How you could pay 25% more for Colin the Caterpillar cake in M&S cafe than from store just yards away
CONNIN THE CATERPILLAR How you could pay 25% more for Colin the Caterpillar cake in M&S cafe than from store just yards away
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
THE cost of Colin the Caterpillar is creeping up in M&S cafes – as The Sun on Sunday reveals you pay up to 25 per cent more for the cake than when it's bought in store.
In Maidstone, Kent, the price of the mini-roll was £1.80 in the food aisles — but just a few feet away in the cafe, they sell for £2.25.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
4
The cost of Colin the Caterpillar is creeping up in M&S cafes
Credit: Louis Wood News Group Newspapers Ltd
4
In the shops Colin costs £1.80
Credit: Supplied
4
Colin costs £2.00 in the garages
Credit: Supplied
4
Colin costs £2.25 in shop cafes
Credit: Andrew Styczynski
It was the same story in Durham, Wilmslow, Cheshire and Pudsey, West Yorks, where the 52g cake cost 45p more to sit down and eat.
And if you pick up a small Colin with your petrol, you can fork out ten per cent more than in the shop.
At Leeds Central and London Bridge stations, they also cost £2.25.
Consumer expert Martyn James said: 'In challenging times, we all need a little consistency. So why is the iconic Colin the Caterpillar costing more depending on where you find him?
'It's bonkers to see such a price hike for the pleasure of dining with Colin in the same building where he's much cheaper to take home.
'So come on M&S, keep Colin consistently priced so we can all enjoy him.'
We investigated the cost of Colin across the country and found that prices varied in supermarkets, cafes and petrol stations.
And while there was little difference in price between locations, you pay a premium for the cake in London's Lewisham, where the price of a 52g mini Colin was £1.90 — 10p more than in other M&S stores.
In the M&S superstore in Durham's Arnison Centre, shoppers were surprised to find out they were being charged more for Colin in the cafe.
The tiny sweet treat is £2.25 if you want to eat it at a table upstairs, but just £1.80 in the shop downstairs.
M&S launches new 'cute' Colin the Caterpillar style Easter treat and shoppers are going wild
Courier Mario Condurache, 27, is dad to three-year-old Andrei.
Mario said: 'It's very greedy of M&S to charge so much more in the cafe. It's all about the profit. I have a little one and you are forced to fork out more money. It's a rip-off.
'This would definitely stop me from going to the cafe.'
Grandmother Maureen Waugh, 69, said: 'I think it's greedy, especially when M&S markets itself as family-friendly. I have grandkids, and it would put me off buying mini Colins. It makes you wonder what else is more expensive in the cafe. I'm shocked.'
Launched by M&S in 1990, Colin soon became a national favourite.
The store typically sells more than 450,000 of the chocolate roll treats each year, with 15million sold since 1990.
An M&S spokesman said: 'There are additional costs when it comes to dining in at cafes and coffee shops across the UK, including legislated 20 per cent VAT, which plays a part in why some prices may vary to those in store.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
19 minutes ago
- The Sun
Big bank with 3.6million customers makes huge change to accounts and customers are desperate for it come back
A MAJOR bank with over 3.6million UK customers has made a big change to its current accounts. Starling customers can no longer open a second personal current account with the digital bank - a feature used by many banking customers to help them manage their money. 1 Starling told The Sun it had "temporarily" stopped allowing customers to open additional accounts while it makes improvements. The bank quietly suspended additional accounts in 2024, the Sun understands, and customers have since been calling on the business to bring back the feature. One customer posted to X this week: "@StarlingBank any idea when additional accounts will be back? I originally had one and would like to enable it again." Another posted to the platform in January asking: "Can i create a second personal account in @StarlingBank?" One customer asked on Reddit: "Have Starling stopped letting you open a second personal account for yourself? "I'm sure it used to be a thing when I first started with Starling, but now I get 'you've reached your personal account limit' with one account, and a similar error ('you're not currently able to apply for this account') when I go to open a Personal Additional." Starling previously allowed customers to open an extra everyday bank account, free of charge, alongside their personal current account. The change only affects additional personal current accounts, and customers can still open joint and business accounts with the bank. A spokesperson for Starling told the Sun: "We've paused applications for secondary personal accounts while we focus on improving our account offering. "Customers are still able to apply for a joint account, provided both customers are Starling customers. Joint accounts remain limited to one per customer." Popular bank with over 400 spots confirms it is shutting 18 branches in August – it follows 148 closures by rivals Starling did not confirm when additional accounts would be returning to the banking app. It comes after the bank scrapped interest payments on its current accounts for all customers in February. Before February 10, Starling paid 3.25% interest on balances up to £5,000, meaning a customer with the maximum amount in their account