PepsiCo announced as official partner of Formula 1
Formula 1
and PepsiCo has announced a multi-year agreement that will see PepsiCo become an official partner of the sport until 2030.
The deal offers huge potential to both the global brands and their worldwide fans, as it joins together the thrill of motorsport with some of the powerhouse products of the PepsiCo family, including Sting Energy, Gatorade and Doritos.
With Formula 1's fanbase of more than 820 million people worldwide and PepsiCo's coverage of over 200 markets, the two brands together have unrivalled opportunities to engage existing, new and diverse audiences around the world at an unprecedented scale.
PepsiCo will prioritise the creation of meaningful fan engagement beyond just the race venues through exciting on-pack promotions, digital experiences, and unique content that will bring Formula 1 to an even wider audience. This partnership includes opportunities such as immersive brand experiences in Formula 1 Fan Zones and rights for limited edition, co-branded products.
Sting Energy will join Formula 1 as its official energy drink, delivering the taste and refreshment of a soft drink with the energising benefits of an energy drink. As PepsiCo's flagship energy brand, Sting has seen rapid global growth across key markets such as India, Pakistan, Egypt and Vietnam. The partnership marks a powerful platform for Sting's continued expansion alongside Formula 1's global audience.
Gatorade, the world's sports and isotonic drinks brand, will become the official partner of F1 Sprint, bringing its legacy of fuelling peak athletic performance to motorsport's most dynamic format from Spa-Francorchamps later this year, continuing through the events at Austin, São Paulo and Qatar. The Sprint has proved to be hugely popular among fans with TV viewership on those weekends on average ten per cent greater than a non-Sprint weekend.
Doritos becomes the official savoury snack partner of Formula 1. With global activation rights, the partnership will bring Doritos to fans at every turn, whether in the stands or on the sofa.
PepsiCo will also extend their partnership to F1 Academy, with further details to be announced.
From 2026, PepsiCo's broader brand portfolio will become integrated into the Formula 1 ecosystem through pouring and supply at all Formula 1 Grands Prix. PepsiCo will also leverage its retail footprint to connect with F1 fans through themed packaging, point-of-sale materials and promotions.
As the sport celebrates its 75th anniversary, this partnership epitomises the recent rise in its popularity and commitment to cultural engagement.
Stefano Domenicali, president and chief executive officer of Formula 1 said, 'Today is a moment to celebrate the partnership between two iconic and historic global brands. A sparkling union that will bring together tradition and innovation, generating excitement, entertainment and unforgettable experiences for our fans and customers around the world.'
'PepsiCo will tap into the unique potential of Formula 1 as a global platform to connect with new audiences and we will benefit from their energy, their extraordinary products and their loyal community. With a long-lasting history of creativity and ability to celebrate the fun and special moments in life, PepsiCo is the ideal partner to share together unique moments along our journey," Domenicali added.
Eugene Willemsen, chief executive officer, international beverages, PepsiCo said, 'This landmark partnership with Formula 1 represents a perfect fusion of two global powerhouses that share a passion for creating extraordinary fan experiences... Together, we'll deliver bold, innovative experiences that connect with drivers and fans at race venues and well beyond, while also supporting Formula 1's continued expansion to new audiences worldwide in markets where PepsiCo and Sting have a strong presence.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
4 hours ago
- News18
F1: Red Bull's Max Verstappen Open To Mercedes Switch For 2026 Season
Mercedes team principal Toto Wolff confirmed that 'conversations behind closed doors" were taking place. As per a Sky Sports report, talks have intensified, with Verstappen willing to free himself from his current Red Bull contract, which runs until 2028. However, the Mercedes board is unsure if signing Verstappen is necessary, given they could have the car to beat following the new regulations in 2026 and may not need the driver who is widely seen as the best on the grid. Sky Sports News understands Verstappen has not indicated he wants to leave Red Bull early, nor has there been an official approach from Mercedes for the reigning F1 world champion. But Verstappen has a clause in his contract allowing him to leave Red Bull after this season if he is not in the top four of the Drivers' Championship at the start of the F1 summer break, which follows the Hungarian Grand Prix on August 3. Is Verstappen Moving From Red Bull To Mercedes? Christian Horner had commented on the reports that Mercedes is having 'conversations" with Verstappen about a possible switch, calling it 'a lot of noise". 'We are very clear with the contract we have with Max until 2028. Anything is entirely speculative that has been said. We tend to not pay too much attention to it. 'I can imagine George is frustrated that he hasn't been given a contract yet, but that's between him and his team. 'The situation with Max – we know clearly where we are at, as does Max. Everything is subject to noise and obviously within the contract remains confidential to the two parties." Amid the continued speculation, Mercedes Team Principal Toto Wolff asserted that it was still the case he and Russell wanted to continue the partnership, but recognised the team still needed to have certain conversations. '[We're] absolutely keen to continue the relationship," said Wolff in Austria.
