License plate reader vote postponed amid community, council concerns
The city manager wrote:
'While I appreciate the Austin Police Department's thorough presentation at today's work session regarding the Automated License Plate Reader technology and have confidence that APD can continue to use this tool in a responsible way focused on keeping Austinites safe, I am also sensitive to community concerns and outstanding questions from members of the City Council.
Given concerns expressed today, I have decided to withdraw this item from the agenda at this time to provide more opportunities to address council members' questions and do our due diligence to alleviate concerns prior to bringing this item back to City Council for consideration.'
It's unclear when license plate reader technology may come back to the city council for a vote.
KXAN has reached out to APD for a response. During Tuesday's work session, APD explained to the dais why it finds the technology beneficial.
'This police department is 300 officers short. Currently, we do not have enough officers to [perform] the job that we would prefer to do without the use of technology to supplement [our] work,' said Assistant Austin Police Chief Sheldon Askew.
'Today we heard powerful testimony from residents, nonprofit leaders, privacy experts, and many others,' said Council Member Mike Siegel in a release. 'We are in an unprecedented time of authoritarian rule at the state and federal levels, and we should not be using City of Austin resources to fund a mass surveillance tool that can be used by private companies, immigration authorities, and other outside entities. I look forward to working with my colleagues on Council to support public safety strategies do not create such a risk of injury to our diverse communities.'
You can read more about the contents of that work session and the discussion had here.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Manhattan Borough President Mark Levine wins comptroller primary
MANHATTAN, N.Y. (PIX11) – Manhattan Borough President Mark Levine has won the Democratic primary for New York City comptroller. Levine defeated City Council Member Justin Brannan, winning the Democratic nomination in the November election. Click here for election results Levine has been vocal about the need for a rent freeze this year, acknowledging that both tenants and landlords are struggling in New York City. Levine will now set his sights on the 2025 New York City comptroller election on Nov. 4, where he hopes to become the city's chief financial officer. Incumbent comptroller Brad Lander was eligible for a second term, but retired to run for mayor. Ben Mitchell is a digital content producer from Vermont who has covered both local and international news since 2021. He joined PIX11 in 2024. See more of his work here. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Forbes
5 hours ago
- Forbes
Tax Credit Housing Project Costs Continue To Be 'Ridiculous.'
Sen. Todd Young (R-IN) talks to reporters just off the floor of the Senate Chamber. Senator Young ... More remains one of the biggest boosters of the Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) program in spite of it's costs (Photo by) There is a shocking story in the Washington Post with the headline, These publicly funded homes for the poor cost $1.2 million each to build. For me, what's shocking is not the cost, but that there is surprise among the people quoted in the story, especially a Washington D.C. City Councilmember who attended a ribbon cutting for the project only later to find out the price tag. I've been watching the per unit cost of 'affordable' housing, especially projects built using Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LITHC) climb for years. That simply is not a surprise to me or anyone else paying attention. That the Washington Post and local political leaders are just now figuring this out is scandalous and only emphasizes the ongoing need for reform. The Post story highlights 5 projects that range from $785,293 per unit to the $1,182,017 per unit. Costs for LIHTC projects continue to be "ridiculous." Taking the math further, that's 468 units for a total of $438,262,683 or $936,458.72 per unit. To get a sense of the scale of this spending, consider that the average house in Washington D.C., according to Zillow, sells for $607,908, or $328,550.72 less than the average cost of the units created in these projects. Also consider that for the price of building 1 unit at the pricey Ontario Place project, one could buy two homes in the District of Columbia, priced at $591,008 each. Finally, in Adams Morgan where the Ontario Place project was built, the average price, again, according to Zillow, is just $597,832. What's the excuse? Jubilee, the developer, told the Post in a statement (they wouldn't return phone calls), that 'Placing deeply affordable housing in high opportunity neighborhoods with on site and nearby programs and services helps harness the power of zip code.' The Post explains that the developer believes that 'The location promotes tenants' success by connecting them to high-performing schools, transportation options, grocery stores and other advantages, the statement said.' For these prices, Jubilee could just buy all the tenants a new car and free food and delivery for life from Whole Foods. And D.C. Council Chairman Phil Mendelson, according to the Post, called the spending 'ridiculous' and 'really disturbing.' I agree. And so would most people in the housing world. Yet the culprits behind these projects wouldn't go on the record in an interview, and if they responded at all, sent a statement. The problem is the 'power of the zip code' doesn't make any sense. Why are market rate units, houses not apartments, selling – not renting – for half the cost of these rental units. If the 'power of the zip code' was a real thing, it would have made more sense to buy 900 people houses in Adams Morgan and other DC neighborhoods rather than building them and having to operate them into the future. But Mendelson is part of the problem too. He says in his comments that choices have to be made to avoid these kinds of costs. 