
Iranian woman living in US for 47 years released by ICE after Republican House Majority Leader intervenes
Mandonna 'Donna' Kashanian, 64, was detained by ICE officers last month as she gardened in the yard of her New Orleans home. She had been living in the United States for 47 years and her husband and daughter are both US citizens.
Ms Kashanian had been allowed to stay in the US as long as she checked in regularly with immigration authorities, as she had done without fail, her family and attorney said.
After a surge of community support for Ms Kashanian, Mr Scalise, who represents Louisiana 's First Congressional District, including the New Orleans suburbs, told media outlet WDSU that he asked the Department of Homeland Security to give Kashanian 'a fair shake'.
Mr Scalise said Ms Kashanian should be judged on 'her life's work' and role in her community.
'When she was picked up, we looked at it and said, 'Are they really looking at it the right way, objectively?'' Mr Scalise told WDSU. 'And so they took a second look at it.'
Mr Scalise's intervention was 'absolutely crucial' to behind-the-scenes advocacy to secure Ms Kashanian's release, her attorney Ken Mayeaux told The Associated Press. What happens next for Ms Kashanian's legal status is still being worked out, he added.
Mr Scalise's office did not respond to a request for comment from The AP.
Ms Kashanian had been a 'devoted mother and wife, a caretaker, neighbour and dedicated volunteer' with Habitat for Humanity, her local school district and other organizations, said Rep. Stephanie Hilferty, a Republican who represents Ms Kashanian's community.
More than 100 of Ms Kashanian's neighbours wrote letters of support for her, which Ms Hilferty told AP she and Mr Scalise had shared with President Donald Trump 's administration.
'She's just been an incredible volunteer and servant to our Lakeview community, everybody knows her because of all she gives and does,' said Connie Uddo, a neighbour of Ms Kashanian's who leads the NOLA Tree Project where Ms Kashanian and husband have volunteered for years.
Some neighbors wrote letters addressed to Trump expressing support for his immigration policies but saying that some people like Ms Kashanian were being detained improperly and urging him to reconsider her case.
Ms Kashanian had arrived in the US in 1978 on a student visa and unsuccessfully applied for asylum based on her father's support of the US-backed shah.
ICE New Orleans said in a June post on X that Ms Kashanian had failed to depart the US after the Board of Immigration Appeals upheld a deportation order in 1992.
'She was ordered by a judge to depart the US and didn't,' the agency said. 'Shouldn't be a surprise we came knocking.'
But Ms Kashanian was allowed to remain with her husband and child as long as she checked in regularly with immigration authorities, her family said. For decades, she had 'faithfully and fully complied with those terms,' said Mr Mayeaux, her attorney. She even managed to check in with authorities while displaced by Hurricane Katrina.
Russell Milne, Ms Kashanian's husband, told AP his family was 'extremely grateful' for all the support from their community and elected officials.
Ms Kashanian met her husband while bartending as a student in the late 1980s. She volunteered with Habitat for Humanity, filmed Persian cooking tutorials on YouTube and doted on the neighboring children.
'She's meeting her obligations,' Mr Milne told AP following her detention. 'She's retirement age. She's not a threat. Who picks up a grandmother?'
The US Department of Homeland Security did not immediately provide comment on Ms Kashanian's release.
Other Iranians living in the US for decades have also been picked up by immigration authorities, and US military strikes on Iran have raised concerns that more may be taken into custody and deported. Iran was one of 12 countries subject to a US travel ban that took effect this month.
Immigration authorities are seeking to arrest 3,000 people a day under directives from the Trump administration.
Ms Kashanian's attorney Mr Mayeaux said he represents other clients who had built lives in the US over decades and are now being detained and deported.