Indian Express
5 hours ago
- Indian Express
Amid trade wars and conflicts, New Delhi must strengthen its associations with BRICS
The BRICS summit in Rio is happening as the global order grapples with two forms of interstate conflicts: Trade wars and regional wars. These conflicts demonstrate the international order's limitations and the existing institutions' inability to contain the crises. States are adopting myriad hedging and balancing strategies to cope with the new challenges. The US is trying to withdraw from and limit its external engagements, while other countries are joining alternative institutions to safeguard their interests. The world is at a juncture where the hegemon cannot ensure compliance of others and the successors are reluctant to provide leadership and take responsibility. Under these circumstances, emerging powers find it advantageous to group together and amplify their influence. Amid a turbulent and unpredictable world order, BRICS functions as a key instrument of a broader hedging and diversification strategy. Members view this as a critical alternative forum that provides a sense of security, status, and collective leadership. BRICS has become a coveted organisation for the Global South. It comprises 11 states with nearly 50 per cent of the global population and about 40 per cent of the global GDP. It is a heterogeneous organisation with no shared history, culture, ideology or territories. It cannot be compared with any other existing organisation given its diversity and uniqueness. Experts often compare it with the G7 because of its global outreach, but the G7 countries have identical political systems and a comparable level of development. The same cannot be said about BRICS. Because BRICS is an organisation of the non-West, it is often viewed as a challenge to the West. It is not without reason that Donald Trump threatened to slap a 100 per cent tariff on BRICS countries if they sought to develop an alternative currency. Many in the West fear that a BRICS currency would weaken the dollar. However, it must be underlined that BRICS is not in the process of developing a new currency. A common currency requires integrating financial institutions and closely coordinating industrial and agricultural policies. BRICS does not have the level of coordination needed and is not pursuing such a goal. Therefore, this Western fear is entirely misplaced. Instead, BRICS is exploring the possibility of amplifying trade in national currencies. The trade between Russia and China is carried out in national currencies. Similarly, a large part of Russia's trade with India and Brazil occurs in local currencies. These states are also trying to set up fixed reference rates for their local currencies, independent of the dollar. The extent of the impact of this process on the dollar is unclear, but BRICS states should expect new threats from the Trump administration. It would be viewed as an attempt at de-dollarisation, and President Trump cannot remain silent for long. In a recent interview, US Secretary of Commerce, Howard Lutnick, described India's association with BRICS as an irritant which rubbed America the wrong way. Nonetheless, New Delhi will continue to follow a diversified multi-engagement policy, disregarding external pressure. Prime Minister Narendra Modi will attend the Rio summit, even as Xi Jinping and Putin give it a pass. The BRICS summit in Rio De Janeiro is conspicuous for several reasons: First, following its expansion in 2024 and 2025, it would be the first time that all the members will participate. It provides an important platform for them to socialise, explore the areas of cooperation and develop an understanding of each other's concerns. Further, the BRICS membership enhances the status of new members. However, the expansion of the organisation will also pose coordination and consensus-building challenges. Second, the issue of the Israel-Iran conflict is likely to figure prominently in discussions. A few days ago, BRICS issued a joint statement condemning the Israeli attack on Iran as a violation of international law and the UN Charter. This assumes significance because India had distanced itself from a joint statement at the SCO meeting previously. In a world where states do not want to be seen taking a stand against Trump, Iran finds many supporters at the BRICS forum. Third, the expansion of BRICS has enabled greater representation of the Global South. At a time when the US is withdrawing from its global responsibilities of peace and security, climate action, the WTO and the WHO, BRICS has the opportunity to fill the vacuum and protect the interests of the Global South. BRICS can simultaneously focus on reforms in West-dominated institutions and enhanced cooperation in the South. The Rio summit will focus on the ethical use of artificial