
Little-known way you can stop taking in a neighbour's parcel forever as summer holidays begin
As the summer holidays begin, more and more people can expect to be asked to hold packages for someone who lives nearby.
1
Yet for those who feel overburdened, there is a convenient way to prevent being asked in the first place – and it all comes down to one simple form.
There are hundreds of age-old debates when it comes to neighbours, whether it be from a personal opinion or a legal standpoint.
But the rise of of online shopping has prompted serious debate over how often it is acceptable for people to accept packages on their neighbour's behalf.
Now with social media becoming the number one place people go to vent, the list of neighbour rows seems to be ever-growing.
In a recent case, a woman who spent thousands renovating her Victorian home was ordered to tear down her loft conversion after neighbours branded it a "monstrosity".
In another high-profile incident, an angry homeowner revealed that his neighbour was refusing to sort out their "hideous" garden – even though it was attracting rats.
Other disputes tend to erupt around the modern issue of what time of night you should keep the noise down to how tall your garden fence can be.
The latter issue has sparked some particularly thorny arguments in recent months.
Many of these discussions do have legal answers.
However, there are some which seem to be down to personal preference and common courtesy.
That includes the slightly sensitive subject of whether you can refuse to take in a neighbour's parcel.
Whether you're generally not a fan of your neighbour or if you feel like their personal postman with their never-ending packages, you do have a say.
Whilst there is no legal standpoint, you do have the right to refuse to take in the item.
Some postal services do state they will find a safe space, which can be with neighbours.
However, you can still say no, and they will find another neighbour or safe space for the parcel.
If you are in a situation where your neighbour may have put your address down as a safe space without asking, you can then discuss the matter with the neighbour and ask them to change it.
However, if they refuse to do so, you then have the right to not take in the parcels and inform the postal worker so they are aware for the future.
While you may have to discuss with postal workers for some services such as Amazon, the Royal Mail does offer a neighbour opt-out scheme.
The Royal Mail's website states: "Please fill in your details [on the form] and tell us why you'd like to opt out.
"We'll then send you an Opt-Out sticker which you'll need to display on or near your letterbox – somewhere clearly visible."
here.
One study by Compare the Market revealed the top reason British neighbour's argue:
Broken fences - top of the board was broken fences and whose responsibility it was to fix it.
Parking: one of the leading drivers of neighbour disputes, with 54.1 per cent of people having issues with people parking in front of their house, parking bay or driveway.
Trees - complaints about a neighbour's tree cracking your garden path was also common with nearly half of participants finding it frustrating.
Bin wars - outdoor bin etiquette continues to ignite the most furious debates between neighbours.
Nosy Neighbours - some people have their eyes and ears at the ready to have a peek causing problems for others.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
5 minutes ago
- BBC News
Fleetwood businesses losing money from 'toxic stench', MP says
Businesses have begun losing money because of the "toxic stench" from a nearby landfill site, an MP has said. Lorraine Beavers said the Jameson Road site in Fleetwood was affecting people's "whole lives" and "the future of our town". In a letter to the Environment Agency's (EA) regional director Carol Holt, the MP for Blackpool North and Fleetwood said local firms had been reporting cancelled bookings and low attendances after the 40th anniversary of the Fleetwood Festival of Transport at the weekend because of the pungent smell. The EA said it was demanding improvements and "maintaining our increased regulatory response", including regular "odour checks" and site inspections. Apart from the smell of "rotten eggs", there have also been health concerns about emissions from the site, with people complaining of nosebleeds, headaches, sore throats and breathing Council, which owns the land, has said the lease would not be renewed after 31 December 2027. An EA representative said: "We completely understand the impact this landfill has had on the community "We have made it clear that we expect significant improvements to gas infrastructure and close control over the types of waste accepted for operations at the site to continue."In her letter, Beavers said the recent festival, traditionally known as Tram Sunday, was an event that "brings our community together and drives visitors to our town". But she said the community was "fatigued, unwell and frustrated by the continued smell". 'Deserve better' Operators Transwaste said it had recently invested over £40,000 on 11 new deep wells to extract gas and address odour also pointed to an EA report in May which found that that air quality was well within WHO safety told the Local Democracy Reporting Service she wanted to meet EA staff this week to "discuss what happens next". "Enough is enough. We cannot accept this any more. The people who live here deserve better," Beavers said. "If Transwaste can't run this site properly, it should be closed down." Listen to the best of BBC Radio Lancashire on Sounds and follow BBC Lancashire on Facebook, X and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.


TTG
an hour ago
- TTG
Havila Voyages launches savings of up to 35% on Norwegian coastal cruises this winter
To continue reading this article you must log in. If you've never set a password you may need to register for free here and get unlimited access. For assistance contact support@


BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
Call for greater monitoring of £12m Colwick fish pass
A charity is calling for greater monitoring of England's largest fish pass, which cost £ described as a "motorway for fish", it was installed at Colwick Country Park in Nottinghamshire by the Environment Agency (EA) and opened in November aim was to "make it easier for salmon and other fish to reach their spawning and feeding grounds" along the River Trent, boosting declining EA has no legal obligation to monitor the effectiveness of the structure and will carry out short-term checks during key migratory windows, but the Trent Rivers Trust fears it is not enough. 'Canary in the coal mine' Wild Atlantic salmon were once native to the River Trent and are the main species the fish pass was designed to help fell rapidly during the industrial revolution when weirs and dams prevented them from reaching breeding grounds and water pollution destroyed their habitats."They've been referred to as the canary in the coal mine," said Alison Baker, restoration director at the Wild Atlantic Salmon Trust."Salmon require cold, clean water and if there's no cold clean water, then we all suffer."The fish pass is built around Holme Sluices, part of a 1950s flood defence scheme owned by the EA on the notoriously unpredictable structure is 210m (656ft) long, 6m (19.7ft) deep and 6.5m (21.3ft) is divided into 20 ascending chambers - each slightly higher than the previous ones to match the slope of the landscape - into which water flows through narrow slots. The EA said the pass - built under the Salmon and Freshwater Fisheries Act 1975 - was "carefully designed and is relevant for all fish species, including salmon".It is yet to carry out any monitoring and plans to perform short-term checks using underwater cameras to "better understand fish migration" in autumn of this year and spring Dr Scott McKenzie, head of rivers and nature-based solutions at the Trent Rivers Trust, said it was not enough to know how efficient the fish pass is or to learn from it."We don't just want a snapshot into whether they can get through at certain times of year," he added."A fish pass like this costs a lot of money; we want to make sure it's worth it."Dr McKenzie said monitoring should involve counting salmon at key breeding sites to check they were "not only navigating the structure, but actually reaching their breeding habitats", and include other recovering species. Dr McKenzie said monitoring should involve counting salmon at key breeding sites to check if they were "not only navigating the structure, but actually reaching their breeding habitats", and include other recovering species. The Trent Rivers Trust is leading a recovery of a 75km stretch of the river - a project that could see further fish passes McKenzie said the facility at Colwick was "only worth it if it's part of a bigger recovery plan which should include monitoring".The EA said: "For salmon monitoring, funding is concentrated on those rivers designated as 'principal salmon rivers', which the River Trent is not."Therefore, a strategy of monitoring at key migration windows is being applied here."Should further funding become available, the monitoring will be enhanced."