‘Premature' to decide whether MI5 should face contempt probe, judges rule
In 2022, then-attorney general Suella Braverman went to the High Court to stop the broadcaster airing a programme that would name a man who has allegedly abused two women and is a covert human intelligence source.
An injunction was made in April 2022 to prevent the corporation disclosing information likely to identify the man, referred to only as 'X', though Mr Justice Chamberlain said the BBC could still air the programme and the key issues, without identifying him.
But at a hearing earlier this year, the London court was told that part of the written evidence provided by MI5 was false.
Lawyers for the BBC told the court the 'low threshold' for launching contempt proceedings against MI5 and a number of individuals, for not being fully transparent with the court, had been met.
In a decision on Wednesday, the Lady Chief Justice Baroness Carr said that a further investigation should be carried out and that it would be 'premature to reach any conclusions on whether to initiate contempt proceedings against any individual'.
The senior judge said that the new investigation should be carried out on behalf of the Investigatory Powers Commissioner.
Baroness Carr, sitting with Dame Victoria Sharp and Mr Justice Chamberlain, also said: 'The investigations carried out by MI5 to date suffer from serious procedural deficiencies.
'Their conclusions cannot presently be relied on.'
The written witness evidence, now accepted to have been false, said the Security Service had maintained its policy of neither confirming nor denying (NCND) the identities of intelligence sources.
However, MI5 disclosed X's status to a BBC reporter, but then said it had kept to the NCND policy.
Lawyers on behalf of MI5 apologised earlier this year and carried out two investigations, which concluded the false evidence was given due to a series of mistakes with no deliberate attempt by any staff member to mislead.
In Wednesday's 26-page ruling, the three judges said they were not 'satisfied' with the investigations or their conclusions.
They added: 'It is regrettable that MI5's explanations to this court were given in a piecemeal and unsatisfactory way — and only following the repeated intervention of the court.'
In the programme about X, the BBC alleged the intelligence source was a misogynistic neo-Nazi who attacked his girlfriend, referred to by the pseudonym Beth, with a machete.
Beth is bringing related legal action in the Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT), with the judges finding on Wednesday that the specialist tribunal – which investigates allegations against the UK intelligence services – was also misled.
Baroness Carr later said: 'Whilst we accept the genuineness of the apologies proffered on behalf of MI5, the fact remains that this case has raised serious issues.
'MI5 gave false evidence to three courts. This was compounded by inadequate attempts to explain the circumstances.'
Following the ruling, MI5 director-general Sir Ken McCallum said: 'I wish to repeat my full and unreserved apology for the errors made in these proceedings.
'We take our duty to provide truthful, accurate and complete information with the utmost seriousness.
'Resolving this matter to the court's satisfaction is of the highest priority for MI5 and we are committed to co-operating fully with the Investigatory Powers Commissioner's Office and the court.
'MI5 is now embarked on a programme of work to learn all lessons and implement changes to ensure this does not happen again. This programme will build in external challenge and expertise – with independent assurance to the Home Secretary on our progress.
'MI5's job is to keep the country safe. Maintaining the trust of the courts is essential to that mission.'
A BBC spokesperson said: 'We are pleased this decision has been reached and that the key role of our journalist Daniel De Simone in bringing this to light has been acknowledged by the judges.
