Texas flooding death toll climbs to 32 including 14 children
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
Partygoers cower in horror 1am shooting
A block party in central Philadelphia quickly turned fatal after a mass shooting broke out between attendees. In footage captured by a Ring doorbell camera, partygoers are seen squirming around on the floor of a tiled porch, ducking and weaving to avoid the gunfire a mere arms length above them. Others are seen running for their lives down the street, ducking behind cars for safety. A man, dressed in all black and wearing a backpack, is seen moving up the stairs of the neighbouring porch and ducks, before peeking back out to the road to shoot. Two men leap from the huddle of people hiding to join in, firing in the same direction. Three men – aged 19, 23 and 24 – died at the 1500 block of South Etting Street in Grays Ferry just after 1am on Monday morning. It is not known what triggered the shooting, with a neighbour telling the Philadelphia Inquirer the gathering quickly grew in numbers and got out of hand. 'This is coward stuff,' Philadelphia Police Commissioner Kevin Bethel told reporters. 'Just individuals just shooting randomly into houses, into cars, children out here. 'This is coward, wannabe thug stuff.' Police had already responded to the same block late Saturday into early Sunday and some arrests were made, the commissioner said. Commissioner Bethel said evidence indicated nearly 140 shots were fired. 'Reports of around 40 individuals may be out here, but those numbers can surge particularly when you're on a block of this size,' he said. 'People go in, they go out, they see the police officers, they back in, clearly there was something on the block.' Another 13 people were reportedly injured, including a 19-year-old who was hit twice in the head and remains in a critical condition at the University of Pennsylvania hospital. A 15-year-old girl and two 17-year-old boys were also injured. One person with a weapon has been taken into custody, police confirmed. It is unknown at this stage if they were involved.
ABC News
3 hours ago
- ABC News
Erin Patterson's trial revealed our need for moral certainty in uncertain times
It is an odd conundrum of modern life that the more frenzied the proliferation of information with which we are pelted daily, on every subject imaginable, the more voracious and unreasonable becomes our appetite for moral clarity. Of the data presently available on the internet world wide, approximately 90 per cent was created in the last two years. Probably not even a fifth of that data comprises hot takes on the Mushroom Murders, but the trial of Erin Patterson certainly provides a neat example of how humans behave when swamped with too much information. The escalating daily assault of data on our brains — war, horror, destruction, dead sea creatures on Adelaide beaches, dead children in Texas rivers, Italian brain-rot, the power-sucking zombie creep of AI — what does it really make us feel like doing? Turns out it makes millions of us feel like getting to the bottom of whether Patterson really did have mismatched plates. That's what. The only solution, perhaps, to this misery of overwhelm and huge things, is to pursue aggressive certainty about smaller things. And to find ourselves in company with others who also are sure. How odd, that an endless torrent of context and nuance should inflame, in humans, an urgent need to abolish all traces of doubt. We need people to be good, or to be evil. We need a cause to be unimpeachable, or reprehensible. How else to explain the unscratchable itch that the trial of Erin Patterson has become for humans all over the world? It's not the blamelessness of the dead generating traffic volumes here; Patterson's three victims and sole survivor are surely that, but their names swirl quickly away in the tally of humans who have died horribly and unfairly, even in this week alone. And while chat forums and podcasts discussing the case often carry a virtuous disclaimer that the real tragedy here is of course the loss of innocent life, there's no doubt at all that the juice in the system of this content behemoth is the perfidy or otherwise of the chef herself. The trial unfurled the kind of detail that is now common in murder trials and would have been inconceivable a generation ago; hot-tempered exchanges that once would have wafted away on the air are now immortalised by messaging apps. Pings from mobile phone towers point an accusatory finger. Closed circuit TV sequences are excavated, along with the damning, unscrubbable images of a dehydrator. A Facebook thread in which an outburst about in-laws, suspended forever like a mosquito in amber, suddenly reanimates and buzzes back to torment its author. This wealth of detail, along with DNA technology, makes the job of detectives and juries easier of course, in one sense. There's more evidence. But the jobs of "detective" and "juror" are harder now, too, simply by virtue of the fact that they're contestable now. We're all detectives. We're all jurors. The justice system — like so many institutions, whether their business be public policy or news reporting or weather forecasting or epidemiology — has been violently democratised by disruptive technology. The jury system was originally conceived to ensure that defendants would be judged not by elites but by a group of utterly unremarkable peers. But now, jurors are remarkable in one key respect: they're the only humans during a criminal trial who aren't allowed to google the key players and undertake a spot of online sleuthing. The rest of us — having not only access to the trial evidence in real time but also the ability to form our own opinions without much by way of structural constraint — are free to succumb to that uniquely modern act of self-soothing, the sorting of ourselves into prejudicial tribes. In his 2020 book Why We Are Polarised, Ezra Klein argues that the formation of tribes has to do with the human brain's incapacity