‘You're talking about a war criminal': Trump slammed for calling Russian G7 expulsion a ‘mistake'
U.S. President Donald Trump's criticism of Russia being expelled from the G7 is drawing sharp criticism from Canadian officials and diplomats, as Prime Minister Mark Carney navigates a summit agenda that includes both war and tariffs.
'Barack Obama and a person named Trudeau didn't want to have Russia in, and I would say that that was a mistake, because I think you wouldn't have a war right now if you had Russia in,' Trump told reporters Monday, in an apparent reference to Russia's expulsion from the group of major industrialized democracies in 2014, and to former prime minister Justin Trudeau, who was not yet elected at the time.
'There are a bunch of factual errors there,' said former Alberta premier Jason during a panel segment with CTV's Power Play Monday. 'It wasn't always the G8. It started as the G7 in the 1970s, precisely to bring together the major democratic economies of the world as a counterpoint to the coordination going on in the Soviet bloc.'
Russia was only invited as part of an effort to encourage reform in the post-Soviet era, said Kenney, a move he called a 'failed experiment' as Russia later annexed Crimea and invaded Ukraine.
'Bringing Putin in … all that does is create an impossible group to discuss anything in terms of shared values or strategic interests,' Kenney said.
Derek Burney, former Canadian ambassador to the U.S., was even more blunt.
'You're talking about a war criminal,' Burney said. 'There's no way anybody can pretend that Russia is a democracy today.'
Burney said Trump's comments reflect a comfort with autocratic leaders, adding that Canada and other G7 members 'are going to stand firm on this.'
Trump has continued to insist the war in Ukraine wouldn't have broken out had he remained in office, a statement Burney dismissed as 'nonsensical.'
'Thank God (Ukrainian President Volodymyr) Zelensky is at the G7 summit in Canada, and not Putin,' he said.
Carney has invited Zelenskyy to attend alongside G7 leaders and select guests.
John Manley, who served as both foreign affairs and finance minister during Jean Chretien's premiership, noted there may be 'a little piece of truth' in Trump's emphasis on keeping lines of communication open, but said that doesn't justify reinstating Russia.
'I don't think that Vladimir Putin is on the same wavelength as the other countries in the G7,' Manley said. 'His exclusion was done at a time that wasn't accompanied by enough other firm measures … but I've never believed in pulling our ambassadors out of countries.'
'We deserve what we negotiated'
Despite the foreign policy fireworks, Trump said his focus at the summit was trade and Canada.
'I think our primary focus will be trade, and trade with Canada, and I'm sure we can work something out,' Trump said at a bilateral meeting with Carney. 'I'm a tariff person. I've always been a tariff (person). It's simple, it's easy, it's precise and it just goes very quickly, and I think Mark has a more complex idea, but also very good.'
The two leaders met privately following weeks of calls and text exchanges in a bid to de-escalate tensions tied to tariffs and market access.
Kenney said Trump's fondness for tariffs is deeply ingrained.
'He has said before that his favourite word in the English language is tariffs … and in 40 years of public commentary on issues, it is the one issue on which he has been most consistent,' he said. 'I hope that what we're going to get out of some agreement is a minimization of tariffs.'
Kenney noted Trump imposed steel and aluminum tariffs on Canada during his first administration, only to later walk them back and sign the Canada-U.S.-Mexico (CUSMA) trade deal.
'The challenge for Prime Minister Carney is to bring him back to that,' Kenney said. 'The early evidence of growth in the U.S. economy… is probably not a good sign. It will probably be seen as wind in the sails of Trump tariff protectionism.'
Burney said Canada must hold the line.
'We have an agreement … which reduces almost all of the tariffs between our two economies. For us to backslide on that under whatever pretext is not something we should be jumping into,' he said.
'We don't deserve modest relief. We deserve what we negotiated.'
Manley echoed that concern, questioning whether Canada can rely on Trump as a trading partner.
'We did have an agreement with him before, and his first day in office, he breached it,' Manley said. 'So do we have a reliable counterparty?'
Manley added that Canada needs more than promises.
'We absolutely want to have preferential access to the U.S. market,' Manley said. 'We need some stability and certainty… not something we're reviewing every year.'
