Bersih, Suaram want rally law amendments expedited
Bersih chairperson Muhammad Faisal Abdul Aziz said the Federal Court's declaration that it is unconstitutional to criminalise failure to give notice to the authorities would open up Malaysia's democratic space.
"It's a commendable decision by the court, given the provision is punitive and exceeds the fundamental liberties as enshrined in our Constitution.
"We agree that every action, including peaceful rallies, needs to be regulated, but it must be proportionate.
"Bersih urges the government to expedite the amendment of the act to give more space for the people to hold peaceful rallies."
Suaram executive director Azura Nasron called on the government to fully repeal Section 9(5) of the act in the Parliament session in October.
Azura added: "We urge the police to incorporate clear, rights-based guidelines on facilitating peaceful assemblies into its human rights training module developed jointly with the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (Suha-kam)."
She said Section 9(5) of the act was consistently used as a tool of intimidation against assembly organisers, especially human rights defenders.
Suaram was investigated 13 times over the notice requirement in Section 9(1) from 2020 to 2024, but was never charged.
On Tuesday, the Federal Court declared it unconstitutional to criminalise the failure to notify police five days before a peaceful assembly.
In delivering the unanimous decision by a five-member bench, Chief Justice Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat said Section 9(5) of the act imposes a penalty that goes beyond what is allowed under Article 10(1)(b) of the Federal Constitution, which guarantees the freedom of speech, assembly and association.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malaysiakini
2 hours ago
- Malaysiakini
Judiciary not playground of partisan preferences
LETTER | Lately, there have been statements from various groups on the government's decision not to extend former chief justice Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat's tenure. She retired on July 1, 2025. Opposition leader Hamzah Zainudin has criticised the government's decision not to extend Tengku Maimun's tenure, saying it signals a lack of consideration for the future of the country's legal system. For weeks, before her impending retirement, questions had arisen among legal practitioners and politicians over the lack of an extension for her and an announcement of a successor. The DAP came out late with a statement saying that the judiciary is of paramount importance, and reiterated its position that the extension' of the tenures 'would be consistent with the reformist agenda of the Madani government'. It is obvious from these statements that Tengku Maimun has shown integrity and defends judicial independence. The question is, does the Malaysian public's trust in the judiciary have to be confined to individuals, or would it be better if judges are able to safeguard the independence and integrity of the judiciary? Is the judiciary not a guiding light to the objectivity of constitutional principles? What the public aspires for is not only judges with integrity but also for them to collectively safeguard constitutional principles that make the judiciary truly independent. If this were the case, the retirement of the chief justice would not have been an issue to the people, since whoever comes after would carry on the torch of justice through a balanced and enlightened interpretation of the Constitution that protects the life and liberty of all Malaysians. Therefore, the Association for Welfare, Community and Dialogue believes that it would be wise for judicial appointments to be separated from the preferences of the prime minister or politicians who have their own agendas. The judiciary is the carrier of holistic constitutional principles; it cannot be a playground of partisan preferences or ideological battles. The views expressed here are those of the author/contributor and do not necessarily represent the views of Malaysiakini.
The Star
16 hours ago
- The Star
Ahead of Sabah polls, Armizan urges continued local leadership in state govt
KOTA KINABALU: With the Sabah state election drawing closer, a federal minister from Gabungan Rakyat Sabah (GRS) has made a clear pitch — the state must continue to be led by local parties to ensure that its interests are not diluted in national politics. Domestic Trade and Cost of Living Minister Datuk Armizan Mohd Ali, who is also Papar MP and Parti Gagasan Rakyat Sabah (Gagasan Rakyat) vice-president, said having local parties at the helm of the state government ensures that Sabah's voice is protected and respected, particularly in negotiations with the Federal Government. Speaking in Tenom during the Melalap PGRS' annual conference, Armizan said the successful amendment of the Carbon Capture, Utilisation and Storage (CCUS) Act 2025 — which only applies to Peninsular Malaysia and Labuan for now — is a direct outcome of this local-federal power balance. 'At first, the law was meant for the whole country. But the Cabinet amended it after listening to Sabah and Sarawak — both led by local coalitions. That's the power of inter-governmental negotiation, not intra-party compromise,' he said. Armizan said this outcome was only possible because the current Federal Government, led by Pakatan Harapan, was willing to uphold the constitutional recognition of Sabah and Sarawak's special position under the Federal Constitution and the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63). 'This is why it's important that the core of the Federal Government remains national, while the core of the state government stays local. It creates the right platform for state-level interests to be defended through formal government-to-government engagement,' he said. He contrasted this with the Territorial Sea Act (TSA) 2012, which limits state control of territorial waters to just three nautical miles — legislation passed when both federal and state governments were dominated by the same national party. 'Some of the loudest critics of the TSA today were in government when it was passed. They were ministers, MPs — and they said nothing then,' he said. Armizan noted that almost all Sabah MPs in 2012 belonged to national parties and were bound by centralised coalition decisions, leaving them little room to dissent or represent Sabah's unique position. 'These are historical records — party and leader decisions — that cannot be erased,' he said. While Sabah does not reject national parties — with Pakatan Harapan representatives also serving in the state government — Armizan stressed that local parties must remain the foundation. 'It's about making sure Sabah's priorities stay front and centre, always discussed government to government, not party to party,' he added.
The Star
21 hours ago
- The Star
Prosecution: Philippines VP Sara Duterte impeachment trial ‘not optional,' Senate must proceed
Sara Duterte. - Photo from Inday Sara Duterte/Facebook MANILA: A member of the House prosecution team said the Senate impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte is 'not optional.' Last June 25, Senate President Francis Escudero said the chamber, sitting as an impeachment court, can dismiss the case against Duterte if a motion is made and passed by a simple majority, or at least 13 votes. However, in an interview over DZMM on Friday (July 4), Bukidnon Rep. Jonathan Keith Flores said mostly in Filipino, 'It [trial] is not optional. As soon as it is filed, as I understand it, it is the Senate's obligation to hear and decide the case.' Flores is a member of the House prosecution team. The Senate convened as an impeachment court on June 10 and remanded the articles of impeachment to the House to verify that it did not violate the 'one-year bar rule' and that the 20th Congress still intends to pursue the case. A day later, the House adopted a resolution certifying that the impeachment complaint against Duterte adhered to Article XI, Section 3, Paragraph 5 of the 1987 Constitution, satisfying the first requirement. The constitutional provision states: 'No impeachment proceedings shall be initiated against the same official more than once within a period of one year.' But as for the second requirement, Flores said, 'No certification or compliance can be done until the 20th Congress is organized and starts.' The 20th Congress is set to formally open its session on July 28, starting with President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.'s fourth State of the Nation Address. Last Saturday, House prosecution panel spokesperson Antonio Bucoy said that if the Senate dismisses the impeachment complaint without a trial, their team may file a petition for certiorari with mandamus before the Supreme Court. Duterte is accused of culpable violation of the Constitution, bribery, graft and corruption, betrayal of public trust, and other high crimes—particularly her alleged misuse of P612.5 million in confidential funds. - Philippine Daily Inquirer/ANN
