
Judge orders Trump administration to halt indiscriminate immigration stops, arrests in California
Immigrant advocacy groups filed the lawsuit last week accusing President Donald Trump's administration of systematically targeting brown-skinned people in Southern California during its ongoing immigration crackdown. The claimants include three detained immigrants and two US citizens, one of whom was held despite showing agents his identification.
The filing in US District Court asked a judge to block the administration from using what they call unconstitutional tactics in immigration raids. Immigrant advocates accuse immigration officials of detaining individuals based on their race, carrying out warrantless arrests, and denying detainees access to legal counsel at a holding facility in downtown LA.
Tricia McLaughlin, assistant secretary of the US Department of Homeland Security, said in an email that 'any claims that individuals have been targeted by law enforcement because of their skin colour are disgusting and categorically FALSE.' McLaughlin said 'enforcement operations are highly targeted, and officers do their due diligence' before making arrests.
Judge Maame E. Frimpong also issued a separate order barring the federal government from restricting solicitor access at a Los Angeles immigration detention facility.
Frimpong issued the orders the day after a hearing during which advocacy groups argued that the government was violating the Fourth and Fifth Amendments of the Constitution.
Immigrants and Latino communities across Southern California have been on edge for weeks since the Trump administration stepped up arrests at car washes, Home Depot car parks, immigration courts and a range of businesses. Tens of thousands of people have participated in rallies in the region over the raids and the subsequent deployment of the National Guard and Marines.
The order also applies to Ventura County, where busloads of workers were detained on Thursday while the court hearing was underway, after federal agents descended on a cannabis farm, leading to clashes with protesters and multiple injuries.
According to the American Civil Liberties Union, the recent wave of immigration enforcement has been driven by an 'arbitrary arrest quota' and based on 'broad stereotypes based on race or ethnicity.' When detaining the three day labourers who are claimants in the lawsuit, all immigration agents knew about them was that they were Latino and were dressed in construction work clothes, the filing said. It goes on to describe raids at swap meets and Home Depots where witnesses say federal agents grabbed anyone who 'looked Hispanic.'
ACLU solicitor Mohammad Tajsar said Brian Gavidia, one of the US citizens who was detained, was 'physically assaulted … for no other reason than he was Latino and working at a tow yard in a predominantly Latin American neighbourhood.' Tajsar asked why immigration agents detained everyone at a car wash except two white workers, according to a declaration by a car wash worker, if race wasn't involved.
Representing the government, solicitor Sean Skedzielewski said there was no evidence that federal immigration agents considered race in their arrests, and that they only considered appearance as part of the 'totality of the circumstances', including prior surveillance and interactions with people in the field.
In some cases, they also operated off 'targeted, individualised packages', he said.
'The Department of Homeland Security has policy and training to ensure compliance with the Fourth Amendment,' Skedzielewski said.
Solicitors from Immigrant Defenders Law Centre and other groups say they also have been denied access to a US Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility in downtown LA known as 'B-18' on several occasions since June, according to court documents.
Solicitor Mark Rosenbaum said in one incident on 7 June, solicitors 'attempted to shout out basic rights' at a bus of people detained by immigration agents in downtown LA when the government drivers honked their horns to drown them out and chemical munitions akin to tear gas were deployed.
Skedzielewski said access was only restricted to 'protect the employees and the detainees' during violent protests and it has since been restored.
Rosenbaum said solicitors were denied access even on days without any demonstrations nearby, and that the people detained are also not given sufficient access to phones or informed that solicitors were available to them.
He said the facility lacks adequate food and beds, which he called 'coercive' to getting people to sign papers agreeing to leave the country before consulting a solicitor.
Attorneys general for 18 Democratic states also filed briefs in support of the orders.
US Customs and Border Protection agents were already barred from making warrantless arrests in a large swathe of eastern California after a federal judge issued a preliminary injunction in April.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India.com
31 minutes ago
- India.com
Russia in deep trouble as US decides to provide arms to Ukraine through..., missiles and rockets worth Rs 250000000000000 to be....
