Jinko Tiger solar panel review: best for high output in low light conditions
As solar power becomes more popular across the UK, homeowners are increasingly searching for the best solar panels that balance efficiency, cost, and durability. With so many unfamiliar brands and similar specs across the market, it's easy to feel overwhelmed. That's why this review helps you decide if the Jinko Tiger solar panel is right for your home and whether solar panels are truly worth the investment.
Many panels now offer similar specifications on paper — comparable power output, 25- to 30-year lifespans, and sleek all-black designs. But with installation often representing the largest part of the overall cost of solar panels, and British weather posing its own set of challenges, the stakes for getting the right system are high.
The boom in commercial solar farms has helped push the technology forward. Installation is still the biggest cost, so it pays to invest in long-lasting panels. Fortunately, costs have fallen dramatically over the past two decades, especially as China has scaled up manufacturing and innovation. But fitting panels still involves scaffolding, labor, and additional equipment to connect to your home mains, so it's wise to factor in total system cost, not just the panel price, when choosing the best solar panel installers.
Why choose the Jinko Tiger?
Price, installed: £1250 per kW
Efficiency: 22 per cent
Wattage per panel: 440W
Type: N-Type
Made in: China and Malaysia, US and Vietnam
Degradation: 87.40 per cent after 30 years
Warranty: 25 years for the product itself, 30 years for the degradation figure
Founded in 2006, Jinko Solar has grown into one of the world's largest solar panel manufacturers. It's a Tier-1 producer, meaning it's been established for more than five years, is financially stable, and uses advanced, automated manufacturing techniques.
The company is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, offering greater transparency than many of its competitors. It's also invested in solar infrastructure, including a 20% stake in one of the world's largest solar farms in the UAE. Jinko is a member of the Solar Module Super League, a group of seven firms responsible for around half of the world's panel production.
This is a useful guide on a company's financial strength, but as a consumer rather than an investor, you may have other priorities.
That's why our Jinko Tiger review highlights a few of the panel's standout features:
For the Jinko Tiger solar panels themselves, the stats are fairly middle of the road compared to others we have reviewed, but all our featured solar panels have good warranties, power output, efficiency and useable lifespan. But while the Jinko Tiger solar panel doesn't offer the very highest wattage on the market, its balance of efficiency, degradation rate, and price make it a solid choice for UK homes.
You can also take confidence in Jinko's scale and track record. If your preferred installer works exclusively with Jinko Tiger solar panels, rest assured you're still getting a dependable, cost-effective product.
A bit like flat-screen TVs, intense competition in the solar panel market means prices have dropped while quality has risen. Jinko benefits from this trend, offering panels with great low-light performance, ideal for the UK's overcast climate as well as early morning and evening sunlight.
The panels use N-type cells, which degrade more slowly than standard P-type cells, so they maintain output better over time. They're also resistant to salt mist, making them a good choice for coastal homes that need extra protection.
The panels weigh in at 22kg, a shade lighter than most, and measure 1.76m by 1.13m. They are 3cm thick.
Pros:
Strong low-light performance
Reliable, well-established manufacturer
Solid all-round efficiency and warranty
Cons:
Jinko Tiger panels deliver reliability and performance with robustness and high energy output in weak light conditions. They're a great choice for customers who want quality, affordability, and performance from one of the best solar manufacturers in the world
Edward McKay at fitter Solar4Good
How we compiled our guide
To compile our list, we spoke to experts on the ground and have broken down the top-performing brands based on real-world value, not just technical specs.
We've prioritised long-term performance, value for money, and the reputation of the best solar panel installers in the UK. And if you're wondering if solar panels are worth it for your home, this guide is designed to help you make a smart, informed decision that pays off over time, whether you're upgrading an old array or fitting solar panels for the first time.
Most panels are guaranteed for 25 years and offer similar power output, size, efficiency and looks.
So we've weighted our judgement towards cost and degradation, which describes how much power the cells will provide after a number of years. The higher the percentage, the better.
Much of your decision will also depend on which installer you go with, as many have preferred brands they work with due to bulk purchasing. You'll also see a lot of unfamiliar Chinese names as you do your research, but many of these are Tier-1 manufacturers in clean energy with strong track records in quality and durability.
