Outrage over Limpopo council's R3 million Warmbaths conference
A war of words has broken out between political parties in the Elias Motsoaledi local municipality in the Sekhukhune region in Limpopo over R3 million in alleged wasteful and irregular expenditures.
The fierce argument is between councillors from the ANC, DA, and the Bolsheviks party of South Africa.
At the centre of controversy are allegations that the ANC-led council spent more than R3 million on food, transport, and accommodation for about 300 councillors at the Belabela Aventura in Warmbaths for a councillors' conference in October last year.
DA councillor and caucus leader Sipho Mmaboko said the party has written to the office of the Auditor-General Tsakani Maluleke, asking her office to look into the alleged wasteful expenditure.
The party alleged the expenditure was exorbitant and that it could have been best spent on addressing service delivery backlogs, such as building municipal roads and bridges, collecting garbage and giving municipal buildings a new facelift.
A costly conference
About 400 councillors and staffers attended the conference, with the exception of the DA, as it protested the cost implications.
Some of the expenses incurred during the conference, according to the DA, included:
R1 030 773.75 for the accommodation of councillors,
R893 550 for the conference package at Forever Resorts Bela Bela
R513 532 for the supply and delivery of golf t-shirts for the ward committee conference
R142 011 for fifteen 22-seater taxis from all wards to transport ward committee members,
R 864 432 for 400 soft shell jackets for 310 ward committee members, 61 members of council and 29 officials for a ward committee conference, and
260 hiker hats for Extended Public Works Programme participants.
ALSO READ: Limpopo ANC conference rocked by membership manipulation claims
President of the Bolsheviks Seun Mogotji was outraged
'Sekhukhune is known in the province and beyond as a haven for both international and domestic tourists. The region boasts a wide range of sophisticated lodges, with breathtaking halls and kitchens unparalleled by any.
'We are baffled to the core that this council chose to hold their conference hundreds of kilometres away from home. What is it that Bela-Bela has that we don't have?
'This ANC-led council must hang their heads in shame. What are they saying about the local economy?
'They must just make sure they bring back the money. It belongs to the taxpayers. Otherwise, otla nkga goss bola [a Sepedi expression which loosely translates: all hell will break loose]'.
ALSO READ: Malema slams politicians exploiting 'blackness' to mask corruption and escape justice
Municipality defends conference
Municipality spokesperson Simon Makua said the primary function of ward committees was to promote accountable and participatory governance.
'These structures are essential for ensuring that the voices of community members are heard and represented in local decision-making processes'
'The selection of the venue for the conference was conducted through a competitive bidding process. This approach was taken to ensure that the municipality addresses the required capacity needs of the attendees while also being mindful of the associated cost.
'It is also important to note that due to capacity limitations within Sekhukhune, no local venue was able to accommodate the 390 delegates expected at the conference. This necessitated the selection of a venue outside the immediate area,' said Makua.
Makua said his municipality remained committed to transparency and accountability in all its operations.
'We adhere strictly to the bidding process and are dedicated to ensuring that the ward committee conference not only fulfils its objectives but also contributes to local economic empowerment,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
Sapref unveils ambitious plans after R1 sale
THE Central Energy Fund (CEF), which bought South Africa's biggest former oil refinery, Sapref, for just R1 last year, said it plans to expand the refinery's capacity as part of a broader energy transition strategy. CEF is a government-owned company under the Department of Mineral Resources. Also read: eThekwini Municipality hopes to see Sapref revived Sapref, located in Prospecton, was previously owned by BP South Africa and Shell South Africa. At its peak before the 2022 floods, it produced 180 000 barrels of fuel per day, about 35% of the country's refining capacity. After it stopped production and shifted to importing fuel, the facility has handled about 70% of South Africa's petroleum fuel supply. Speaking at a recent conference in Cape Town, CEF's acting group CEO, Dr Tshepo Mokoka, said the need to increase capacity comes amid the country's rising demand for fuel. He said CEF aims to increase capacity to between 400 000 and 600 000 barrels per day. 'We want to address demand by processing the hydrocarbons that we have in South Africa as well as those in neighbouring countries,' said Mokoka. Hydrocarbons are organic compounds found in fossil fuels like crude oil, natural gas, and coal. Hydrocarbons are known for their combustibility, making them a primary energy source. Mokoka added that the CEF is striking a balance between renewable energy and hydrocarbons, which aligns government's broader strategy to implement a just energy transition from fossil to renewable energy. A University of South Africa professor, however, has questioned the R1 sale of Sapref to the government, saying it could have been designed for Sapref to evade its social and environmental liabilities. Llewellyn Leonard, of the university's Environmental Science Department, said decommissioning the refinery would have meant that Sapref was liable for the costs of restoring the site to its original state. 'Selling the refinery to the South African government, instead of decommissioning it, suggests that Sapref will not be held accountable for historical environmental liabilities and social injustices,' said Leonard. Over the years, Sapref was at loggerheads with nearby communities over air pollution and oil pipeline leaks. The acquisition of Sapref by CEF was approved by the Competition Commission in September 2024. For more South Coast Sun news, follow us on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. You can also check out our videos on our YouTube channel or follow us on TikTok. Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter and get news delivered straight to your inbox. Do you have more information pertaining to this story? Feel free to let us know by commenting on our Facebook page or you can contact our newsroom on 031 903 2341 and speak to a journalist. At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
