Curious, Concerned: Picton Residents Weigh In On SH1 Changes
Picton residents have stopped by an NZTA display to show the proposed relocation of SH1 through the town.
In a small room in Picton's library, dozens of people have gathered to discuss the intricacies of truck routes, intersections, school crossings and parking spaces.
They pored over stands and wall displays, showing the proposed permanent State Highway 1 route along Kent Street to the ferry terminal, instead of through central Picton.
The proposed changes have already caused controversy, with one resident calling them 'horrible', when they were announced on 11 June.
NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi's pop-up sessions on Tuesday and Wednesday hummed with questions, fresh ideas and a bit of debate, but not from Heather Hopkins, a resident of upper Kent Street, who had popped in to see how the highway would go past her home.
She was pretty happy, she said.
'I'm not really affected, I just wanted more information,' Hopkins said.
'[I have] no concerns at all, it'll be free flowing, once everyone gets used to it.'
In the evening session, people were most drawn to the board showing where Kent Street met the Wairau Road/SH1 intersection, which would take ferry passengers and freight trucks from the terminals out of town under the new proposal.
Lara O'Brien, who lived around the corner from Kent Street, said the intersection's new alignment would cut residents off from their own town centre during peak traffic.
Drivers on SH1 south of Kent Street wanting to get into central Picton would need to make a right-hand turn onto Wairau Road towards Nelson Square. During peak ferry traffic, they would be stuck in a right-turning lane with no gaps, O'Brien said.
'These people [leaving the ferry terminal] get to just go, but people going to town, when do they get to go?' O'Brien said.
'You get 60 trucks coming out of the ferry terminal. This is going to be a congestion point for locals coming out of town.'
Another group lingered around the board showing the relocation of the Picton School crossing on Kent Street.
Many of the attendees were reluctant to speak publicly about their opinions on the divisive subject. The loss of roadside parking and problems with trucks parking along the road were common complaints.
A truck driver from Levin, whose cousin was a Picton-based truckie, came along to the evening session. He said NZTA did a similar consultation about a pedestrian overpass in Levin and he was sceptical that feedback would alter the proposal.
A Picton resident praised NZTA for moving the crossing outside Picton School back to its original position, saying he didn't know why it was put there a few years ago.
'They're just putting it back to where it was, because people don't use it.'
NZTA regional manager of system design Robert Osborne said the sessions were a valuable way of sharing information with Picton residents and getting their feedback.
'The drop-in sessions were all well attended, with around 30 – 40 people each session and some coming to visit us a couple of times to ask further questions,' Osborne said.
'We received a great range of questions and comments, which will help us with our detailed design work.
'We also understand… that there will likely be a wide range of opinions about them. However, this project is aimed at improving Picton's roads and making it easier for people to get around.
'We look forward to continuing to hear from the community about our plans.'
Design plans would now be finalised and work would start next winter.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsroom
17 hours ago
- Newsroom
Tourism's role in peace and prosperity
The Nobel Peace Prize has been won by presidents, fighters for the oppressed, people who've changed history and put their lives on the line for a cause. So when Washington-based Auckland-educated Lelei Tuisamoa Lelaulu found out he'd been nominated, it's not surprising he thought it was a prank. He is a Samoan development entrepreneur whose leadership has extended across the globe including the United Nations, the World Bank, the International Finance Corporation, and the World Indigenous Games. He chairs the Earth Council Alliance and a council at George Washington University School of Business. This year he told the Metropolitan Museum of Art to take its reimagined Rockefeller Wing arts collections on tour to the places they came from. Lelaulu is nominated 'for his work in reshaping the narrative around tourism – not just for leisure, but as a vessel of peace'. He's still trying to get his head around the nomination. 'It's a huge honour and I'm just a little bit stunned waiting for something to happen. It's a little bit overwhelming.' Lelaulu was nominated by NGOs associated with the Anglican Church and the United Nations. 'It was a bit out of the blue in a sense 'cause I don't really go to Anglican churches or any churches generally, so I thought it was a prank initially, and then they called back and it was true, and they sent the recommendation and I saw it and away it went. We'll see what happens.' But what does tourism have to do with peace? 'I think that tourism is the only real peace dividend,' he says. 'It's basically the industry of peace because if you think about it … this is the largest transfer of resources from the haves to the have nots in history – voluntarily. No one's forcing it. 'Then you think about the hundreds of millions of lives that have been lost because people tried to wrest resources from others over the centuries; it's just astounding but tourism has reversed all that,' Lelaulu said. If it's handled properly tourism gets resources and money to communities instead of corporations 'and it has enormous possibilities for allowing communities to improve their education, their health, their welfare and their dignity – their ability to live lives of dignity. That's why I think the industry of peace is tourism,' he says. Lelaulu explains to Lei'ataualesa Susana Lei'ataua in a special episode of The Detail that bilateral aid goes mostly to the treasuries of countries whereas tourism handled properly goes to families and the communities directly 'and it builds them up and gives them a whole new dignity of life'. But how does tourism fit in when it comes to conflict zones? 'In terms of conflict we have to end the conflicts before tourism can apply. It is very much the industry of peace because once there's peace then people tend to stream across borders to see what their former adversaries are like and what they did and how they live, and this then builds up connections between former adversaries and this is what I hope for,' Lelaulu said. Lelaulu is quick to point out the 'holus bolus' introduction of tourists is not the answer. The wine routes in France are a successful example of a planned approach to directing a huge percentage of tourists outside of an over-crowded Paris, benefiting the agricultural sector. He says we could take a leaf out of that book. 'New Zealand is obviously one of the most beautiful countries on the planet but it also has one of the richest cultural ethnic heritages that should be looked at, and pulling people out of the major tourist destinations is the way to do it.' Lelaulu highlights Māori tourism. 'It's incredibly innovative and very effective. If you look at what they're doing in the South Island, looking at Kaikōura and what the iwi are doing there that's enormous. It's one of the most successful tourism projects in New Zealand … and they're very, very generous with the local communities which is an important thing.' Lelaulu was a guest speaker at the re-opening of the Metropolitan Museum of Art's US$70m revamped Michael C Rockefeller Wing in New York, and had a strong message for them. 'We should move these wonderful pieces of art around the world so that more and more people should see them … move it overseas to the major art capitals of the world and also to the places of origin like Papua New Guinea, Tonga, Samoa, Fiji. Let the people there see the beauty of what emerged from their artists a long, long time ago.' Lelaulu suggested these collections would tour for six months at a time and door-take profits would be split with the destinations to upgrade and build 'museologically sound' facilities for the artefacts. 'In a sense as the collection goes around and as you return some of the artefacts now and then where applicable, the collection that comes back to the Metropolitan Museum is going to be richer and more valuable than the exhibit that left, so I called it a cultural diplomatic continuum.' The 2025 Nobel Peace Prize will be announced on October 10, with the award ceremony taking place on December 10 in Oslo, Norway. Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here. You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook or following us on Twitter.