'There is still a tremendous amount of heartache that is happening for people,' Mr Mayeaux said. "The difference is they lived quiet lives and didn't have access to political power to change the outcomes in their cases."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
13 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Married British couple who have been held on espionage charges in Iran since January have been moved to separate prisons after they were 'subjected to torture'
A British couple held in Iran since January on espionage charges have reportedly been transferred to two separate prisons - amid fears they have been mistreated and 'subjected to torture'. Craig and Lindsay Foreman, both 52, were arrested in Kerman, southern Iran, on January 3, as they embarked on a motorcycle journey around the world to Australia. The couple had intended to travel from Armenia to Pakistan via Iran when they were intercepted by authorities and detained on unspecified charges. Their arrests came after ignoring pleas from friends, family and the Foreign Office not to visit the nation before attempting to journey across the entire length of the country. Foreign Office guidance advises against all travel to Iran, adding that travellers could be arrested just for 'having a British passport or connections to the UK'. The couple's concerned family revealed this week that they have not had any direct contact with them since they were incarcerated, while the Foreign Office said until recent weeks that it could not confirm the couple's whereabouts. Now seven months on, it is believed the couple have been separated and moved from a security detention facility in Kerman. According to information received by Hengaw Organization for Human Rights, Lindsay Foreman was recently transferred to Qarchak Prison, while husband Craig was moved to Greater Tehran Prison. The two facilities lie more than 20 miles away from each other. In a statement published yesterday the charity also claimed that during their detention in Kerman the couple were 'subjected to severe pressure and torture aimed at extracting forced confessions.' It added that their family has become increasingly concerned about their wellbeing during recent heightened tensions between Israel and Iran. The claims surrounding the couple's whereabouts and condition come as Lindsay's eldest son, Joe Bennett, urged the UK government to raise their case with Iranian officials. Speaking to The Guardian this week, Mr Bennett said: 'The silence is intolerable, inhumane and a stain on the duty of care that the British government owes its citizens. 'While other countries are ensuring their citizens' cases are raised at the highest levels in negotiations with Iran, we are left shouting into the void, writing letters, running social media campaigns, tagging David Lammy and Keir Starmer and hearing nothing.' He added: 'It's hard for me to say with 100% confidence that I know my mum's alive, and it's mental to even think to say that, but that is the reality, I haven't spoken to my mum.' Following their arrest earlier this year, the country's authorities released a statement on their plight and also published an image of the couple - with their faces blurred - meeting Hugo Shorter, the British ambassador. In February, an Iranian government source told The Telegraph that the couple could have been arrested simply for being British, and are being used as bargaining chips to secure concessions from the UK. The source told the newspaper: 'They weren't arrested for committing a crime – they're British citizens, and that alone is enough to justify their detention and then phone England and ask for something. 'They likely took photos of something, which has been used as a pretext for their arrest, and now they [the authorities] are trying to get something from England in exchange for their release. 'We don't know exactly what's happening, but demands may have already been made to England for their release. 'You don't need to commit a crime – holding a European passport makes you a target here. 'If you have blue eyes and blonde hair, Iran is not safe for you, whether you're a tourist or travelling for business.' Since their arrest, the government has faced increasing pressure to secure their release. Richard Ratcliffe, the husband of former hostage of Iran Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe, previously said that the government ought to 'respond more promptly.' 'My heart goes out to them, and I hope they are not in for a long ordeal, and that the government is able to respond more promptly than it did in our case. 'I do think the risks would be a lot clearer to people if the UK travel advice to Iran talked about the risks of hostage-taking. People would be more alert to the fact that it is not personal, and it doesn't matter whether you have travelled there with a good heart.' Craig, a carpenter, and Lindsay, a life coach, had apparently been aware of the risks attached to visiting the nation, but had made up their minds to travel there. In one of their last posts before their capture, the couple wrote that they were choosing to look past this advice because: 'We believe that, no matter where you are in the world, most people are good, kind humans striving for a meaningful life. 'Yes, we're aware of the risks. But we also know the rewards of meeting incredible people, hearing their stories, and seeing the breathtaking landscapes of these regions could far outweigh the fear. 'From the vast deserts of Iran to the towering peaks of Pakistan, we hope to share the beauty, hospitality, and humanity that often go unnoticed.' The couple had previously found fame on the Channel 4 show 'A New Life in the Sun', documenting their move from Sussex to a 'breathtaking' three-bedroom villa in the Andalusia region of Spain. They said they wanted to 'really take advantage of the cheaper cost of living, the wonderful weather, lifestyle and more relaxed pace of life'. In a post on January 3, after they had crossed into Iran, Lindsay posted a photo of herself with a religious leader, both holding their hands over their hearts. Capturing the poignant scene, she said: 'Travel continues to teach me that humanity's core is shared: kindness, humility, and respect for one another. Sometimes, it's the quietest moments that leave the loudest impressions.' In another from the same day, she posted a photo of herself laughing with locals, and praising the 'one human family' she had found in her travels. She added: 'Travel has a way of reminding you of what really matters. On this journey around the world, we've felt a deep sense of connection—and nowhere more so than here in Iran. 'This journey has taught me that when we strip away our differences, what remains is simple and powerful - our shared humanity. And when we choose to shine, together we can truly light up the world. 'Let's focus on what unites us, celebrate each other's truths, and embrace the beauty of connection.' A spokesman for the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office told the Daily Mail: 'We are deeply concerned by reports that two British nationals have been charged with espionage in Iran. 'We continue to raise this case directly with the Iranian authorities.


