Greg made an insurance claim after a serious bike crash. Then a private investigator came calling
'To do that, they often ask for personal detail, like how the person was employed, where they live, and exactly what was happening when the injury occurred. That's especially the case for injuries that happen on a journey to or from work.'
Denning said if someone was worried about what could happen with their data – especially if the claim ends up being rejected – it was a good idea to speak with a lawyer before proceeding.
Under Victorian legislation, employees are entitled to compensation if their injury arises 'out of or in the course of any employment'.
But as the Victorian Chamber of Commerce and Industry notes, 'there is no single definition of what will and will not be deemed to be a work-related injury' – leading to ambiguity on whether a worker's injury should lead to compensation.
The chamber said the legislation provided 'some clarity by listing several examples deemed to be 'in the course of employment', such as where the worker is travelling for the purpose of their employment, or where they are injured whilst attending a compulsory training course'.
Insurer Allianz Australia, an authorised agent of the Victorian WorkCover Authority, rejected Muller's claim because he was injured during his commute outside work hours.
'Allianz has determined that your injuries have not arisen in or out of the course of your employment … you sustained the injuries while travelling from your home to your workplace,' it said.
Allianz did not respond to requests for comment on Muller's case.
Loading
Muller accepts the decision to reject his claim but does not understand why he was interviewed about his personal life when his accident did not fall under WorkCover's umbrella. 'I thought, why the hell did I go through all this? This should never have proceeded,' he said.
He is also frustrated that Allianz says it is unable to delete his personal information – particularly when large-scale cyber breaches are increasingly common.
'Regarding the request to erase information obtained during the claim investigation, please note that we are unable to delete this information. However, rest assured that no personal data will be disclosed externally,' it said.
Investigators are not required to determine whether a person is eligible for WorkCover before interviewing them about their personal life. WorkSafe, which manages workers' compensation in Victoria, said investigators had a responsibility to ask a wide range of questions regarding a claimant's personal and health matters to assess a claim. It also said it was required to hold on to claimants' data for various periods in case claimants made future claims or launched legal proceedings.
John Pane, data privacy expert and chair of digital rights not-for-profit Electronic Frontiers Australia, said the Victorian and federal governments needed to update privacy laws to require organisations to delete individuals' data on request, as happened in the European Union.
'There is no current right in Australia that grants individuals the power to demand that their personal data be deleted from any organisation that holds it, even if they unlawfully or erroneously captured it,' Pane said. 'And the retention period of these records could be for a substantial period of time.'
While there is no 'right to erasure' in this country, Allianz is required, under the Australian Privacy Principles, to only use or disclose personal information 'for the purpose for which it is collected'.
Taxpayers have poured more than $1.3 billion into WorkCover to help cover the rising cost of claims, particularly in mental health-related claims. There were 35,575 new claims to WorkCover in the 2024 financial year, up 25 per cent in three years.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
West Australian
6 minutes ago
- West Australian
Ryan Daniels: Inside Harley Reid's contract talks and the multi-million dollar offers on the table
It wasn't quite high-powered Wall Street execs in Armani suits, marching in to close a billion-dollar deal — but the stakes, in a footy sense, were just as high. Harley's Melbourne-based manager Nick Geischen rolled into town, and while he didn't utter the words 'Show Me the Money', he didn't need to. The phrase was emanating from his $24 million smile. It's been a hectic week in Harley-world, with a somewhat surprising shift in the situation. Earlier this year, the Eagles put forward multiple contract options to Harley's team. Three, five, seven-year deals — a pick-your-own-adventure approach. Nothing came of it. which had people thinking — he's gone. Even before the Eagles drafted him, there was talk Harley would bail. That the Eagles would be better off trading the pick. Victorian journalist Sam McLure now famously declared 'they won't pick him, Mitch (Cleary)' — suggesting West Coast would be better off passing on one of the most prodigious talents the draft has seen in years — just to avoid the inevitable messy exit. It's always been perceived as a matter of when Harley will leave, not if . Then, the twist. Geischen had come bearing gifts — a proposal for West Coast. An 11-year deal. $2.2 million per year, on average. $24 million all up. The largest deal in AFL history. More money per year than Australian cricket captain Pat Cummins. Unprecedented numbers across the board. While it sounds like monopoly money, in 11 years, $2.2 million won't be as crazy as it sounds right now. By then, Harley will be 32 and potentially edging out of his prime — but with the growth of the AFL's salary cap, he might end up a bargain at some stage. Remember, back in 1994 Alastair Lynch signed a ten-year deal for $1 million — at $100,000 per season, people lost their minds at the money. By the time Lynch retired, he was woefully underpaid. As part of this proposed deal, Harley would have the option to leave after two years. If not, he'd be here until the end of 2037. Let that sink in. In 2037 we might actually have flying cars and robot slaves. Or we'll be slaves to the robots. I'll be 54 years old. Bring me a pair of warm slippers, a glass of prune juice, and cap it off with a few episodes of Murder She Wrote. Maybe my idea of what it's like to be 54 is a little dated — but you get the point — 2037 is an eternity away. Harley's people bringing this to the