Council takes no action on land purchase for Willmar Municipal Utilities facilities
on Monday again deferred action on a purchase agreement for 27 acres of land for
new facilities.
The presentation and discussion for that agenda item took more than an hour, after which action was deferred until the April 7 meeting of the City Council.
The land which Willmar Municipal Utilities wants to purchase for $600,000 for its new facilities is located just east of the Highway 71/23 Bypass and north of Willmar Avenue Southeast. It is adjacent to, but not within, the city limits.
The Municipal Utilities Commission approved the purchase agreement during its Feb. 24 meeting and it was on the City Council's agenda March 3 for approval. This is the fifth property down the list of properties that Willmar Municipal Utilities has tried to purchase since the search for land started in 2023.
The City Council on March 3 chose to defer approval for 30 days or until the next council meeting. City Attorney Robert Scott on Monday explained to the council that the City Charter's language is ambiguous and he interprets that to mean that the council could continue the matter to the April 7 meeting.
Some members of the City Council are questioning why Willmar Municipal Utilities wants to build its new facilities outside city limits — where there is significant cost to extend city sewer and water infrastructure — when there are parcels in the
that, in the opinion of those councilors, would be suitable for Municipal Utilities needs.
The cost to extend sewer and water services to the land on the bypass would be an estimated $2.7 million. However, that infrastructure, if built, would be able to service more than 400 acres of land in that area, not only the 27 acres to be purchased.
This is a breaking news update from Monday night's meeting. More details of the discussion from the meeting will be published later on wctrib.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
8 hours ago
- Forbes
Tax Credit Housing Project Costs Continue To Be 'Ridiculous.'
Sen. Todd Young (R-IN) talks to reporters just off the floor of the Senate Chamber. Senator Young ... More remains one of the biggest boosters of the Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) program in spite of it's costs (Photo by) There is a shocking story in the Washington Post with the headline, These publicly funded homes for the poor cost $1.2 million each to build. For me, what's shocking is not the cost, but that there is surprise among the people quoted in the story, especially a Washington D.C. City Councilmember who attended a ribbon cutting for the project only later to find out the price tag. I've been watching the per unit cost of 'affordable' housing, especially projects built using Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LITHC) climb for years. That simply is not a surprise to me or anyone else paying attention. That the Washington Post and local political leaders are just now figuring this out is scandalous and only emphasizes the ongoing need for reform. The Post story highlights 5 projects that range from $785,293 per unit to the $1,182,017 per unit. Costs for LIHTC projects continue to be "ridiculous." Taking the math further, that's 468 units for a total of $438,262,683 or $936,458.72 per unit. To get a sense of the scale of this spending, consider that the average house in Washington D.C., according to Zillow, sells for $607,908, or $328,550.72 less than the average cost of the units created in these projects. Also consider that for the price of building 1 unit at the pricey Ontario Place project, one could buy two homes in the District of Columbia, priced at $591,008 each. Finally, in Adams Morgan where the Ontario Place project was built, the average price, again, according to Zillow, is just $597,832. What's the excuse? Jubilee, the developer, told the Post in a statement (they wouldn't return phone calls), that 'Placing deeply affordable housing in high opportunity neighborhoods with on site and nearby programs and services helps harness the power of zip code.' The Post explains that the developer believes that 'The location promotes tenants' success by connecting them to high-performing schools, transportation options, grocery stores and other advantages, the statement said.' For these prices, Jubilee could just buy all the tenants a new car and free food and delivery for life from Whole Foods. And D.C. Council Chairman Phil Mendelson, according to the Post, called the spending 'ridiculous' and 'really disturbing.' I agree. And so would most people in the housing world. Yet the culprits behind these projects wouldn't go on the record in an interview, and if they responded at all, sent a statement. The problem is the 'power of the zip code' doesn't make any sense. Why are market rate units, houses not apartments, selling – not renting – for half the cost of these rental units. If the 'power of the zip code' was a real thing, it would have made more sense to buy 900 people houses in Adams Morgan and other DC neighborhoods rather than building them and having to operate them into the future. But Mendelson is part of the problem too. He says in his comments that choices have to be made to avoid these kinds of costs. 'But that analytical work has never happened.' But yes, it has. I've been doing it for years. About 6 years ago, I looked at 10 years of LIHTC projects in Seattle and found that the average cost per unit over the period was about $245,000 per unit. What I found is that, depending on the year, the costs per unit were almost always the same or higher than a typical single-family home. One of the most egregious cases was a project called 12th Avenue Arts that rang in at $47 million for 88 units, a total development cost of $534,000 per unit. I wrote about that project in 2016 in a post titled When Will Affordable Housing Advocates Push For More Supply, Fewer Rules? The answer, based on the numbers from D.C. seems like never. One of the people that is most stubborn in their support of these spendy projects is Senator Todd Young, a Republican from Indiana. In his state there is one project, Artesian Place in Martinsville, Indiana with a price tag of $15,307,352 for 34 units, a total development cost of $450,216 per unit. How much to buy a single-family house, with three bedrooms in Martinsville? Listings on Zillow range from $200,000 to $450,000. According to Senator Young in a recent statement expressing his support for the expansion of LIHTC, this sort of 'investment' will 'help to tackle the housing affordability crisis head on to help Hoosier families, expand our workforce, and strengthen our communities.' Senator Young needs to turn over his membership card in the conservative club if he's going to support such profligate spending. If a Republican from Indiana won't hit the pause button on this sort of outrageous spending, it's difficult to see where the political will can come from. I thought maybe total development cost hitting $1 million per unit might be the threshold that would start a move toward reform. But as I put it in a post here a few years ago, Senator Young and his fellow LIHTC boosters seem to be saying what Nixon told John Dean when the later said keeping Watergate quiet could cost $1 million dollars: 'We could get that.'