SowetanLIVE
an hour ago
- SowetanLIVE
DA rejects Simelane, Nkabane departmental budgets
The DA has followed through on its threat to vote against departmental budget votes of ministers who are facing allegations of wrongdoing. This after the party this week voted against budgets of the departments of human settlements and higher education led by Thembi Simelane-Nkadimeng and Nobuhle Nkabane respectively. This decision was taken as a direct response to President Cyril Ramaphosa axing trade and industry deputy minister Andrew Whitfield, of the DA, last week for defying his order that none of the members of his executive were allowed to go to the US at the height of the diplomatic tensions between the two countries. The DA in response argued that Ramaphosa had been harsh on Whitfield and that it was not acceptable that he fired him for such a minor transgression while he still kept Simelane and Nkabane in his cabinet. Unlike Whitfield, the DA argued, Simelane was accused of corruption and Nkabane stood accused of lying to parliament. Instead of dealing with the two ministers who were facing serious allegations, Ramaphosa decided to axe Whitfield for going on a trip without getting permission, the DA argued. DA MP Luyolo Mphithi on Wednesday said his party was voting against Simelane's budget vote because of the corruption allegations she was facing. Mphithi said the DA was concerned that instead of firing Simelane, Ramaphosa had moved her from the department of justice to human settlements. 'You'd think that the response to this that the president would have shown minister Simelane the door, he did not. He asked for the report that he stayed with for three months,' said Mphithi. 'And even though the DA sustained pressure asking the president to act, he lacked courage to act and instead decided to dump minister Simelane at human settlements, one of the most important departments for South Africans.'
The Herald
2 hours ago
- The Herald
DA rejects Simelane, Nkabane departmental budgets
The DA has followed through on its threat to vote against departmental budget votes of ministers who are facing allegations of wrongdoing. This after the party this week voted against budgets of the departments of human settlements and higher education led by Thembi Simelane-Nkadimeng and Nobuhle Nkabane respectively. This decision was taken as a direct response to President Cyril Ramaphosa axing trade and industry deputy minister Andrew Whitfield, of the DA, last week for defying his order that none of the members of his executive were allowed to go to the US at the height of the diplomatic tensions between the two countries. The DA in response argued that Ramaphosa had been harsh on Whitfield and that it was not acceptable that he fired him for such a minor transgression while he still kept Simelane and Nkabane in his cabinet. Unlike Whitfield, the DA argued, Simelane was accused of corruption and Nkabane stood accused of lying to parliament. Instead of dealing with the two ministers who were facing serious allegations, Ramaphosa decided to axe Whitfield for going on a trip without getting permission, the DA argued. DA MP Luyolo Mphithi on Wednesday said his party was voting against Simelane's budget vote because of the corruption allegations she was facing. Mphithi said the DA was concerned that instead of firing Simelane, Ramaphosa had moved her from the department of justice to human settlements. 'You'd think that the response to this that the president would have shown minister Simelane the door, he did not. He asked for the report that he stayed with for three months,' said Mphithi. 'And even though the DA sustained pressure asking the president to act, he lacked courage to act and instead decided to dump minister Simelane at human settlements, one of the most important departments for South Africans.' 'It seems that this president does not take an issue with the fact that a person accused of corruption sits in his cabinet and will have to look after a budget of R30bn that is set aside for South Africans,' he said. Ideally, Mphithi said, the DA would not have a problem with voting for the department of human settlements' budget as it relates to people's housing and security but they could not do it because of the allegations faced by Simelane. 'The DA will always support the granting of funds to house the vulnerable at the same time fast-tracking jobs and growth to give many more South Africans the dignity of being able to buy and own their own houses,' he said. 'And though this budget and the department have many challenges under normal circumstances it would be supported. However, we sit with a minister who faces corruption allegations who has not been accountable to the South African public. And it is because of this we struggle support this particular budget.' Mphithi and the MK Party's Thulani Gumede raised several issues with the human settlements budget presented by Simelane, saying it was not dealing with some of the key issues faced by South Africans in the sector. 'A critical examination reveals a fundamental flaw, an overall real decline in the department's budget. None of its five main programmes demonstrates above-inflation increases,' said Gumede. 'This systemic underfunding of human settlements initiatives will inevitably worsen existing backlogs and impair the progressive realisation of adequate housing.' He said his party could not vote for as it would mean they accepted the decrease in allocation. 'I asserted during the committee meeting last week and I reiterate now that this draft budget must be rejected. It's real term decline across key programmes particularly in integrated human settlements and informal settlements upgrading directly contradicts the constitutional obligation to provide adequate housing and the strategic goals of the national development plans,' he said. 'Accepting this budget will constitute a retreat from addressing deeply entrenched structural inequalities and the pressing needs of the vulnerable communities for basic services and dignified living conditions.' TimesLIVE