table signals his intention to stay — if terms can be agreed. So, what's changed? Nothing, really. All along we've heard Harley, the Eagles, even his management declare the young midfielder was taking his time, happy in Perth. In recent weeks Reid's form has elevated, he's exhibiting an edge, leadership around the club. He's forming strong bonds with teammates. My understanding is he's told Andrew McQualter he wants to stay. At 20, he's living on his own, cooking, cleaning, he's got a dog. He's handling the media/fan pressure superbly. Some 20-year-olds can barely remember to flush the toilet. This kid is settled. Credit to the Eagles for an environment where a country kid from the other side of Australia feels comfortable, happy. Saying that, nothing is guaranteed here. The new proposal isn't quite a gun to the head, an ultimatum — but it's not miles off it. This is how keeping Harley Reid looks. If that's too rich, there will be other suitors. It's a fairly simple situation — other than the overwhelming commitment. That's the holdup, if there is one. No one saw this coming. Not even the Eagles. The deal, or at least the sheer enormity of it, has blindsided West Coast. They've taken a pause. In the month following the contract proposal landing in their inbox, there's been no response. Some meals take a lot longer to digest, and this is like going to a steak joint and being served an entire cow. Don't panic Eagles fans, they know what they have in Harley. They love him. If they believe they've found the sun which all other planets can rotate around, that he could be their Dustin Martin, their Patrick Dangerfield, then they need to do it. Maybe it's a slight variation of this proposed deal, a happy compromise, but they can't get too cute here. Harley could be the AFL's best player within a few years. Yes, a deal that long, with that kind of financial commitment comes with risk. In my opinion, it's a risk worth taking. This kid is special. He wants to be here and he's box office. After a disastrous four years at the West Coast Eagles, the signature of Harley Reid would be a significant victory and a sign that things might finally be turning around. Years of endless chat about a move back to Victoria for Harley, now the Eagles have a chance to keep their man. They just need to sign on the dotted line.
Sydney Morning Herald
36 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
How The Age covered the biggest stories of the month
To say Victoria has been in the eye of a news cyclone over the past month would imply there was at least a moment of serenity. It began as many families were winding down for school holidays in early July with one of the most confronting stories in recent memory: allegations that childcare worker Joshua Dale Brown was to be charged with sexually abusing babies and toddlers at a centre where he worked. Brown is facing 73 charges, including rape. He faced court this week and the investigation is ongoing. These allegations not only horrified the nation, but triggered serious questions about the nation's child protection systems and what can only be described as the reckless indifference of governments in that space. Noel Towell reported this week on the former commissioner for children and young people's warning three years ago that 'children would be abused' if the Victorian government did not properly fund the Reportable Conduct Scheme that failed to act on red flags raised about the accused paedophile. Our journalists have also looked closely at the investigations into Brown and the conduct of the companies that employed him to work at many facilities around Melbourne. Sherryn Groch, Caroline Schelle and Carla Jaeger – who have covered this saga with sensitivity, clarity and determination – last week revealed that Brown had been fired from at least three childcare centres before he was arrested, and brought to light crucial details of his past that were missed by regulators and childcare providers. Yesterday, Nicole Precel reported that male childcare workers were being turned away from centres in the aftermath of the Brown allegations. Today, Colin Kruger and Elias Visontay examine the corporate history of Affinity, one of the for-profit childcare providers that employed Brown. On July 7, the attention of our subscribers was firmly fixed on a court in Morwell, where Erin Patterson was found guilty of three counts of murder and one of attempted murder, after poisoning her in-laws, the local pastor and his wife with death cap mushrooms hidden in a beef Wellington. Erin Pearson, who tirelessly and meticulously covered the marathon trial for The Age, described an unflinching Patterson as the four guilty verdicts were read out by the jury foreperson. Crime reporter Marta Pascual Juanola was also stationed at Morwell for the trial. Her interview with Dr Chris Webster, who treated the victims after the poisoning, was one of the most compelling pieces published in the aftermath of the verdicts. Photographer Jason South was also there to capture every moment. This story contains a gallery of some of his best work throughout the trial, plus South's telling of how an AFP photographer captured the famous images of Patterson being driven away from the courtroom. Below is one of my favourite pictures from the trial, showing prosecutor Dr Nanette Rogers in this eerie scene. John Silvester was at his analytical best with this piece on how Patterson needed to jump 10 hurdles with her defence and stumbled at every one. And only this morning, Chris Vedelago broke the news of an investigation by the state's Juries Commissioner into the way the jury in the so-called mushroom case was protected from outside influence during its deliberations. Then there were the chaotic and disturbing events of July 4, when police allege 34-year-old Angelo Loras tried to torch an East Melbourne synagogue. On the same night, though there is no suggestion the events are connected, a group of about 20 people stormed into an Israeli restaurant in Hardware Lane, trashing the place and chanting at diners. Groch and Vedelago's look at the group behind it is illuminating. Meanwhile in Greensborough on the same night, a company that manufactures parts for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter used by Israel, as Jaeger reported, was vandalised and cars outside were set alight.
