Alaska Senate approves pared-down budget draft while warning of ‘coming storm' in state finances
Members of the Alaska Senate issued warnings Wednesday as they approved a draft operating budget for the upcoming fiscal year.
Senators' draft, which includes an estimated $1,000 Permanent Fund dividend for eligible Alaskans and a small year-over-year increase for K-12 education, also cuts services.
The proposal would cut proposed funding increases for early education programs, reduce funding for state prisons, eliminate the state's office of citizenship assistance, mostly defund the state militia, reduce road maintenance, and deny salary increases except as required by union contracts.
Legislators are trying to address a significant deficit caused by low oil prices, and Wednesday's 16-4 vote by the Senate keeps the Capitol on schedule for the May 21 end of the regular session.
The Senate's draft of the budget measure, House Bill 53, is scheduled to return to the House as soon as Friday. If lawmakers there vote down the Senate draft, that action would set up the creation of a conference committee designed to combine the Senate's draft budget with one passed by the House in April.
The resulting compromise likely would be among the last items completed before lawmakers end their session for the year. The budget bill would then go to Gov. Mike Dunleavy, who has the power to veto individual line items.
Members of the bipartisan group that leads the Senate said they wanted to balance the budget without using the state's savings accounts, because a worsening state fiscal picture will almost certainly require tapping them next year.
'The Senate Finance chairs believe that the state is facing some very strong headwinds in future budgets,' said Sen. Lyman Hoffman, D-Bethel and the lead author of the Senate's draft budget.
Right now, the Senate's $5.8 billion budget proposal has a small surplus when combined with all other spending bills and the state's spring revenue forecast.
But that surplus is almost certainly an illusion, Hoffman said. The federal government is cutting the amount of money it sends to states, oil prices are below what was forecast in March, labor contracts will increase in costs, and this year's budget uses one-time funding sources that won't be available next year.
Sen. Lyman Hoffman, D-Bethel, presents the Senate's draft operating budget to the full Senate on Wednesday, May 7, 2025. (Photo by James Brooks/Alaska Beacon)
'With all of these budget headwinds, it's clear to me that the decisions next year will be more difficult than the decisions made today,' Hoffman said.
Where the House proposed spending from savings to boost the amount of the Permanent Fund dividend and increase some spending on services, the Senate prioritized the state's savings accounts.
'Now is the time to preserve our rainy-day fund for that coming storm,' Hoffman said.
All 14 members of the Senate's bipartisan majority caucus voted in favor of the budget proposal, as did two Republicans who are members of the Senate's all-Republican minority caucus and sit on the finance committee.
'This is a conservative budget, no matter how you look at it. It's very lean,' said Sen. Mike Cronk, R-Tok and one of those lawmakers.
'Is this perfect? No. It's going to be a lot worse next year, and I think that people in Alaska need to understand that,' he said.
Sen. James Kaufman, R-Anchorage, listens to Sen. Bert Stedman, R-Sitka (not pictured) talk about the Senate's draft operating budget to the full Senate on Wednesday, May 7, 2025. (Photo by James Brooks/Alaska Beacon)
Sen. Robert Yundt, R-Wasilla, is also a member of the Senate minority and criticized Dunleavy, whose initial budget proposal in December included a $3,900 Permanent Fund dividend and a $1.5 billion deficit.
'I've heard and felt frustration from members of all four caucuses,' he said. 'It is baffling to me that you can walk in here and say, 'Here, 60 people — here's a budget that's a billion and a half dollars upside-down.' It shouldn't be legal.'
The House's draft budget, which followed the governor's proposal, had plenty of problems, said Senate Minority Leader Mike Shower, R-Wasilla.
The Senate's finance committee 'were handed a bag of lemons and told to make lemonade, and frankly, when you look at what they were able to do … I think they really did,' he said.
But Shower, Yundt and two other members of the Senate minority noted that even with the Senate's cuts, the budget is unsustainable and that they couldn't support it.
