
NEET PG 2025: NBEMS warns candidates against false SMS, notices, and social media posts, check details here
A number of fraudulent messages, often claiming to offer exam postponement, leaked question papers, or guaranteed marks, have recently circulated under the NBEMS name.
In a notice dated July 10, 2025, the Board clarified that its only official websites are natboard.edu.in and nbe.edu.in, and that it does not communicate via unofficial channels. It also introduced an official WhatsApp channel, urging students to verify any suspicious message.
Candidates are advised to remain alert, verify all updates from the source, and report phishing attempts.
NBEMS issues notice for NEET PG 2025 candidates
The official notice issued by NBEMS is available at
nbe.edu.in
. Candidates can check the same notice below:
NBEMS issues warning against NEET PG 2025 false notices.
What NBEMS said in the latest notice
In its July 10 notice, NBEMS raised red flags on several fronts:
Only two official websites:
NBEMS clarified that any information regarding its exams, such as NEET-PG 2025 should be accessed exclusively from:
https://natboard.edu.in
https://nbe.edu.in
Only one verified WhatsApp channel:
NBEMS emphasised it does not operate on X (Twitter), Facebook, Instagram, or any other platform. The only official social media channel is its WhatsApp channel.
Look for QR codes on notices:
Every official NBEMS notice released since July 2020 includes a QR code. Scanning this code redirects users to the corresponding notice on the official website. Notices without this verification should be treated with suspicion.
Watch out of misinformation
NBEMS has highlighted several types of scams currently targeting NEET-PG 2025 aspirants. One common tactic includes spreading false information about the exam schedule, such as bogus claims that the test has been postponed.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Zo bestrijden vrouwen van 60+ incontinentie – helemaal discreet
Damesondergoed
Meer informatie
Undo
In addition, candidates are receiving fraudulent SMS or email messages that offer to help them secure high marks—often in exchange for payment or personal details.
There are also widespread false promises about access to leaked question papers. Another alarming trend involves fake agents or touts posing as officials on social media, claiming they can provide exam-related assistance or special favours. NBEMS has firmly warned students not to trust or engage with any such messages and to verify all information through official sources only.
TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us
here
.
Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Inside the cockpit: ‘Why did you cut off ...?' What was the last conversation between AI 171 pilots
Inside the cockpit: 'Why did you cut off ...?' What was the last conversation between AI 171 pilots NEW DELHI: The cockpit voice recorder from the London-bound Air India 787 that crashed in Ahmedabad has revealed the final conversation between the flight Captain Sumeet Sabharwal and first officer Clive Kunder. A 15-page preliminary report by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB), in its detailing, disclosed that after the fuel supply to both engines of the aircraft was cut off, one pilot was heard asking 'Why did you cutoff?' to which the other replied, 'I did not do so,' suggesting a potential technical malfunction or involuntary activation. The AAIB report, released a month after the June 12 crash, lists key details about the accident flight, the crew, and the final moments recorded in the cockpit. Flight AI171 was operated by a flight crew comprising a Pilot-in-Command (PIC) and a Co-pilot, along with ten cabin crew members. The report mentions that the operating crew had arrived in Ahmedabad a day earlier. Upon reaching the airport, the crew underwent a preflight breath analyser test at 06:25 UTC and were found 'fit to operate' the flight. The report also stated that both pilots had adequate rest before operating the June 12 flight. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Don't Pay Full Price for 2025's Top Games! Shop Now Undo Data from the aircraft's Enhanced Airborne Flight Recorder (EAFR) showed that the aircraft had reached its maximum recorded airspeed just before the engine 1 and engine 2 fuel control switches were shifted from 'RUN' to 'CUTOFF' — one after the other. Also read | Engine 1 and Engine 2 cut off within 1 second: What caused Air India plane crash? 10 key findings from probe report AAIB report reveals minutes before the aircraft was airborne. At 07:55:15 UTC (13:25:15 IST), the aircraft requested taxi clearance, which was granted by Air Traffic Control (ATC). The aircraft took off at 08:08:39 UTC (13:38:39 IST), and at 08:09:05 UTC (13:39:05 IST), one of the pilots transmitted a distress call: 'MAYDAY MAYDAY MAYDAY.' The air traffic controller (ATCO) responded by asking for the flight's call sign but received no reply, the report said. The report also stated that the aircraft's take-off weight was within allowable limits, and there were no dangerous goods listed onboard. Flight AI171, bound for London Gatwick, crashed into a medical hostel complex shortly after takeoff from Ahmedabad, killing 260 people, including 241 onboard.


