Migrant permits should be time-specific
In an interview with BBC Politics East, Farage said: "If we really can't recruit people in Britain to work in care - and I believe we could with some tweaks to the tax system - recruit them on a time-specific contract with no entitlement to health care or social benefits."We give people who come in indefinite leave to remain and once they have got that they can then bring in their mum, their dad, their aunty, their uncle, theirs. That's what's gone wrong. We have been way too lax on this."He said he recognised skilled workers, such as builders, were sometimes needed from abroad and saw care home workers as "necessary" workers rather than skilled.
Cane, the Ely and East Cambridgeshire MP, also appeared on the programme as part of a panel including Labour MP for Ipswich, Jack Abbott, and Tom Pursglove, the former Tory MP for Corby and ex-immigration minister.Responding to Farage, Cane said: "We need to respect the value these people [migrants] are bringing to our country."I really do object to the suggestion that care workers aren't skilled. If you've ever watched a care worker work, they are hugely skilled and hugely important. "We struggle to get enough care givers, who struggle to provide the care people need in their homes. "We should be really grateful that these people are willing to come to our country to help us care for people in need and it is absolutely a skilled task. We also need to pay these people properly."
Abbott said: "One of the biggest reasons we have a social care problem in this country is because of retention and recruitment because we don't pay them properly. "We are going to set up a pay review body to make sure we are paying people for the jobs they do."It's an important role but physically demanding too. We should be paying people properly."
Pursglove said the Conservative Party still needed to "rebuild trust with the public" on immigration.But he said Labour's "Smash the Gangs" pledge, intended to target people-smuggling networks, was "a slogan not an action for government".The Home Office has been approached for comment.
BBC Politics East will be broadcast on Sunday, 2 March at 10:00 GMT on BBC One in the East of England, and will be available after broadcast on BBC iPlayer.Follow Essex news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Imported dogs could carry disease or behaviour risk, RSPCA warns
RSPCA spokesman David Bowles likened the process to 'Deliveroo for dogs' and called on the Government to tighten regulations on animal rescues. He told the BBC: 'The RSPCA's major concern is these dogs are essentially ticking time bombs – coming over, not being health tested. 'Diseases are now coming in through these dogs. They're affecting not just the dogs that are being imported, they could also affect the dogs already in this country and their owners. 'They've almost set up a Deliveroo for dogs and that is a real problem.' There is no requirement for rescue organisations to be licensed in England, Wales or Northern Ireland. It comes weeks after a bill that aims to stop animal smuggling and cruelty cleared the Commons with cross-party support. Legislation put forward by Liberal Democrat MP Dr Danny Chambers will reduce the number of animals for non-commercial entry into the UK, ban the import of puppies and kittens under six months old or heavily pregnant dogs and cats, and introduce a halt on the import of dogs and cats who have been 'mutilated', including having their ears docked. The MP for Winchester's Animal Welfare (Import of Dogs, Cats and Ferrets) Bill was supported by the Government, and will now proceed to the House of Lords on its passage to becoming law. Dr Chambers said: 'As a vet, I've seen the devastating consequences of puppy smuggling. It's unimaginably cruel to separate puppies and kittens from their mothers at a very young age, and then bring them across borders in substandard conditions where they're then sold for maximum profit by unscrupulous traders who prioritise profit over welfare.' He added: 'Careful consideration has been given to setting these limits, balancing the need to disrupt illegal trade with minimising impact on genuine pet owners. To underpin this, only an owner, not an authorised person, will be permitted to sign and declare that the movement of a dog or cat is non-commercial. He criticised the influence of social media on the increased demand for dogs with docked ears, and a party colleague hit out at the platforms' role in publishing animal abuse. He said: 'One reason that there is such an interest in dogs with cropped ears is that a lot of influencers on Instagram and other social media platforms pose with these dogs or show they have these new dogs with cropped ears. Many people aren't aware that this is a mutilation. 'They think it's how the dogs' ears normally look, and it drives a demand for dogs that look like this.'