With files from The Canadian Press
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
34 minutes ago
- CTV News
Conestoga College reports a $121M surplus
Conestoga College is reporting a huge financial surplus. But, as CTV's Karis Mapp explains, it's almost half of what the school had the previous year. Conestoga College is reporting a huge financial surplus. But, as CTV's Karis Mapp explains, it's almost half of what the school had the previous year. Conestoga College is reporting a huge surplus, but that's far from good news for the Kitchener school. Colleges across Ontario were required to publicly release the data by 11:59 p.m. on July 31. While Conestoga College made the deadline, it was the last school in the province to do so. The report showed that in its most recent fiscal year, ending March 31, the school's surplus topped $121 million – a huge drop from the $252 million surplus they posted the previous year. Conestoga College said its revenue from tuition dropped to $563 million, $119 million less than it reported in 2024. The school also said it spent $436 million on salaries and benefits, an increase of $37 million from the year before. Seeking answers CTV News asked Conestoga College for an in-person interview, but the school said no one was available to comment on the surplus. In fact, CTV News has repeatedly reached out to Conestoga College for interviews on international student enrolment, as well as its financial and community impact. Each time, the school claimed no one was available. John Tibbits, the president of the college, has not agreed to any interview requests from CTV News since 2023. The school has only responded with written statements, sent by email, none of which have been attributed to Tibbits. According to the Ontario Sunshine List, Tibbits' salary soared alongside the increase in international student enrolment. In 2022, he earned $409,900 as the school's president. The following year it rose 20.7 per cent to $494,716. Tibbits' salary for 2024 was listed on the Ontario Sunshine List as $636,107. That was a year-over-year increase of 28.6 per cent. It also made Tibbits the highest-paid public sector worker in Waterloo Region. He earned more than the presidents of Wilfrid Laurier University, the University of Waterloo and the University of Guelph. The school's board of governors has extended Tibbits' contact until Aug. 31, 2025. He has been Conestoga College's president since 1987. Conestoga College's statement Conestoga College responded to CTV News' request for an interview with a statement sent, as per usual, by email. In it, the school blamed federal caps and changes to the international student program for 'significantly reduced' enrolment. They said it 'placed financial pressure on institutions across the province that rely on this revenue to support core programs and services.' They also cited what they called 'Canada's rapidly declining popularity as an international education destination.' 'No Ontario college has been able to achieve its allotted international enrolment,' the statement read. 'Most colleges have seen a reduction of 60-70 per cent. Conestoga expects a loss of approximately 20,000 international student enrolments for the fall 2025 term compared to the fall of 2023. This equates to a loss of approximately $450 million in revenue over the last two years.' The federal government announced in early 2024 it was slashing study permits for international students and Ontario's allotment was reduced by almost half. Schools were told applications could not exceed 2023 permit levels, and international permits must be less than 55 per cent of the school's first-year domestic enrolment. The province specifically called out Conestoga College, stating it would see the 'largest decline.' That was not surprising, since the school had one of the largest international student populations in the province. The college said its surplus, for the fiscal year ending March 31, was 'the result of careful planning and responsible financial management while balancing the impact of reduced international enrolment.' They added: 'This was not without its challenges, and we continue to navigate the biggest financial crisis in the history of the Ontario public post-secondary education system.' In a report, sent to students and staff on July 28, Conestoga College said 8,584 international students were enrolled in its 2025 spring semester. That marked a 62 per cent drop from the year before, when it totaled 22,633. Domestic student enrolment, however, rose 28 per cent to 3,498 during the spring semester. In the statement sent to CTV News, the school said they have 'taken steps to grow domestic enrolment by maintaining existing academic programming where possible, developing new programs that meet workforce needs, and strategically investing in building infrastructure, equipment and student support services.' Conestoga College also touted its renewed focus. 