Khanna says Democrats pushed for Epstein files' release since 2019
In an interview on ABC News's 'This Week,' Khanna pushed back on the suggestion that his party only began calling for the documents to be released recently — now that the issue is politically fraught for President Trump.
'Why are Democrats suddenly interested in the Epstein case?' ABC News's Jonathan Karl asked the California Democrat. 'I mean, did you ask the Biden Justice Department to release these files?'
'It's not a sudden interest. Actually, the former chair, Elijah Cummings, had an investigation starting in 2019,' Khanna said, referring to the late civil rights activist and Maryland Democratic House member, who chaired the House Oversight and Reform Committee at the time.
'And I have tweeted out supporting that, back in 2019,' Khanna added. 'We have been pushing for transparency. During the Biden administration, both in 2021 and 2024, the court ordered release of documents.'
Khanna acknowledged the heightened scrutiny on the case in recent months.
'But Donald Trump raised the stakes,' Khanna said. 'And he did it in a way in the campaign that was justified. He said, look, when I get there, I'm going to release the files. Pam Bondi says there's a client list. Then she says, no, it's just a file. She's going to release them.'
'I didn't criticize them at all those first few months,' Khanna continued. 'But when they refused to release the files — when they said there's nothing more to see — that's when we said transparency demands the full release of the files.'
Khanna has been a leading Democrat in Congress calling for Epstein files to be released, and he is co-sponsoring a bill with Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) that would force the release of the files.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
9 minutes ago
- The Hill
Bove vote dogged by new whistleblower complaints
Senate Democrats are seeking clarification about whether there is an ongoing investigation into Justice Department official Emil Bove after three different whistleblowers came forward with information ahead of his confirmation vote for a lifetime appointment to the bench. The request from Sens. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) and Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) comes as a third whistleblower filed a complaint against Bove, alleging the nominee misled the Senate Judiciary Committee. Bove, previously one of Trump's personal defense lawyers, serves in the No. 3 role at the Justice Department and has been nominated to sit on the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals. After clearing an initial procedural hurdle, a vote on his nomination could come as soon as Tuesday night. Schiff and Booker ask the Justice Department's Office of Inspector General to confirm for lawmakers whether they have ignited an investigation into Bove. 'As the Senate approaches a final vote this week on Mr. Bove's nomination to serve as United States Circuit Judge for the Third Circuit, it is imperative that Senators exercise their constitutional duty of advice and consent with full knowledge of Mr. Bove's actions,' they wrote. 'We therefore request that you clarify for Senators whether your office is undertaking any investigations of or related to Mr. Bove. In the event these whistleblower complaints and other reports have not already prompted investigations by your office, we urge you to undertake a thorough review of these disclosures and allegations.' They argue the three different whistleblower complaints 'paint a picture that Mr. Bove likely violated laws and Department regulations, and abused his authority while acting as one of the Department's most senior officials.' According to The Washington Post, a third whistleblower has forwarded new allegations about Bove's role in ending the prosecution of New York Mayor Eric Adams (D) on bribery charges. Prosecutors who worked the case refused to drop the charges and sign onto the dismissal notice, prompting a wave of resignations. Bove said during his confirmation hearing that the Trump administration needed Adams's cooperation on immigration matters, prompting cries from Democrats that the move was a clear quid pro quo. 'Policy reasons made it appropriate to drop the charges,' Bove said at the time. He has already been accused by whistleblower Erez Reuveni of suggesting the Justice Department defy any court orders blocking the Trump administration from deporting migrants to a foreign prison under the Alien Enemies Act, saying DOJ might have to tell the courts 'f–k you.' A second whistleblower has stepped forward with information they say corroborates Reuveni's allegations. A judge has since begun a probe into whether the Justice Department defied his order to halt or turn around flights carrying Venezuelan men deported under the Alien Enemies Act, finding probable cause to hold the Trump administration in criminal contempt for willfully disobeying his order to immediately halt deportations. Bove has said he could not recall whether he used the expletive but said during his confirmation hearing that he 'certainly conveyed the importance of the upcoming operation.' Details are scarce on the third whistleblower complaint. 