This conclave to choose a new pope was short — but not the shortest ever
Before 1274, there were times when a pope was elected the same day as the death of his predecessor. After that, however, the church decided to wait at least 10 days before the first vote. Later that was extended to 15 days to give all cardinals time to get to Rome.
Advertisement
The quickest conclave observing the 10-day wait rule appears to have been the 1503 election of Pope Julius II, who was elected in just a few hours, according to Vatican historian Ambrogio Piazzoni. In more recent times, Pope Francis was elected in 2013 on the fifth ballot, Benedict XVI won in 2005 on the fourth and Pope Pius XII won on the third in 1939.
Black smoke billowed from the chimney of the Sistine Chapel where 133 cardinals gathered on the second day of the conclave to elect a successor to late Pope Francis, at the Vatican, Thursday.
Alessandra Tarantino/Associated Press
The longest conclave since the 20th century began took 14 rounds of balloting across five days, ending with the election of Pius XI in 1922. The shortest was the conclave that elected Pius XII in 1939, which took three ballots in two days.
Cardinals must reach a two-thirds majority to elect a pope. That was somewhat easier in conclaves past: In 1922 there were just 53 voting cardinals, and until 1978 there were fewer than 100 each time. This year there are 133, so 89 votes were needed.
Advertisement
Here's a look at the duration of conclaves in recent history, according to multiple sources including Catholic and other Italian publications:
- 1914: Benedict XV: 10 ballots, 3 days
- 1922: Pius XI: 14 ballots, 5 days
- 1939: Pius XII: 3 ballots, 2 days
- 1958: John XXIII: 11 ballots, 4 days
- 1963: Paul VI: 5 or 6 ballots, 3 days
- 1978: John Paul I: 4 ballots, 2 days
- 1978: John Paul II: 8 ballots, 3 days
- 2005: Benedict XVI: 4 ballots, 2 days
- 2013: Francis: 5 ballots, 2 days
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
6 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Catholic bishops try to rally opposition to Trump's immigration agenda
Advertisement The image in Los Angeles and elsewhere of ICE agents seizing people in Costco parking lots and car washes 'rips the illusion that's being portrayed, that this is an effort which is focused on those who have committed significant crimes,' said Cardinal Robert W. McElroy of Washington, in an interview from Rome. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'The realities are becoming more ominous,' he said. 'It is becoming clearer that this is a wholesale, indiscriminate deportation effort aimed at all those who came to the country without papers.' McElroy, who has frequently spoken against Trump's immigration policies, was named the archbishop of Washington as one of Francis' final major actions in the United States, reflecting the Vatican's desire to counter the Trump administration's immigration agenda. Immigration arrests are rising sharply, and ICE has a goal of apprehending 3,000 people a day. Advertisement 'A very large number of Catholic bishops, and religious leaders in general, are outraged by the steps which the administration is taking to expel mostly hardworking, good people from the United States,' McElroy said. Trump campaigned on aggressive immigration tactics, and polls before his inauguration captured broad support among Americans for deportations. Since then, Americans have 'mixed to negative views' of the administration's immigration actions, according to an early June survey by the Pew Research Center. The Trump administration has said the aggressive immigration tactics are necessary to protect public safety because some illegal immigrants are violent criminals. Vice President JD Vance, who converted to Catholicism six years ago, articulated his personal views in an interview last month, saying that immigration 'at the levels and at the pace that we've seen over the last few years' was destructive to the common good. 'I really do think that social solidarity is destroyed when you have too much migration too quickly,' he added. 'That's not because I hate the migrants or I'm motivated by grievance. That's because I'm trying to preserve something in my own country where we are a unified nation.' It is not clear how much influence the bishops will have on the issue. In Congress, there has been little debate between the two chambers over the immigration portion of the policy bill. The bishops expressing concern stand in opposition to the voices of key Catholics in executive leadership, including Vance. 'We as a church unfortunately don't have the kind of megaphone that the administration does,' said Bishop Mark Seitz of El Paso, Texas. 'It's a real challenge to reach even Catholics, especially when maybe one out of five who identify as Catholic make it to Mass on Sunday.' Advertisement Leo, an American and Peruvian citizen, has from the beginning of his papacy called for the need to respect the dignity of every person, 'citizens and immigrants alike.' After his election in May, his brother John Prevost said Leo was 'not happy with what's going on with immigration. I know that for a fact.' But so far the new pope has not directly weighed in publicly on Trump's deportation campaign. On Thursday, Archbishop Timothy P. Broglio, president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, implored Congress to 'make drastic changes' to Trump's domestic policy bill, despite its anti-abortion provisions. He wrote that the bill failed to protect families including 'by promoting an enforcement-only approach to immigration and eroding access to legal protections.' Leading Catholic prelates including McElroy and Cardinal Joseph W. Tobin of Newark, New Jersey, went even further in an interfaith letter to Senate leadership Thursday night, strongly urging them to vote against the bill entirely. In their letter they claimed that the bill, which calls for billions of dollars to bolster ICE, would spur immigration raids, harm hardworking families and fund a border wall that would heighten peril for migrants. 