Russia in deep trouble as US decides to provide arms to Ukraine through..., missiles and rockets worth Rs 250000000000000 to be.... The Russia-Ukraine war is far from over. In the latest development, US President Donald Trump said that the US will send weapons to Ukraine through NATO and NATO will bear the full cost of these weapons. This move comes after the negotiation on ceasefire failed between Russia and Ukraine. Notably, US itself is a member of NATO which is an international military alliance. By 2025, NATO has 32 member countries. Its purpose is to ensure collective security of member countries and protect them from external attacks. US contributes 66% to NATO expenses. What will be the cost of the aid? According to media reports, the US is preparing to send a package of $300 million (Rs 2.5 thousand crores) to Ukraine, which will include Patriot missile systems and medium-range rockets, although a final decision on the weapons is yet to be taken. This is a legal method that allows the President to send weapons directly from US stockpiles in bad times. Earlier, the Trump administration had only sent weapons approved by former President Joe Biden to Ukraine. What is agreement on arms between US, NATO and Ukraine? This new arms agreement is between the US, NATO and Ukraine. Earlier the US used to send arms directly to Ukraine, but now this process will happen through NATO. Rs 90 thousand crores aid to Ukraine A conference for the reconstruction of Ukraine was held in Rome, the capital of Italy. In this conference, Ukraine was promised aid of 10 billion euros (Rs 90 thousand crores rupees). The European Commission announced aid of 2.3 billion euros (about 2.7 billion dollars). Zelensky said at this conference that Russia's assets should be used to rebuild Ukraine. He also demanded increased arms supplies, joint defense production and investment. The Ukraine Reconstruction Conference, held in Rome on 10 and 11 July 2025, is attended by 38 countries and several international organisations.


Time of India
33 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Most transformative term…': Michael Whatley explains how Trump overturned the painful Biden years
At the Turning Point USA Student Action Summit, RNC Chair Michael Whatley declared Donald Trump is having the most 'transformative term of any president since Ronald Reagan.' He highlighted Trump's comeback, victories in battleground states, the GOP's legislative wins, and efforts to secure borders, cut taxes, and restore US strength. Whatley praised youth conservatives and called them the present not just future of the Republican Party. Show more Show less


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Legally protect Telangana govt ordinance on 42% quota, says BC netas to CM Revanth Reddy
HYDERABAD: The state govt is likely to file caveats in the Telangana high court and Supreme Court to protect the proposed ordinance extending 42% reservations to BCs in local bodies after taking legal experts' opinion. Leaders of various BC welfare associations on Friday met chief minister A Revanth Reddy and urged to take all legal precautions to protect the ordinance. The delegation led by National BC Welfare Association president R Krishnaiah, who is also a BJP MP (Rajya Sabha), thanked the CM for what they termed a historic decision and a major step towards political empowerment of the BCs. R Krishnaiah told TOI: "The CM responded positively and asked all the BC leaders also to be alert. He assured us that the govt is committed to BC welfare and 42% quota, and it will fight on all fronts if the situation arises. " While welcoming the state cabinet's decision, various BC association leaders also sought to warn that the entire community will launch an agitation and see the end of the political career of any individual or party if they went to court against 42% reservations to the BCs. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad "We will have no option but to come onto the roads against the 10% EWS reservations and demand its withdrawal if anyone from the upper caste is found to be behind filing a case against the BC quota," warned BC leader Jajula Srinivas Goud during a media conference on Friday. He said the only permanent solution was for the central govt to amend the Constitution and include BC reservations enhancement in the IX Schedule. "The central govt has disappointed the BCs as it sat on the BC Bills sent by the govt for almost three months. With no other option, the Congress govt decided to come out with an ordinance. Our appeal to all the political parties is to support the 42% quota to BCs. Anyone opposing the BC quota will be branded as anti-BC," he said.