'Our investments have enabled the college to be one of the fastest-growing in domestic enrolment in the last year, seeing a three per cent increase in winter 2025 enrolment, a 7.5 per cent increase in the spring, and fall confirmations are up by almost 15 per cent,' they wrote. Tough decisions also had to be made, they explained, to address a projected fiscal deficit for 2025-2026. 'Through decisive action to reduce labour and operational costs, we will address these financial pressures and position the college for a stable and sustainable future,' they promised. The school previously offered early retirement packages to some employees, while others were laid off. Earlier this month, the college announced several of its senior administrators were no longer employed at the school. Cuts have also been made to programs, as well as campus consolidations in Kitchener and Brantford. Despite the projected fiscal deficit, Conestoga College said it is investing in its future. 'The college plans to invest $145 million in capital projects that include phase two of the Conestoga Skilled Trades Campus in Cambridge, phase two of the Waterloo campus renovation, renovations of the Tollgate Technological Skills Centre in Brantford to expand skilled trades programming and Doon campus renovations to accommodate new programming such as the animal care suite of programs,' the statement said. One project, however, has stalled. The college confirmed to CTV News it had paused work at its satellite campus in Guelph. The school purchased the building, at 130 Macdonell Street, in 2023. Conestoga College said plans for what comes next will be decided when 'student enrolment allows.' Reaction to surplus Vikki Poirier is the president of OPSEU Local 238, which represents full-time and part-time support staff at the college. She said the school's response is concerning. 'I don't see this as being rightsizing, or an international student issue,' Porier told CTV News. 'This is about deliberate underfunding and bad management choices.' She also questioned the school's focus on growth. 'Why are we not investing in our workforce? Our real resources of support staff and faculty, rather than brick and mortar.' Michael Harris is a regional councillor who has been critical of the college's large surplus, as well as the international student boom and its impact on regional services and planning. He shared his concerns with CTV News prior to the report's release. 'There was a tuition freeze happening provincially and colleges, frankly, exploited the monetary gain from international students,' Harris said. Poirier felt the school should have seen a change coming. 'I'm not going to say that we didn't need our international students, or we shouldn't have them, but this was only going to last for so long,' she explained. 'We were so saturated.' Poirier was also skeptical of the college's next steps. 'We haven't really received the full snapshot of what the erosion is,' she said. 'We saw a pretty picture that was sent out in a graph form, but we don't have the nitty gritty.' Harris, meanwhile, was cautiously optimistic about what lies ahead for the school and Waterloo Region. 'We'll continue to hopefully have that dialog with the college in terms of where they're going,' he said. 'But there's no doubt been a strain on regional resources over the last little while.'
Toronto Star
41 minutes ago
- Toronto Star
After a reference to Trump's impeachments is removed from a history museum, complex questions echo
NEW YORK (AP) — It would seem the most straightforward of notions: A thing takes place, and it goes into the history books or is added to museum exhibits. But whether something even gets remembered and how — particularly when it comes to the history of a country and its leader — is often the furthest thing from simple. The latest example of that came Friday, when the Smithsonian Institution said it had removed a reference to the 2019 and 2021 impeachments of President Donald Trump from a panel in an exhibition about the American presidency. Trump has pressed institutions and agencies under federal oversight, often through the pressure of funding, to focus on the country's achievements and progress and away from things he terms 'divisive.'