'Its passage would be a moral failure for American society as a whole,' the letter states. The letter was organized by Archbishop John C. Wester of Santa Fe, New Mexico, who attended an ecumenical protest against the bill last week. 'This draconian, heavy-handed, mean-spirited way that the country is dealing with immigrants today, it is not fair, it is not humane, it is not moral,' he said. 'It's something we have to really be earnest about, and do everything we can within the law to make our voices heard.' Advertisement Archbishop José H. Gomez of Los Angeles, a naturalized U.S. citizen born in Mexico, has long supported immigration reform and Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, a program that shields from deportation people who were brought into the United States as children and did not have citizenship or legal residency. But as the recent raids were executed in Los Angeles, his criticism of the Trump administration became more direct. 'This is not policy, it is punishment, and it can only result in cruel and arbitrary outcomes,' he wrote in a recent column. In an interview, he pointed to the example of Bishop Michael M. Pham of San Diego, the first bishop named by Leo in the United States. Pham, who fled to America from Vietnam as a child, recently went to a courthouse to support migrants waiting for hearings. 'We may have to do that,' Gomez said. More than a third of the Catholic church in the United States is Hispanic. In recent weeks, priests have increasingly reported that families are not leaving their homes to come to Mass because they are afraid. Still, many Catholics support Trump. The president increased his share of Catholic voters in 2024, receiving the majority of their support unlike in 2020, and his support from Hispanic Catholic voters also grew, to 41% from 31%, according to a new analysis from the Pew Research Center. Progressive and moderate Christians have expressed concern over Trump's immigration plans for years, particularly fearing the consequences of his reelection. At his inaugural prayer service, Episcopal Bishop Mariann E. Budde pleaded with the president to 'have mercy' on vulnerable people, particularly immigrants and children who were afraid. Trump lashed out, and a Republican member of Congress called for her deportation. Advertisement At a private retreat in San Diego this month, bishops discussed the crisis at length over meals. 'No person of goodwill can remain silent,' Broglio, the bishops' conference president, said in an opening reflection that was made public for churches, to reach immigrant families. 'Count on the commitment of all of us to stand with you in this challenging hour.' Bishops still oppose abortion, in alignment with church teaching. But immigration 'has become more and more a serious situation' that must be addressed, said Seitz, who chairs the bishops' committee on migration. In his area, auxiliary bishops and religious sisters in El Paso have been showing up at immigration court to stand alongside migrants who are appearing at required hearings. Some of the migrants have been seized by ICE agents. McElroy and several other top prelates have had private conversations with senior members of the Trump administration on this issue this month. They are also working with their priests to address pastoral needs on the ground. Not all priests are in lockstep about how far to take their response, but McElroy said that significant numbers of them feel they need to take strong action. In East Los Angeles, Father Brendan Busse, pastor of Dolores Mission Church in Boyle Heights, rushed to the scene after a call that ICE vehicles had rammed a car, deployed tear gas and hauled out a man, leaving his wife and two babies in the back seat. He said he sensed that some Catholics believe their political allegiance comes before the values of their faith. Advertisement 'My body is tired, my emotions are all over the place,' he said. 'But I have to say, my spirit is strong, I think, in part because there's a kind of moral clarity in moments like this.'
Newsweek
7 hours ago
- Newsweek
Senator Thom Tillis Will Not Seek Another Term After Voting Down Trump Bill
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Senator Thom Tillis, a North Carolina Republican who voted against the President Donald Trump-backed "Big Beautiful" spending bill last night, has announced he will not seek reelection in a Sunday statement, according to the Associated Press. Newsweek has reached out to Tillis' press office for the statement via email on Sunday. "In Washington over the last few years, it's become increasingly evident that leaders who are willing to embrace bipartisanship, compromise, and demonstrate independent thinking are becoming an endangered species," he said in a statement obtained by the AP. The two-term Republican congressman's announcement comes the day after he voted against Trump's spending bill and was subsequently called out by the president. Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill" represents his signature domestic policy initiative, combining massive tax cuts with significant spending on border security and defense while implementing substantial cuts to social safety net programs. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO), which is nonpartisan, estimates the House's version would add $2.4 trillion to the nation's deficit over the next decade, though Republicans dispute this calculation. The bill's passage would fundamentally reshape federal spending priorities and tax policy, affecting millions of Americans across income levels. This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.