Telegraph
43 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump is wrong to pick a fight with Powell – but is right about interest rates
Visiting Scotland last week, Donald Trump used a joint press conference to mock Keir Starmer. He castigated Labour's policies on immigration, energy and much else. The Prime Minister sat awkwardly, sporting his trademark rictus grin. Trump has lately dished out plenty of public humiliation – not least aimed at Jerome Powell, chairman of the Federal Reserve. The president has put huge pressure on the Fed to lower interest rates, to boost US growth and ease interest payments on America's massive $36trn (£27.6trn) national debt. This jars badly with the conventional wisdom that central banks should be independent, allowing technocrat economists to set interest rates to bear down on inflation. That's far better for the economy in the long-run, but this precious independence is jeopardised when vote-hungry politicians seek to keep borrowing costs too low. Such independence has become an almost sacred policy concept over the last half century. And no central bank matters more than the Fed, which sets the course for monetary policy across the globe. Yet Trump, astonishingly, has lately called Powell a 'numbskull', a 'stubborn mule' and worse. On a recent Fed visit, he rebuked him over the cost of a refurbishment project – a potential pretext to sack Powell, which may not be legally possible, but which Trump often floats regardless. Between September and December last year, the Fed's committee of twelve rate-setters voted to lower the US benchmark interest rate three times from its post-Covid-peak of 5.25pc-5.5pc, in increments down to 4.25pc-4.5pc. But much to the president's frustration, rates have since stayed put. The Bank of England, meanwhile, has cut rates four times since last summer, including as recently as May, while the European Central Bank has enacted no less than eight eurozone rate reductions over the same period, the latest in June. Having held rates since the start of 2025, the Fed just did so again when governors met last Wednesday (although two Trump-appointees voted against, the biggest intra-Fed rate disagreement in thirty years). Fed policymakers are rightly worried about price pressures, with headline inflation hitting 3.7pc during the year to June, up from 2.4pc the previous month and well above the 2pc target. And Trump's era-defining slew of tariffs – taxes on imports into the US – means we could see a lot more inflation yet. With the President's three-month moratorium expiring this weekend, and tariffs now set to bite on some of America's largest trading partners, the Fed is understandably concerned. Powell insists the US economy is strong enough for the Fed to wait before further rate cuts, as we see if Trump's tariffs really do aggravate inflation. And last week's GDP numbers – a 3pc expansion from April to June – was certainly way above consensus forecasts, reversing a 0.5pc contraction during the first three months of the year, the worst quarterly performance since early 2022. This January to March shrinkage, though, was largely due to the huge rise in US imports as buyers sought to get ahead of Trump's expected tariff onslaught. And since 'liberation day' in April, when the President unveiled his tariffs on the White House lawn, imports into the US have plunged. This artificially boosted April to June GDP growth as the first-quarter trend unwound. Yes, consumer spending rose 1.4pc during the second quarter, outpacing the 0.5pc increase over the previous three months, supporting Powell's argument the economy is coping without further rate cuts. But 'final sales to private domestic purchasers', a key demand metric that the Fed watches closely, grew just 1.2pc over the latest quarter, slower than the 1.9pc increase between January and March. High mortgage rates are also holding back the housing market and related construction, as Trump relentlessly points out, with residential investment down 4.6pc during the second quarter. But that's part of a broader investment slump as business leaders look to see how the president's tariffs play out. For now, the market consensus is that the US economy is showing resilience, but more rate cuts may be justified as long as inflation isn't further provoked. So Trump's attacks on Powell are based on legitimate economic analysis. Yet his language is way over the top. Some say the president is picking headline-grabbing fights with the Fed chair to detract from mounting criticism over his handling of the Epstein files. I suspect he simply wants lower rates and, for now at least, Powell stands in his way. Ironically, it was Trump who appointed Powell in 2017. But having repeatedly called for him to resign, the president seems certain to replace him when Powell's term expires next May. In the meantime, Trump's ceaseless undermining of central bank independence is deeply damaging. Yes, the Fed has a 'dual mandate' to pursue both price stability and full employment, unlike the solely inflation-focussed aims of most other central banks. But while Trump's arguments may be technically valid, it should absolutely not be him making them, nor anyone else near the top of government. Given the tone he has set, though, Powell's successor will be seen as the president's lackey. And with US and global inflation far from tamed, that could end up being a serious problem. My general view is that central bank independence is far more important than any individual central banker. Andrew Bailey, for instance, has shown seriously bad judgement at the Bank of England – endlessly insisting post-Covid inflation would be 'transitory', for instance, while deriding those of us who correctly predicted otherwise. His appointment was a mistake, but he should stay, free from the threat politicians might remove him, until his term expires in March 2028. The same applies to Powell and far more so – he should serve his full term.