'A new whistleblower, whose disclosures have not been publicized, has strong evidence that Emil Bove was not truthful to the Senate Judiciary Committee during his confirmation hearing for his nomination to serve on the Third Circuit Court of Appeals,' Peter Carr, a spokesman for Justice Connection said in a statement. The group, a DOJ alumni group that assists whistleblowers, was asked to release a statement on the whistleblower's behalf. 'The whistleblower has tried to share this information with Republican senators for weeks and they have not provided any response. We urge the senators to hear from this whistleblower before the final vote on his nomination.' The Justice Department did not respond to a request for comment. GOP members have not stopped by Booker's office to review the documents provided by the latest whistleblower, the Post reported. Committee members asked Bove questions on a number of topics. Beyond whether he encouraged defiance of court orders, he was also asked about leading the effort to fire prosecutors who worked on Jan. 6 cases and collecting a list of FBI agents who worked on investigations into rioters. Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) backed Bove out of the committee, saying that while he will not confirm those who condoned Jan. 6, he did not feel the nominee had condoned the riots. Bove advanced after an initial round of voting where Sens. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) and Susan Collins (R-Maine) were the only GOP members to vote against him. Democrats previously demanded a hearing with Reuveni, but the panel's Republicans blocked it. 'Another whistleblower has come forward with evidence that raises serious concerns with Emil Bove's misconduct,' Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee said. 'This is another damning indictment of a man who should never be a federal judge—and Senate Republicans will bear full responsibility for the consequences if they rubber stamp Mr. Bove's nomination.'
The Hill
9 minutes ago
- The Hill
Watch live: Peter Welch unveils legislation to combat Trump ‘sick tax'
Sen. Peter Welch (D-Vt.) will speak Tuesday afternoon on recently introduced legislation targeting President Trump's 'sick tax,' a provision in the GOP-led spending and tax package that will require Medicaid enrollees to pay more out of pocket when visiting a health care provider. Welch, along with other Democrats, has in recent weeks pushed back against sweeping cuts and reforms to Medicaid included in the 'big, beautiful bill' that Trump signed into law on July 4. 'As a result, seniors, children, people with disabilities, and working families already fighting to make ends meet will be forced to pay an out-of-pocket cost before they can receive vital health care services,' the Vermont Democrat wrote in a statement introducing the Repealing the Trump Sick Tax Act. 'This 'sick tax' imposed by President Trump and Congressional Republicans will force Medicaid enrollees to choose between paying their bills and receiving vital care every time they need to see a provider,' he added. Welch's remarks are scheduled to begin at 3:30 p.m. EDT. Watch the live video above.
New York Times
10 minutes ago
- New York Times
Top Lawyer for National Security Agency Is Fired
The top lawyer for the National Security Agency was removed from her job on Friday, according to multiple former officials, after she was criticized by conservative activists. April Falcon Doss had been appointed to the general counsel post in April 2022, during the Biden administration. The web page on the N.S.A. site that displayed her biography now redirects to an error page. On July 23, the Daily Wire, a conservative website, wrote about Ms. Doss and her former work for the Senate Intelligence Committee's Democratic staff. Later that day, Laura Loomer, a far-right conspiracy theorist, amplified a social media post critical of Ms. Doss that cited the Daily Wire article. In a text message on Tuesday, Ms. Loomer said that she had 'reposted a tweet that exposed her last week and flagged it for the right people.' Ms. Doss could not be reached for comment. But an official briefed on the matter said Ms. Loomer's criticism appeared to have a role in the firing. In the spring, Trump administration officials removed Gen. Timothy D. Haugh, the N.S.A. director, and his deputy, Wendy Noble, from their jobs after Ms. Loomer complained about them. Ms. Loomer argued, without evidence, that they were disloyal to the Trump administration. And in February, Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, announced she was firing more than 100 N.S.A. employees who she said had participated in an explicit chat group on classified computers. Ms. Doss worked at the agency before becoming general counsel and has extensive experience in cybersecurity law, including writing a 2020 book, 'Cyber Privacy: Who Has Your Data and Why You Should Care.' Spokesmen for the National Security Agency did not immediately comment. The general counsel post is a civil servant job and is supposed to be apolitical. At the end of President Trump's first term, Michael Ellis, an administration loyalist, was appointed to the job amid protests from Democrats in Congress. Mr. Ellis was put on leave at the start of the Biden administration and ultimately resigned from the role. He is now the deputy director of the C.I.A.