could earn an extra £162.50 a year in interest. For customers still wanting to save, the bank introduced an easy access savings account paying 4% interest. Saving £5,000 into this account would yield £200 in interest over 12 months. Other bank changes The Sun revealed this week that NatWest is increasing fees for cash payments, cheque transactions and certain online transactions. From August 30, cash payments into and out of business accounts will see their fees surge from 70p per £100 to 95p per £100. Cheque payments, whether processed by hand or by mobile, will also jump from 70p to 75p per cheque. The bank is also increasing some charges related to its BACS payment system, with processing fees rising from 18p to 21p. Meanwhile, Santander recently revealed that it would start charging customers £120 a year for an account it promised would be "free forever". Thousands of small business and self-employed account holders are facing £9.99 monthly charges from October for business accounts. The changes come despite written assurances that their accounts would always remain free of fees, leaving customers feeling betrayed by the charges, which some branded "disgusting". A spokesperson for Santander said: "The business banking landscape has changed significantly over the last decade. "As such, we are simplifying our business banking offering as the first step to ensure that we can sustainably and efficiently evolve to better meet the needs of our business customers in the future." Do you have a money problem that needs sorting? Get in touch by emailing money-sm@
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Huge sporting event faces TV blackout for first time in 70 years with no BBC deal agreed
One of the big events in the sporting calendar could end up not being shown on television next year despite its long history with the BBC, with no broadcasting agreement reached yet The Commonwealth Games faces a potential television blackout in the UK. The competition, which started in 1930, is still yet to secure a broadcasting agreement, despite there being a year until its start date. Glasgow will be playing host to the competition in the summer of 2026, 12 years after hosting the event in 2014. The BBC has served as the main broadcaster of the sporting spectacle since 1954, but discussions about an arrangement for next year are still being had. It's been reported that certain BBC executives harbour doubts about the event's ongoing significance, given the declining number of nations prepared to host it. Glasgow was previously confirmed as emergency replacement hosts in September last year, after multiple cities withdrew from hosting, due to financial concerns. Before Glasgow hosted the games in 2014, chiefs at the BBC agreed a broadcasting deal in 2011. When the event was in Birmingham in 2020, an agreement was wrapped up two years prior. According to The Sun, sources close to the BBC claimed "an agreement is still some way off", with other officials at the Beeb also feeling that there is a "waning appetite" for the event. The overwhelming majority of the event's funding now stems from the £100million compensation the Australian state of Victoria provided to Commonwealth organisers following their withdrawal. Both the UK and Scottish Governments declined to guarantee the expenses of staging the event, pointing to broader strains on public spending. Phil Batty, chief executive of Glasgow 2026, offered a brighter picture of the current situation, saying: "This week we have just announced Sky New Zealand as one of our broadcast partners. We also have Channel 7 in Australia, and there will be news on a UK broadcaster later this year." A spokeswoman for the Games also told the Daily Record: "We're in positive discussions with broadcasters across the Commonwealth, including the UK, and further announcements will be made in the months ahead." Scotland First Minister John Swinney has declared his confidence that Glasgow is "well-organised and well-prepared" for a revamped Games that will spark the public's enthusiasm. He said: "All of our experience tells us that, on major events, the people of Scotland – and especially in Glasgow – get engaged." Swinney also supported Glasgow's choice to rescue an event which has faced criticism in certain circles as being an antiquated connection to Britain's colonial history. He told the BBC: "The Commonwealth is still a very important forum for international co-operation and partnership between countries. And, frankly, we need more international co-operation and friendship and collective endeavour in a world that is becoming increasingly fractured." The competition has been dramatically reduced due to financial concerns, with only 11 sports taking place across four locations. Track and field will be hosted at Scotstoun Stadium, rather than Hampden Park, whilst aquatic competitions will return to the current Tollcross facility. The total expenditure for the 2014 competition reached £543m, but this occasion will see just £114-130m allocated. Petria Thomas, chief of the Australian Commonwealth commission, said: "We're incredibly grateful and fortunate that the Scottish have stepped up to the mark here. "It was obviously highly disappointing that the Victorian government pulled out and it left the Commonwealth sport movement in a very difficult position. It's fantastic that the Games will be on in Glasgow. "Obviously a little bit of a different look to them this time with fewer sports which is a shame. But it's the reality of the position that the Commonwealth sport movement was put in, unfortunately."