The Age
36 minutes ago
- The Age
How The Age covered the biggest stories of the month
To say Victoria has been in the eye of a news cyclone over the past month would imply there was at least a moment of serenity. It began as many families were winding down for school holidays in early July with one of the most confronting stories in recent memory: allegations that childcare worker Joshua Dale Brown was to be charged with sexually abusing babies and toddlers at a centre where he worked. Brown is facing 73 charges, including rape. He faced court this week and the investigation is ongoing. These allegations not only horrified the nation, but triggered serious questions about the nation's child protection systems and what can only be described as the reckless indifference of governments in that space. Noel Towell reported this week on the former commissioner for children and young people's warning three years ago that 'children would be abused' if the Victorian government did not properly fund the Reportable Conduct Scheme that failed to act on red flags raised about the accused paedophile. Our journalists have also looked closely at the investigations into Brown and the conduct of the companies that employed him to work at many facilities around Melbourne. Sherryn Groch, Caroline Schelle and Carla Jaeger – who have covered this saga with sensitivity, clarity and determination – last week revealed that Brown had been fired from at least three childcare centres before he was arrested, and brought to light crucial details of his past that were missed by regulators and childcare providers. Yesterday, Nicole Precel reported that male childcare workers were being turned away from centres in the aftermath of the Brown allegations. Today, Colin Kruger and Elias Visontay examine the corporate history of Affinity, one of the for-profit childcare providers that employed Brown. On July 7, the attention of our subscribers was firmly fixed on a court in Morwell, where Erin Patterson was found guilty of three counts of murder and one of attempted murder, after poisoning her in-laws, the local pastor and his wife with death cap mushrooms hidden in a beef Wellington. Erin Pearson, who tirelessly and meticulously covered the marathon trial for The Age, described an unflinching Patterson as the four guilty verdicts were read out by the jury foreperson. Crime reporter Marta Pascual Juanola was also stationed at Morwell for the trial. Her interview with Dr Chris Webster, who treated the victims after the poisoning, was one of the most compelling pieces published in the aftermath of the verdicts. Photographer Jason South was also there to capture every moment. This story contains a gallery of some of his best work throughout the trial, plus South's telling of how an AFP photographer captured the famous images of Patterson being driven away from the courtroom. Below is one of my favourite pictures from the trial, showing prosecutor Dr Nanette Rogers in this eerie scene. John Silvester was at his analytical best with this piece on how Patterson needed to jump 10 hurdles with her defence and stumbled at every one. And only this morning, Chris Vedelago broke the news of an investigation by the state's Juries Commissioner into the way the jury in the so-called mushroom case was protected from outside influence during its deliberations. Then there were the chaotic and disturbing events of July 4, when police allege 34-year-old Angelo Loras tried to torch an East Melbourne synagogue. On the same night, though there is no suggestion the events are connected, a group of about 20 people stormed into an Israeli restaurant in Hardware Lane, trashing the place and chanting at diners. Groch and Vedelago's look at the group behind it is illuminating. Meanwhile in Greensborough on the same night, a company that manufactures parts for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter used by Israel, as Jaeger reported, was vandalised and cars outside were set alight.