Why trust us
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
2 minutes ago
- The Independent
Car loans: Why could drivers still get compensation after court ruling?
Millions of UK motorists could be eligible for payouts worth hundreds of pounds after regulators announced an industry-wide compensation scheme. It came after a landmark Supreme Court ruling over whether motor finance firms complied with rules related to commission paid by lenders to dealers selling car loans. The ruling on Friday was widely considered a victory for finance firms potentially affected, after it was judged that two key cases were did not break the law. Here the PA news agency looks at why consumers could still be able to make claims for compensation payments. What was the court case and why was it important? The UK's highest court was considering an appeal against a Court of Appeal ruling made in October last year, relating to three claimants who had each bought cars on credit. In each case, the car dealer made a profit on the sale of the car but also received a commission from the lender for introducing the business to them, which the three claimants argued they did not know about. The Court of Appeal originally found that 'secret' commission payments, as part of finance arrangements made before 2021 without the motorist's fully informed consent, were unlawful. The lenders, FirstRand Bank and Close Brothers, challenged the decision. If the case confirmed that these three cases were all still unlawful, then consumers who bought cars with similar finance deals could make claims to potentially secure compensation. What was the result? On Friday, Lords Reed, Hodge, Lloyd-Jones, Briggs and Hamblen ruled that car dealers did not have a relationship with their customers that would require them to act only in the customers' interest, and that the Court of Appeal was wrong. But they said that some customers could still receive payouts by bringing claims under the Consumer Credit Act (CCA). It upheld one of the three claims and stressed that it was still broadly considered 'unfair'. What does it mean for consumers? Consumers who are concerned that they were not told about commission and think they may have paid too much could therefore still be eligible for compensation. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) watchdog said not all claims will receive payouts however. The FCA had launched its own process to look at discretionary commission arrangements (DCAs) on motor finance deals in 2024 but had put this on hold until the outcome of the Supreme Court case. Some 80,000 open cases on this issue were effectively paused for the ruling. Who is eligible for compensation? The case specifically relates to people who took out car loans between 2007 and 2021. Consumer champion Martin Lewis said in a video posted to X that millions of people are still likely to be due payments. He told Sky News the consultation is 'likely to mean 40% of people who got a car finance deal between 2007 and 2021 will be due some form of redress'. How much could I receive? The FCA said it is consulting on a redress scheme which is expected to cost between £9 billion and £18 billion. This is expected to mean victims could receive up to £950 in compensation. The regulator stressed that it was 'hard to estimate precisely at this stage the total cost to industry of the scheme'. What will the compensation process be? Currently, a lot is still not known about who exactly is eligible and how it will take place. The FCA has said that those who have already complained do not need to do anything and advised that others with potential claims contact their car loan provider, rather than use a claims management company. The regulator added that its consultation will be launched by early October. If the compensation scheme goes ahead, the first payments should be made in 2026. What does that mean for car finance firms? The motor finance industry is expected to cover the costs of the compensation, including administrative costs. Over the past few years, lenders and motor finance firms have been setting aside money to cover potential compensation payments. Why has the sector reacted positively to this? On Monday, shares in lender Lloyds and Close Brothers moved firmly higher after the ruling appeared to be more favourable than expected. Lloyds told shareholders on Monday morning that further financial provisions are 'unlikely to be material' in order to cover likely redress payments. While there is still some uncertainty over the cost of redress for the industry, positive outcomes in two of the cases mean they are likely to face fewer claims than previously expected. AJ Bell investment director Russ Mould said: 'While this issue could still cause some damage, it looks unlikely to be a repeat of the PPI scandal which blighted the banking industry in the 2010s.'