The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
ICE is recruiting agents with ads, incentives. Sheriffs aren't happy.
"America needs you," reads one of the ICE recruiting ads, featuring a finger-pointing Uncle Sam, evoking WWI recruiting posters. "America has been invaded by criminals and predators. We need YOU to get them out." The federal spending plan funds the hiring of 10,000 new ICE agents, making ICE the single-largest law enforcement agency in the country, larger than the FBI, DEA, ATF and other agencies combined. For comparison, the FBI only has about 13,700 special agents, according to the Department of Justice. Even before the new hires take their posts, the dramatic expansion of public ICE operations has upset communities from coast to coast, and raised questions about the tactics agents have used as they've chased suspects across Home Depot parking lots, farm fields and into medical buildings. The aggressive recruitment efforts have also angered local sheriffs worried that deputies in already understaffed offices will be lured away by the big bonuses and higher pay. "It is tone deaf and reflects a total lack of judgment and character on their part," Jonathan Thompson, the executive director and CEO of the National Sheriff's Association, said of a recruiting offer emailed to local deputies nationwide. "This is either galactically stupid or purposefully malicious. You're just robbing Peter to pay Paul. And in this case, you're robbing the poorest of Peter to pay the richest of Paul." Massive media blitz, incentives and job offers Bolstered by new staffing, federal officials have promised to further flood Democrat-run cities with deportation officers in response to a lack of cooperation in executing Trump's get-tough approach that has targeted undocumented immigrations with or without criminal records. The Department of Homeland Security has already begun hiring for the new jobs. Federal officials are planning a massive social media blitz to reach recruits, potentially advertising on YouTube and SnapChat, but also on connected TVs via Hulu and Amazon Prime. In addition to the signing bonuses, ICE is offering up to $60,000 in student loan forgiveness, although applicants don't need to have college degrees to be considered for some of the jobs. ICE officials on July 31 announced they've made 1,000 job offers since Trump signed the funding law. Among those receiving job offers are retired ICE agents who quit during the Biden administration, said acting ICE Director Todd M. Lyons in a statement. "They couldn't do the jobs they signed up to do," Lyons said. "Now, people are lining up to work with us because they know our officers and agents are allowed to enforce immigration law fairly and across the board, and that's a cause people really believe in." Applicants 'should expect a certain level of risk' White House officials say there's been an 830% increase in assaults against agents through July 14th, compared with the same period last year, and the recruiting materials say applicants "should expect a certain level of risk," but that they will be trained to take "every precaution" in remaining safe. How quickly ICE can bring aboard the new employees remains uncertain. U.S. Customs and Border Protection has long struggled to hire Border Patrol agents, who typically take more than 300 days to bring aboard, according to a 2024 GAO study. Joe Gamaldi, the national vice president of the Fraternal Order of Police union, said he suspects ICE will face the same recruiting challenges as local departments. He said years of demonizing law enforcement by some politicians, activists and media has created a "toxic cocktail" that will make hiring challenging. "Truth be told, all police agencies are competing for a small pool of people who are still willing to serve and literally die for their communities," he said. "Bonuses and better pay will help, but ultimately police officers, and those interested in police work, want to serve for an agency and communities that appreciate them and don't treat them like scum." Local sheriffs furious about ICE recruitment efforts The aggressive hiring efforts have frustrated local law enforcement leaders who worry their officers will flock to better-paying federal jobs. Without telling local sheriffs in advance, ICE officials directly emailed recruitment offers to hundreds of deputies across the country. Thompson, of the National Sheriff's Association, said sheriffs feel betrayed by the move. Thompson said sheriffs agreed to send deputies to special immigration enforcement training designed for local police, only to then have ICE try to simply poach them away. "It's become a wildfire of discontent, and not how partners treat partners," he said. "This is an embarrassment to this president, and it's sad." Thompson said some sheriff's offices currently have vacancies of 40% and predicted the ICE hiring spree could further winnow the ranks of local law enforcement. Other policing experts have raised concerns about the risks of hiring so quickly. National-security expert and commentator Garrett Graf, who investigated Border Patrol hiring surges after 9/11, said in a Substack post that ICE risks a surge of applications from Americans "specifically attracted by the rough-em-up, masked secret police tactics, no-holds-barred lawlessness that ICE has pursued since January." Graff added: "If you're excited to dress up like you're taking Fallujah for a raid of hard-working roofers in the Home Depot parking lot, working for ICE or CBP shouldn't be for you."