Winnipeg Free Press
41 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
It's Trump's economy now. The latest financial numbers offer some warning signs
WASHINGTON (AP) — For all of President Donald Trump's promises of an economic 'golden age,' a spate of weak indicators this week told a potentially worrisome story as the impacts of his policies are coming into focus. Job gains are dwindling. Inflation is ticking upward. Growth has slowed compared to last year. More than six months into his term, Trump's blitz of tariff hikes and his new tax and spending bill have remodeled America's trading, manufacturing, energy and tax systems to his own liking. He's eager to take credit for any wins that might occur and is hunting for someone else to blame if the financial situation starts to totter. But as of now, this is not the boom the Republican president promised, and his ability to blame his Democratic predecessor, Joe Biden, for any economic challenges has faded as the world economy hangs on his every word and social media post. When Friday's jobs report turned out to be decidedly bleak, Trump ignored the warnings in the data and fired the head of the agency that produces the monthly jobs figures. 'Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes,' Trump said on Truth Social, without offering evidence for his claim. 'The Economy is BOOMING.' It's possible that the disappointing numbers are growing pains from the rapid transformation caused by Trump and that stronger growth will return — or they may be a preview of even more disruption to come. Trump's economic plans are a political gamble Trump's aggressive use of tariffs, executive actions, spending cuts and tax code changes carries significant political risk if he is unable to deliver middle-class prosperity. The effects of his new tariffs are still several months away from rippling through the economy, right as many Trump allies in Congress will be campaigning in the midterm elections. 'Considering how early we are in his term, Trump's had an unusually big impact on the economy already,' said Alex Conant, a Republican strategist at Firehouse Strategies. 'The full inflationary impact of the tariffs won't be felt until 2026. Unfortunately for Republicans, that's also an election year.' The White House portrayed the blitz of trade frameworks leading up to Thursday's tariff announcement as proof of his negotiating prowess. The European Union, Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, Indonesia and other nations that the White House declined to name agreed that the U.S. could increase its tariffs on their goods without doing the same to American products. Trump simply set rates on other countries that lacked settlements. The costs of those tariffs — taxes paid on imports to the U.S. — will be most felt by many Americans in the form of higher prices, but to what extent remains uncertain. 'For the White House and their allies, a key part of managing the expectations and politics of the Trump economy is maintaining vigilance when it comes to public perceptions,' said Kevin Madden, a Republican strategist. Just 38% of adults approve of Trump's handling of the economy, according to a July poll by The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs. That's down from the end of Trump's first term when half of adults approved of his economic leadership. The White House paints a rosier image, seeing the economy emerging from a period of uncertainty after Trump's restructuring and repeating the economic gains seen in his first term before the pandemic struck. 'President Trump is implementing the very same policy mix of deregulation, fairer trade, and pro-growth tax cuts at an even bigger scale – as these policies take effect, the best is yet to come,' White House spokesman Kush Desai said. Recent economic reports suggest trouble ahead The economic numbers over the past week show the difficulties that Trump might face if the numbers continue on their current path: — Friday's jobs report showed that U.S. employers have shed 37,000 manufacturing jobs since Trump's tariff launch in April, undermining prior White House claims of a factory revival. — Net hiring has plummeted over the past three months with job gains of just 73,000 in July, 14,000 in June and 19,000 in May — a combined 258,000 jobs lower than previously indicated. On average last year, the economy added 168,000 jobs a month. — A Thursday inflation report showed that prices have risen 2.6% over the year that ended in June, an increase in the personal consumption expenditures price index from 2.2% in April. Prices of heavily imported items, such as appliances, furniture, and toys and games, jumped from May to June. — On Wednesday, a report on gross domestic product — the broadest measure of the U.S. economy — showed that it grew at an annual rate of less than 1.3% during the first half of the year, down sharply from 2.8% growth last year. 'The economy's just kind of slogging forward,' said Guy Berger, senior fellow at the Burning Glass Institute, which studies employment trends. 'Yes, the unemployment rate's not going up, but we're adding very few jobs. The economy's been growing very slowly. It just looks like a 'meh' economy is continuing.' Trump's Fed attacks could unleash more inflation Trump has sought to pin the blame for any economic troubles on Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, saying the Fed should cut its benchmark interest rates even though doing so could generate more inflation. Trump has publicly backed two Fed governors, Christoper Waller and Michelle Bowman, for voting for rate cuts at Wednesday's meeting. But their logic is not what the president wants to hear: They were worried, in part, about a slowing job market. But this is a major economic gamble being undertaken by Trump and those pushing for lower rates under the belief that mortgages will also become more affordable as a result and boost homebuying activity. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. His tariff policy has changed repeatedly over the last six months, with the latest import tax numbers serving as a substitute for what the president announced in April, which provoked a stock market sell-off. It might not be a simple one-time adjustment as some Fed board members and Trump administration officials argue. Trump didn't listen to the warnings on 'universal' tariffs Of course, Trump can't say no one warned him about the possible consequences of his economic policies. Biden, then the outgoing president, did just that in a speech last December at the Brookings Institution, saying the cost of the tariffs would eventually hit American workers and businesses. 'He seems determined to impose steep, universal tariffs on all imported goods brought into this country on the mistaken belief that foreign countries will bear the cost of those tariffs rather than the American consumer,' Biden said. 'I believe this approach is a major mistake.'