Otago Daily Times
a day ago
- Otago Daily Times
Support grows for return of Southerner
Southern MPs Scott Willis (Green Party), Mark Patterson (NZ First) and Rachel Brooking (Labour) celebrate after a petition to restore the Southerner train service was accepted. PHOTO: GREGOR RICHARDSON Restoring the long-retired Southerner train service from Invercargill to Christchurch has moved a step closer to becoming a reality. Yesterday, supporters gathered at the Dunedin Railway Station to watch as New Zealand First MP and Regional Development Associate Minister Mark Patterson accepted a petition to restore the Southerner service as a regular public transport service from Invercargill to Christchurch. More than 12,000 people from Invercargill to Christchurch have signed the petition. Dunedin resident and former Hamilton city councillor Dave MacPherson said passenger rail was an issue that transcended political boundaries. "It doesn't matter whether you're progressive or conservative or Green or New Zealand First — there's definitely a place for tourist trains, but there's a lot of locals that also want to use this kind of service. The group, Save Our Trains, was asked by MPs to drum up a petition within about a month. "That was their challenge to us — they said, 'Look, we'll try and help you, but if you give us some sort of proof of the level of support you've got, that makes it easier for us'." That was at the end of May, he said. While the group was originally Dunedin-based, it now had support from Invercargill to Christchurch, and in many of the population centres along the proposed route. "We've got one woman from Oamaru who collected about 1500 signatures ... she did an amazing job. "It's a genuine regional thing, not just for Dunedin." They would like to see prices on the restored Southerner similar to routes in the North Island, about $60 to $70. Mr MacPherson, who was involved in getting the Te Huia line from Auckland to Hamilton running, said he had never had such an easy time collecting signatures. "There's a transport and infrastructure select committee they're planning to put [the petition] in front of, and hopefully that sparks a discussion. "It's not going to happen overnight, but the fact that there is government-supported long-distance passenger trains already under way up in the North Island, but nothing in the South Island, is a powerful reason for this getting done."
Otago Daily Times
a day ago
- Otago Daily Times
Council discards proposal for direct Dunedin to Oamaru bus service
Hopes of Oamaru getting a direct bus service to Dunedin have been dashed for now, after the Otago Regional Council last week discarded proposals to establish a link. Waitaki District Mayor Gary Kircher had lobbied strongly for the regional council to provide a bus service to Oamaru during its recent annual plan submissions but said he recognised the challenges of funding it. "There's a lot of calls from other areas wanting to expand their services. For us, obviously, it's about starting a service and it's really difficult if the co-funder, [NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi] NZTA, doesn't have the money there. "Fundamentally, that's the issue and it's something that the government has to address because it's causing issues not just with public transport, but with projects everywhere. "It would just be too expensive if ORC paid for the whole thing themselves without the co-funding. It would just be too costly on our ratepayers." Mr Kircher had also submitted to the regional council about providing a connecter service between central Oamaru and the North End. He said the service would need to be funded by ORC, not the district council. "Again, it would come at a cost and public transport doesn't cover its costs, unfortunately. So, there has to be some other money coming from somewhere and with all of the pressure on rates, that'd be a difficult thing for the [district] council to be able to underwrite. It is a regional council responsibility." Mr Kircher said he was meeting with regional council representatives and would be talking about what other opportunities there might be to "make something happen". ORC chairwoman Gretchen Robertson said the council remained committed to connecting Oamaru. "Some regional upgrades will not happen due to co-funding gaps, but we're committed to finding ways to improve connectivity options for Ōamaru, Balclutha and Central Otago," she said. Transport Minister Chris Bishop said public transport was funded from both public and private revenue sources, noting government funding for public transport in Otago has increased from $90 million to $125m. "Private share refers to the proportion of funding that comes from private sources, including fares paid by passengers, advertising on buses, bus stops, trains, train stations, as well as other commercial opportunities like renting or leasing commercial space," he said. "The Government Policy Statement on land transport 2024 [GPS 2024] sets the expectation that there will be increases in private share revenue to support the growing operational costs for public transport, as well as to reduce the burden on ratepayers and taxpayers. "Under the previous government the private share revenue dropped as low as 10%, meaning far more of the costs had to be covered by taxpayers and ratepayers. "To reach agreement on targets, NZTA asked PTAs [public transport authorities] to show they had considered methods appropriate to each region that did not drive adverse outcomes such as patronage decline."