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Anger as role at sharia court advertised on site for Government jobs
Outraged MPs demanded action last night as it emerged that a Government jobs site is advertising a role in a sharia court. They insisted that the British state should not be promoting the separate justice system based on Islamic law. And they urged the Department for Work and Pensions to remove the online posting for the £23,500-a-year administrative role. It comes after an investigation found Britain has become the western capital for sharia courts – with up to 85 operating here, offering religious rulings on marriage and divorce even though they are not legally recognised. Independent MP Rupert Lowe wrote in a letter to Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall: 'I am writing to express my absolute alarm and disgust that the Department for Work and Pensions "Find a Job" platform is currently advertising for a "Sharia Law Administrator". 'The requirements include a degree in sharia law and experience in sharia courts in Muslim countries. 'The DWP is promoting and facilitating the embedding of a parallel legal system in the United Kingdom. 'Sharia law has no place operating as a recognised legal framework within our country. It is fundamentally incompatible with British law, and our very way of life.' Mr Lowe demanded to know who approved the job posting and urged the department to immediately remove it. Reform's Zia Yusuf also wrote on social media: 'There is only one legal system in the UK. Any attempt to upend or replace it should be illegal.' While party leader Nigel Farage claimed: 'Our country and its values are being destroyed.' And Tory MP Peter Bedford said: 'I would be aghast if a politician signed off allowing recruitment for this type of role. 'I suspect, once again, this is the out-of-control civil service creating and implementing policy contrary to democratic authority. This must stop.' The advert posted on the DWP's Find A Job website on Thursday was for a 'Sharia Law Administrator' at Manchester Community Centre based in Didsbury. It requested an individual to 'provide all admin and secretarial work for Manchester Sharia Council' including to 'plan, manage, organise and oversee all MSC social and sharia services and activities on a day to day basis'. Candidates needed a degree in sharia law along with 'previous working experience in sharia law-related fields and/or sharia courts in Muslim countries'. 'Boundary-setting' was an essential skill, with the ad stating: 'The nature of the work means it is easy to get emotionally involved in certain cases. 'Setting boundaries ensures professional lines are not crossed...' A DWP spokesman said: 'This is a position being advertised on the Find A Job portal by an independent registered charity and is not within DWP. 'Find A Job is a free platform to help jobseekers find vacancies with employers from various sectors.'
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Online Safety Act having a ‘catastrophic' impact on free speech after users blocked from viewing videos of asylum seeker hotel protests, campaigners warn
The Online Safety Act is having a 'catastrophic' impact on free speech after people were blocked from viewing videos of asylum seeker hotel protests, campaigners have warned. Users of X – formerly Twitter – complained they were unable to view clips of police detaining activists in the UK, with messages on-screen saying it was 'due to local laws'. X even barred users from watching a powerful speech about grooming gangs which Conservative MP Katie Lam made to Parliament earlier this year. Since last Friday, websites have been required to check users are aged over 18 before letting them access potentially 'harmful' material such as pornography or face being fined up to £18million. But critics including US Vice-President JD Vance have said legislation introduced by the Tories in 2023 could be used to attack free speech. After a demonstration outside the Britannia Hotel in Leeds on Friday, X users said it blocked arrest footage. They were shown the message: 'Due to local laws, we are temporarily restricting access to this content until X estimates your age.' Following a row over Essex Police allegedly escorting counter-protesters to a demonstration in Epping, West Yorkshire Police stressed it was not involved in censoring posts. X has not commented but its AI chatbot Grok suggested the Leeds clip was restricted under the Online Safety Act due to violent conduct. As X does not have an age verification process, for many, access to posts defaulted to 'restricted' mode. Reform UK's Zia Yusuf last night branded the Online Safety Act 'the biggest ever assault on free speech in the UK'. 'This Tory monstrosity hands unelected bureaucrats sweeping powers to censor content they disapprove of,' he told the Mail. Madeleine Stone, senior advocacy officer at Big Brother Watch, warned of a 'catastrophic effect on free speech online' with 'intrusive new age checks to access a range of websites'. A government spokesman said: 'Free speech is fundamental to our democracy and we've taken robust action to protect it, including through the Online Safety Act.'