The Sun
3 minutes ago
- The Sun
The Range's stunning & realistic LED olive tree adds elegance & sophistication to any room for £110 less than Next's buy
SAVVY shoppers are flocking to The Range to bag a bargain that promises to transform any room into a Mediterranean paradise. The realistic olive tree is decorated with 120 LED lights, and the best part is that the accessory is £110 less than Next's version. The delicate faux foliage measures 120cm in height and includes an IP20 Indoor transformer. The branches can be shaped and adjusted, perfect for fitting into any space. The Range's LED Olive Tree is a bargain at £34.99 and is available in store and online. To check if your local branch supplies the beautiful product, just select a store on The Range's website. Next's version If you're feeling more flush, Next also has a faux olive tree for £145. The tree has 160 warm white LED lights and comes in a plastic pot. It measures 150cm in height and it plugs in at the wall, so no batteries are needed. This comes after The Range launched a kitchen gadget that is £300 cheaper than Ninja's version. This 2-in-1 machine has also been described as great for entertaining guests or "bringing something different to your BBQ." Ninja dupe The slushy maker retails for £39.99 - coming in at a far more affordable price point than the Ninja equivalent which sets shoppers back £349.99. Available in three different colours, the electric ice crusher has a built in stirrer and measuring jug, which makes it perfect for irresistible slushies. The product description reads: "From ice-cold slushies to frozen cocktails, enjoy a huge range of drinks thanks to this easy to use machine, which crushes ice AND stirs your drinks. "It will go down a treat at children's parties." The machine also allows you to choose either fine or coarse shaved ice by turning the dial on the front of the machine. The description adds: "Once crushed ice falls into the jug, it is constantly agitated by the stirrer which helps prevent it from sticking together, and if you add your fruit juice, alcohol or syrup to the jug, your drinks will be stirred too." Garden gadget The retro designs comes in red, grey, and black and measures 21cm in length and 19cm in width. The store also launched a charming £2.99 outdoor light that's perfect for garden parties. The Solar Mini Animal Light features two LED light-up eyes and a stylish pebble stone finish. Available in an assortment of fun designs, including a frog and cow, they will make your garden truly shine. 2
Telegraph
3 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Over half of Germans would not fight for their country
Nearly two-thirds of Germans would 'probably not' defend their homeland from invaders, a survey has found, in a blow to the government's rearmament plans. In a survey carried out for RND, a German broadcaster, 59 per cent of respondents said they were 'probably' or 'definitely' unwilling to defend the country from an attack. Only 16 per cent of Germans were 'definitely' willing to take up arms to defend Germany, while 22 per cent said they would 'probably' do it. The new figures are a headache for Boris Pistorius, the German defence minister, as he leads efforts to rearm Germany and turn it into a serious European security power, following decades of under-investment in the army. In July, Mr Pistorius unveiled plans to recruit 40,000 young adults per year into the Bundeswehr, the German armed forces, by 2031 as part of a new military service scheme. The same scheme plans to send out compulsory questionnaires to young male Germans to fill in once they turn 18, and could be followed by compulsory health screenings of young men to check their suitability for the army. Bundeswehr officials say that the overall size of the army needs to grow from 182,000 soldiers to at least 260,000 by 2035. The Bundeswehr reserve forces also need to be increased from 60,000 to 200,000 people. The German military has struggled for decades with recruitment, partly due to Germans' wartime guilt and a widely held view that their country no longer needed an army. Conscription in Germany, which was deeply unpopular, ended in 2011. But the Russian invasion of Ukraine has prompted a major rethink on security in Berlin, known as the 'Zeitenwende', or turning of the times. Friedrich Merz, the German chancellor, declared that 'Germany is back' after his election victory in February, as he vowed to stand up to Russian president Vladimir Putin. The centre-Right Christian Democrats [CDU] party leader has introduced historic debt reforms, which allow potentially unlimited government defence spending on projects costing more than 1 per cent of GDP. The Merz government has also created a 500bn euro (£435bn) special infrastructure fund, which will rebuild the country's crumbling road and rail networks. The fund is a crucial part of Nato's wider security planning for a potential war with Russia, as Germany would serve as a transit zone for troops and tanks en route to the eastern front. Germany is not the only country having difficulties drumming up recruits: in Italy, a similar survey also found that only 16 per cent of citizens were willing to defend their nation - despite defence spending increasing by 46 per cent over the past decade. In Britain, the army and navy have missed nearly every annual recruitment target since 2010, according to government statistics. The shortfall has been blamed on stagnant pay, poor military housing, a wider downward trend in young people being interested in fighting for their country.
