE and Jordan carry out aid air drops into Gaza Mediators resume contact with Israel and Hamas negotiators Yemen's Houthis threaten to target ships linked to Israeli ports Netanyahu says 'no more excuses' for UN after Gaza aid routes opened Israel announces 10-hour pause in military operations in Al Mawasi, Deir Al Balah, and Gaza city At least 59,821 Palestinians killed and 144,851 wounded since Gaza war began
Gulf Today
11 hours ago
- Gulf Today
US and China to resume tariff talks in effort to extend truce
Senior US and Chinese negotiators meet in Stockholm on Monday to tackle longstanding economic disputes at the centre of the countries' trade war, aiming to extend a truce keeping sharply higher tariffs at bay. China is facing an August 12 deadline to reach a durable tariff agreement with President Donald Trump's administration, after Beijing and Washington reached a preliminary deal in June to end weeks of escalating tit-for-tat tariffs. Without an agreement, global supply chains could face renewed turmoil from duties exceeding 100%. The Stockholm talks, led by US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng, take place a day after European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen meets Trump at his golf course in Scotland to try to clinch a deal that would likely see a 15% baseline tariff on most EU goods. Trade analysts on both sides of the Pacific say the discussions in the Swedish capital are unlikely to produce any breakthroughs but could prevent further escalation and help create conditions for Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping to meet later this year. Previous US-China trade talks in Geneva and London in May and June focused on bringing US and Chinese retaliatory tariffs down from triple-digit levels and restoring the flow of rare earth minerals halted by China and Nvidia H20 AI chips and other goods halted by the United States. So far, the talks have not delved into broader economic issues. They include US complaints that China's state-led, export-driven model is flooding world markets with cheap goods, and Beijing's complaints that US national security export controls on tech goods seek to stunt Chinese growth. 'Stockholm will be the first meaningful round of U.S.-China trade talks,' said Bo Zhengyuan, Shanghai-based partner at China consultancy firm Plenum. Trump has been successful in pressuring some other trading partners, including Japan, Vietnam and the Philippines, into deals accepting higher US tariffs of 15% to 20%. He said there was a 50-50 chance that the US and the 27-member European Union could also reach a framework trade pact, adding that Brussels wanted to 'make a deal very badly'. Two of Trump's top trade officials, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, will attend the Scotland talks and then travel to Stockholm. Analysts say the U.S.-China negotiations are far more complex and will require more time. China's grip on the global market for rare earth minerals and magnets, used in everything from military hardware to car windshield wiper motors, has proved to be an effective leverage point on US industries. In the background of the talks is speculation about a possible meeting between Trump and Xi in late October. Trump has said he will decide soon whether to visit China in a landmark trip to address trade and security tensions. A new flare-up of tariffs and export controls would likely derail any plans for a meeting with Xi. 'The Stockholm meeting is an opportunity to start laying the groundwork for a Trump visit to China,' said Wendy Cutler, vice president at the Asia Society Policy Institute. Bessent has already said he wants to work out an extension of the August 12 deadline to prevent tariffs snapping back to 145% on the US side and 125% on the Chinese side. Still, China will likely request a reduction of multi-layered US tariffs totaling 55% on most goods and further easing of US high-tech export controls, analysts said. Beijing has argued that such purchases would help reduce the US trade deficit with China, which reached $295.5 billion in 2024. China is currently facing a 20% tariff related to the US fentanyl crisis, a 10% reciprocal tariff, and 25% duties on most industrial goods imposed during Trump's first term. Bessent has also said he would discuss with He the need for China to rebalance its economy away from exports toward domestic consumer demand. The shift would require China to put an end to a protracted property crisis and boost social safety nets to encourage household spending. Michael Froman, a former US trade representative during Barack Obama's administration, said such a shift has been a goal of US policymakers for two decades. 'Can we effectively use tariffs to get China to fundamentally change their economic strategy? That remains to be seen,' said Froman, now president of the Council on Foreign Relations think-tank. Reuters