Sen. Jesse Kiehl, D-Juneau, said that Alaskans need to be aware that over the past 10 years, the growth in state spending on services has been below the rate of inflation.
As a result, services have gotten worse because dollars don't stretch as far as they used to. Construction contracts for road projects aren't getting out on time, he said.
'The notion that we're vastly overspending on the services Alaskans want and expect, don't you believe it for a second,' he said.
Kiehl joined Sen. Bill Wielechowski, D-Anchorage, in saying that if Alaskans want a larger Permanent Fund dividend and better services, they need to ask their legislators to vote for revenue bills.
Wielechowski noted that in the coming fiscal year, Alaska will spend more on tax deductions and tax credits for oil companies than it will on the dividend.
'We need to reevaluate how we are doing things in this state,' Wielechowski said. 'We are not following our constitutional obligation to get the maximum value for our resources. If you want a full PFD, you want to have a 50-50 PFD, you have to fix oil taxes. You absolutely have to do that.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Cory Booker's pathetic stunts reveal the sad state of the Democratic Party
Sen. Cory Booker's latest stunt offered yet another eye-opener about the Democratic Party's current dead-endism. Booker went bananas on the Senate floor Tuesday, demanding that Democrats join him in voting NO — on a bipartisan bill — to supposedly prove that they aren't 'bending the knee' to Donald Trump. That is, it was a 'grand gesture' utterly unrelated to the cause he claimed to be serving. Advertisement Booker almost made Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) cry when he thundered that the humdrum package of bills (to improve police staffing and give cops more access to mental-health treatment) would represent 'complicity with an authoritarian leader.' These bills — which, as Klobuchar pointed out, passed unanimously out of a committee Booker sits on — were classic feel-good, no-brainer legislation. But Spartacus 2.0 still paced the Senate floor like a caged Colosseum lion, shouting, 'Don't question my integrity!' when Klobuchar noted that Booker had actually skipped the hearing at which he could have raised any objections. Advertisement Why not question his integrity, or at least his devotion to actually stopping a bill he was treating as the essence of Trumpism? This isn't the first time kooky Cory has gone in big on empty performance art. In July, he staged a walkout during Emil Bove's judicial confirmation hearing — as if his absence would change anything. Advertisement Then there was his record-breaking 25-hour 'filibuster,' without any actual bill on the floor to filibuster against. This posturing isn't new for Booker: As a lowly Newark city councilman, he years ago went on a 10-day hunger strike — in a tent, no less — to 'protest crime.' (It's safe to say that this awakened not a single criminal's conscience, nor anyone else's.) Senator Stuntman is plainly gearing up for another presidential run. 'The Democratic Party needs a wake-up call!' he thundered amid Tuesday's tantrum, practically begging for activists to make the moment viral. The sad part is that Booker's antics are only a bit cheesier than other Democrats' performative 'resistance,' whether it's sit-ins at ICE facilities, kumbaya-style teach-ins on the steps of the Capitol, holding up grumpy signs at the State of the Union address, or filming cringy TikToks. Advertisement It's not simply that Democrats are out of power, but that they're out of ideas (unless you count unpopular ones). Which leaves Booker and all the rest desperately trying to feign passion about . . . absolutely nothing.


Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Republican Senate candidates seeking to replace McConnell aim to define themselves at Fancy Farm
CALVERT CITY, Ky. (AP) — Three Republicans competing to succeed longtime Sen. Mitch McConnell tried to define themselves before the political attacks that could come Saturday when they share the spotlight at the Fancy Farm picnic, a daunting rite of passage for candidates seeking statewide office in Kentucky. 'You're going to hear some barbs tomorrow, but what I want to focus on is my vision for serving in the United States Senate,' Daniel Cameron, one of the candidates, told a GOP crowd Friday evening. Cameron's rivals in next year's Senate primary — U.S. Rep. Andy Barr and businessman Nate Morris — used their speeches at the event to introduce themselves to Republican voters in western Kentucky. All three could shift into attack mode against each other Saturday afternoon at the Fancy Farm picnic — the Bluegrass State's premier political event. Politicians compete to land the sharpest — and sometimes most outlandish — barbs, and have to endure shouting and heckling from their rivals' supporters. The picnic could turn into a Republican skirmish since Democratic politicians are mostly skipping the event. McConnell, the longest-serving Senate party leader in U.S. history, revealed in February, on his 83rd birthday, that he won't seek another term in Kentucky and will retire when his current term ends. His pending retirement has set up a fierce competition for his seat. Warming up for their appearance that will air on statewide TV at Fancy Farm, the three GOP rivals kept to one script they've all shared — lavishing praise on Republican President Donald Trump. Barr portrayed his congressional experience as an advantage that sets him apart. He represents a district stretching from central Kentucky's bluegrass region to the Appalachian foothills. 'I'm an 'America First' fighter in the United States Congress,' Barr said Friday night. 'Other people like to talk about being a Trump guy or being with Trump. I've been with President Trump from day one. I'm not just talking about supporting President Trump. I've done it. I'm continuing to do it.' Giving voters a glimpse into his political philosophy, Barr said: 'I'm a guy who was raised in the era of Ronald Reagan. I believe in limited government, free enterprise and a strong national defense.' Morris, a tech entrepreneur, portrayed himself as a populist and a political outsider while trying to attach himself to Trump's popularity in Kentucky. 'What we've seen with this president is that he has put emphasis back on the American worker,' Morris said Friday night. 'And the people that have been in Washington for all this time — the elites – they sold out the American worker.' Morris also touted his hardline stance on immigration. He said he supports a moratorium on immigration into the United States until every immigrant currently in the country illegally is deported. Cameron, who is Black, used his speech to rail against diversity, equity and inclusion efforts. 'We don't need … an America built on DEI,' Cameron said. 'We need a country that's built on MEI – merit, excellence and intelligence.' Cameron entered the Senate campaign with one clear advantage — a higher statewide name recognition than his rivals. Cameron served one term as state attorney general and lost to Democrat Andy Beshear in the 2023 governor's race. 'You've been with us in the past,' Cameron told the GOP group Friday night. 'I hope that you'll be with us this time. We're going to get it done because we know that what happens in this seat will have reverberations across this country.' Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .


Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
'Was the president up for the job?' Steve Ricchetti defends Biden's fitness as GOP seeks answers
Steve Ricchetti was the gatekeeper for former President Biden. But House Republican investigators hoped Ricchetti was the key to unlocking answers about Mr. Biden's cognitive state when he was commander in chief. The House Oversight Committee summoned Ricchetti for a closed-door deposition recently. Ricchetti worked for President Clinton, was Biden's top aide when he was Vice President and served as a key advisor in the Biden White House. He frequently visited Capitol Hill as President Biden and Congressional Republicans negotiated a debt ceiling pact in the spring of 2023. "What's your message to the committee today?" yours truly asked Ricchetti when he materialized on the third floor of the Rayburn House Office Building for a voluntary, transcribed interrogation. "I'm not going to say anything on the way in. I'm just going to go in and give an interview," replied Ricchetti. "Was the President up for the job?" I inquired. "Of course he was," answered Ricchetti. "Of course he was." In a statement, Ricchetti conceded that former President Biden "occasionally stumbled." But he argued the former president was fit for the job. Ricchetti added that no one "usurped President Biden's Constitutional duties." In their inquest, Republicans have specific questions about the former President's use of the autopen and about legal documents bearing Mr. Biden's signature. "Who was signing any of these documents and who was running the White House?" asked Rep. Andy Biggs, R-Ariz., on Fox. "That's the biggest, weirdest