to accommodate the vast new tides of information that swamp the world. "We are exquisitely tuned to understand and manage our role in the small, necessary groups that defined our world as hunter-gatherers, but we've not had long to adjust to the digitised, globalised, accelerated world we've built," Klein writes. "The sensitivities that helped us thrive within the interplay of a few groups of a few hundred people can drive us mad when exposed to the scale, noise, and sophisticated manipulations of modern capitalism and politics." How mad? In the case of the criminal trial of the moment, this hunger for simplicity, for clarity, for fellow feeling, for quiet, might lead us to Reddit threads or podcasts or scans of iNaturalist in search of the exhilaration that accompanies the certainty that another human being is absolutely black of heart. In other more extreme contexts that same hunger might lead us to dox someone, or storm a building, or trash a synagogue. The jury in the Patterson trial — a dozen Gippsland locals whose names we don't know — were sequestered for a week. They delivered an answer on Monday, and were allowed to go home with the commendation of the presiding judge. Unlike American jurors, they cannot be identified by name or give interviews. Unlike judges who hear criminal cases in the Australian jurisdictions which allow trials by judge alone (NSW, SA, WA, Queensland and the ACT), they are not required to provide grounds for their decision. So juries, in Australia, find themselves in a weird situation. The job they do is publicly, flappingly contestable. They may find themselves — as did the Morwell Twelve — at the centre of a live-action drama commanding global attention. But their own reasoning, unlike that of every pub galah on Reddit, stays hidden forever. Only conjecture — or painstaking simulations, like Tosca Looby's recent SBS series, Jury: Death On The Staircase, in which cameras monitored the decision-making process of a jury for whom the entire real-life criminal trial of a Sydney man was recreated by actors — can summon their arguments, their reasons, their midnight moments of self-doubt or epiphany. They remain anonymous. Their job is done. But the vast and clanking business of Mushroom Investigation Inc is unlikely to be crimped by anything so trifling as a verdict supplied by the relevant legal authority. There are documentaries to be made, and a fresh-fallen snowdrift of evidence from the court files to be romped through; messages exchanged between the accused and her victims, and new CCTV of Patterson visiting a service station whilst simultaneously wearing white trousers and experiencing explosive diarrhoea (a detail that launched a thousand opinions). Each new detail delivers a spark of certainty for someone; filaments of context that delivers us, one by one, from evil, having established that it lives in the hearts of others.
ABC News
5 hours ago
- ABC News
AI scammer posing as US Secretary of State Marco Rubio targets foreign ministers, US politicians
An impostor has used artificial intelligence to impersonate the voice of US Secretary of State Marco Rubio in contacts with three foreign ministers and two US politicians, according to a diplomatic cable seen by multiple news outlets. The person used a voice generator in contacts with the ministers, a US governor and a member of Congress via the Signal messaging app. Voicemails were left in two instances and a text message in a third instance invited the targeted person to communicate on Signal, the cable said. The perpetrator copied a fake "@ email address on the messages as well as logos and branding used by State's Bureau of Diplomatic Technology, it said. "The actor likely aimed to manipulate targeted individuals using AI-generated text and voice messages, with the goal of gaining access to information or accounts," the cable said. The State Department cable, dated July 3, was sent to all diplomatic and consular posts and suggests that staff warn external partners about fake accounts and impersonations. "There is no direct cyber threat to the department from this campaign, but information shared with a third party could be exposed if targeted individuals are compromised," it said. Responding to an AFP request for comment, the State Department said it was aware of the incident and was "currently investigating the matter." "The Department takes seriously its responsibility to safeguard its information and continuously takes steps to improve the department's cybersecurity posture to prevent future incidents," said a senior State Department official. The cable referred to a second effort in April that was attributed to a Russia-linked hacker who conducted a spear phishing campaign targeting think tanks, Eastern European activists and dissidents and former State Department officials. "The actor demonstrated extensive knowledge of the department's naming conventions and internal documentation," it said. In that campaign, the person posed as a State Department official in messages sent to private Gmail accounts. The State Department said industry partners attributed that campaign to a cyber actor associated with the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service. The FBI has previously warned that since April, "malicious actors" have impersonated senior US officials to target their contacts, including current and former federal or state government officials. "The malicious actors have sent text messages and AI-generated voice messages — techniques known as smishing and vishing, respectively — that claim to come from a senior US official in an effort to establish rapport before gaining access to personal accounts," the FBI said in May. In May, President Donald Trump said an impersonator breached the phone of White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles. US senators, governors and business executives received text messages and phone calls from someone claiming to be Wiles, the Wall Street Journal reported. Reuters/AFP