intelligence (AI), climate action, global health, reforming global governance, and peace and security. Since the Trump administration holds contrarian views on these issues, the only hope is greater cooperation among countries of the Global South. Fourth, Xi Jinping would not be present at the Rio summit. Premier Li Qiang will be representing China. Xi's absence has led to speculations of a fraying unity, strains in ties between China and Brazil and Prime Minister Lula Da Silva's invitation to PM Modi for a state dinner. It is not easy to find the real reason, but Brazil views it as a diplomatic slight. Silva's advisor Celso Amorim once stated that 'BRICS without China is not BRICS'. This would be the first time that China's president will not be present at the summit. This is surprising because Brazil has good ties with China, and PM Silva recently visited Beijing. Russia's president, Vladimir Putin, will also not participate in person because of the International Criminal Court (ICC) warrant issued against him. Finally, New Delhi must strengthen its associations with BRICS. In a world where Trump's whimsical policies send shockwaves, India needs closer ties with alternative regional powers. India lends immense credibility to the organisation and seeks to gain a lot in the future. New Delhi's strong ties with Washington should not come in the way of its associations with BRICS. PM Modi and his team will have an opportunity to sensitise the members on issues like digital inclusion, sustainable development, climate action, poverty elimination, and terrorism. In a favourable development, New Delhi has aligned its stance with other members on Israel's attack on Iran. It is likely to receive support from others on the issue of terrorism in reciprocation. The writer teaches at the School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, Delhi. Views are personal
Hindustan Times
6 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Del Monte files for bankruptcy: What it means for food, grocery prices in US
Del Monte Foods has filed for bankruptcy. The 138-year-old company is looking for a buyer. On Tuesday, Del Monte Foods announced it was voluntarily entering Chapter 11, Reuters reported. The canned foods firm is going through a sale process for all of its assets as well. As per its statement, Del Monte has secured $912.5 million in new funding. This will allow the company to remain afloat as it enters the peak canning season while the sale process is underway. According to court documents, the liabilities of Del Monte Foods were estimated between $1 billion and $10 billion. Del Monte canned tomatoes are seen among other nonperishable goods inside the West CAP Food Pantry in Boyceville, Wisconsin, U.S(REUTERS) Also read: Popular Canned food company Del Monte files for bankruptcy The decision could significantly impact food and grocery prices in the United States. Del Monte is behind some major brands such as College Inn, which sells broth and stocks, and Joyba's tea products. Sarah Foss, global head of legal and restructuring at Debtwire, told CNN that Del Monte cited declining consumer demand for the Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. 'Consumer preferences have shifted away from preservative-laden canned food in favor of healthier alternatives,' she added. This led the company to incur increased costs in terms of storing surplus inventory and promotional spending to encourage buyers. Del Monte's bankruptcy needs to be seen in the light of inflation and US President Donald Trump's tariff policies. In May, inflation in the US picked up a bit due to rising food prices. As per a report by the Labor Department, consumer prices jumped 2.4 per cent in May compared with a year ago. In April, the prices had registered a 2.3 per cent increase year-on-year. The figures mean that the Federal Reserve's 2 per cent inflation target remains unfulfilled. This means the central bank is less likely to reduce borrowing costs in the future. As for tariffs, an Associated Press report stated that almost all economists expect that the Trump administration's policies could make things more expensive in the second half of 2025, but the exact impact remains uncertain. In this context, Del Monte Food's bankruptcy and closure could potentially increase food prices. However, the exact impact is expected to become apparent in the next few months. FAQs 1. Has Del Monte Foods filed for bankruptcy? Yes, it filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on Tuesday. 2. How much in liabilities does Del Monte Foods have? The estimated liabilities are between $1 and $10 billion. 2. Are Del Monte's non-US subsidiaries included in the bankruptcy filing? No, as per Reuters, the company's non-U.S. subsidiaries are not part of the Chapter 11 proceedings and will continue to operate as usual.