scandal probably in American history since Woodrow Wilson's wife was running the White House." That refers to First Lady Edith Wilson. Historians generally believe that she took over day-to-day executive functions after President Woodrow Wilson suffered a stroke. "Anything that had the force of (law) that was signed by autopen should be null and void," argued Rep. Pat Fallon, R-Texas, on Fox Business. Unlike Ricchetti, three other Biden figures have ducked questions when summoned for closed-door interviews. The Oversight Committee issued subpoenas for former Biden administration aide Annie Tomasini, former Jill Biden aide Anthony Bernal and the President's former physician, White House doctor Kevin O'Connor. All three invoked the Fifth Amendment during their sessions before the House Oversight Committee, declining to answer questions. "I think the real witness is the doctor. And unfortunately, he took the Fifth," said Sen. Roger Marshall, R-Kan. Marshall himself is an OB-GYN. "A doctor certainly has an obligation ethically to protect (a patient) for privacy. But the needs of the country – the national security issue, legal issues – trump that relationship as well," said Marshall. Democrats contend Republicans are flailing in their probe of the former President. Sen. Peter Welch, D-Vt., believes the GOP should focus on the economy and affordability issues. "Message to House Republicans," declared Welch. "You won the election. I mean, I'm not quite sure why they want to waste time on this." "He's not the president," said Sen. John Fetterman, D-Penn., of former President Biden. "I think we really should just move (on)." Fetterman himself faced questions about his health after suffering a stroke during his 2022 campaign and hospitalization for depression after taking office as a senator in 2023. But Republicans contend the Biden investigation is critical. Former President Biden's medical state isn't clear, although the public saw his performance in the debate last June. Republicans insist their probe is about figuring out what to do if a future President struggles cognitively. "What we're doing today is setting sort of a template for the future," said Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C. "How can we make it better? Because it's a Democratic President today. It may be a Republican President tomorrow." It's not just a challenge for the presidency. But for lawmakers, too. In recent years, Capitol Hill has witnessed uncomfortable, steady declines of late Sens. Strom Thurmond, R-S.C., Thad Cochran, R-Miss., Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., and Rep. Kay Granger, R-Tex. "Hopefully all of us make the right decision when it's appropriate," said Welch. "And we have people around us to do the right thing." Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, D-Wash., is one of the most conservative, politically pragmatic Democrats in the House. She represents a district President Trump carried three times. And even though Sens. Patty Muray, D-Wash., and Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., routinely win statewide, they fail to carry Gluesenkamp Perez's district. Gluesenkamp Perez bested GOP nominee Joe Kent - for a second time – by four points in 2024. The 36-year-old Gluesenkamp Perez introduced a plan requiring cognitive standards for persons to serve in the House. The House Appropriations Committee rejected her amendment late last month. However, there are Constitutional and legal problems with imposing a cognitive exam on prospective lawmakers. Article, I, Section 5 of the Constitution says the House and Senate "may determine the Rules of its Proceedings." So, it's possible the House or Senate could impose a "rule" dictating a test. The same part of the Constitution says each body may judge "the qualifications of its own Members." But imposing an additional provision for eligibility to serve could be extra-constitutional. For instance, Article I, Section 2 of the Constitution says House Members must be at least 25-years-old, have been a citizen for seven years and reside in the state from which they were elected. A senator must be 30, a citizen for nine years and live in the state they represent. However, heaping another mandate on top of that is a problem. This is why the Supreme Court found term limits to be unconstitutional. An additional "rule" – such as how long one can serve – introduces an extra qualification not outlined in the Constitution. That's why the Supreme Court ruled against term limits proposals. It's likely the High Court would follow suit with additional stipulations to serve in Congress. Moreover, installing an acuity credential holds the potential to undo the will of the voters. Late Rep. Adam Clayton Powell, D-N.Y., faced ethics issues in the late 1960s. Voters re-elected Powell in 1966. But the House refused to seat him. Powell sued. In Powell v. McCormick, the Supreme Court found that the House didn't have the right to exclude Powell. The High Court argued that the House's refusal to seat Powell wasn't Constitutional since it placed additional conditions on his service in Congress. There's no easy solution on how to handle an impaired President or lawmaker. It is often said Congress simply reflects the rest of the country. There are cognitively-diminished persons serving in every walk of life in the U.S. And that's a reality for those in government, too.