Boston Globe
7 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Senate Republicans move forward on Trump's tax bill, but final outcome is uncertain
By midday Sunday the Senate had rounded its 12th hour, more than halfway through the clerk's reading of the foot-high bill. There were hours still to go. 'Senate Republicans are scrambling to pass a radical bill, released to the public in the dead of night, praying the American people don't realize what's in it,' Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer of New York said after vote. 'If Senate Republicans won't tell the American people what's in this bill, then Democrats are going to force this chamber to read it from start to finish.' Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The slow-walking points to a difficult days ahead. Advertisement Republicans, who have control of the House and Senate, are closer to passing Trump's signature domestic policy package, yet there is a long and politically uncertain path ahead to get the bill to Trump by the Friday holiday. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. J. Scott Applewhite/Associated Press Republicans remain reluctant to give their votes, and their leaders have almost no room to spare, given their narrow majorities. Essentially, they can afford three dissenters in the Senate, with its 53-47 GOP edge, and about as many in the House, if all members are present and voting. House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La. had sent his colleagues home for the weekend. Advertisement Trump, who has at times allowed wiggle room on his deadline, kept the pressure on lawmakers to finish. But the tense scene as voting came to a standstill for more than three hours let the internal discord play out in public. In the end, Republicans Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina and Rand Paul of Kentucky opposed the motion to move ahead, joining all 47 Democrats. Trump noticed. He threatened to campaign against Tillis, worried that Medicaid cuts would leave many without health care in his state. A new analysis from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said the Senate version of the bill would increase by 11.8 million the number of people without health insurance in 2034.. Trump badgered Tillis again on Sunday morning, saying the senator 'has hurt the great people of North Carolina.' Later in the day, Tillis said he would not run again in 2026. 'In Washington over the last few years, it's become increasingly evident that leaders who are willing to embrace bipartisanship, compromise, and demonstrate independent thinking are becoming an endangered species,' he said in a lengthy statement. Republicans are using their majorities to push aside Democratic opposition, but have run into a series of political and policy setbacks. Not all GOP lawmakers are on board with proposals to reduce spending on Medicaid, food stamps and other programs as a way to help cover the cost of extending some $3.8 trillion in Trump tax breaks. Renewed pressure to oppose the bill came from Elon Musk, who criticized it as 'utterly insane and destructive.' Advertisement If the Senate is able to pass the package in the days ahead, the bill would return to the House for a final round of votes before it could reach the White House. GOP leaders will need almost every one of their members on board. Senator Susan Collins of Maine spoke US Capitol in on Saturday. Aaron Schwartz/Photographer: Aaron Schwartz/Blo Tax breaks and core GOP priorities At its core, the legislation would make permanent many of the tax breaks from Trump's first term that would otherwise expire by year's end if Congress fails to act, resulting in a potential tax increase on Americans. The bill would add new breaks, including no taxes on tips, and commit $350 billion to national security, including for Trump's mass deportation agenda. But the cutbacks to Medicaid, food stamps and green energy investments are also causing dissent within GOP ranks. Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., said the environmental rollbacks would amount to a 'death sentence' for America's wind and solar industries. The Republicans are relying on the reductions to offset the lost tax revenues but some lawmakers say the cuts go too far, particularly for people receiving health care through Medicaid. Meanwhile, conservatives, worried about the nation's debt, are pushing for steeper cuts. Democrats can't filibuster, but can stall Using a congressional process called budget reconciliation, the Republicans can muscle the bill through on a simple majority vote in the Senate, rather than the typical 60-vote threshold needed to overcome objections. Without the filibuster, Democrats in the minority have to latch on to other tools to mount their objections. One is the full reading of the bill text, which has been done in past situations. Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., forced a 2021 reading of a COVID relief package. Other strategies the Democrats plan to use include using their full 10 hours of available debate time expected to launch later Sunday. Advertisement And then the Democrats are prepared to propose dozens of amendments to the package that would be considered in an all-night voting session — or all-day, depending on the hour. Vice President JD Vance was at the Capitol late on Saturday. TIERNEY L. CROSS/NYT A roll call full of drama As Saturday's vote tally teetered, attention turned to Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, who was surrounded by GOP leaders in intense conversation. She voted 'yes.' A short time later, Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., drew holdouts Sen. Rick Scott of Florida, Mike Lee of Utah and Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming to his office. Vice President JD Vance joined in. The talks dragged on. Then Vance led them all back in to vote. Later, Scott said he had met with the president, adding, 'We all want to get to yes.' Lee said the group 'had an internal discussion about the strategy to achieve more savings and more deficit reduction, and I feel good about the direction where this is going, and more to come.' Associated Press writers Ali Swenson, Fatima Hussein, Michelle L. Price contributed to this report.