'But that analytical work has never happened.' But yes, it has. I've been doing it for years. About 6 years ago, I looked at 10 years of LIHTC projects in Seattle and found that the average cost per unit over the period was about $245,000 per unit. What I found is that, depending on the year, the costs per unit were almost always the same or higher than a typical single-family home. One of the most egregious cases was a project called 12th Avenue Arts that rang in at $47 million for 88 units, a total development cost of $534,000 per unit. I wrote about that project in 2016 in a post titled When Will Affordable Housing Advocates Push For More Supply, Fewer Rules? The answer, based on the numbers from D.C. seems like never. One of the people that is most stubborn in their support of these spendy projects is Senator Todd Young, a Republican from Indiana. In his state there is one project, Artesian Place in Martinsville, Indiana with a price tag of $15,307,352 for 34 units, a total development cost of $450,216 per unit. How much to buy a single-family house, with three bedrooms in Martinsville? Listings on Zillow range from $200,000 to $450,000. According to Senator Young in a recent statement expressing his support for the expansion of LIHTC, this sort of 'investment' will 'help to tackle the housing affordability crisis head on to help Hoosier families, expand our workforce, and strengthen our communities.' Senator Young needs to turn over his membership card in the conservative club if he's going to support such profligate spending. If a Republican from Indiana won't hit the pause button on this sort of outrageous spending, it's difficult to see where the political will can come from. I thought maybe total development cost hitting $1 million per unit might be the threshold that would start a move toward reform. But as I put it in a post here a few years ago, Senator Young and his fellow LIHTC boosters seem to be saying what Nixon told John Dean when the later said keeping Watergate quiet could cost $1 million dollars: 'We could get that.'
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
NYC Passes $116 Billion Budget as Mayor Adams Looks to Election
(Bloomberg) -- New York City Mayor Eric Adams reached a deal with the City Council on a $115.9 billion budget, adding new funding for legal services for migrants and more money for early childhood education. Struggling Downtowns Are Looking to Lure New Crowds Philadelphia Transit System Votes to Cut Service by 45%, Hike Fares Squeezed by Crowds, the Roads of Central Park Are Being Reimagined Sprawl Is Still Not the Answer The spending plan for the fiscal year that starts July 1, which the City Council approved on Monday, is the final one in Adams' first term. The budget is more than $3 billion larger than the $112 billion spending plan the city approved last year, and it comes as the mayor, who was elected as a Democrat, is seeking reelection as an independent in November. While Adams' previous budgets had been marked by dire predictions for the city's future — and what some critics decried as overly conservative revenue forecasts — the new plan adds funding for city services that the mayor had previously targeted for freezes or cuts. It passed unanimously— a rare moment of concord between the mayor and Council in a relationship that has mostly been acrimonious in previous years' budget negotiations. Adams branded the spending plan as the 'best budget ever' earlier this year. The plan adds roughly $50 million for legal services for immigrants, and will pay for a $10 million pilot program to provide free childcare for children ages 2 and under. It also fully funds the city's childcare program for 3-year-olds. The new funding represents a starkly different tack by Adams. Two years ago, he implemented unpopular cuts in response to the costly influx of thousands of migrants, which he estimated would cost the city billions of dollars. He slashed service hours at some libraries in response to the migrant crisis, cuts he partially restored last year after migrant arrivals slowed and costs sharply declined. The new budget adds seven-day service at 10 more city libraries, with locations to be announced at a future date. Some fiscal watchdogs criticized the new budget, which comes as the city faces potential funding threats from President Donald Trump's administration. The new plan is 'unaffordable' and 'unprepared for federal cuts,' said Andrew Rein, president of the Citizens Budget Commission, a nonpartisan fiscal watchdog group. The Trump administration has already paused or terminated nearly $400 million in federal grants the city received in the current fiscal year, and $134.5 million in funding for the next one, according to an analysis from state Comptroller Tom DiNapoli's office. City budget officials warned in financial documents released in May that Trump's immigration policies, federal spending cuts and proposed tariffs could create a 'severe downturn' in New York's economy, impairing the still-struggling office market, damping tourism and costing as many as 63,000 jobs in the current year, even under a mild recession scenario. (Updates with budget passing unanimously in fourth paragraph.) America's Top Consumer-Sentiment Economist Is Worried How to Steal a House SNAP Cuts in Big Tax Bill Will Hit a Lot of Trump Voters Too China's Homegrown Jewelry Superstar Pistachios Are Everywhere Right Now, Not Just in Dubai Chocolate ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