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
NYC Passes $116 Billion Budget as Mayor Adams Looks to Election
(Bloomberg) -- New York City Mayor Eric Adams reached a deal with the City Council on a $115.9 billion budget, adding new funding for legal services for migrants and more money for early childhood education. Struggling Downtowns Are Looking to Lure New Crowds Philadelphia Transit System Votes to Cut Service by 45%, Hike Fares Squeezed by Crowds, the Roads of Central Park Are Being Reimagined Sprawl Is Still Not the Answer The spending plan for the fiscal year that starts July 1, which the City Council approved on Monday, is the final one in Adams' first term. The budget is more than $3 billion larger than the $112 billion spending plan the city approved last year, and it comes as the mayor, who was elected as a Democrat, is seeking reelection as an independent in November. While Adams' previous budgets had been marked by dire predictions for the city's future — and what some critics decried as overly conservative revenue forecasts — the new plan adds funding for city services that the mayor had previously targeted for freezes or cuts. It passed unanimously— a rare moment of concord between the mayor and Council in a relationship that has mostly been acrimonious in previous years' budget negotiations. Adams branded the spending plan as the 'best budget ever' earlier this year. The plan adds roughly $50 million for legal services for immigrants, and will pay for a $10 million pilot program to provide free childcare for children ages 2 and under. It also fully funds the city's childcare program for 3-year-olds. The new funding represents a starkly different tack by Adams. Two years ago, he implemented unpopular cuts in response to the costly influx of thousands of migrants, which he estimated would cost the city billions of dollars. He slashed service hours at some libraries in response to the migrant crisis, cuts he partially restored last year after migrant arrivals slowed and costs sharply declined. The new budget adds seven-day service at 10 more city libraries, with locations to be announced at a future date. Some fiscal watchdogs criticized the new budget, which comes as the city faces potential funding threats from President Donald Trump's administration. The new plan is 'unaffordable' and 'unprepared for federal cuts,' said Andrew Rein, president of the Citizens Budget Commission, a nonpartisan fiscal watchdog group. The Trump administration has already paused or terminated nearly $400 million in federal grants the city received in the current fiscal year, and $134.5 million in funding for the next one, according to an analysis from state Comptroller Tom DiNapoli's office. City budget officials warned in financial documents released in May that Trump's immigration policies, federal spending cuts and proposed tariffs could create a 'severe downturn' in New York's economy, impairing the still-struggling office market, damping tourism and costing as many as 63,000 jobs in the current year, even under a mild recession scenario. (Updates with budget passing unanimously in fourth paragraph.) America's Top Consumer-Sentiment Economist Is Worried How to Steal a House SNAP Cuts in Big Tax Bill Will Hit a Lot of Trump Voters Too China's Homegrown Jewelry Superstar Pistachios Are Everywhere Right Now, Not Just in Dubai Chocolate ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
19 hours ago
- Yahoo
More large-scale water and sewer projects ahead for Greenville
Having replaced more than 1,300 feet of water line and nearly 2,000 feet of sewer pipe so far this year in residential areas alone, it's been a busy time for Greenville's water utilities department. Many of the water distribution projects this year have involved not only replacing existing pipe but adding loops for better circulation/reduce water discoloration or to allow future repairs to be made without completely shutting off a neighborhood's water, Greenville utility superintendent Jon Herbert explained at a city council work session last week. Specific projects of this kind that have so far been completed this year include ones on Bourland Street, Upthegrove Street, Turtle Creek Drive and Division Street. In addition to those water line replacements in residential areas, the now-completed water main replacement through downtown Greenville on Washington Street was a highly visible project, as it was in a high-traffic area. The replacement became necessary after a major break last July, for which 80-years-worth of iron buildup inside the pipe was a contributing factor. 'It's a 20-inch line, but you were pretty much only getting about 12-inches in flow because of the buildup,' Herbert said. Meanwhile, on the sewer side of things, the department has also replaced about 4,550 feet of sewer main feeding lift stations near Walmart Supercenter and Graham Park. Ongoing water distribution and wastewater collection projects that are scheduled to be completed by the end of this year include replacing 600 feet of sewer pipe on Walnut Street and the citywide switching out of its water meters from the older positive displacement units to those compatible with the new, more advanced system. The new metering infrastructure – described as including not just the meters themselves but also software, nine towers with cellular gateways, collection equipment and maintenance services – is expected to be fully installed and ready to 'go live' within three to five months. When the system goes live, the high-tech meters will be logging data into the system about every 7.5 second, Shellie Rabroker with Core & Main (the Texas distributor of the specific system) told the city council in April. The system would also allow for the city to keep up to 96 days of usage data for each customer, which could be referred to when billing disputes arise. 'It puts the burden of proof back into the customer's court,' Rabroker said. She also explained that customers would have a portal into the system that they could log into, not only to monitor their water usage but to also troubleshoot for leaks and set usage parameters to help stay within budget. For the 2025-2026 budget year, projects in the department's sites include replacing 6.5 miles of water main valves, side feel connections and air release valves under East Loop (from the intersection of Stuart Street and Anderson Street to the Service First Credit Union near L3Harris) – a large project that is planned in seven phases and will total a projected $10.35 million. The East Loop transmission main project may be included in the 'Phase 2' water infrastructure bond in 2026, City Manager Summer Spurlock said.