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Air India plane crash probe: ‘Why did you cut off?' pilot asked — Cockpit recording reveals final exchange
Air India plane crash probe: 'Why did you cut off?' pilot asked — Cockpit recording reveals final exchange The cockpit voice recorder from the London-bound Air India 787 that crashed in Ahmedabad has revealed the final conversation between the flight Captain Sumeet Sabharwal and first officer Clive Kunder. A 15-page preliminary report by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB), in its detailing, disclosed that after the fuel supply to both engines of the aircraft was cut off, one pilot was heard asking 'Why did you cutoff?' to which the other replied, 'I did not do so,' suggesting a potential technical malfunction or involuntary activation. The AAIB report, released a month after the June 12 crash, lists key details about the accident flight, the crew, and the final moments recorded in the cockpit. Flight AI171 was operated by a flight crew comprising a Pilot-in-Command (PIC) and a Co-pilot, along with ten cabin crew members. The report mentions that the operating crew had arrived in Ahmedabad a day earlier. Upon reaching the airport, the crew underwent a preflight breath analyser test at 06:25 UTC and were found 'fit to operate' the flight. The report also stated that both pilots had adequate rest before operating the June 12 flight. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Vastu Compliant 3BHK @ Kalyani LivingTree, KIADB, Bagalur Kalyani Developers Learn More Undo Data from the aircraft's Enhanced Airborne Flight Recorder (EAFR) showed that the aircraft had reached its maximum recorded airspeed just before the engine 1 and engine 2 fuel control switches were shifted from 'RUN' to 'CUTOFF' — one after the other. AAIB report reveals minutes before the aircraft was airborne. At 07:55:15 UTC (13:25:15 IST), the aircraft requested taxi clearance, which was granted by Air Traffic Control (ATC). The aircraft took off at 08:08:39 UTC (13:38:39 IST), and at 08:09:05 UTC (13:39:05 IST), one of the pilots transmitted a distress call: 'MAYDAY MAYDAY MAYDAY.' The air traffic controller (ATCO) responded by asking for the flight's call sign but received no reply, the report said. The report also stated that the aircraft's take-off weight was within allowable limits, and there were no dangerous goods listed onboard. Flight AI171, bound for London Gatwick, crashed into a medical hostel complex shortly after takeoff from Ahmedabad, killing 260 people, including 241 onboard.


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Air India crash report: The unanswered questions in govt's 15-page preliminary findings into AI-171 tragedy
A month after Air India flight AI171 crashed moments after take off from Ahmedabad, the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) has released its preliminary findings. The 15-page report provides a detailed timeline of the aircraft's final minutes, confirming that both engines shut down seconds after liftoff and that neither pilot acknowledged switching them off. But even with flight data, cockpit recordings, and engine analysis underway, investigators have yet to determine why the fuel cutoff switches for both engines moved to 'CUTOFF' in-flight, one after the other, and without any known command. The Boeing 787-8, flying from Ahmedabad to London, crashed just outside the airport perimeter on June 12, less than a minute after departure. 241 onboard, including ten crew members, were killed, and at least 30 on ground. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Sharp Design, Smoother Drives. Toyota Glanza Learn More Undo Here's what the AAIB report doesn't answer yet: What triggered the dual engine shutdown ? Live Events The most critical unknown is what led to both Engine 1 and Engine 2 shutting down at 08:08:42 UTC (1.38 PM IST). The pilots denied triggering the shutdown, and there is no evidence of bird strike, sabotage, or fuel contamination so far. Also Read: Air India plane crash report out; Both engines 'cut off' mid-air '01 second apart', pilots in cockpit left confused about cause The EAFR confirms the switches moved from 'RUN' to 'CUTOFF,' but the report does not explain whether this was a mechanical failure, an electrical issue, or a software anomaly. Basically, the preliminary report does not reveal how the switch could have flipped to the cutoff position. Was the stabilizer sensor issue linked to the engine cutoffs? The aircraft had earlier arrived from Delhi as flight AI423, and the previous crew had reported a fault code related to the stabilizer position sensor ('STAB POS XDCR'). Although Air India engineers addressed the issue and cleared the aircraft for its next flight, the investigation has not linked or ruled out any connection between this sensor fault and the subsequent failure. Also Read: Air India plane crash- Previous crew logged defect report related to flight's stabilizer sensor, reveals probe findings Is this possibly a case of human error, systemic failure, or broader design issue? This is the central question investigators are still examining. The AAIB has not ruled in or ruled out the possibility of crew error, aircraft system malfunction, or design-related fault. The crew had sufficient rest, cleared preflight checks, and followed procedures. However, the investigation is still reviewing cockpit actions, system inputs, and procedural adherence in the minutes before the crash. Furthermore, the flight data is still under analysis, and additional information from Boeing and GE is being sought. Was the aircraft's emergency power sequence fully functional? The RAT deployed and the APU began to auto-start, but the full effectiveness of the aircraft's emergency power systems, including their role in relight attempts and hydraulic recovery, has not been elaborated in the report.