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
S&P 500, Nasdaq move higher after mixed earnings; Dow lags
July 24 (Reuters) - The S&P 500 and the Nasdaq rose on Thursday, as investors sifted through a patchwork of earnings from megacaps like Alphabet and Tesla, while the Dow was weighed down by losses in UnitedHealth and IBM. At 9:46 a.m. ET, the S&P 500 (.SPX), opens new tab gained 10.62 points, or 0.17%, to 6,369.85 and the Nasdaq Composite (.IXIC), opens new tab gained 66.26 points, or 0.33%, to 21,086.27. Alphabet (GOOGL.O), opens new tab rose 1.9% after the Google parent raised its 2025 capital spending forecast by $10 billion to $85 billion, shrugging off trade jitters, while electric vehicle maker Tesla (TSLA.O), opens new tab tumbled 7.6% as CEO Elon Musk warned of "a few rough quarters" due to cuts in EV incentives. Losses in UnitedHealth (UNH.N), opens new tab, IBM (IBM.N), opens new tab and Honeywell weighed on the blue-chip Dow (.DJI), opens new tab, which fell 0.6% -though it remained close to its December 4 record high. UnitedHealth lost 2.3%. The insurer revealed it's cooperating with a Department of Justice probe into its Medicare practices, following reports of both criminal and civil investigations. IBM sank 9.5% as its second-quarter results fell flat with investors, hampered by disappointing sales in its core software division. Honeywell, meanwhile, dipped 5.2% despite topping Wall Street's expectations and raising its annual outlook. On the trade front, an EU spokesperson hinted that a deal was "within reach"—one that could slap a broad 15% tariff on imports across the 27-member bloc, according to diplomats. Meanwhile, fresh signs of progress emerged after President Donald Trump struck an agreement with Japan, slicing tariffs on Japanese goods to 15%. China and South Korea are also scrambling to clinch their own deals and sidestep Trump's hefty duties. Yet, some of Wall Street's heavyweights were starting to feel the sting of Trump's sweeping tariffs, injecting a dose of caution into the market mood. American Airlines (AAL.O), opens new tab fell 9.2% after forecasting a bigger-than-expected third-quarter loss, hurt by sluggish domestic travel demand. Shares of ServiceNow (NOW.N), opens new tab rose 5.5% after the software firm raised its annual subscription revenue forecast. Markets were also monitoring developments after the White House surprised investors that Trump - fresh from stepping up his criticism of Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell - would pay a visit to the U.S. central bank's headquarters later in the day. With the Fed widely expected to hold rates steady at next week's meeting, traders are now pricing in a 62% chance of a September rate cut, according to CME's FedWatch tool. The latest Labor Department report showed weekly jobless claims fell to 217,000—well below estimates—signaling continued resilience in the U.S. job market. "It (data) is a good guide for the health of the economy and this week's jobless claims show that the economy is ticking along just nicely," said Neil Birrell, chief investment officer at Premier Miton Investors. U.S. business activity gained momentum in July, but companies hiked prices on goods and services—a move that's fueling economists' predictions of faster inflation in the months ahead, largely driven by rising import tariffs Declining issues outnumbered advancers by a 2.05-to-1 ratio on the NYSE and by a 1.63-to-1 ratio on the Nasdaq. The S&P 500 posted 21 new 52-week highs and two new lows, while the Nasdaq Composite recorded 40 new highs and 13 new lows.