'We believe our journalism on this story has always been in the highest public interest.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
27 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Pound calm after Starmer backs Reeves, following bond sell-off
Update: Date: 2025-07-03T06:24:50.000Z Title: Introduction: Bonds and sterling in spotlight after Wednesday wobble Content: Good morning, and welcome to our rolling coverage of business, the financial markets and the world economy. All eyes are on UK bonds, and the pound, after both fell sharply yesterday amid speculation over the future of chancellor Rachel Reeves. Wednesday was a turbulent day for the UK bond market; prices of British government debt fell heavily as investors were gripped by concerns of change at the top of the Treasury. The selloff highlights anxiety that the government's u-turn on welfare reform has blown a multi-billion pound black hole in the chancellor's budget plans. Bonds slumped, driving up borrowing costs, after Keir Starmer failed initially to give his full backing to Reeves at prime minister's questions, with a tearful chancellor alongside him. The pound also suffered, falling by a cent against the US dollar as it slid from $1.3745 to $1.3636, making it the worst-performing major currency in the world. Starmer has now defended Reeves, saying her tears were due to a 'personal matter' and insisted she will remain chancellor 'for a very long time to come'. The bond selloff may actually have reinforced Reeves's position as chancellor, highlighting that the markets would not welcome a replacement who might be less devoted to fiscal discipline. Andrew Wishart, economist at Berenberg Bank argues that 'Investors probably saved the Chancellor', saying: By selling sterling assets investors have probably kept UK chancellor Rachel Reeves in her post. Financial markets initially reacted little to the government failing to get approval for savings in the disability benefit budget from its own parliamentary faction. But when the Prime Minister failed to say that a visibly upset Reeves would remain in her job during Prime Ministers Questions, UK assets sold off. The Chancellor has become synonymous with a fiscal rule of covering day-to-day spending with tax revenue. UK selloff signals that fiscal rules are not just for show #reeves #fiscal #gilts #macro #ukeconomy #ukmacro That fiscal rule may dictate tax rises in the autumn budget, as spending cuts could be too much of a political headache, judging by the massive rebellion against the welfare bill that has created a £5bn hole in the chancellor's plans. America's economy may take the market spotlight off Reeves this afternoon, when the latest US jobs report is released. It will show whether trade war tensions have hit hiring at US businesses. 9.30am BST: UK service sector PMI for June 10am BST: OECD Economic Survey of the European Union and Euro Area 1.30pm BST: US non farm payrolls employment report for June
Telegraph
43 minutes ago
- Telegraph
We've just had the first ominous taste of what the Blob will do to a Reform government
It would be easy to dismiss the story about a council chief executive in Warwickshire defying its new Reform leadership by refusing to take down a Pride flag. After all, it's only a flag, isn't it? How much can it really matter? Surely not enough to justify the rather wild response by Reform's Zia Yusuf, who claimed that 'unelected bureaucrats' have 'seized control of the country', and 'a coup d'etat is under way in Britain'. Well, perhaps. All the same, I do think Reform's supporters are right to take the story seriously. Because I suspect we've just had the first ominous taste of what the Blob will do to a Reform government. Imagine if Nigel Farage actually does win the next election. In his party's manifesto, he will doubtless have promised to deliver radical change. And, whatever that change entails, it will presumably be a good deal more far-reaching than removing a flag from a council building. Bearing that in mind: how eager do we think Whitehall will be to help him enact this radical change? Any more eager than the council chief executive in Warwickshire, who loftily informed Reform councillors that 'I will not be taking the action that you are requesting', because 'the Pride flag has been flown annually during Pride month for many years and I see no reason to diverge from this approach'? I hope no one will think I'm casting doubt on the scrupulous impartiality of our Rolls-Royce Civil Service. All the same, I'm sure Reform will have taken note of the lecture delivered in Oxford last month by a man with extensive experience of how Whitehall really works: Dominic Cummings. Behind closed doors, claimed the former No 10 chief adviser, civil servants are rather more influential than mere politicians. Or, in Mr Cummings's words: we have 'a system where the political ministers are essentially non-player characters in a video game, and the characters with real power are the unelected officials'. The result of this, he said, is that 'for a very long time, the government has not controlled the government'. Mr Farage will already be familiar with these views, because, a few months ago, he and Mr Cummings secretly met for dinner, and one topic of conversation, the latter has since revealed, was 'we have a broken Whitehall'. When Mr Cummings was in No 10, he didn't get far with his own plans to fix it, as he was derailed by the pandemic, and then fell out with Boris Johnson. I wonder whether he might be interested, one day, in having another crack. And whether the same thought has occurred to Mr Farage.
Telegraph
44 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Starmer's strategy unravels as policy U-turns erode authority
Despite Labour's landslide majority, Hodges noted that 'this is not normal… It is not normal for a prime minister facing open revolt from his party'. He points to the failure of Sir Keir's leadership strategy: 'The sort of proper preparations, the hard yards, the hard policy development, the clear 100-day strategy – none of that was done. And what we are seeing is a prime minister who just was not prepared for the demands of government.' With further party unrest caused by reforms to the welfare Bill, there are questions surrounding the ambitions of the Deputy PM: ' She's very popular amongst activists. She has support amongst the trade unions and amongst the growing cadre of Labour MPs who are starting to see the primary threat to Labour coming from Farage and Farage's populist working class appeal.' The prospect of Sir Keir holding the party together, Hodges suggested, is narrowing: 'Both his Left flank and his Right flank are collapsing simultaneously, which is why he's in the dire predicament he is.'
